Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Prostatectomy | Original Article

An MRI-based grading system for preoperative risk estimation of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy

Authors: Lili Xu, Gumuyang Zhang, Daming Zhang, Jiahui Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Xin Bai, Li Chen, Qianyu Peng, Yu Xiao, Hao Wang, Zhengyu Jin, Hao Sun

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To construct a simplified grading system based on MRI features to predict positive surgical margin (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods

Patients who had undergone prostate MRI followed by RP between January 2017 and January 2021 were retrospectively enrolled as the derivation group, and those between February 2021 and November 2022 were enrolled as the validation group. One radiologist evaluated tumor-related MRI features, including the capsule contact length (CCL) of lesions, frank extraprostatic extension (EPE), apex abutting, etc. Binary logistic regression and decision tree analysis were used to select risk features for PSM. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of different systems were calculated. The interreader agreement of the scoring systems was evaluated using the kappa statistic.

Results

There were 29.8% (42/141) and 36.4% (32/88) of patients who had PSM in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The first grading system was proposed (mrPSM1) using two imaging features, namely, CCL ≥ 20 mm and apex abutting, and then updated by adding frank EPE (mrPSM2). In the derivation group, the AUC was 0.705 for mrPSM1 and 0.713 for mrPSM2. In the validation group, our grading systems showed comparable AUC with Park et al.’s model (0.672–0.686 vs. 0.646, p > 0.05) and significantly higher specificity (0.732–0.750 vs. 0.411, p < 0.001). The kappa value was 0.764 for mrPSM1 and 0.776 for mrPSM2. Decision curve analysis showed a higher net benefit for mrPSM2.

Conclusion

The proposed grading systems based on MRI could benefit the risk stratification of PSM and are easily interpretable.

Critical relevance statement

The proposed mrPSM grading systems for preoperative prediction of surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy are simplified compared to a previous model and show high specificity for identifying the risk of positive surgical margin, which might benefit the management of prostate cancer.

Key points

• CCL ≥ 20 mm, apex abutting, and EPE were important MRI features for PSM.
• Our proposed MRI-based grading systems showed the possibility to predict PSM with high specificity.
• The MRI-based grading systems might facilitate a structured risk evaluation of PSM.

Graphical Abstract

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A (2023) Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 73:17–48CrossRefPubMed Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A (2023) Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 73:17–48CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al (2021) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 79:243–262CrossRefPubMed Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al (2021) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 79:243–262CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zhang L, Zhao H, Wu B, Zha Z, Yuan J, Feng Y (2020) Predictive factors for positive surgical margins in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 10:539592CrossRefPubMed Zhang L, Zhao H, Wu B, Zha Z, Yuan J, Feng Y (2020) Predictive factors for positive surgical margins in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 10:539592CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yossepowitch O, Briganti A, Eastham JA et al (2014) Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Eur Urol 65:303–313CrossRefPubMed Yossepowitch O, Briganti A, Eastham JA et al (2014) Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Eur Urol 65:303–313CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Matti B, Reeves F, Prouse M, Zargar-Shoshtari K (2021) The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers. Prostate 81:1428–1434CrossRefPubMed Matti B, Reeves F, Prouse M, Zargar-Shoshtari K (2021) The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers. Prostate 81:1428–1434CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hackman G, Taari K, Tammela TL et al (2019) Randomised trial of adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy versus radical prostatectomy alone in prostate cancer patients with positive margins or extracapsular extension. Eur Urol 76:586–595CrossRefPubMed Hackman G, Taari K, Tammela TL et al (2019) Randomised trial of adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy versus radical prostatectomy alone in prostate cancer patients with positive margins or extracapsular extension. Eur Urol 76:586–595CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Devos G, Devlies W, De Meerleer G et al (2021) Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 18:739–762CrossRefPubMed Devos G, Devlies W, De Meerleer G et al (2021) Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 18:739–762CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ravi P, Kwak L, Xie W et al (2022) Neoadjuvant novel hormonal therapy followed by prostatectomy versus up-front prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a comparative analysis. J Urol 208:838–845CrossRefPubMed Ravi P, Kwak L, Xie W et al (2022) Neoadjuvant novel hormonal therapy followed by prostatectomy versus up-front prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a comparative analysis. J Urol 208:838–845CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Patel VR, Coelho RF, Rocco B et al (2011) Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 186:511–516CrossRefPubMed Patel VR, Coelho RF, Rocco B et al (2011) Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 186:511–516CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Meng S, Chen L, Zhang Q, Wang N, Liu A (2022) Multiparametric MRI-based nomograms in predicting positive surgical margins of prostate cancer after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Front Oncol 12:973285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meng S, Chen L, Zhang Q, Wang N, Liu A (2022) Multiparametric MRI-based nomograms in predicting positive surgical margins of prostate cancer after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Front Oncol 12:973285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Li H, Chang X, Du Y (2022) Perineural invasion detected in prostate biopsy is a predictor of positive surgical margin of radical prostatectomy specimen: a meta-analysis. Andrologia 54:e14395CrossRefPubMed Li H, Chang X, Du Y (2022) Perineural invasion detected in prostate biopsy is a predictor of positive surgical margin of radical prostatectomy specimen: a meta-analysis. Andrologia 54:e14395CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Matikainen MP, von Bodman CJ, Secin FP et al (2010) The depth of the prostatic apex is an independent predictor of positive apical margins at radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 106:622–626CrossRefPubMed Matikainen MP, von Bodman CJ, Secin FP et al (2010) The depth of the prostatic apex is an independent predictor of positive apical margins at radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 106:622–626CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Youssef I, Poch M, Raghunand N, Pow-Sang J, Johnstone PAS (2022) Analysis of MRI radiomic pelvimetry and correlation with margin status after robotic prostatectomy. Can J Urol 29:10976–10978PubMed Youssef I, Poch M, Raghunand N, Pow-Sang J, Johnstone PAS (2022) Analysis of MRI radiomic pelvimetry and correlation with margin status after robotic prostatectomy. Can J Urol 29:10976–10978PubMed
14.
go back to reference Chen J, Chu T, Ghodoussipour S et al (2019) Effect of surgeon experience and bony pelvic dimensions on surgical performance and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 124:828–835CrossRefPubMed Chen J, Chu T, Ghodoussipour S et al (2019) Effect of surgeon experience and bony pelvic dimensions on surgical performance and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 124:828–835CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tian XJ, Wang ZL, Li G et al (2019) Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting positive surgical margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Chin Med J (Engl) 132:928–934CrossRefPubMed Tian XJ, Wang ZL, Li G et al (2019) Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting positive surgical margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Chin Med J (Engl) 132:928–934CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mehralivand S, Shih JH, Harmon S et al (2019) A grading system for the assessment of risk of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer at multiparametric MRI. Radiology 290:709–719CrossRefPubMed Mehralivand S, Shih JH, Harmon S et al (2019) A grading system for the assessment of risk of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer at multiparametric MRI. Radiology 290:709–719CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Xu L, Zhang G, Zhang X et al (2021) External validation of the extraprostatic extension grade on MRI and its incremental value to clinical models for assessing extraprostatic cancer. Front Oncol 11:655093CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xu L, Zhang G, Zhang X et al (2021) External validation of the extraprostatic extension grade on MRI and its incremental value to clinical models for assessing extraprostatic cancer. Front Oncol 11:655093CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Quentin M, Schimmoller L, Ullrich T et al (2022) Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging can predict prostate cancer with risk for positive surgical margins. Abdom Radiol (NY) 47:2486–2493CrossRefPubMed Quentin M, Schimmoller L, Ullrich T et al (2022) Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging can predict prostate cancer with risk for positive surgical margins. Abdom Radiol (NY) 47:2486–2493CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference McEvoy SH, Raeside MC, Chaim J, Ehdaie B, Akin O (2018) Preoperative prostate MRI: a road map for surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:383–391CrossRefPubMed McEvoy SH, Raeside MC, Chaim J, Ehdaie B, Akin O (2018) Preoperative prostate MRI: a road map for surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:383–391CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Alessi S, Maggioni R, Luzzago S et al (2021) Apparent diffusion coefficient and other preoperative magnetic resonance imaging features for the prediction of positive surgical margins in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 19:e335–e345CrossRefPubMed Alessi S, Maggioni R, Luzzago S et al (2021) Apparent diffusion coefficient and other preoperative magnetic resonance imaging features for the prediction of positive surgical margins in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 19:e335–e345CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Park MY, Park KJ, Kim MH, Kim JK (2021) Preoperative MRI-based estimation of risk for positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer: development and validation of a simple scoring system. Eur Radiol 31:4898–4907CrossRefPubMed Park MY, Park KJ, Kim MH, Kim JK (2021) Preoperative MRI-based estimation of risk for positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer: development and validation of a simple scoring system. Eur Radiol 31:4898–4907CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tan PH, Cheng L, Srigley JR et al (2011) International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins. Mod Pathol 24:48–57CrossRefPubMed Tan PH, Cheng L, Srigley JR et al (2011) International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins. Mod Pathol 24:48–57CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Yao A, Iwamoto H, Masago T et al (2014) The role of staging MRI in predicting apical margin positivity for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 93:182–188CrossRefPubMed Yao A, Iwamoto H, Masago T et al (2014) The role of staging MRI in predicting apical margin positivity for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 93:182–188CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Li Y, Fu Y, Li W et al (2020) Tumour location determined by preoperative MRI is an independent predictor for positive surgical margin status after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 126:152–158CrossRefPubMed Li Y, Fu Y, Li W et al (2020) Tumour location determined by preoperative MRI is an independent predictor for positive surgical margin status after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 126:152–158CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Tamada T, Sone T, Kanomata N et al (2016) Value of preoperative 3T multiparametric MRI for surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:584–593CrossRefPubMed Tamada T, Sone T, Kanomata N et al (2016) Value of preoperative 3T multiparametric MRI for surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:584–593CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Radtke JP, Hadaschik BA, Wolf MB et al (2015) The impact of magnetic resonance imaging on prediction of extraprostatic extension and prostatectomy outcome in patients with low-, intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: try to find a standard. J Endourol 29:1396–1405CrossRefPubMed Radtke JP, Hadaschik BA, Wolf MB et al (2015) The impact of magnetic resonance imaging on prediction of extraprostatic extension and prostatectomy outcome in patients with low-, intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: try to find a standard. J Endourol 29:1396–1405CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351CrossRefPubMed Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Eurboonyanun K, Pisuchpen N, O’Shea A, Lahoud RM, Atre ID, Harisinghani M (2021) The absolute tumor-capsule contact length in the diagnosis of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:4014–4024CrossRefPubMed Eurboonyanun K, Pisuchpen N, O’Shea A, Lahoud RM, Atre ID, Harisinghani M (2021) The absolute tumor-capsule contact length in the diagnosis of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:4014–4024CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Giganti F, Allen C, Emberton M, Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, group Ps (2020) Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL): a new quality control scoring system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate from the PRECISION trial. Eur Urol Oncol 3:615–619CrossRefPubMed Giganti F, Allen C, Emberton M, Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, group Ps (2020) Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL): a new quality control scoring system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate from the PRECISION trial. Eur Urol Oncol 3:615–619CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Ponsiglione A, Stanzione A, Califano G et al (2023) MR image quality in local staging of prostate cancer: Role of PI-QUAL in the detection of extraprostatic extension. Eur J Radiol 166:110973CrossRefPubMed Ponsiglione A, Stanzione A, Califano G et al (2023) MR image quality in local staging of prostate cancer: Role of PI-QUAL in the detection of extraprostatic extension. Eur J Radiol 166:110973CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Padhani AR, Petralia G (2020) Radiologists should integrate clinical risk factors with MRI findings for meaningful prostate cancer staging. Radiology 296:96–97CrossRefPubMed Padhani AR, Petralia G (2020) Radiologists should integrate clinical risk factors with MRI findings for meaningful prostate cancer staging. Radiology 296:96–97CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Stanzione A, Ponsiglione A, Alessandrino F, Brembilla G, Imbriaco M (2023) Beyond diagnosis: is there a role for radiomics in prostate cancer management? Eur Radiol Exp 7:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stanzione A, Ponsiglione A, Alessandrino F, Brembilla G, Imbriaco M (2023) Beyond diagnosis: is there a role for radiomics in prostate cancer management? Eur Radiol Exp 7:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference He D, Wang X, Fu C et al (2021) MRI-based radiomics models to assess prostate cancer, extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins. Cancer Imaging 21:46CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral He D, Wang X, Fu C et al (2021) MRI-based radiomics models to assess prostate cancer, extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins. Cancer Imaging 21:46CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
An MRI-based grading system for preoperative risk estimation of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy
Authors
Lili Xu
Gumuyang Zhang
Daming Zhang
Jiahui Zhang
Xiaoxiao Zhang
Xin Bai
Li Chen
Qianyu Peng
Yu Xiao
Hao Wang
Zhengyu Jin
Hao Sun
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01516-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Insights into Imaging 1/2023 Go to the issue