Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Rheumatology International 2/2016

Open Access 01-02-2016 | Short Communication - Education

The educational needs of people with systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (D-ENAT)

Authors: Anne Schouffoer, Mwidimi E. Ndosi, Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland, Jorit J. L. Meesters

Published in: Rheumatology International | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The Dutch Educational Needs Assessment Tool (D-ENAT) systematically assesses educational needs of patients with rheumatic diseases. The present study aims to describe the educational needs of Dutch patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The D-ENAT was sent to 155 SSc patients registered at the outpatient clinic of a university hospital. The D-ENAT consists of 39 items in seven domains. “Each domain has different number of items therefore we normalized each domain score: (domain score/maximum) × 100) and expressed in percentage to enable comparisons between domains.” A total D-ENAT score (0–156) is calculated by summing all 39 items. In addition, age, disease duration, gender, educational level, present information need (yes/no) and information need (1–4; wanting to know nothing–everything) were recorded. Univariate regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with the D-ENAT scores. The response rate was 103 out of 155 (66 %). The mean % of educational needs scores (0–100 %; lowest–highest) were 49 % for “D-ENAT total score,” 46 % for “Managing pain,” 41 % for “Movement,” 43 % for “Feelings,” 59 % for “Disease process,” 44 % for “Treatments from health professionals,” 61 % for “Self-help measures” and 51 % for “Support systems.” No associations between the D-ENAT total score and age, disease duration, gender and educational level were found. The D-ENAT demonstrated its ability to identify educational needs of Dutch SSc patients. SSc patients demonstrated substantial educational needs, especially in the domains: “Disease process” and “Self-help measures.” The validity and practical applicability of the D-ENAT to make an inventory of SSc patients’ educational needs require further investigation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference (1980) Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 23:581–590 (1980) Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 23:581–590
2.
go back to reference Saketkoo LA, Escorpizo R, Keen KJ et al (2012) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set construction in systemic sclerosis and other rheumatic diseases: a EUSTAR initiative. Rheumatology 51:2170–2176CrossRefPubMed Saketkoo LA, Escorpizo R, Keen KJ et al (2012) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set construction in systemic sclerosis and other rheumatic diseases: a EUSTAR initiative. Rheumatology 51:2170–2176CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Stamm TA, Mattsson M, Mihai C et al (2011) Concepts of functioning and health important to people with systemic sclerosis: a qualitative study in four European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 70:1074–1079PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Stamm TA, Mattsson M, Mihai C et al (2011) Concepts of functioning and health important to people with systemic sclerosis: a qualitative study in four European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 70:1074–1079PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Medsger TA Jr (2003) Natural history of systemic sclerosis and the assessment of disease activity, severity, functional status, and psychologic well-being. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 29:255–273CrossRefPubMed Medsger TA Jr (2003) Natural history of systemic sclerosis and the assessment of disease activity, severity, functional status, and psychologic well-being. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 29:255–273CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bassel M, Hudson M, Taillefer SS et al (2011) Frequency and impact of symptoms experienced by patients with systemic sclerosis: results from a Canadian National Survey. Rheumatology (Oxford) 50:762–767CrossRef Bassel M, Hudson M, Taillefer SS et al (2011) Frequency and impact of symptoms experienced by patients with systemic sclerosis: results from a Canadian National Survey. Rheumatology (Oxford) 50:762–767CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kwakkenbos L, Jewett LR, Baron M et al (2013) The Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort: protocol for a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design to support trials of psychosocial and rehabilitation interventions in a rare disease context. BMJ Open 3:1–11CrossRef Kwakkenbos L, Jewett LR, Baron M et al (2013) The Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort: protocol for a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design to support trials of psychosocial and rehabilitation interventions in a rare disease context. BMJ Open 3:1–11CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Taal E, Rasker JJ, Wiegman O (1996) Patient education and self-management in the rheumatic diseases: a self-efficacy approach. Arthritis Care Res 9:229–238CrossRefPubMed Taal E, Rasker JJ, Wiegman O (1996) Patient education and self-management in the rheumatic diseases: a self-efficacy approach. Arthritis Care Res 9:229–238CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Poole JL, Skipper B, Mendelson C (2013) Evaluation of a mail-delivered, print-format, self-management program for persons with systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 32:1393–1398CrossRefPubMed Poole JL, Skipper B, Mendelson C (2013) Evaluation of a mail-delivered, print-format, self-management program for persons with systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 32:1393–1398CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Poole JL, Mendelson C, Skipper B et al (2014) Taking charge of systemic sclerosis: a pilot study to assess the effectiveness of an internet self-management program. Arthritis Care Res 66:778–782CrossRef Poole JL, Mendelson C, Skipper B et al (2014) Taking charge of systemic sclerosis: a pilot study to assess the effectiveness of an internet self-management program. Arthritis Care Res 66:778–782CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schouffoer AA, Zirkzee EJ, Henquet SM et al (2011) Needs and preferences regarding health care delivery as perceived by patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 30:815–824PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Schouffoer AA, Zirkzee EJ, Henquet SM et al (2011) Needs and preferences regarding health care delivery as perceived by patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 30:815–824PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ndosi M, Bremander A, Hamnes B et al (2014) Validation of the educational needs assessment tool as a generic instrument for rheumatic diseases in seven European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 73:2122–2129CrossRefPubMed Ndosi M, Bremander A, Hamnes B et al (2014) Validation of the educational needs assessment tool as a generic instrument for rheumatic diseases in seven European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 73:2122–2129CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Meesters JJ, Vliet Vlieland TP, Hill J et al (2009) Measuring educational needs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (DENAT). Clin Rheumatol 28:1073–1077PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Meesters JJ, Vliet Vlieland TP, Hill J et al (2009) Measuring educational needs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (DENAT). Clin Rheumatol 28:1073–1077PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Zirkzee EJ, Ndosi ME, Vlieland TP et al (2014) Measuring educational needs among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (D-ENAT). Lupus 23:1370–1376CrossRefPubMed Zirkzee EJ, Ndosi ME, Vlieland TP et al (2014) Measuring educational needs among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (D-ENAT). Lupus 23:1370–1376CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hardware B, Johnson D, Hale C et al (2015) Patients and nursing staff views of using the education needs assessment tool in rheumatology clinics: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 24:1048–1058CrossRefPubMed Hardware B, Johnson D, Hale C et al (2015) Patients and nursing staff views of using the education needs assessment tool in rheumatology clinics: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 24:1048–1058CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42CrossRefPubMed Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rubenzik TT, Derk CT (2009) Unmet patient needs in systemic sclerosis. J Clin Rheumatol 15:106–110CrossRefPubMed Rubenzik TT, Derk CT (2009) Unmet patient needs in systemic sclerosis. J Clin Rheumatol 15:106–110CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Van der Vaart R, Repping-Wuts H, Drossaert CH et al (2013) Need for online information and support of patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res 65:594–600CrossRef Van der Vaart R, Repping-Wuts H, Drossaert CH et al (2013) Need for online information and support of patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res 65:594–600CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Willems LM, Vriezekolk JE, Schouffoer AA et al (2015) Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res. doi:10.1002/acr.22595 Willems LM, Vriezekolk JE, Schouffoer AA et al (2015) Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res. doi:10.​1002/​acr.​22595
21.
go back to reference Mawdsley AH (2006) Patient perception of UK scleroderma services—results of an anonymous questionnaire. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45:1573–1575CrossRef Mawdsley AH (2006) Patient perception of UK scleroderma services—results of an anonymous questionnaire. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45:1573–1575CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bode C, Taal E, Emons PA et al (2008) Limited results of group self-management education for rheumatoid arthritis patients and their partners: explanations from the patient perspective. Clin Rheumatol 27:1523–1528CrossRefPubMed Bode C, Taal E, Emons PA et al (2008) Limited results of group self-management education for rheumatoid arthritis patients and their partners: explanations from the patient perspective. Clin Rheumatol 27:1523–1528CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The educational needs of people with systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (D-ENAT)
Authors
Anne Schouffoer
Mwidimi E. Ndosi
Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland
Jorit J. L. Meesters
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Rheumatology International / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0172-8172
Electronic ISSN: 1437-160X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-015-3352-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Rheumatology International 2/2016 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.