Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

Mesh contraction: in vivo documentation of changes in apparent surface area utilizing meshes visible on magnetic resonance imaging in the rabbit abdominal wall model

Authors: Masayuki Endo, Andrew Feola, Nikhil Sindhwani, Stefano Manodoro, Jarek Vlacil, Alexander Carl Engels, Filip Claus, Jan A. Deprest

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our aim was to analyze the apparent contraction of meshes in vivo after abdominal wall reconstruction and evaluate histological and biomechanical properties after explantation.

Methods

Nine New Zealand female rabbits underwent repair of two full-thickness 25 × 30-mm midline defects in the upper and lower parts of the abdomen. These were primarily overlaid by 35 × 40-mm implants of a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) DynaMesh (n = 6) or polypropylene meshes Ultrapro (n = 6) and Marlex (n = 6). Edges of the meshes were secured with iron(II,III) oxide (Fe3O4)-loaded PVDF sutures. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were taken at days 2, 30 and 90 after implantation. The perimeter of the mesh was traced using a 3D spline curve. The apparent surface area or the area within the PVDF sutures was compared with the initial size using the one-sample t test. A two-way repeat analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the apparent surface area over time and between groups.

Results

PVDF meshes and sutures with Fe3O4 could be well visualized on MRI. DynaMesh and Marlex each had a 17 % decrease in apparent surface area by day 2 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001), respectively, which persisted after day 90. Whereas there was a decrease in apparent surface area in Ultrapro, it did not reach significance until day 90 (p = 0.01). Overall, the apparent surface area decreased 21 % in all meshes by day 90. No differences in histological or biomechanical properties were observed at day 90.

Conclusions

There was a reduction in the apparent surface area between implantation and day 2, indicating that most mesh deformation occurs prior to tissue in-growth.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, Dwyer PL, Fatton B, Kocjancic E, Lee J et al (2011) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 30(1):2–12PubMedCrossRef Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, Dwyer PL, Fatton B, Kocjancic E, Lee J et al (2011) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 30(1):2–12PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Svabik K, Martan A, Masata J, El-Haddad R, Hubka P, Pavlikova M (2011) Ultrasound appearances after mesh implantation–evidence of mesh contraction or folding? Int Urogynecol J 22(5):529–533PubMedCrossRef Svabik K, Martan A, Masata J, El-Haddad R, Hubka P, Pavlikova M (2011) Ultrasound appearances after mesh implantation–evidence of mesh contraction or folding? Int Urogynecol J 22(5):529–533PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Velemir L, Amblard J, Fatton B, Savary D, Jacquetin B (2010) Transvaginal mesh repair of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse: a clinical and ultrasonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Official J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(4):474–480CrossRef Velemir L, Amblard J, Fatton B, Savary D, Jacquetin B (2010) Transvaginal mesh repair of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse: a clinical and ultrasonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Official J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(4):474–480CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Palma P, Riccetto C, Fraga R, Miyaoka R, Prando A (2010) Dynamic evaluation of pelvic floor reconstructive surgery using radiopaque meshes and three-dimensional helical CT. Int Braz J Urol 36(2):209–214, discussion 215-207PubMedCrossRef Palma P, Riccetto C, Fraga R, Miyaoka R, Prando A (2010) Dynamic evaluation of pelvic floor reconstructive surgery using radiopaque meshes and three-dimensional helical CT. Int Braz J Urol 36(2):209–214, discussion 215-207PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Guillaume O, Blanquer S, Letouzey V, Cornille A, Huberlant S, Lemaire L, Franconi F, de Tayrac R, Coudane J, Garric X (2012) Permanent polymer coating for in vivo MRI visualization of tissue reinforcement prostheses. Macromol Biosci 12(10):1364–1374PubMedCrossRef Guillaume O, Blanquer S, Letouzey V, Cornille A, Huberlant S, Lemaire L, Franconi F, de Tayrac R, Coudane J, Garric X (2012) Permanent polymer coating for in vivo MRI visualization of tissue reinforcement prostheses. Macromol Biosci 12(10):1364–1374PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Ottinger AP, Junge K, Schumpelick V (2002) PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes. Biomaterials 23(16):3487–3493PubMedCrossRef Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Ottinger AP, Junge K, Schumpelick V (2002) PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes. Biomaterials 23(16):3487–3493PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kramer NA, Donker HC, Otto J, Hodenius M, Senegas J, Slabu I, Klinge U, Baumann M, Mullen A, Obolenski B et al (2010) A concept for magnetic resonance visualization of surgical textile implants. Invest Radiol 45(8):477–483PubMedCrossRef Kramer NA, Donker HC, Otto J, Hodenius M, Senegas J, Slabu I, Klinge U, Baumann M, Mullen A, Obolenski B et al (2010) A concept for magnetic resonance visualization of surgical textile implants. Invest Radiol 45(8):477–483PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kuehnert N, Kraemer NA, Otto J, Donker HC, Slabu I, Baumann M, Kuhl CK, Klinge U (2012) In vivo MRI visualization of mesh shrinkage using surgical implants loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxides. Surg Endosc 26(5):1468–1475PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kuehnert N, Kraemer NA, Otto J, Donker HC, Slabu I, Baumann M, Kuhl CK, Klinge U (2012) In vivo MRI visualization of mesh shrinkage using surgical implants loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxides. Surg Endosc 26(5):1468–1475PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sandaite I, Claus F, Manodoro S, Muellen A, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2011) Experimental MRI-contrast imaging of suture and mesh materials with FE304 –containing polyvinylidenefluoride polymers designed for pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodynam 30(6):1114–1115 Sandaite I, Claus F, Manodoro S, Muellen A, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2011) Experimental MRI-contrast imaging of suture and mesh materials with FE304 –containing polyvinylidenefluoride polymers designed for pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodynam 30(6):1114–1115
10.
go back to reference Conze J, Junge K, Weiss C, Anurov M, Oettinger A, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2008) New polymer for intra-abdominal meshes–PVDF copolymer. J Biomed Mater Research B Appl Biomater 87(2):321–328CrossRef Conze J, Junge K, Weiss C, Anurov M, Oettinger A, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2008) New polymer for intra-abdominal meshes–PVDF copolymer. J Biomed Mater Research B Appl Biomater 87(2):321–328CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ozog Y, Konstantinovic ML, Werbrouck E, De Ridder D, Edoardo M, Deprest J: Shrinkage and biomechanical evaluation of lightweight synthetics in a rabbit model for primary fascial repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2011 Ozog Y, Konstantinovic ML, Werbrouck E, De Ridder D, Edoardo M, Deprest J: Shrinkage and biomechanical evaluation of lightweight synthetics in a rabbit model for primary fascial repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2011
12.
go back to reference Junge K, Rosch R, Krones CJ, Klinge U, Mertens PR, Lynen P, Schumpelick V, Klosterhalfen B (2005) Influence of polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) supplementation on the biocompatibility of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. Hernia 9(3):212–217PubMedCrossRef Junge K, Rosch R, Krones CJ, Klinge U, Mertens PR, Lynen P, Schumpelick V, Klosterhalfen B (2005) Influence of polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) supplementation on the biocompatibility of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. Hernia 9(3):212–217PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U (2005) The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices 2(1):103–117PubMedCrossRef Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U (2005) The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices 2(1):103–117PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Valentin JE, Badylak JS, McCabe GP, Badylak SF (2006) Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 88(12):2673–2686CrossRef Valentin JE, Badylak JS, McCabe GP, Badylak SF (2006) Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 88(12):2673–2686CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zheng F, Lin Y, Verbeken E, Claerhout F, Fastrez M, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2004) Host response after reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with porcine dermal collagen in a rat model. Am J Obst Gynecol 191(6):1961–1970CrossRef Zheng F, Lin Y, Verbeken E, Claerhout F, Fastrez M, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2004) Host response after reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with porcine dermal collagen in a rat model. Am J Obst Gynecol 191(6):1961–1970CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Konstantinovic ML, Lagae P, Zheng F, Verbeken EK, De Ridder D, Deprest JA (2005) Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. BJOG 112(11):1554–1560PubMedCrossRef Konstantinovic ML, Lagae P, Zheng F, Verbeken EK, De Ridder D, Deprest JA (2005) Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. BJOG 112(11):1554–1560PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jones KA, Feola A, Meyn L, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA (2009) Tensile properties of commonly used prolapse meshes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(7):847–853PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Jones KA, Feola A, Meyn L, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA (2009) Tensile properties of commonly used prolapse meshes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(7):847–853PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ozog Y, Konstantinovic ML, Verschueren S, Spelzini F, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2009) Experimental comparison of abdominal wall repair using different methods of enhancement by small intestinal submucosa graft. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(4):435–441PubMedCrossRef Ozog Y, Konstantinovic ML, Verschueren S, Spelzini F, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2009) Experimental comparison of abdominal wall repair using different methods of enhancement by small intestinal submucosa graft. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(4):435–441PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shapiro EM, Skrtic S, Koretsky AP (2005) Sizing it up: cellular MRI using micron-sized iron oxide particles. Magn Reson Med 53(2):329–338PubMedCrossRef Shapiro EM, Skrtic S, Koretsky AP (2005) Sizing it up: cellular MRI using micron-sized iron oxide particles. Magn Reson Med 53(2):329–338PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Manodoro S, Endo M, Uvin P, Albersen M, Vlacil J, Engels A, Schmidt B, De Ridder D, Feola A, Deprest J (2013) Graft-related complications and biaxial tensiometry following experimental vaginal implantation of flat mesh of variable dimensions. BJOG: Int J Obst Gynaecol 120(2):244–250CrossRef Manodoro S, Endo M, Uvin P, Albersen M, Vlacil J, Engels A, Schmidt B, De Ridder D, Feola A, Deprest J (2013) Graft-related complications and biaxial tensiometry following experimental vaginal implantation of flat mesh of variable dimensions. BJOG: Int J Obst Gynaecol 120(2):244–250CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Feola A, Abramowitch S, Jallah Z, Stein S, Barone W, Palcsey S, Moalli P (2013) Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high-stiffness prolapse mesh. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 120(2):224–232CrossRef Feola A, Abramowitch S, Jallah Z, Stein S, Barone W, Palcsey S, Moalli P (2013) Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high-stiffness prolapse mesh. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 120(2):224–232CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Abramowitch SD, Feola A, Jallah Z, Moalli PA (2009) Tissue mechanics, animal models, and pelvic organ prolapse: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 144(Suppl 1):S146–158PubMedCrossRef Abramowitch SD, Feola A, Jallah Z, Moalli PA (2009) Tissue mechanics, animal models, and pelvic organ prolapse: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 144(Suppl 1):S146–158PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bellon JM, Contreras LA, Bujan J, Palomares D, Carrera-San Martin A (1998) Tissue response to polypropylene meshes used in the repair of abdominal wall defects. Biomaterials 19(7–9):669–675PubMedCrossRef Bellon JM, Contreras LA, Bujan J, Palomares D, Carrera-San Martin A (1998) Tissue response to polypropylene meshes used in the repair of abdominal wall defects. Biomaterials 19(7–9):669–675PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Claerhout F, Verbist G, Verbeken E, Konstantinovic M, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2008) Fate of collagen-based implants used in pelvic floor surgery: a 2-year follow-up study in a rabbit model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(1):e91–96, 94CrossRef Claerhout F, Verbist G, Verbeken E, Konstantinovic M, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2008) Fate of collagen-based implants used in pelvic floor surgery: a 2-year follow-up study in a rabbit model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(1):e91–96, 94CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hilger WS, Walter A, Zobitz ME, Leslie KO, Magtibay P, Cornella J (2006) Histological and biomechanical evaluation of implanted graft materials in a rabbit vaginal and abdominal model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(6):1826–1831PubMedCrossRef Hilger WS, Walter A, Zobitz ME, Leslie KO, Magtibay P, Cornella J (2006) Histological and biomechanical evaluation of implanted graft materials in a rabbit vaginal and abdominal model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(6):1826–1831PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Konerding MA, Chantereau P, Delventhal V, Holste JL, Ackermann M: Biomechanical and histological evaluation of abdominal wall compliance with intraperitoneal onlay mesh implants in rabbits: A comparison of six different state-of-the-art meshes. Medical engineering & physics 2011 Konerding MA, Chantereau P, Delventhal V, Holste JL, Ackermann M: Biomechanical and histological evaluation of abdominal wall compliance with intraperitoneal onlay mesh implants in rabbits: A comparison of six different state-of-the-art meshes. Medical engineering & physics 2011
27.
go back to reference Ozog Y, Konstantinovic M, Werbrouck E, De Ridder D, Mazza E, Deprest J (2011) Persistence of polypropylene mesh anisotropy after implantation: an experimental study. BJOG 118(10):1180–1185PubMedCrossRef Ozog Y, Konstantinovic M, Werbrouck E, De Ridder D, Mazza E, Deprest J (2011) Persistence of polypropylene mesh anisotropy after implantation: an experimental study. BJOG 118(10):1180–1185PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pierce LM, Grunlan MA, Hou Y, Baumann SS, Kuehl TJ, Muir TW (2009) Biomechanical properties of synthetic and biologic graft materials following long-term implantation in the rabbit abdomen and vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(5):e541–548, 549 Pierce LM, Grunlan MA, Hou Y, Baumann SS, Kuehl TJ, Muir TW (2009) Biomechanical properties of synthetic and biologic graft materials following long-term implantation in the rabbit abdomen and vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(5):e541–548, 549
29.
go back to reference Kraemer NA, Donker HC, Kuehnert N, Otto J, Schrading S, Krombach GA, Klinge U, Kuhl CK: In Vivo Visualization of Polymer-Based Mesh Implants Using Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positive-Contrast Susceptibility Imaging. Investigative radiology 2013. Kraemer NA, Donker HC, Kuehnert N, Otto J, Schrading S, Krombach GA, Klinge U, Kuhl CK: In Vivo Visualization of Polymer-Based Mesh Implants Using Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positive-Contrast Susceptibility Imaging. Investigative radiology 2013.
Metadata
Title
Mesh contraction: in vivo documentation of changes in apparent surface area utilizing meshes visible on magnetic resonance imaging in the rabbit abdominal wall model
Authors
Masayuki Endo
Andrew Feola
Nikhil Sindhwani
Stefano Manodoro
Jarek Vlacil
Alexander Carl Engels
Filip Claus
Jan A. Deprest
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2293-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2014 Go to the issue