Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Radiation Protection | Statement

How to establish and use local diagnostic reference levels: an ESR EuroSafe Imaging expert statement

Authors: John Damilakis, Guy Frija, Boris Brkljacic, Eliseo Vano, Reinhard Loose, Graciano Paulo, Hugues Brat, Virginia Tsapaki, the European Society of Radiology

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Although the Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) have been shown to be an important tool for optimising patient radiation protection, there are still difficulties related to the methodology that should be used to establish and use local DRL values. This statement represents the current view of the EuroSafe Imaging ‘Clinical DRLs’ working group formed with the purpose to produce scientific and educational material on DRLs and promote the concept of local DRLs. Guidelines on how to establish and how to use local DRLs presented herein can be implemented using a multidisciplinary team approach. Local DRLs are easy to determine and implement and they reflect local equipment performance and local clinical needs. They can be updated more frequently than the national DRLs, especially if a dose management system is available. To establish local DRLs, a practical approach could be to collect a reasonable set, i.e., at least 20–30 procedures, of data for well-defined clinical indications and calculate the 3rd quartile values. The median values of the distribution can be set to define the ‘typical values’. The International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) suggests setting ‘typical values’ for newer technologies that enable decreased amounts of radiation exposure for a similar level of image quality. Local DRLs should be similar or lower to the national DRLs. They could be higher only if the clinical benefits for some medical indications are fully explained and reported. Local DRLs may be used as a quality benchmark to track outliers and can be also used as alert values.

Key points

  • Guidelines on how to establish and use local DRLs are presented.
  • Local DRLs are easy to determine and implement and can be updated frequently
  • Additionally, local DRLs can be used to track outliers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-ray Medical Imaging. Radiation Protection 195. Directorate-General for Energy. European Commission 2021. European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-ray Medical Imaging. Radiation Protection 195. Directorate-General for Energy. European Commission 2021.
2.
go back to reference Damilakis J, Vassileva J (2021) The growing potential of diagnostic reference levels as a dynamic tool for dose optimization. Phys Med 84:285–287CrossRef Damilakis J, Vassileva J (2021) The growing potential of diagnostic reference levels as a dynamic tool for dose optimization. Phys Med 84:285–287CrossRef
4.
go back to reference IAEA Radiation Protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards, No GSR Part 3, Vienna, 2014 IAEA Radiation Protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards, No GSR Part 3, Vienna, 2014
5.
go back to reference ICRP (2017). Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. ICRP Publication 135. Ann ICRP 46(1):1–144. ICRP (2017). Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. ICRP Publication 135. Ann ICRP 46(1):1–144.
6.
go back to reference European Guidelines on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Paediatric Imaging. Radiation Protection 185. Directorate-General for Energy. European Commission 2018. European Guidelines on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Paediatric Imaging. Radiation Protection 185. Directorate-General for Energy. European Commission 2018.
7.
go back to reference Ubeda C, Miranda P, Vano E (2015) Local patient dose diagnostic reference levels in pediatric interventional cardiology in Chile using age bands and patient weight values. Med Phys 42(2):615–622CrossRef Ubeda C, Miranda P, Vano E (2015) Local patient dose diagnostic reference levels in pediatric interventional cardiology in Chile using age bands and patient weight values. Med Phys 42(2):615–622CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brat H, Zanca F, Montandon S et al (2019) Local clinical diagnostic reference levels for chest and abdomen CT examinations in adults as a function of body mass index and clinical indication: a prospective multicenter study. Eur Radiol 29(12):6794–6804CrossRef Brat H, Zanca F, Montandon S et al (2019) Local clinical diagnostic reference levels for chest and abdomen CT examinations in adults as a function of body mass index and clinical indication: a prospective multicenter study. Eur Radiol 29(12):6794–6804CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Morcillo AB, Alejo L, Huerga C et al (2020) Local diagnostic reference levels for paediatric non-cardiac interventional radiology procedures. Phys Med 72:1–6CrossRef Morcillo AB, Alejo L, Huerga C et al (2020) Local diagnostic reference levels for paediatric non-cardiac interventional radiology procedures. Phys Med 72:1–6CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Papanastasiou E, Protopsaltis A, Finitsis S, Hatzidakis A, Prassopoulos P, Siountas A (2021) Institutional diagnostic reference levels and peak skin doses in selected diagnostic and therapeutic interventional radiology procedures. Phys Med 89:63–71CrossRef Papanastasiou E, Protopsaltis A, Finitsis S, Hatzidakis A, Prassopoulos P, Siountas A (2021) Institutional diagnostic reference levels and peak skin doses in selected diagnostic and therapeutic interventional radiology procedures. Phys Med 89:63–71CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Benmessaoud M, Housni A, Elmabrouki M et al (2021) Derivation of local diagnostic reference levels for common adult computed tomography examinations in Moroccan hospital. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 194(4):208–213CrossRef Benmessaoud M, Housni A, Elmabrouki M et al (2021) Derivation of local diagnostic reference levels for common adult computed tomography examinations in Moroccan hospital. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 194(4):208–213CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kropelnicki A, Eaton R, Adamczyk A, Waterman J, Mohaghegh P (2021) Establishing local diagnostic reference levels for common orthopaedic procedures using the mini C-arm fluoroscope. Br J Radiol 94(1117):20190878CrossRef Kropelnicki A, Eaton R, Adamczyk A, Waterman J, Mohaghegh P (2021) Establishing local diagnostic reference levels for common orthopaedic procedures using the mini C-arm fluoroscope. Br J Radiol 94(1117):20190878CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Loose R, Vano E, Mildenberger P et al (2021) Radiation dose management systems—Requirements and recommendations for users from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative. Eur Radiol 31(4):2106–2114CrossRef Loose R, Vano E, Mildenberger P et al (2021) Radiation dose management systems—Requirements and recommendations for users from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative. Eur Radiol 31(4):2106–2114CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Parakh A, Kortesniemi M, Schindera ST (2016) CT radiation dose management: a comprehensive optimization process for improving patient safety. Radiology 280(3):663–673CrossRef Parakh A, Kortesniemi M, Schindera ST (2016) CT radiation dose management: a comprehensive optimization process for improving patient safety. Radiology 280(3):663–673CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How to establish and use local diagnostic reference levels: an ESR EuroSafe Imaging expert statement
Authors
John Damilakis
Guy Frija
Boris Brkljacic
Eliseo Vano
Reinhard Loose
Graciano Paulo
Hugues Brat
Virginia Tsapaki
the European Society of Radiology
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01369-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Insights into Imaging 1/2023 Go to the issue