Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Diabetes Reports 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Sulfonylurea | Economics and Policy in Diabetes (AA Baig and N Laiteerapong, Section Editors)

Economics of Genetic Testing for Diabetes

Author: Rochelle Naylor

Published in: Current Diabetes Reports | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Monogenic diabetes is an uncommon but important form of diabetes, with the most common causes benefitting from management that accounts for the genetic mutation. This often results in decreased costs and treatment burden for affected individuals. Misdiagnosis as type 1 and type 2 diabetes is common. Given the significant burden of diabetes costs to the healthcare system, it is important to assess the economic impact of incorporating genetic testing for monogenic diabetes into clinical care through formal cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). This article briefly summarizes the barriers to timely monogenic diabetes diagnosis and then summarizes findings from CEAs on genetic testing for monogenic diabetes.

Recent Findings

CEAs have shown that routine genetic testing of all patients with a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes can be cost-saving when applied to the scenarios of neonatal diabetes or in a pediatric population. Routine screening has not been shown to be cost-effective in adult populations. However, next-generation sequencing strategies and applying biomarkers to identify and limit genetic testing to people most likely to have monogenic diabetes are promising ways to make testing strategies cost-effective.

Summary

CEAs have shown that genetic testing for monogenic diabetes diagnosis can be cost-effective or cost-saving and should guide insurers to consider broader coverage of these tests, which would lead to accurate and timely diagnosis and impact treatment and clinical outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association. 2018;41(5):917–28.CrossRefPubMed American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association. 2018;41(5):917–28.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association. 2016;40(Supplement 1):S11–24.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association. 2016;40(Supplement 1):S11–24.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. Springer-Verlag. 2012;55(6):1577–96.CrossRef Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. Springer-Verlag. 2012;55(6):1577–96.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Raz I, Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Buse JB, Inzucchi SE, Home PD, et al. Personalized management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: reflections from a diabetes care editors’ expert forum. Diabetes Care American Diabetes Association. 2013;36(6):1779–88.CrossRefPubMed Raz I, Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Buse JB, Inzucchi SE, Home PD, et al. Personalized management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: reflections from a diabetes care editors’ expert forum. Diabetes Care American Diabetes Association. 2013;36(6):1779–88.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bacon S, Kyithar MP, Rizvi SR, Donnelly E, McCarthy A, Burke M, et al. Successful maintenance on sulphonylurea therapy and low diabetes complication rates in a HNF1A-MODY cohort. Diabet Med. 2016;33(7):976–84.CrossRef Bacon S, Kyithar MP, Rizvi SR, Donnelly E, McCarthy A, Burke M, et al. Successful maintenance on sulphonylurea therapy and low diabetes complication rates in a HNF1A-MODY cohort. Diabet Med. 2016;33(7):976–84.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shepherd MH, Shields BM, Hudson M, Pearson ER, Hyde C, Ellard S, et al. A UK nationwide prospective study of treatment change in MODY: genetic subtype and clinical characteristics predict optimal glycaemic control after discontinuing insulin and metformin. Diabetologia. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2018;61(12):2520–7.CrossRefPubMed Shepherd MH, Shields BM, Hudson M, Pearson ER, Hyde C, Ellard S, et al. A UK nationwide prospective study of treatment change in MODY: genetic subtype and clinical characteristics predict optimal glycaemic control after discontinuing insulin and metformin. Diabetologia. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2018;61(12):2520–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pihoker C, Gilliam LK, Ellard S, Dabelea D, Davis C, Dolan LM, et al. Prevalence, characteristics and clinical diagnosis of maturity onset diabetes of the young due to mutations in HNF1A, HNF4A, and glucokinase: results from the SEARCH for diabetes in youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Endocrine Society Chevy Chase, MD. 2013;98(10):4055–62.CrossRefPubMed Pihoker C, Gilliam LK, Ellard S, Dabelea D, Davis C, Dolan LM, et al. Prevalence, characteristics and clinical diagnosis of maturity onset diabetes of the young due to mutations in HNF1A, HNF4A, and glucokinase: results from the SEARCH for diabetes in youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Endocrine Society Chevy Chase, MD. 2013;98(10):4055–62.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shepherd M, Shields B, Hammersley S, Hudson M, McDonald TJ, Colclough K, et al. Systematic population screening, using biomarkers and genetic testing, identifies 2.5% of the U.K. Pediatric diabetes population with monogenic diabetes. Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association. 2016;39(11):1879–88.CrossRefPubMed Shepherd M, Shields B, Hammersley S, Hudson M, McDonald TJ, Colclough K, et al. Systematic population screening, using biomarkers and genetic testing, identifies 2.5% of the U.K. Pediatric diabetes population with monogenic diabetes. Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association. 2016;39(11):1879–88.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Shields BM, Shepherd M, Hudson M, McDonald TJ, Colclough K, Peters J, et al. Population-based assessment of a biomarker-based screening pathway to aid diagnosis of monogenic diabetes in young-onset patients. Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association. 2017;40(8):dc170224–1025.CrossRef Shields BM, Shepherd M, Hudson M, McDonald TJ, Colclough K, Peters J, et al. Population-based assessment of a biomarker-based screening pathway to aid diagnosis of monogenic diabetes in young-onset patients. Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association. 2017;40(8):dc170224–1025.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kanakatti Shankar R, Pihoker C, Dolan LM, Standiford D, Badaru A, Dabelea D, et al. Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus: prevalence and genetic diagnosis in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Pediatr Diabetes. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111). 2013;14(3):174–80. Kanakatti Shankar R, Pihoker C, Dolan LM, Standiford D, Badaru A, Dabelea D, et al. Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus: prevalence and genetic diagnosis in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Pediatr Diabetes. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111). 2013;14(3):174–80.
11.
go back to reference Zammit MA, Agius SM, Calleja-Agius J. Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus: a challenge and opportunity for specialized nursing care. Neonatal Netw World Health Organization. 2017;36(4):196–205.CrossRef Zammit MA, Agius SM, Calleja-Agius J. Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus: a challenge and opportunity for specialized nursing care. Neonatal Netw World Health Organization. 2017;36(4):196–205.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mackay DJG, Temple IK. Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus type 1. Weksberg R, Temple K, editors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010;154C(3):335–42. Mackay DJG, Temple IK. Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus type 1. Weksberg R, Temple K, editors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010;154C(3):335–42.
13.
go back to reference Letourneau LR, Greeley SAW. Congenital forms of diabetes: the beta-cell and beyond. Curr Opin Genet Dev Elsevier Current Trends. 2018;50:25–34.CrossRef Letourneau LR, Greeley SAW. Congenital forms of diabetes: the beta-cell and beyond. Curr Opin Genet Dev Elsevier Current Trends. 2018;50:25–34.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Naylor R, Knight AJ, del Gaudio D. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young overview. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., editors. GeneReviews [Internet]. Seattle: University of Washington, Seattle; 2018. Naylor R, Knight AJ, del Gaudio D. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young overview. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., editors. GeneReviews [Internet]. Seattle: University of Washington, Seattle; 2018.
15.
go back to reference Shields BM, Hicks S, Shepherd MH, Colclough K, Hattersley AT, Ellard S. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): how many cases are we missing? Diabetologia Springer-Verlag. 2010;53(12):2504–8.CrossRef Shields BM, Hicks S, Shepherd MH, Colclough K, Hattersley AT, Ellard S. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): how many cases are we missing? Diabetologia Springer-Verlag. 2010;53(12):2504–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pearson ER, Liddell WG, Shepherd M, Corrall RJ, Hattersley AT. Sensitivity to sulphonylureas in patients with hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha gene mutations: evidence for pharmacogenetics in diabetes. Diabet Med. 2000;17(7):543–5.CrossRef Pearson ER, Liddell WG, Shepherd M, Corrall RJ, Hattersley AT. Sensitivity to sulphonylureas in patients with hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha gene mutations: evidence for pharmacogenetics in diabetes. Diabet Med. 2000;17(7):543–5.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shepherd M, Shields B, Ellard S, Cabezas OR, Hattersley AT. A genetic diagnosis of HNF1A diabetes alters treatment and improves glycaemic control in the majority of insulin-treated patients. Diabet Med. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111). 2009;26(4):437–41.CrossRef Shepherd M, Shields B, Ellard S, Cabezas OR, Hattersley AT. A genetic diagnosis of HNF1A diabetes alters treatment and improves glycaemic control in the majority of insulin-treated patients. Diabet Med. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111). 2009;26(4):437–41.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Colclough K, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Saint-Martin C, Flanagan SE, Ellard S. Mutations in the genes encoding the transcription factors hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha and 4 alpha in maturity-onset diabetes of the young and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Hum Mutat. 2013;34(5):669–85.CrossRef Colclough K, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Saint-Martin C, Flanagan SE, Ellard S. Mutations in the genes encoding the transcription factors hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha and 4 alpha in maturity-onset diabetes of the young and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Hum Mutat. 2013;34(5):669–85.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Steele AM, Wensley KJ, Ellard S, Murphy R, Shepherd M, Colclough K, et al. Use of HbA1c in the identification of patients with hyperglycaemia caused by a glucokinase mutation: observational case control studies. Lin XE, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65326.CrossRefPubMed Steele AM, Wensley KJ, Ellard S, Murphy R, Shepherd M, Colclough K, et al. Use of HbA1c in the identification of patients with hyperglycaemia caused by a glucokinase mutation: observational case control studies. Lin XE, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65326.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Stride A, Shields B, Gill-Carey O, Chakera AJ, Colclough K, Ellard S, et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies suggest pharmacological treatment used in patients with glucokinase mutations does not alter glycaemia. Diabetologia. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2014;57(1):54–6.CrossRef Stride A, Shields B, Gill-Carey O, Chakera AJ, Colclough K, Ellard S, et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies suggest pharmacological treatment used in patients with glucokinase mutations does not alter glycaemia. Diabetologia. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2014;57(1):54–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Steele AM, Shields BM, Wensley KJ, Colclough K, Ellard S, Hattersley AT. Prevalence of vascular complications among patients with glucokinase mutations and prolonged, Mild Hyperglycemia. JAMA American Medical Association. 2014;311(3):279–86.CrossRef Steele AM, Shields BM, Wensley KJ, Colclough K, Ellard S, Hattersley AT. Prevalence of vascular complications among patients with glucokinase mutations and prolonged, Mild Hyperglycemia. JAMA American Medical Association. 2014;311(3):279–86.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ellard S, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Hattersley AT, Group EMGQNEM. Best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young. Diabetologia. Springer-Verlag. 2008;51(4):546–53.CrossRefPubMed Ellard S, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Hattersley AT, Group EMGQNEM. Best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young. Diabetologia. Springer-Verlag. 2008;51(4):546–53.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Carmody D, Naylor RN, Bell CD, Berry S, Montgomery JT, Tadie EC, et al. GCK-MODY in the US National Monogenic Diabetes Registry: frequently misdiagnosed and unnecessarily treated. Acta Diabetol Springer Milan. 2016;53(5):703–8.CrossRefPubMed Carmody D, Naylor RN, Bell CD, Berry S, Montgomery JT, Tadie EC, et al. GCK-MODY in the US National Monogenic Diabetes Registry: frequently misdiagnosed and unnecessarily treated. Acta Diabetol Springer Milan. 2016;53(5):703–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kleinberger JW, Copeland KC, Gandica RG, Haymond MW, LEVITSKY LL, Linder B, et al. Monogenic diabetes in overweight and obese youth diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: the TODAY clinical trial. Genet Med Nature Publishing Group. 2018;20(6):583–90.CrossRef Kleinberger JW, Copeland KC, Gandica RG, Haymond MW, LEVITSKY LL, Linder B, et al. Monogenic diabetes in overweight and obese youth diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: the TODAY clinical trial. Genet Med Nature Publishing Group. 2018;20(6):583–90.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ramsey S, Willke R, Briggs A, Brown R, Buxton M, Chawla A, et al. Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force Report. Value in Health. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111). 2005;8(5):521–33.CrossRef Ramsey S, Willke R, Briggs A, Brown R, Buxton M, Chawla A, et al. Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force Report. Value in Health. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111). 2005;8(5):521–33.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull Oxford University Press. 2010;96(1):5–21.CrossRef Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull Oxford University Press. 2010;96(1):5–21.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Braithwaite RS, Meltzer DO, King JT Jr, Leslie D, Roberts MS.What does the value of modern medicine say about the $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year decision rule? Med Care. 2008;46(4):349-56.CrossRef Braithwaite RS, Meltzer DO, King JT Jr, Leslie D, Roberts MS.What does the value of modern medicine say about the $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year decision rule? Med Care. 2008;46(4):349-56.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference • Greeley SAW, John PM, Winn AN, Ornelas J, Lipton RB, Philipson LH, et al. The cost-effectiveness of personalized genetic medicine: the case of genetic testing in neonatal diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(3):622–7. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of routine genetic testing for monogenic neonatal diabetes in a hypothetical patient cohort with infancy-onset diabetes.CrossRefPubMed • Greeley SAW, John PM, Winn AN, Ornelas J, Lipton RB, Philipson LH, et al. The cost-effectiveness of personalized genetic medicine: the case of genetic testing in neonatal diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(3):622–7. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of routine genetic testing for monogenic neonatal diabetes in a hypothetical patient cohort with infancy-onset diabetes.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference • Peters JL, Anderson R, Hyde C. Development of an economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies: the case of monogenic diabetes. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5):e002905. This study defines five test-treatment strategies for monogenic diabetes relevant for cost-effectiveness analyses.CrossRefPubMed • Peters JL, Anderson R, Hyde C. Development of an economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies: the case of monogenic diabetes. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5):e002905. This study defines five test-treatment strategies for monogenic diabetes relevant for cost-effectiveness analyses.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference • Naylor RN, John PM, Winn AN, Carmody D, Greeley SAW, Philipson LH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of MODY genetic testing: translating genomic advances into practical health applications. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):202–9. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of routine genetic testing in a hypothetical patient cohort with young-onset, presumed type 2 diabetes. CrossRefPubMed • Naylor RN, John PM, Winn AN, Carmody D, Greeley SAW, Philipson LH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of MODY genetic testing: translating genomic advances into practical health applications. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):202–9. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of routine genetic testing in a hypothetical patient cohort with young-onset, presumed type 2 diabetes. CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, Farmer AJ, Fenn P, Stevens RJ, et al. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia Springer-Verlag. 2004;47(10):1747–59.CrossRef Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, Farmer AJ, Fenn P, Stevens RJ, et al. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia Springer-Verlag. 2004;47(10):1747–59.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference •• Nguyen HV, Finkelstein EA, Mital S, Gardner DS-L. Incremental cost-effectiveness of algorithm-driven genetic testing versus no testing for Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in Singapore. J Med Genet. 2017;54(11):747–53. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of algorithm-driven genetic testing in a patient cohort with young-onset diabetes. CrossRef •• Nguyen HV, Finkelstein EA, Mital S, Gardner DS-L. Incremental cost-effectiveness of algorithm-driven genetic testing versus no testing for Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in Singapore. J Med Genet. 2017;54(11):747–53. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of algorithm-driven genetic testing in a patient cohort with young-onset diabetes. CrossRef
33.
go back to reference •• Johnson SR, Carter HE, Leo P, Hollingworth SA, Davis EA, Jones TW, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine screening using massively parallel sequencing for maturity-onset diabetes of the young in a pediatric diabetes cohort: reduced health system costs and improved patient quality of life. Diabetes Care. 2018;dc180261. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of routine genetic testing using mass parallel sequencing for MODY in a pediatric patient cohort with presumed type 1 diabetes. •• Johnson SR, Carter HE, Leo P, Hollingworth SA, Davis EA, Jones TW, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine screening using massively parallel sequencing for maturity-onset diabetes of the young in a pediatric diabetes cohort: reduced health system costs and improved patient quality of life. Diabetes Care. 2018;dc180261. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of routine genetic testing using mass parallel sequencing for MODY in a pediatric patient cohort with presumed type 1 diabetes.
34.
go back to reference Thokala P, Kruger J, Brennan A, Basarir H, Duenas A, Pandor A, et al. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of type 1 diabetes interventions: the Sheffield Type 1 Diabetes Policy Model. Diabet Med. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111). 2014;31(4):477–86.CrossRef Thokala P, Kruger J, Brennan A, Basarir H, Duenas A, Pandor A, et al. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of type 1 diabetes interventions: the Sheffield Type 1 Diabetes Policy Model. Diabet Med. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111). 2014;31(4):477–86.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Economics of Genetic Testing for Diabetes
Author
Rochelle Naylor
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1534-4827
Electronic ISSN: 1539-0829
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1140-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Current Diabetes Reports 5/2019 Go to the issue

Microvascular Complications—Nephropathy (M Afkarian and B Roshanravan, Section Editors)

The Interconnection Between Immuno-Metabolism, Diabetes, and CKD

Therapies and New Technologies in the Treatment of Diabetes (M Pietropaolo, Section Editor)

Current Status on Immunological Therapies for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Immunology, Transplantation, and Regenerative Medicine (L Piemonti and and V Sordi, Section Editors)

Islet Transplantation Alone Versus Solitary Pancreas Transplantation: an Outcome-Driven Choice?

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.