Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2004

Open Access 01-12-2004 | Research

Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease

Authors: Mark J Atkinson, Anusha Sinha, Steven L Hass, Shoshana S Colman, Ritesh N Kumar, Meryl Brod, Clayton R Rowland

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a general measure of patients' satisfaction with medication, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM).

Methods

The content and format of 55 initial questions were based on a formal conceptual framework, an extensive literature review, and the input from three patient focus groups. Patient interviews were used to select the most relevant questions for further evaluation (n = 31). The psychometric performance of items and resulting TSQM scales were examined using eight diverse patient groups (arthritis, asthma, major depression, type I diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, migraine, and psoriasis) recruited from a national longitudinal panel study of chronic illness (n = 567). Participants were then randomized to complete the test items using one of two alternate scaling methods (Visual Analogue vs. Likert-type).

Results

A factor analysis (principal component extraction with varimax rotation) of specific items revealed three factors (Eigenvalues > 1.7) explaining 75.6% of the total variance; namely Side effects (4 items, 28.4%, Cronbach's Alpha = .87), Effectiveness (3 items, 24.1%, Cronbach's Alpha = .85), and Convenience (3 items, 23.1%, Cronbach's Alpha = .87). A second factor analysis of more generally worded items yielded a Global Satisfaction scale (3 items, Eigenvalue = 2.3, 79.1%, Cronbach's Alpha = .85). The final four scales possessed good psychometric properties, with the Likert-type scaling method performing better than the VAS approach. Significant differences were found on the TSQM by the route of medication administration (oral, injectable, topical, inhalable), level of illness severity, and length of time on medication. Regression analyses using the TSQM scales accounted for 40–60% of variation in patients' ratings of their likelihood to persist with their current medication.

Conclusion

The TSQM is a psychometrically sound and valid measure of the major dimensions of patients' satisfaction with medication. Preliminary evidence suggests that the TSQM may also be a good predictor of patients' medication adherence across different types of medication and patient populations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Golin CE, DiMatteo MR, Gelberg L: The role of patient participation in the doctor visit. Implications for adherence to diabetes care. Diabetes Care 1996, 19: 1153–1164.PubMedCrossRef Golin CE, DiMatteo MR, Gelberg L: The role of patient participation in the doctor visit. Implications for adherence to diabetes care. Diabetes Care 1996, 19: 1153–1164.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Katz JN: Patient preferences and health disparities. JAMA 2001, 286: 1506–1509. 10.1001/jama.286.12.1506PubMedCrossRef Katz JN: Patient preferences and health disparities. JAMA 2001, 286: 1506–1509. 10.1001/jama.286.12.1506PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Owens DK: Spine update. Patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines. Spine 1998, 23: 1073–1079. 10.1097/00007632-199805010-00023PubMedCrossRef Owens DK: Spine update. Patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines. Spine 1998, 23: 1073–1079. 10.1097/00007632-199805010-00023PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Eriksen LR: Patient satisfaction with nursing care: concept clarification. Journal of Nursing Measurement 1995, 3: 59–76.PubMed Eriksen LR: Patient satisfaction with nursing care: concept clarification. Journal of Nursing Measurement 1995, 3: 59–76.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH: Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 2001, 52: 1865–1878. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00303-8PubMedCrossRef Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH: Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 2001, 52: 1865–1878. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00303-8PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Turnbull JE, Luther KM: Patient satisfaction report paves way to improved care. QRC Advisor 1996, 13: 1–7.PubMed Turnbull JE, Luther KM: Patient satisfaction report paves way to improved care. QRC Advisor 1996, 13: 1–7.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Wright JG: Evaluating the outcome of treatment. Shouldn't We be asking patients if they are better? J Clin Epidemiol 2000, 53: 549–553. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00225-5PubMedCrossRef Wright JG: Evaluating the outcome of treatment. Shouldn't We be asking patients if they are better? J Clin Epidemiol 2000, 53: 549–553. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00225-5PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brody D, Miller S, Lerman C, Smith D, Caputo G: Patient perception of involvement in medical care: Relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1989, 4: 506–511.PubMedCrossRef Brody D, Miller S, Lerman C, Smith D, Caputo G: Patient perception of involvement in medical care: Relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1989, 4: 506–511.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Taylor TR: Understanding the choices that patients make. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 2000, 13: 124–133.PubMedCrossRef Taylor TR: Understanding the choices that patients make. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 2000, 13: 124–133.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Albrecht G, Hoogstraten J: Satisfaction as a determinant of compliance. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998, 26: 139–146.PubMedCrossRef Albrecht G, Hoogstraten J: Satisfaction as a determinant of compliance. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998, 26: 139–146.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference McCracken LM, Klock A, Mingay DJ, Asbury JK, Sinclair DM: Assessment of satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain. Journal of Pain & Symptom Management 1997, 14: 292–299. 10.1016/S0885-3924(97)00225-XCrossRef McCracken LM, Klock A, Mingay DJ, Asbury JK, Sinclair DM: Assessment of satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain. Journal of Pain & Symptom Management 1997, 14: 292–299. 10.1016/S0885-3924(97)00225-XCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Weaver M, Patrick DL, Markson LE, Martin D, Frederic I, Berger M: Issues in the measurement of satisfaction with treatment. Am J Manag Care 1997, 3: 579–594.PubMed Weaver M, Patrick DL, Markson LE, Martin D, Frederic I, Berger M: Issues in the measurement of satisfaction with treatment. Am J Manag Care 1997, 3: 579–594.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Anderson RB, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH: Physical Symptoms Distress Index: a sensitive tool to evaluate the impact of pharmacological agents on quality of life. Archives of Internal Medicine 1999, 159: 693–700. 10.1001/archinte.159.7.693PubMedCrossRef Anderson RB, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH: Physical Symptoms Distress Index: a sensitive tool to evaluate the impact of pharmacological agents on quality of life. Archives of Internal Medicine 1999, 159: 693–700. 10.1001/archinte.159.7.693PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Awad AG, Voruganti LN: Quality of life and new antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Are patients better off? Int J Soc Psychiatry 1999, 45: 268–275.PubMedCrossRef Awad AG, Voruganti LN: Quality of life and new antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Are patients better off? Int J Soc Psychiatry 1999, 45: 268–275.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Diamond R: Drugs and the quality of life: the patient's point of view. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1985, 46: 29–35.PubMed Diamond R: Drugs and the quality of life: the patient's point of view. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1985, 46: 29–35.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Adverse effects of the atypical antipsychotics. Collaborative Working Group on Clinical Trial Evaluations J Clin Psychiatry 1998,59(Suppl 12):17–22. Adverse effects of the atypical antipsychotics. Collaborative Working Group on Clinical Trial Evaluations J Clin Psychiatry 1998,59(Suppl 12):17–22.
17.
go back to reference Gelber RD, Gelman RS, Goldhirsch A: A quality-of-life-oriented endpoint for comparing therapies. Biometrics 1989, 45: 781–795.PubMedCrossRef Gelber RD, Gelman RS, Goldhirsch A: A quality-of-life-oriented endpoint for comparing therapies. Biometrics 1989, 45: 781–795.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gopalakrishna P, Mummalaneni V: Examination of the role of social class as a predictor of choice of health care provider and satisfaction received a model and empirical test. Journal of Ambulatory Care Marketing 1992, 5: 35–48.PubMed Gopalakrishna P, Mummalaneni V: Examination of the role of social class as a predictor of choice of health care provider and satisfaction received a model and empirical test. Journal of Ambulatory Care Marketing 1992, 5: 35–48.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Greiner DL, Addy SN: Sumatriptan use in a large group-model health maintenance organization. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 1996, 53: 633–638.PubMed Greiner DL, Addy SN: Sumatriptan use in a large group-model health maintenance organization. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 1996, 53: 633–638.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Llewellyn-Thomas HA: Investigating patients' preferences for different treatment options. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 1997, 29: 45–64.PubMed Llewellyn-Thomas HA: Investigating patients' preferences for different treatment options. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 1997, 29: 45–64.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Schommer JC, Kucukarslan SN: Measuring patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 1997, 54: 2721–2732.PubMed Schommer JC, Kucukarslan SN: Measuring patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 1997, 54: 2721–2732.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Robinson A, Thomson R: Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Quality in Health Care 2001,10(Suppl 1):i34-i38.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Robinson A, Thomson R: Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Quality in Health Care 2001,10(Suppl 1):i34-i38.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fraenkel L, Bodardus S, Wittink DR: Understanding patient preferences for the treatment of lupus nephritis with adaptive conjoint analysis. Med Care 2001, 39: 1203–1216. 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00007PubMedCrossRef Fraenkel L, Bodardus S, Wittink DR: Understanding patient preferences for the treatment of lupus nephritis with adaptive conjoint analysis. Med Care 2001, 39: 1203–1216. 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00007PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hakim Z, Pathak DS: Modelling the EuroQol data: a comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modelling. Health Economics 1999, 8: 103–116. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199903)8:2<103::AID-HEC393>3.3.CO;2-5PubMedCrossRef Hakim Z, Pathak DS: Modelling the EuroQol data: a comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modelling. Health Economics 1999, 8: 103–116. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199903)8:2<103::AID-HEC393>3.3.CO;2-5PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Feighner JP: Impact of anxiety therapy on patients' quality of life. American Journal of Medicine 1987, 82: 14–19.PubMedCrossRef Feighner JP: Impact of anxiety therapy on patients' quality of life. American Journal of Medicine 1987, 82: 14–19.PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Dunbar-Jacob J, Erlen JA, Schlenk EA, Ryan CM, Sereika SM, Doswell WM: Adherence in chronic disease. Annual Review of Nursing Research 2000, 18: 48–90.PubMed Dunbar-Jacob J, Erlen JA, Schlenk EA, Ryan CM, Sereika SM, Doswell WM: Adherence in chronic disease. Annual Review of Nursing Research 2000, 18: 48–90.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Bukstein DA: Incorporating quality of life data into managed care formulary decisions: a case study with salmeterol. Am J Manag Care 1997, 3: 1701–1706.PubMed Bukstein DA: Incorporating quality of life data into managed care formulary decisions: a case study with salmeterol. Am J Manag Care 1997, 3: 1701–1706.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Fottler MD, Ford RC, Bach SA: Measuring patient satisfaction in healthcare organizations: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc 1997, 2: 227–239.PubMed Fottler MD, Ford RC, Bach SA: Measuring patient satisfaction in healthcare organizations: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc 1997, 2: 227–239.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Ross CK, Steward CA, Sinacore JM: The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction. Med Care 1993, 31: 1138–1149.PubMedCrossRef Ross CK, Steward CA, Sinacore JM: The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction. Med Care 1993, 31: 1138–1149.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Aharony L, Strasser S: Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore. Medical Care Review 1993, 50: 49–79.PubMedCrossRef Aharony L, Strasser S: Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore. Medical Care Review 1993, 50: 49–79.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Strasser S, Aharony L, Greenberger D: The patient satisfaction process: moving toward a comprehensive model. Medical Care Review 1993, 50: 219–248.PubMedCrossRef Strasser S, Aharony L, Greenberger D: The patient satisfaction process: moving toward a comprehensive model. Medical Care Review 1993, 50: 219–248.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bredart A, Razavi D, Delvaux N, Goodman V, Farvacques C, Van Heer C: A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care for cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer 1998, 6: 518–523. 10.1007/s005200050207PubMedCrossRef Bredart A, Razavi D, Delvaux N, Goodman V, Farvacques C, Van Heer C: A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care for cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer 1998, 6: 518–523. 10.1007/s005200050207PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, Didier F, Scaffidi E, Fonzo D, Autier P, de Haes JC: Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using information on patients' satisfaction. Oncology 2001, 61: 120–128. 10.1159/000055362PubMedCrossRef Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, Didier F, Scaffidi E, Fonzo D, Autier P, de Haes JC: Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using information on patients' satisfaction. Oncology 2001, 61: 120–128. 10.1159/000055362PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hudak PL, Wright JG: The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 2000, 25: 3167–3177. 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00012PubMedCrossRef Hudak PL, Wright JG: The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 2000, 25: 3167–3177. 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00012PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Lubeck DP, Litwin MS, Henning JM, Mathias SD, Bloor L, Carroll PR: An instrument to measure patient satisfaction with healthcare in an observational database: results of a validation study using data from CaPSURE. Am J Manag Care 2000, 6: 70–76.PubMed Lubeck DP, Litwin MS, Henning JM, Mathias SD, Bloor L, Carroll PR: An instrument to measure patient satisfaction with healthcare in an observational database: results of a validation study using data from CaPSURE. Am J Manag Care 2000, 6: 70–76.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Westbrook JI: Patient satisfaction: methodological issues and research findings. Australian Health Review 1993, 16: 75–88.PubMed Westbrook JI: Patient satisfaction: methodological issues and research findings. Australian Health Review 1993, 16: 75–88.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Avis M, Bond M, Arthur A: Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction. J Adv Nurs 1995, 22: 316–322. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020316.xPubMedCrossRef Avis M, Bond M, Arthur A: Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction. J Adv Nurs 1995, 22: 316–322. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020316.xPubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Bradley C: Diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Change version for use alongside status version provides appropriate solution where ceiling effects occur. Diabetes Care 1999, 22: 530–532.PubMedCrossRef Bradley C: Diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Change version for use alongside status version provides appropriate solution where ceiling effects occur. Diabetes Care 1999, 22: 530–532.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Carr-Hill RA: The measurement of patient satisfaction. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1992, 14: 236–249.PubMed Carr-Hill RA: The measurement of patient satisfaction. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1992, 14: 236–249.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Lin B, Kelly E: Methodological issues in patient satisfaction surveys. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 1995, 8: 32–37. 10.1108/09526869510098840PubMedCrossRef Lin B, Kelly E: Methodological issues in patient satisfaction surveys. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 1995, 8: 32–37. 10.1108/09526869510098840PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Pouwer F, Snoek FJ, Heine RJ: Ceiling effect reduces the validity of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. Diabetes Care 1998, 21: 2039.PubMedCrossRef Pouwer F, Snoek FJ, Heine RJ: Ceiling effect reduces the validity of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. Diabetes Care 1998, 21: 2039.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Petterson T, Lee P, Hollis S, Young B, Newton P, Dornan T: Well-being and treatment satisfaction in older people with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998, 21: 930–935.PubMedCrossRef Petterson T, Lee P, Hollis S, Young B, Newton P, Dornan T: Well-being and treatment satisfaction in older people with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998, 21: 930–935.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Singh J, Wood VR, Goolsby J: Consumers' satisfaction with health care delivery: issues of measurement, issues of research design. Journal of Ambulatory Care Marketing 1990, 4: 105–115.PubMedCrossRef Singh J, Wood VR, Goolsby J: Consumers' satisfaction with health care delivery: issues of measurement, issues of research design. Journal of Ambulatory Care Marketing 1990, 4: 105–115.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Sitzia J, Wood N: Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 1998, 10: 311–317. 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311PubMedCrossRef Sitzia J, Wood N: Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 1998, 10: 311–317. 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Sitzia J: How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 1999, 11: 319–328. 10.1093/intqhc/11.4.319PubMedCrossRef Sitzia J: How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 1999, 11: 319–328. 10.1093/intqhc/11.4.319PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK: The Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) Scales and the Service Satisfaction Scale-30 (SSS-30). In Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice (Edited by: Sederer L, Dickey B). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1996, 120–127. Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK: The Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) Scales and the Service Satisfaction Scale-30 (SSS-30). In Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice (Edited by: Sederer L, Dickey B). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1996, 120–127.
49.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use 2 Edition Oxford, England: Oxford University Press 1995. Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use 2 Edition Oxford, England: Oxford University Press 1995.
50.
go back to reference Williams SA, Swanson MS: The effect of reading ability and response formats on patients' abilities to respond to a patient satisfaction scale. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 2001, 32: 60–67.PubMed Williams SA, Swanson MS: The effect of reading ability and response formats on patients' abilities to respond to a patient satisfaction scale. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 2001, 32: 60–67.PubMed
51.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Hays RD: Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med Care 1988, 26: 393–402.PubMedCrossRef Ware JE Jr, Hays RD: Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med Care 1988, 26: 393–402.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Torrance GW, Feeny D, Furlong W: Visual analog scales: do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Medical Decision Making 2001, 21: 329–334. 10.1177/02729890122062622PubMedCrossRef Torrance GW, Feeny D, Furlong W: Visual analog scales: do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Medical Decision Making 2001, 21: 329–334. 10.1177/02729890122062622PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Hanita M: Self-report measures of patient utility: should we trust them? J Clin Epidemiol 2000, 53: 469–476. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00205-XPubMedCrossRef Hanita M: Self-report measures of patient utility: should we trust them? J Clin Epidemiol 2000, 53: 469–476. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00205-XPubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Gill K: Social psychological artifacts in the measurement of consumer satisfaction with health care. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering 1996,57(2-B):1495. Gill K: Social psychological artifacts in the measurement of consumer satisfaction with health care. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering 1996,57(2-B):1495.
55.
go back to reference Chatterton ML, Scott-Lennox J, Wu AW, Scott J: Quality of life and treatment satisfaction after the addition of lamivudine or lamivudine plus loviride to zidovudine-containing regimens in treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection. PharmacoEconomics 1999, 15 Suppl 1: 67–74.PubMedCrossRef Chatterton ML, Scott-Lennox J, Wu AW, Scott J: Quality of life and treatment satisfaction after the addition of lamivudine or lamivudine plus loviride to zidovudine-containing regimens in treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection. PharmacoEconomics 1999, 15 Suppl 1: 67–74.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Cohen JA, Beall D, Beck A, Rawlings J, Miller DW, Clements B, Pait DG, Batenhorst A: Sumatriptan treatment for migraine in a health maintenance organization: economic, humanistic, and clinical outcomes. Clinical Therapeutics 1999, 21: 190–204. 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88278-8PubMedCrossRef Cohen JA, Beall D, Beck A, Rawlings J, Miller DW, Clements B, Pait DG, Batenhorst A: Sumatriptan treatment for migraine in a health maintenance organization: economic, humanistic, and clinical outcomes. Clinical Therapeutics 1999, 21: 190–204. 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88278-8PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Colman SS, Brod MI, Krishnamurthy A, Rowland CR, Jirgens KJ, Gomez-Mancilla B: Treatment satisfaction, functional status, and health-related quality of life of migraine patients treated with almotriptan or sumatriptan. Clinical Therapeutics 2001, 23: 127–145. 10.1016/S0149-2918(01)80036-9PubMedCrossRef Colman SS, Brod MI, Krishnamurthy A, Rowland CR, Jirgens KJ, Gomez-Mancilla B: Treatment satisfaction, functional status, and health-related quality of life of migraine patients treated with almotriptan or sumatriptan. Clinical Therapeutics 2001, 23: 127–145. 10.1016/S0149-2918(01)80036-9PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Lewis R, Bennett CJ, Borkon WD, Boykin WH, Althof SE, Stecher VJ, Siegel RL: Patient and partner satisfaction with Viagra (sildenafil citrate) treatment as determined by the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. Urology 2001, 57: 960–965. 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)00945-1PubMedCrossRef Lewis R, Bennett CJ, Borkon WD, Boykin WH, Althof SE, Stecher VJ, Siegel RL: Patient and partner satisfaction with Viagra (sildenafil citrate) treatment as determined by the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. Urology 2001, 57: 960–965. 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)00945-1PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Mathias SD, Warren EH, Colwell HH, Sung JC: A new treatment satisfaction measure for asthmatics: a validation study. Qual Life Res 2000, 9: 873–882. 10.1023/A:1008913209828PubMedCrossRef Mathias SD, Warren EH, Colwell HH, Sung JC: A new treatment satisfaction measure for asthmatics: a validation study. Qual Life Res 2000, 9: 873–882. 10.1023/A:1008913209828PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Payne R, Mathias SD, Pasta DJ, Wanke LA, Williams R, Mahmoud R: Quality of life and cancer pain: satisfaction and side effects with transdermal fentanyl versus oral morphine. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1998, 16: 1588–1593.PubMed Payne R, Mathias SD, Pasta DJ, Wanke LA, Williams R, Mahmoud R: Quality of life and cancer pain: satisfaction and side effects with transdermal fentanyl versus oral morphine. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1998, 16: 1588–1593.PubMed
61.
go back to reference Glasser BG, Strauss AL: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research New York, Aldine de Gruyter 1967. Glasser BG, Strauss AL: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research New York, Aldine de Gruyter 1967.
62.
go back to reference Krueger HP, Patton MQ: Focus Groups. A practical guide for applied research Newbury Park, Sage Publications 1988. Krueger HP, Patton MQ: Focus Groups. A practical guide for applied research Newbury Park, Sage Publications 1988.
63.
go back to reference Merton RK, Friske M, Kendall PL: The Focused Interview. A Manual of Problems and Procedures 2 Edition New York, The Free Press 1990. Merton RK, Friske M, Kendall PL: The Focused Interview. A Manual of Problems and Procedures 2 Edition New York, The Free Press 1990.
64.
go back to reference Grogan S, Conner M, Norman P, Willits D, Porter I: Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services. Quality in Health Care 2000, 9: 210–215. 10.1136/qhc.9.4.210PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Grogan S, Conner M, Norman P, Willits D, Porter I: Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services. Quality in Health Care 2000, 9: 210–215. 10.1136/qhc.9.4.210PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Gorsuch RL: Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment 1997, 68: 532–560.PubMedCrossRef Gorsuch RL: Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment 1997, 68: 532–560.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Gorsuch RL: New procedures for extension analysis in exploratory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1997, 57: 725–740.CrossRef Gorsuch RL: New procedures for extension analysis in exploratory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1997, 57: 725–740.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Russell D: In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28: 1629–1646. 10.1177/014616702237645CrossRef Russell D: In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28: 1629–1646. 10.1177/014616702237645CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Borner MM, Schoffski P, de Wit R, Caponigro F, Comella G, Sulkes A, Greim G, Peters GJ, van der BK, Wanders J, et al.: Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer. European Journal of Cancer 2002, 38: 349–358. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00371-9PubMedCrossRef Borner MM, Schoffski P, de Wit R, Caponigro F, Comella G, Sulkes A, Greim G, Peters GJ, van der BK, Wanders J, et al.: Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer. European Journal of Cancer 2002, 38: 349–358. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00371-9PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, Warner E: Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1997, 15: 110–115.PubMed Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, Warner E: Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1997, 15: 110–115.PubMed
70.
go back to reference Stier DM, Gause D, Joseph WS, Schein JR, Broering JM, Warolin KL, Doyle JJ: Patient satisfaction with oral versus nonoral therapeutic approaches in onychomycosis. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2001, 91: 521–527.PubMedCrossRef Stier DM, Gause D, Joseph WS, Schein JR, Broering JM, Warolin KL, Doyle JJ: Patient satisfaction with oral versus nonoral therapeutic approaches in onychomycosis. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2001, 91: 521–527.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Liem WH, McCullough JL, Weinstein GD: Effectiveness of topical therapy for psoriasis: results of a national survey. Cutis 1995, 55: 306–310.PubMed Liem WH, McCullough JL, Weinstein GD: Effectiveness of topical therapy for psoriasis: results of a national survey. Cutis 1995, 55: 306–310.PubMed
72.
go back to reference Cronk BC, West JL: Personality research on the Internet: a comparison of Web-based and traditional instruments in take-home and in-class settings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2002, 34: 177–180.CrossRef Cronk BC, West JL: Personality research on the Internet: a comparison of Web-based and traditional instruments in take-home and in-class settings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2002, 34: 177–180.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Hatcher M: Internet usage and potential impact for acute care hospitals: survey in the United States. Journal of Medical Systems 1998, 22: 371–378. 10.1023/A:1020662124683PubMedCrossRef Hatcher M: Internet usage and potential impact for acute care hospitals: survey in the United States. Journal of Medical Systems 1998, 22: 371–378. 10.1023/A:1020662124683PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Ness TJ, Jones L, Smith H: Use of compounded topical analgesics – results of an Internet survey. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2002, 27: 309–312. 10.1053/rapm.2002.31212 Ness TJ, Jones L, Smith H: Use of compounded topical analgesics – results of an Internet survey. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2002, 27: 309–312. 10.1053/rapm.2002.31212
75.
go back to reference Rzymski P: A study of Internet use by doctors and patients in Poland. Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare 2001, 7: 344–347. 10.1258/1357633011936985CrossRef Rzymski P: A study of Internet use by doctors and patients in Poland. Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare 2001, 7: 344–347. 10.1258/1357633011936985CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Duff S: Paying more for results. CMS tries to enlist Premier to tie hospital reimbursement to quality performance. Modern Healthcare 2002, 32: 9.PubMed Duff S: Paying more for results. CMS tries to enlist Premier to tie hospital reimbursement to quality performance. Modern Healthcare 2002, 32: 9.PubMed
77.
go back to reference Clark PA: Medical practices' sensitivity to patients' needs. Opportunities and practices for improvement. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 2003, 26: 110–123.PubMedCrossRef Clark PA: Medical practices' sensitivity to patients' needs. Opportunities and practices for improvement. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 2003, 26: 110–123.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease
Authors
Mark J Atkinson
Anusha Sinha
Steven L Hass
Shoshana S Colman
Ritesh N Kumar
Meryl Brod
Clayton R Rowland
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2004
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-12

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2004 Go to the issue