Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy | Case report

Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer with side-to-end anastomosis in a patient with anal stenosis

Authors: Yosuke Tajima, Tsunekazu Hanai, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Koji Masumori, Yoshikazu Koide, Keigo Ashida, Hiroshi Matsuoka, Junichiro Hiro, Tomoyoshi Endo, Tadahiro Kamiya, Yongchol Chong, Kotaro Maeda, Ichiro Uyama

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colorectal anastomosis using the double stapling technique (DST) has become a standard procedure. However, DST is difficult to perform in patients with anal stenosis because a circular stapler cannot be inserted into the rectum through the anus. Thus, an alternative procedure is required for colorectal anastomosis.

Case presentation

A 78-year-old woman presented with bloody stool. Colonoscopy and computed tomography revealed advanced low rectal cancer without lymph node or distant metastasis. We initially planned to perform low anterior resection using a double stapling technique or transanal hand-sewn anastomosis, but this would have been too difficult due to anal stenosis and fibrosis caused by a Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy performed 20 years earlier. The patient had never experienced defecation problems and declined a stoma. Therefore, we inserted an anvil into the rectal stump and fixed it robotically with a purse-string suture followed by insertion of the shaft of the circular stapler from the sigmoidal side. In this way, side-to-end anastomosis was accomplished laparoscopically. The distance from the anus to the anastomosis was 5 cm. The patient was discharged with no anastomotic leakage. Robotic assistance proved extremely useful for low anterior resection with side-to-end anastomosis.

Conclusion

Performing side-to-end anastomosis with robotic assistance was extremely useful in this patient with rectal cancer and anal stenosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Katsuno H, Hanai T, Masumori K, Koide Y, Matsuoka H, Tajima Y, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Surg Today. 2020;50:240–7.CrossRef Katsuno H, Hanai T, Masumori K, Koide Y, Matsuoka H, Tajima Y, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Surg Today. 2020;50:240–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Beart RW Jr, Kelly KA. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg. 1981;141:143–7.CrossRef Beart RW Jr, Kelly KA. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg. 1981;141:143–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference O'Connor TJ, Gaskin TA, Isobe JH. Reestablishing continuity after the Hartmann operation: use of the EEA stapling device. South Med J. 1983;76:90.CrossRef O'Connor TJ, Gaskin TA, Isobe JH. Reestablishing continuity after the Hartmann operation: use of the EEA stapling device. South Med J. 1983;76:90.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Baran JJ, Goldstein SD, Resnik AM. The double-staple technique in colorectal anastomoses: a critical review. Am Surg. 1992;58:270–2.PubMed Baran JJ, Goldstein SD, Resnik AM. The double-staple technique in colorectal anastomoses: a critical review. Am Surg. 1992;58:270–2.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Miller K, Moritz E. Circular stapling techniques for low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43:823–31.PubMed Miller K, Moritz E. Circular stapling techniques for low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43:823–31.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ho YH. Techniques for restoring bowel continuity and function after rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:6252–60.CrossRef Ho YH. Techniques for restoring bowel continuity and function after rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:6252–60.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS. Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;16:CD006040. Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS. Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;16:CD006040.
8.
go back to reference Ho YH, Brown S, Heah SM, Tsang C, Seow-Choen F, Eu KW, et al. Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates. Ann Surg. 2002;236:49–55.CrossRef Ho YH, Brown S, Heah SM, Tsang C, Seow-Choen F, Eu KW, et al. Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates. Ann Surg. 2002;236:49–55.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Okkabaz N, Haksal M, Atici AE, Altuntas YE, Gundogan E, Gezen FC, et al. J-pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis after hand-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial on short and long term outcomes including life quality and functional results. Int J Surg. 2017;47:4–12.CrossRef Okkabaz N, Haksal M, Atici AE, Altuntas YE, Gundogan E, Gezen FC, et al. J-pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis after hand-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial on short and long term outcomes including life quality and functional results. Int J Surg. 2017;47:4–12.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fazio VW, Mantyh CR, Hull TL. Colonic “coloplasty”: novel technique to enhance low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1448–50.CrossRef Fazio VW, Mantyh CR, Hull TL. Colonic “coloplasty”: novel technique to enhance low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1448–50.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Parc Y, Ruppert R, Fuerst A, Golcher H, Zutshi M, Hull T, et al. Better function with a colonic J-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis?: a randomized controlled trial to compare the complications, functional outcome, and quality of life in patients with low rectal cancer after a J-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis. Ann Surg. 2019;269:815–26.CrossRef Parc Y, Ruppert R, Fuerst A, Golcher H, Zutshi M, Hull T, et al. Better function with a colonic J-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis?: a randomized controlled trial to compare the complications, functional outcome, and quality of life in patients with low rectal cancer after a J-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis. Ann Surg. 2019;269:815–26.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Maeda K, Maruta M, Hanai T, Sato H, Horibe Y. Irrigation volume determines the efficacy of “rectal washout”. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1706–10.CrossRef Maeda K, Maruta M, Hanai T, Sato H, Horibe Y. Irrigation volume determines the efficacy of “rectal washout”. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1706–10.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kodeda K, Holmberg E, Jörgren F, Nordgren S, Lindmark G. Rectal washout and local recurrence of cancer after anterior resection. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1589–97.CrossRef Kodeda K, Holmberg E, Jörgren F, Nordgren S, Lindmark G. Rectal washout and local recurrence of cancer after anterior resection. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1589–97.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer with side-to-end anastomosis in a patient with anal stenosis
Authors
Yosuke Tajima
Tsunekazu Hanai
Hidetoshi Katsuno
Koji Masumori
Yoshikazu Koide
Keigo Ashida
Hiroshi Matsuoka
Junichiro Hiro
Tomoyoshi Endo
Tadahiro Kamiya
Yongchol Chong
Kotaro Maeda
Ichiro Uyama
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02121-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2021 Go to the issue