Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Septicemia | Study protocol

Right Dose Right Now: bedside data-driven personalized antibiotic dosing in severe sepsis and septic shock — rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled superiority trial

Authors: Luca F. Roggeveen, Lucas M. Fleuren, Tingjie Guo, Patrick Thoral, Harm Jan de Grooth, Eleonora L. Swart, Thomas L. T. Klausch, Peter H. J. van der Voort, Armand R. J. Girbes, Rob J. Bosman, Paul W. G. Elbers

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Antibiotic exposure is often inadequate in critically ill patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and this is associated with worse outcomes. Despite markedly altered and rapidly changing pharmacokinetics in these patients, guidelines and clinicians continue to rely on standard dosing schemes. To address this challenge, we developed AutoKinetics, a clinical decision support system for antibiotic dosing. By feeding large amounts of electronic health record patient data into pharmacokinetic models, patient-specific predicted future plasma concentrations are displayed graphically. In addition, a tailored dosing advice is provided at the bedside in real time. To evaluate the effect of AutoKinetics on pharmacometric and clinical endpoints, we are conducting the Right Dose Right Now multicenter, randomized controlled, two-arm, parallel-group, non-blinded, superiority trial.

Methods

All adult intensive care patients with a suspected or proven infection and having either lactatemia or receiving vasopressor support are eligible for inclusion. Randomization to the AutoKinetics or control group is initiated at the bedside when prescribing at least one of four commonly administered antibiotics: ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, meropenem and vancomycin. Dosing advice is available for patients in the AutoKinetics group, whereas patients in the control group receive standard dosing.
The primary outcome of the study is pharmacometric target attainment during the first 24 h. Power analysis revealed the need for inclusion of 42 patients per group per antibiotic. Thus, a total of 336 patients will be included, 168 in each group. Secondary pharmacometric endpoints include time to target attainment and fraction of target attainment during an entire antibiotic course. Secondary clinical endpoints include mortality, clinical cure and days free from organ support. Several other exploratory and subgroup analyses are planned.

Discussion

This is the first randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and safety of bedside data-driven automated antibiotic dosing advice. This is important as adequate antibiotic exposure may be crucial to treat severe sepsis and septic shock. In addition, the trial could prove to be a significant contribution to clinical pharmacometrics and serve as a stepping stone for the use of big data and artificial intelligence in the field.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), NL6501/​NTR6689. Registered on 25 August 2017.
European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), 2017-002478-37. Registered on 6 November 2017.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference de Sousa AG, Junior C, Santos G, Laselva CR. The impact of each action in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign measures on hospital mortality of patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. Einstein (Sao Paolo). 2008;6:323–7. de Sousa AG, Junior C, Santos G, Laselva CR. The impact of each action in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign measures on hospital mortality of patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. Einstein (Sao Paolo). 2008;6:323–7.
2.
go back to reference Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1589–96.CrossRef Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1589–96.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mac Arthur RD, Miller M, Albertson T, Panacek E, Johnson D, Teoh L, et al. Adequacy of early empiric antibiotic treatment and survival in severe sepsis: experience from the MONARCS Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:284–8.CrossRef Mac Arthur RD, Miller M, Albertson T, Panacek E, Johnson D, Teoh L, et al. Adequacy of early empiric antibiotic treatment and survival in severe sepsis: experience from the MONARCS Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:284–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fernando SM, Reardon PM, Rochwerg B, Shapiro NI, Yealy DM, Seely AJE, et al. Sepsis-3 septic shock criteria and associated mortality among infected hospitalized patients assessed by a rapid response team. Chest. 2018;154:309–16.CrossRef Fernando SM, Reardon PM, Rochwerg B, Shapiro NI, Yealy DM, Seely AJE, et al. Sepsis-3 septic shock criteria and associated mortality among infected hospitalized patients assessed by a rapid response team. Chest. 2018;154:309–16.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–10.CrossRef Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–10.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marshall JC. Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed? Trends Mol Med. 2014;20:195–203.CrossRef Marshall JC. Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed? Trends Mol Med. 2014;20:195–203.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 Update. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:997–1000.CrossRef Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 Update. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:997–1000.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mayr FB, Yende S, Angus DC. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence. 2014;5:4–11.CrossRef Mayr FB, Yende S, Angus DC. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence. 2014;5:4–11.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Roberts JA, Abdul-Aziz MH, Lipman J, Mouton JW, Vinks AA, Felton TW, et al. Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill: challenges and potential solutions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:498–509.CrossRef Roberts JA, Abdul-Aziz MH, Lipman J, Mouton JW, Vinks AA, Felton TW, et al. Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill: challenges and potential solutions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:498–509.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roberts JA, Paul SK, Akova M, Bassetti M, De Waele JJ, Dimopoulos G, et al. DALI: defining antibiotic levels in intensive care unit patients: are current β-lactam antibiotic doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1072–83.CrossRef Roberts JA, Paul SK, Akova M, Bassetti M, De Waele JJ, Dimopoulos G, et al. DALI: defining antibiotic levels in intensive care unit patients: are current β-lactam antibiotic doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1072–83.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference De Waele JJ, Lipman J, Akova M, Bassetti M, Dimopoulos G, Kaukonen M, et al. Risk factors for target non-attainment during empirical treatment with β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1340–51.CrossRef De Waele JJ, Lipman J, Akova M, Bassetti M, Dimopoulos G, Kaukonen M, et al. Risk factors for target non-attainment during empirical treatment with β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1340–51.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Blot S, Koulenti D, Akova M, Bassetti M, De Waele JJ, Dimopoulos G, et al. Does contemporary vancomycin dosing achieve therapeutic targets in a heterogeneous clinical cohort of critically ill patients? Data from the multinational DALI study. Crit Care. 2014;18:R99.CrossRef Blot S, Koulenti D, Akova M, Bassetti M, De Waele JJ, Dimopoulos G, et al. Does contemporary vancomycin dosing achieve therapeutic targets in a heterogeneous clinical cohort of critically ill patients? Data from the multinational DALI study. Crit Care. 2014;18:R99.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fleuren LM, Roggeveen LF, Guo T, Waldauf P, van der Voort PHJ, Bosman RJ, et al. Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic knowledge on antibiotic dosing among intensive care professionals is insufficient: a cross-sectional study. Crit Care. 2019;23:185.CrossRef Fleuren LM, Roggeveen LF, Guo T, Waldauf P, van der Voort PHJ, Bosman RJ, et al. Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic knowledge on antibiotic dosing among intensive care professionals is insufficient: a cross-sectional study. Crit Care. 2019;23:185.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hanrahan TP, Harlow G, Hutchinson J, Dulhunty JM, Lipman J, Whitehouse T, et al. Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in the critically ill: a retrospective multivariate regression analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:2527–36.CrossRef Hanrahan TP, Harlow G, Hutchinson J, Dulhunty JM, Lipman J, Whitehouse T, et al. Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in the critically ill: a retrospective multivariate regression analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:2527–36.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mouton JW, Ambrose PG, Canton R, Drusano GL, Harbarth S, MacGowan A, et al. Conserving antibiotics for the future: new ways to use old and new drugs from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspective. Drug Resist Updat. 2011;14:107–17.CrossRef Mouton JW, Ambrose PG, Canton R, Drusano GL, Harbarth S, MacGowan A, et al. Conserving antibiotics for the future: new ways to use old and new drugs from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspective. Drug Resist Updat. 2011;14:107–17.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Elbers PWG, Girbes A, Malbrain MLNG, Bosman R. Right Dose, Right Now: using big data to optimize antibiotic dosing in the critically ill. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47:457–63.CrossRef Elbers PWG, Girbes A, Malbrain MLNG, Bosman R. Right Dose, Right Now: using big data to optimize antibiotic dosing in the critically ill. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47:457–63.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Touw DJ, Neef C, Thomson AH, Vinks AA. Cost-effectiveness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Committee of the International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. Cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring: a systematic review. Ther Drug Monit. 2005;27:10–7.CrossRef Touw DJ, Neef C, Thomson AH, Vinks AA. Cost-effectiveness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Committee of the International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. Cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring: a systematic review. Ther Drug Monit. 2005;27:10–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference von Gunten V, Reymond J-P, Beney J. Clinical and economic outcomes of pharmaceutical services related to antibiotic use: a literature review. Pharm World Sci. 2007;29:146–63.CrossRef von Gunten V, Reymond J-P, Beney J. Clinical and economic outcomes of pharmaceutical services related to antibiotic use: a literature review. Pharm World Sci. 2007;29:146–63.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Garot D, Respaud R, Lanotte P, Simon N, Mercier E, Ehrmann S, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in critically ill septic patients: a reappraisal. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;72:758–67.CrossRef Garot D, Respaud R, Lanotte P, Simon N, Mercier E, Ehrmann S, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in critically ill septic patients: a reappraisal. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;72:758–67.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Muro T, Sasaki T, Hosaka N, Umeda Y, Takemoto S, Yamamoto H, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of meropenem in Japanese adult patients. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011;36:230–6.CrossRef Muro T, Sasaki T, Hosaka N, Umeda Y, Takemoto S, Yamamoto H, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of meropenem in Japanese adult patients. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011;36:230–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Khachman D, Conil J-M, Georges B, Saivin S, Houin G, Toutain P-L, et al. Optimizing ciprofloxacin dosing in intensive care unit patients through the use of population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:1798–809.CrossRef Khachman D, Conil J-M, Georges B, Saivin S, Houin G, Toutain P-L, et al. Optimizing ciprofloxacin dosing in intensive care unit patients through the use of population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:1798–809.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Roberts JA, Taccone FS, Udy AA, Vincent J-L, Jacobs F, Lipman J. Vancomycin dosing in critically ill patients: robust methods for improved continuous-infusion regimens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:2704–9.CrossRef Roberts JA, Taccone FS, Udy AA, Vincent J-L, Jacobs F, Lipman J. Vancomycin dosing in critically ill patients: robust methods for improved continuous-infusion regimens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:2704–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Han B, Enas NH, McEntegart D. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation. Stat Med. 2009;28:3329–46.CrossRef Han B, Enas NH, McEntegart D. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation. Stat Med. 2009;28:3329–46.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference van Lent-Evers NA, Mathôt RA, Geus WP, van Hout BA, Vinks AA. Impact of goal-oriented and model-based clinical pharmacokinetic dosing of aminoglycosides on clinical outcome: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ther Drug Monit. 1999;21:63–73.CrossRef van Lent-Evers NA, Mathôt RA, Geus WP, van Hout BA, Vinks AA. Impact of goal-oriented and model-based clinical pharmacokinetic dosing of aminoglycosides on clinical outcome: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ther Drug Monit. 1999;21:63–73.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1717–27.CrossRef Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1717–27.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36.CrossRef Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bouwmans C, Krol M, Severens H, Koopmanschap M, Brouwer W, Hakkaart-van RL. The iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire: a standardized instrument for measuring and valuing health-related productivity losses. Value Health. 2015;18:753–8.CrossRef Bouwmans C, Krol M, Severens H, Koopmanschap M, Brouwer W, Hakkaart-van RL. The iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire: a standardized instrument for measuring and valuing health-related productivity losses. Value Health. 2015;18:753–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Heil E, Nicolau DP, Robinson G, Farkas A, Thom K. Pharmacodynamic target attainment for meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam using a PK/PD-based dosing calculator in critically ill patients. Open Forum Infect Dis Narnia. 2017;4:S27.CrossRef Heil E, Nicolau DP, Robinson G, Farkas A, Thom K. Pharmacodynamic target attainment for meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam using a PK/PD-based dosing calculator in critically ill patients. Open Forum Infect Dis Narnia. 2017;4:S27.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Toutain P-L, Bousquet-Mélou A, Martinez M. AUC/MIC: a PK/PD index for antibiotics with a time dimension or simply a dimensionless scoring factor? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:1185–8.CrossRef Toutain P-L, Bousquet-Mélou A, Martinez M. AUC/MIC: a PK/PD index for antibiotics with a time dimension or simply a dimensionless scoring factor? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:1185–8.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Roberts JA, Alobaid AS, Wallis SC, Perner A, Lipman J, Sjövall F. Defining optimal dosing of ciprofloxacin in patients with septic shock. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74:1662–9.CrossRef Roberts JA, Alobaid AS, Wallis SC, Perner A, Lipman J, Sjövall F. Defining optimal dosing of ciprofloxacin in patients with septic shock. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74:1662–9.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Szałek E, Tomczak H, Kamińska A, Grabowski T, Smuszkiewicz P, Matysiak K, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients after the first intravenous administration of 400 mg. Adv Med Sci. 2012;57:217–23.CrossRef Szałek E, Tomczak H, Kamińska A, Grabowski T, Smuszkiewicz P, Matysiak K, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients after the first intravenous administration of 400 mg. Adv Med Sci. 2012;57:217–23.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Right Dose Right Now: bedside data-driven personalized antibiotic dosing in severe sepsis and septic shock — rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled superiority trial
Authors
Luca F. Roggeveen
Lucas M. Fleuren
Tingjie Guo
Patrick Thoral
Harm Jan de Grooth
Eleonora L. Swart
Thomas L. T. Klausch
Peter H. J. van der Voort
Armand R. J. Girbes
Rob J. Bosman
Paul W. G. Elbers
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3911-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Trials 1/2019 Go to the issue