Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 1/2010

01-03-2010 | Original Research Article

Development and Testing of the Insulin Treatment Experience Questionnaire (ITEQ)

Authors: Dr Jörn Moock, Franz Hessel, Diana Ziegeler, Thomas Kubiak, Thomas Kohlmann

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and psychometrically evaluate a domain-specific questionnaire to assess subtle but clinically relevant differences in treatment experiences and satisfaction over a wide range of currently available insulin therapy regimens. The study focussed on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and placed particular attention on the impact of different forms of insulin therapy on diabetes self-management.
Methods: The development of the Insulin Treatment Experience Questionnaire (ITEQ) was conducted in three steps: (i) a qualitative phase to generate relevant items and identify relevant domains; (ii) a pilot study to reduce the number of generated items; and (iii) a validation study to assess major psychometric properties of the final ITEQ version.
Results: The final version of the questionnaire comprised 28 items with the subscales ‘leisure activities’ (four items), ‘psychological barriers’ (two items), ‘handling’ (five items), ‘diabetes control’ (six items), ‘dependence’ (five items), ‘weight control’ (three items), ‘sleep’ (two items), and one further item assessing general treatment satisfaction. The subscales’ internal consistencies (Cronbach’s alpha) ranged from 0.52 to 0.83. Motivated by the homogenous structure of inter-scale-correlations (range 0.10–0.46), a summary composite score was calculated (alpha = 0.86). Construct validity showed statistically significant correlations with other scales (ITEQ vs the Problem Areas in Diabetes [PAID] questionnaire total score −0.60, ITEQ vs the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ] total score 0.52).
Conclusion: The newly developed ITEQ displayed satisfactory to good psychometric properties, thereby allowing the assessment of everyday life experience and treatment satisfaction in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Additional research is needed to assess test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(5): 1047–53PubMedCrossRef Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(5): 1047–53PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Massi-Benedetti M. The cost of diabetes type II in Europe: the CODE-2 study. Diabetologica 2002; 45: S1–4CrossRef Massi-Benedetti M. The cost of diabetes type II in Europe: the CODE-2 study. Diabetologica 2002; 45: S1–4CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Turner RC, Millns H, Neil HAW, et al. Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23). BMJ 1998; 316(7134): 823–8PubMedCrossRef Turner RC, Millns H, Neil HAW, et al. Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23). BMJ 1998; 316(7134): 823–8PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 917–32PubMedCrossRef Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 917–32PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2007. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(3): 596–615CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2007. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(3): 596–615CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res 1999; 15:205–18CrossRef Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res 1999; 15:205–18CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Watkins K, Connell CM. Measurement of health-related QOL in diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoeconomics 2004; 22(17): 1109–26PubMedCrossRef Watkins K, Connell CM. Measurement of health-related QOL in diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoeconomics 2004; 22(17): 1109–26PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rose M, Burkert U, Scholler G, et al. Determinants of quality of life of patients with diabetes under intensified insulin therapy. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1876–83PubMedCrossRef Rose M, Burkert U, Scholler G, et al. Determinants of quality of life of patients with diabetes under intensified insulin therapy. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1876–83PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bradley C. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: DTSQ. In: Bradley C, editor. Handbook of psychology and diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1994: 111–32 Bradley C. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: DTSQ. In: Bradley C, editor. Handbook of psychology and diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1994: 111–32
10.
go back to reference Anderson RT, Skovlund SE, Marrero D, et al. Development and validation of the insulin treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Clin Ther 2004; 26(4): 565–78PubMedCrossRef Anderson RT, Skovlund SE, Marrero D, et al. Development and validation of the insulin treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Clin Ther 2004; 26(4): 565–78PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Krichbaum M, et al. How to screen for depression and emotional problems in patients with diabetes: comparison of screening characteristics of depression questionnaires, measurement of diabetes-specific emotional problems and standard clinical assessment. Diabetologia 2006; 49: 469–77PubMedCrossRef Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Krichbaum M, et al. How to screen for depression and emotional problems in patients with diabetes: comparison of screening characteristics of depression questionnaires, measurement of diabetes-specific emotional problems and standard clinical assessment. Diabetologia 2006; 49: 469–77PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference FDA. Draft guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: use in medicinal product development to support labelling claims. Fed Register 2006; 71: 5862–63 FDA. Draft guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: use in medicinal product development to support labelling claims. Fed Register 2006; 71: 5862–63
14.
go back to reference Quinn Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2002 Quinn Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2002
15.
go back to reference Neumann WL. Basics of social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston (MA): Pearson, 2007 Neumann WL. Basics of social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston (MA): Pearson, 2007
17.
go back to reference Silverman D. Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. Newbury Park (CA): Sage, 2000 Silverman D. Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. Newbury Park (CA): Sage, 2000
18.
go back to reference Harb B, Kubiak T, Roth R. Der Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. In: Bengel JC, Wirtz M, Zwingmann C, editors. Diagnostische Verfahren in der Rehabilitation: Verfahren zum krankheitsübergreifenden Einsatz und für ausgewählte Indikationsgebiete. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2008: 266–9 Harb B, Kubiak T, Roth R. Der Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. In: Bengel JC, Wirtz M, Zwingmann C, editors. Diagnostische Verfahren in der Rehabilitation: Verfahren zum krankheitsübergreifenden Einsatz und für ausgewählte Indikationsgebiete. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2008: 266–9
19.
go back to reference Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care 1995; 18(6): 754–60PubMedCrossRef Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care 1995; 18(6): 754–60PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kubiak T, Hermanns N, Kulzer B. Der Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Fragebogen. In: Bengel J, Wirtz M, Zwingmann C, editors. Diagnostische Verfahren in der Rehabilitation-Verfahren zum krankheitsübergreifenden Einsatz und für ausgewählte Indikationsgebiete. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2008: 276–9 Kubiak T, Hermanns N, Kulzer B. Der Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Fragebogen. In: Bengel J, Wirtz M, Zwingmann C, editors. Diagnostische Verfahren in der Rehabilitation-Verfahren zum krankheitsübergreifenden Einsatz und für ausgewählte Indikationsgebiete. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2008: 276–9
21.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003 Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003
22.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334CrossRef Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, 1994 Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, 1994
24.
go back to reference Hays RD, Hayashi T. Beyond internal consistency reliability: rationale and user’s guide for Multitrait analysis program on the microcomputer. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1990; 22: 167–75CrossRef Hays RD, Hayashi T. Beyond internal consistency reliability: rationale and user’s guide for Multitrait analysis program on the microcomputer. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1990; 22: 167–75CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment analysis and interpretation of patient reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2007 Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment analysis and interpretation of patient reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2007
26.
go back to reference Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminate validation by multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959; 56(2): 81–105PubMedCrossRef Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminate validation by multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959; 56(2): 81–105PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Howard KI, Forehand GC. A method for correcting item-total correlations for the effect of relevant item inclusion. Educat Psychol Measures 1962; 22: 731CrossRef Howard KI, Forehand GC. A method for correcting item-total correlations for the effect of relevant item inclusion. Educat Psychol Measures 1962; 22: 731CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Juniper EF, Gordon HG, Roman J. How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996: 49–56 Juniper EF, Gordon HG, Roman J. How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996: 49–56
29.
go back to reference Cappelleri JC, Gerber RA, Kourides IA, et al. Development and factor analysis of a questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with injected and inhaled insulin for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000; 23(12): 1799–803PubMedCrossRef Cappelleri JC, Gerber RA, Kourides IA, et al. Development and factor analysis of a questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with injected and inhaled insulin for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000; 23(12): 1799–803PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Brod M, Christensen T, Bushnell D. Maximizing the value of validation findings to better understand treatment satisfaction issues for diabetes. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 1053–63PubMedCrossRef Brod M, Christensen T, Bushnell D. Maximizing the value of validation findings to better understand treatment satisfaction issues for diabetes. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 1053–63PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Brod M, Cobden D, Lammert M, et al. Examining correlates of treatment satisfaction for injectable insulin in type 2 diabetes: lessons learned from a clinical trial comparing biphasic and basal analogues. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007; 5: 8PubMedCrossRef Brod M, Cobden D, Lammert M, et al. Examining correlates of treatment satisfaction for injectable insulin in type 2 diabetes: lessons learned from a clinical trial comparing biphasic and basal analogues. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007; 5: 8PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Brod M, Skovlund SE, Wittrup-Jensen KU. Measuring the impact of diabetes through patient report of treatment satisfaction, productivity and symptom experience. Qual Life Res 2006; 15(3): 481–91PubMedCrossRef Brod M, Skovlund SE, Wittrup-Jensen KU. Measuring the impact of diabetes through patient report of treatment satisfaction, productivity and symptom experience. Qual Life Res 2006; 15(3): 481–91PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Atkinson MJ, Sinha A, Hass SL, et al. Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 12PubMedCrossRef Atkinson MJ, Sinha A, Hass SL, et al. Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 12PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Revicki DA, Osoba D, Fairclough D, et al. Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 887–900PubMedCrossRef Revicki DA, Osoba D, Fairclough D, et al. Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 887–900PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and Testing of the Insulin Treatment Experience Questionnaire (ITEQ)
Authors
Dr Jörn Moock
Franz Hessel
Diana Ziegeler
Thomas Kubiak
Thomas Kohlmann
Publication date
01-03-2010
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11319510-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 1/2010 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.