Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Paper

Measurement of cardiac valve and aortic blood flow velocities in stroke patients: a comparison of 4D flow MRI and echocardiography

Authors: Thomas Wehrum, Felix Guenther, Alexander Fuchs, Florian Schuchardt, Anja Hennemuth, Andreas Harloff

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

4D flow MRI is an emerging technique that allows quantification of 3D blood flow in vivo. However, comparisons with methods of blood velocity quantification used in clinical routine are sparse. Therefore, we compared velocity quantification using 4D flow MRI with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography at the mitral and aortic valves and the aorta. Forty-eight stroke patients (age 67.3 ± 15.0 years) were examined by 4D flow MRI. Blood flow velocities were assessed using standardized 2D analysis planes positioned in the mitral valve (MV), aortic valve (AV), ascending aorta (AAo), and descending aorta (DAo) and were compared with echocardiography. MRI showed moderate-high correlations of systolic velocity values for the MV (r = 0.67, p < 0.001), AV (r = 0.77, p < 0.001), AAo (r = 0.93, p < 0.001), and DAo (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) along with moderate-high intraclass-correlation-coefficients: MV 0.79 (95% CI 0.62, 0.88), AV 0.86 (95% CI 0.75, 0.92), AAo 0.96 (95% CI 0.93, 0.98), and DAo 0.83 (95% CI 0.70, 0.90). However, MRI underestimated absolute systolic blood flow velocities compared with echocardiography by 8.6% for the MV (p = 0.07), 3.1% for the AV (p = 0.48), 10.7% for the AAo (p = 0.09), and 15.0% for the DAo (p = 0.01). Blood flow velocities obtained using 4D flow MRI and echocardiography at the MV, AV, and the ascending and DAo showed moderate to high correlations. Underestimation of absolute velocity values by MRI was low. Thus, 4D flow MRI seems ideally suited to comprehensively assess cardiac and aortic pathologies and related hemodynamic changes in future studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK et al (2010) Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 255:53–61CrossRefPubMed Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK et al (2010) Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 255:53–61CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hope MD, Hope TA, Crook SES et al (2011) 4D flow CMR in assessment of valve-related ascending aortic disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:781–787CrossRefPubMed Hope MD, Hope TA, Crook SES et al (2011) 4D flow CMR in assessment of valve-related ascending aortic disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:781–787CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Barker AJ, Markl M, Bürk J et al (2012) Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:457–466CrossRefPubMed Barker AJ, Markl M, Bürk J et al (2012) Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:457–466CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Trauzeddel RF, Barker AJ et al (2014) Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement: a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI. Int J Cardiol 170:426–433CrossRef von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Trauzeddel RF, Barker AJ et al (2014) Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement: a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI. Int J Cardiol 170:426–433CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kvitting J-PE, Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A et al (2010) In vitro assessment of flow patterns and turbulence intensity in prosthetic heart valves using generalized phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:1075–1080CrossRefPubMed Kvitting J-PE, Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A et al (2010) In vitro assessment of flow patterns and turbulence intensity in prosthetic heart valves using generalized phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:1075–1080CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Markl M, Draney MT, Miller DC et al (2005) Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130:456–463CrossRefPubMed Markl M, Draney MT, Miller DC et al (2005) Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130:456–463CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kvitting J-PE, Ebbers T, Wigström L et al (2004) Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:1602–1607CrossRefPubMed Kvitting J-PE, Ebbers T, Wigström L et al (2004) Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:1602–1607CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bürk J, Blanke P, Stankovic Z et al (2012) Evaluation of 3D blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the normal and dilated thoracic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:84CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bürk J, Blanke P, Stankovic Z et al (2012) Evaluation of 3D blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the normal and dilated thoracic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:84CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Dyverfeldt P, Hope MD, Tseng EE, Saloner D (2013) Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:64–71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dyverfeldt P, Hope MD, Tseng EE, Saloner D (2013) Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:64–71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Frydrychowicz A, Markl M, Hirtler D et al (2011) Aortic hemodynamics in patients with and without repair of aortic coarctation: in vivo analysis by 4D flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 46:317–325PubMed Frydrychowicz A, Markl M, Hirtler D et al (2011) Aortic hemodynamics in patients with and without repair of aortic coarctation: in vivo analysis by 4D flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 46:317–325PubMed
11.
go back to reference Bogren HG, Buonocore MH, Valente RJ (2004) Four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease compared to age-matched normal subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:417–427CrossRefPubMed Bogren HG, Buonocore MH, Valente RJ (2004) Four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease compared to age-matched normal subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:417–427CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jarvis K, Vonder M, Barker AJ et al (2016) Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jarvis K, Vonder M, Barker AJ et al (2016) Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Geiger J, Arnold R, Herzer L et al (2013) Aortic wall shear stress in Marfan syndrome. Magn Reson Med 70:1137–1144CrossRefPubMed Geiger J, Arnold R, Herzer L et al (2013) Aortic wall shear stress in Marfan syndrome. Magn Reson Med 70:1137–1144CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Geiger J, Markl M, Herzer L et al (2012) Aortic flow patterns in patients with Marfan syndrome assessed by flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:594–600CrossRefPubMed Geiger J, Markl M, Herzer L et al (2012) Aortic flow patterns in patients with Marfan syndrome assessed by flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:594–600CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Frydrychowicz A, Berger A, Munoz D et al (2012) Interdependencies of aortic arch secondary flow patterns, geometry, and age analysed by 4-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Eur Radiol 22:1122–1130CrossRefPubMed Frydrychowicz A, Berger A, Munoz D et al (2012) Interdependencies of aortic arch secondary flow patterns, geometry, and age analysed by 4-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Eur Radiol 22:1122–1130CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bogren HG, Buonocore MH (1999) 4D magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in young vs. elderly normal subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:861–869CrossRefPubMed Bogren HG, Buonocore MH (1999) 4D magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in young vs. elderly normal subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:861–869CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Brix L, Ringgaard S, Rasmusson A et al (2009) Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11:3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brix L, Ringgaard S, Rasmusson A et al (2009) Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11:3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Hope MD, Meadows AK, Hope TA et al (2010) Clinical evaluation of aortic coarctation with 4D flow MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:711–718CrossRefPubMed Hope MD, Meadows AK, Hope TA et al (2010) Clinical evaluation of aortic coarctation with 4D flow MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:711–718CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nordmeyer S, Riesenkampff E, Crelier G et al (2010) Flow-sensitive four-dimensional cine magnetic resonance imaging for offline blood flow quantification in multiple vessels: a validation study. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:677–683CrossRefPubMed Nordmeyer S, Riesenkampff E, Crelier G et al (2010) Flow-sensitive four-dimensional cine magnetic resonance imaging for offline blood flow quantification in multiple vessels: a validation study. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:677–683CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Carlsson M, Töger J, Kanski M et al (2011) Quantification and visualization of cardiovascular 4D velocity mapping accelerated with parallel imaging or k-t BLAST: head to head comparison and validation at 1.5 T and 3 T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carlsson M, Töger J, Kanski M et al (2011) Quantification and visualization of cardiovascular 4D velocity mapping accelerated with parallel imaging or k-t BLAST: head to head comparison and validation at 1.5 T and 3 T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Valverde I, Nordmeyer S, Uribe S et al (2012) Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow in patients with palliated univentricular heart physiology: measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance 4D velocity acquisition. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Valverde I, Nordmeyer S, Uribe S et al (2012) Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow in patients with palliated univentricular heart physiology: measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance 4D velocity acquisition. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Nordmeyer S, Riesenkampff E, Messroghli D et al (2013) Four-dimensional velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging improves blood flow quantification in patients with complex accelerated flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:208–216CrossRefPubMed Nordmeyer S, Riesenkampff E, Messroghli D et al (2013) Four-dimensional velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging improves blood flow quantification in patients with complex accelerated flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:208–216CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Markl M, Wallis W, Harloff A (2011) Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:988–994CrossRefPubMed Markl M, Wallis W, Harloff A (2011) Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:988–994CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wentland AL, Grist TM, Wieben O (2013) Repeatability and internal consistency of abdominal 2D and 4D phase contrast MR flow measurements. Acad Radiol 20:699–704CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wentland AL, Grist TM, Wieben O (2013) Repeatability and internal consistency of abdominal 2D and 4D phase contrast MR flow measurements. Acad Radiol 20:699–704CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Harloff A, Albrecht F, Spreer J et al (2009) 3D blood flow characteristics in the carotid artery bifurcation assessed by flow-sensitive 4D MRI at 3T. Magn Reson Med 61:65–74CrossRefPubMed Harloff A, Albrecht F, Spreer J et al (2009) 3D blood flow characteristics in the carotid artery bifurcation assessed by flow-sensitive 4D MRI at 3T. Magn Reson Med 61:65–74CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Harloff A, Zech T, Wegent F et al (2013) Comparison of blood flow velocity quantification by 4D flow MR imaging with ultrasound at the carotid bifurcation. Am J Neuroradiol 34:1407–1413CrossRefPubMed Harloff A, Zech T, Wegent F et al (2013) Comparison of blood flow velocity quantification by 4D flow MR imaging with ultrasound at the carotid bifurcation. Am J Neuroradiol 34:1407–1413CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wetzel S, Meckel S, Frydrychowicz A et al (2007) In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T. Am J Neuroradiol 28:433–438PubMed Wetzel S, Meckel S, Frydrychowicz A et al (2007) In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T. Am J Neuroradiol 28:433–438PubMed
28.
go back to reference Gabbour M, Schnell S, Jarvis K et al (2015) 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography. Pediatr Radiol 45:804–813CrossRefPubMed Gabbour M, Schnell S, Jarvis K et al (2015) 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography. Pediatr Radiol 45:804–813CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Markl M, Lee DC, Furiasse N et al (2016) Left atrial and left atrial appendage 4D blood flow dynamics in atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:9(9)CrossRef Markl M, Lee DC, Furiasse N et al (2016) Left atrial and left atrial appendage 4D blood flow dynamics in atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:9(9)CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P et al (2012) Normal and altered three-dimensional portal venous hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis. Radiology 262:862–873CrossRefPubMed Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P et al (2012) Normal and altered three-dimensional portal venous hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis. Radiology 262:862–873CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Wehrum T, Kams M, Schroeder L et al (2014) Accelerated analysis of three-dimensional blood flow of the thoracic aorta in stroke patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30:1571–1577CrossRefPubMed Wehrum T, Kams M, Schroeder L et al (2014) Accelerated analysis of three-dimensional blood flow of the thoracic aorta in stroke patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30:1571–1577CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39CrossRefPubMed Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Gardin JM, Burn CS, Childs WJ, Henry WL (1984) Evaluation of blood flow velocity in the ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery of normal subjects by Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J 107:310–319CrossRefPubMed Gardin JM, Burn CS, Childs WJ, Henry WL (1984) Evaluation of blood flow velocity in the ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery of normal subjects by Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J 107:310–319CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:e57–e185CrossRefPubMed Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:e57–e185CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Fyrenius A, Wigström L, Bolger AF et al (1999) Pitfalls in Doppler evaluation of diastolic function: insights from 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 12:817–826CrossRefPubMed Fyrenius A, Wigström L, Bolger AF et al (1999) Pitfalls in Doppler evaluation of diastolic function: insights from 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 12:817–826CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Mahadevia R, Barker AJ, Schnell S et al (2014) Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy. Circulation 129:673–682CrossRefPubMed Mahadevia R, Barker AJ, Schnell S et al (2014) Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy. Circulation 129:673–682CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Measurement of cardiac valve and aortic blood flow velocities in stroke patients: a comparison of 4D flow MRI and echocardiography
Authors
Thomas Wehrum
Felix Guenther
Alexander Fuchs
Florian Schuchardt
Anja Hennemuth
Andreas Harloff
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1298-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2018 Go to the issue