Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2009

Open Access 01-10-2009 | Breast Oncology

Obtaining Adequate Surgical Margins in Breast-Conserving Therapy for Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Current Modalities and Future Directions

Authors: Rick G. Pleijhuis, BSc, Maurits Graafland, BSc, Jakob de Vries, MD, PhD, Joost Bart, MD, PhD, Johannes S. de Jong, MD, PhD, Gooitzen M. van Dam, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Inadequate surgical margins represent a high risk for adverse clinical outcome in breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for early-stage breast cancer. The majority of studies report positive resection margins in 20% to 40% of the patients who underwent BCT. This may result in an increased local recurrence (LR) rate or additional surgery and, consequently, adverse affects on cosmesis, psychological distress, and health costs. In the literature, various risk factors are reported to be associated with positive margin status after lumpectomy, which may allow the surgeon to distinguish those patients with a higher a priori risk for re-excision. However, most risk factors are related to tumor biology and patient characteristics, which cannot be modified as such. Therefore, efforts to reduce the number of positive margins should focus on optimizing the surgical procedure itself, because the surgeon lacks real-time intraoperative information on the presence of positive resection margins during breast-conserving surgery. This review presents the status of pre- and intraoperative modalities currently used in BCT. Furthermore, innovative intraoperative approaches, such as positron emission tomography, radioguided occult lesion localization, and near-infrared fluorescence optical imaging, are addressed, which have to prove their potential value in improving surgical outcome and reducing the need for re-excision in BCT.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;56:1–95.PubMed Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;56:1–95.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:581–92.PubMedCrossRef Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:581–92.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Medina-Franco H, Barca-Perez L, Garcia-Alvarez MN, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) versus wire-guided lumpectomy for non-palpable breast lesions: a randomized prospective evaluation. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:108–11.PubMedCrossRef Medina-Franco H, Barca-Perez L, Garcia-Alvarez MN, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) versus wire-guided lumpectomy for non-palpable breast lesions: a randomized prospective evaluation. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:108–11.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:383–93.PubMedCrossRef Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:383–93.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kramer S, Darsow M, Kummel S, et al. Breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer—oncological and reconstructive aspects. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 2008;48:56–62.PubMedCrossRef Kramer S, Darsow M, Kummel S, et al. Breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer—oncological and reconstructive aspects. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 2008;48:56–62.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schwartz GF, Veronesi U, Clough KB, et al. Consensus conference on breast conservation. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:198–207.PubMedCrossRef Schwartz GF, Veronesi U, Clough KB, et al. Consensus conference on breast conservation. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:198–207.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Blichert-Toft M, Nielsen M, During M, et al. Long-term results of breast conserving surgery vs. mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the Danish randomized DBCG-82TM protocol. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:672–81.PubMedCrossRef Blichert-Toft M, Nielsen M, During M, et al. Long-term results of breast conserving surgery vs. mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the Danish randomized DBCG-82TM protocol. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:672–81.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.PubMedCrossRef van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jacobs L. Positive margins: the challenge continues for breast surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1271–2.PubMedCrossRef Jacobs L. Positive margins: the challenge continues for breast surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1271–2.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kreike B, Hart AA, van de Velde T, et al. Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:1014–21.PubMed Kreike B, Hart AA, van de Velde T, et al. Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:1014–21.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Komoike Y, Akiyama F, Iino Y, et al. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer: risk factors and impact on distant metastases. Cancer. 2006;106:35–41.PubMedCrossRef Komoike Y, Akiyama F, Iino Y, et al. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer: risk factors and impact on distant metastases. Cancer. 2006;106:35–41.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nottage MK, Kopciuk KA, Tzontcheva A, et al. Analysis of incidence and prognostic factors for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and its impact on disease-specific survival of women with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:R44.PubMedCrossRef Nottage MK, Kopciuk KA, Tzontcheva A, et al. Analysis of incidence and prognostic factors for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and its impact on disease-specific survival of women with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:R44.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bijker N, Peterse JL, Duchateau L, et al. Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2263–71.PubMed Bijker N, Peterse JL, Duchateau L, et al. Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2263–71.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mannell A. Breast-conserving therapy in breast cancer patients—a 12-year experience. S Afr J Surg. 2005;43:28–30.PubMed Mannell A. Breast-conserving therapy in breast cancer patients—a 12-year experience. S Afr J Surg. 2005;43:28–30.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rubio IT, Marco V. The importance of surgical margins in conservative surgery for breast cancer. Cir Esp. 2006;79:3–9.PubMedCrossRef Rubio IT, Marco V. The importance of surgical margins in conservative surgery for breast cancer. Cir Esp. 2006;79:3–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Miller AR, Brandao G, Prihoda TJ, et al. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86:134–40.PubMedCrossRef Miller AR, Brandao G, Prihoda TJ, et al. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86:134–40.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Weng EY, Juillard GJ, Parker RG, et al. Outcomes and factors impacting local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer. 2000;88:1643–9.PubMedCrossRef Weng EY, Juillard GJ, Parker RG, et al. Outcomes and factors impacting local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer. 2000;88:1643–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1668–75.PubMed Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1668–75.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Hagendoorn LJ, et al. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188:399–402.PubMedCrossRef Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Hagendoorn LJ, et al. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188:399–402.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cao D, Lin C, Woo SH, et al. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1625–32.PubMedCrossRef Cao D, Lin C, Woo SH, et al. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1625–32.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sacchini V, Beal K, Goldberg J, et al. Study of quadrant high-dose intraoperative radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1105–10.PubMedCrossRef Sacchini V, Beal K, Goldberg J, et al. Study of quadrant high-dose intraoperative radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1105–10.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Reitsamer R, Sedlmayer F, Kopp M, et al. Concepts and techniques of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:40–6.PubMedCrossRef Reitsamer R, Sedlmayer F, Kopp M, et al. Concepts and techniques of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:40–6.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–106.PubMed Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–106.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Reitsamer R, Sedlmayer F, Kopp M, et al. The Salzburg concept of intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer: results and considerations. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:2882–7.PubMedCrossRef Reitsamer R, Sedlmayer F, Kopp M, et al. The Salzburg concept of intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer: results and considerations. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:2882–7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lemanski C, Azria D, Thezenas S, et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy given as a boost for early breast cancer: long-term clinical and cosmetic results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:1410–5.PubMed Lemanski C, Azria D, Thezenas S, et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy given as a boost for early breast cancer: long-term clinical and cosmetic results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:1410–5.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Bauer L, Kehrer T, et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in patients with early-stage breast cancer—acute toxicity. Onkologie. 2006;29:77–82.PubMedCrossRef Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Bauer L, Kehrer T, et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in patients with early-stage breast cancer—acute toxicity. Onkologie. 2006;29:77–82.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans PM, et al. Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3259–65.PubMedCrossRef Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans PM, et al. Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3259–65.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wasser K, Schoeber C, Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, et al. Early mammographic and sonographic findings after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1865–74.PubMedCrossRef Wasser K, Schoeber C, Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, et al. Early mammographic and sonographic findings after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1865–74.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:1005–15.PubMed Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:1005–15.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Kunos C, Latson L, Overmoyer B, et al. Breast conservation surgery achieving ≥2 mm tumor-free margins results in decreased local-regional recurrence rates. Breast J. 2006;12:28–36.PubMedCrossRef Kunos C, Latson L, Overmoyer B, et al. Breast conservation surgery achieving ≥2 mm tumor-free margins results in decreased local-regional recurrence rates. Breast J. 2006;12:28–36.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Vargas C, Kestin L, Go N, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence and cause-specific survival in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:1514–21.PubMedCrossRef Vargas C, Kestin L, Go N, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence and cause-specific survival in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:1514–21.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, et al. Impact of young age on outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:296–306.PubMed Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, et al. Impact of young age on outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:296–306.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Zavagno G, Goldin E, Mencarelli R, et al. Role of resection margins in patients treated with breast conservation surgery. Cancer. 2008;112:1923–31.PubMedCrossRef Zavagno G, Goldin E, Mencarelli R, et al. Role of resection margins in patients treated with breast conservation surgery. Cancer. 2008;112:1923–31.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56:979–90.PubMedCrossRef Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56:979–90.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Jobsen JJ, van der Palen J, Ong F, et al. Differences in outcome for positive margins in a large cohort of breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Acta Oncol. 2007;46:172–80.PubMedCrossRef Jobsen JJ, van der Palen J, Ong F, et al. Differences in outcome for positive margins in a large cohort of breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Acta Oncol. 2007;46:172–80.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, et al. Can patient-, treatment- and pathology-related characteristics explain the high local recurrence rate following breast-conserving therapy in young patients? Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:932–44.PubMedCrossRef Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, et al. Can patient-, treatment- and pathology-related characteristics explain the high local recurrence rate following breast-conserving therapy in young patients? Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:932–44.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.PubMedCrossRef Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1458–71.PubMedCrossRef Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1458–71.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, et al. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:333–9.PubMedCrossRef Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, et al. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:333–9.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Yildirim E. Locoregional recurrence in breast carcinoma patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:258–63.PubMed Yildirim E. Locoregional recurrence in breast carcinoma patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:258–63.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Kennecke H, McArthur H, Olivotto IA, et al. Risk of early recurrence among postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Cancer. 2008;112:1437–44.PubMedCrossRef Kennecke H, McArthur H, Olivotto IA, et al. Risk of early recurrence among postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Cancer. 2008;112:1437–44.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Noh WC, Paik NS, Kim MS, et al. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving therapy: a comparison of quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy at a single institution. World J Surg. 2005;29:1001–6.PubMedCrossRef Noh WC, Paik NS, Kim MS, et al. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving therapy: a comparison of quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy at a single institution. World J Surg. 2005;29:1001–6.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, et al. Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:277–300.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, et al. Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:277–300.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Cho KR, Seo BK, Kim CH, et al. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings. Yonsei Med J. 2008;49:103–10.PubMedCrossRef Cho KR, Seo BK, Kim CH, et al. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings. Yonsei Med J. 2008;49:103–10.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Ikeda DM, Andersson I. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances. Radiology. 1989;172:661–6.PubMed Ikeda DM, Andersson I. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances. Radiology. 1989;172:661–6.PubMed
48.
go back to reference Rauscher GH, Johnson TP, Cho YI, et al. Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:748–57.PubMedCrossRef Rauscher GH, Johnson TP, Cho YI, et al. Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:748–57.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O’Shaughnessy KF, et al. Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening. Radiology. 2003;226:494–503.PubMedCrossRef Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O’Shaughnessy KF, et al. Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening. Radiology. 2003;226:494–503.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Leff DR, Warren OJ, Enfield LC, et al. Diffuse optical imaging of the healthy and diseased breast: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;108:9–22.PubMedCrossRef Leff DR, Warren OJ, Enfield LC, et al. Diffuse optical imaging of the healthy and diseased breast: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;108:9–22.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Deurloo EE, Klein Zeggelink WF, Teertstra HJ, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:692–701.PubMedCrossRef Deurloo EE, Klein Zeggelink WF, Teertstra HJ, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:692–701.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Faverly DR, Hendriks JH, Holland R. Breast carcinomas of limited extent: frequency, radiologic-pathologic characteristics, and surgical margin requirements. Cancer. 2001;91:647–59.PubMedCrossRef Faverly DR, Hendriks JH, Holland R. Breast carcinomas of limited extent: frequency, radiologic-pathologic characteristics, and surgical margin requirements. Cancer. 2001;91:647–59.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Zonderland HM, Hermans J, Coerkamp EG. Ultrasound variables and their prognostic value in a population of 1103 patients with 272 breast cancers. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1562–8.PubMedCrossRef Zonderland HM, Hermans J, Coerkamp EG. Ultrasound variables and their prognostic value in a population of 1103 patients with 272 breast cancers. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1562–8.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Hwang ES, Kinkel K, Esserman LJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma-in-situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:381–8.PubMedCrossRef Hwang ES, Kinkel K, Esserman LJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma-in-situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:381–8.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:190–7.PubMedCrossRef Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:190–7.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007;370:485–92.PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007;370:485–92.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E, et al. MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component. Eur J Radiol. 2007;62:273–82.PubMedCrossRef van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E, et al. MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component. Eur J Radiol. 2007;62:273–82.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Bhattacharyya M, Ryan D, Carpenter R, et al. Using MRI to plan breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:289–93.PubMedCrossRef Bhattacharyya M, Ryan D, Carpenter R, et al. Using MRI to plan breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:289–93.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang WT, et al. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:386–91.PubMedCrossRef Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang WT, et al. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:386–91.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:161–9.PubMedCrossRef Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:161–9.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Morrow M, Freedman G. A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006;14:363–78, vi.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M, Freedman G. A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006;14:363–78, vi.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Burkholder HC, Witherspoon LE, Burns RP, et al. Breast surgery techniques: preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons. Am Surg. 2007;73:574–578.PubMed Burkholder HC, Witherspoon LE, Burns RP, et al. Breast surgery techniques: preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons. Am Surg. 2007;73:574–578.PubMed
64.
go back to reference Schmidt-Ullrich R, Wazer DE, Tercilla O, et al. Tumor margin assessment as a guide to optimal conservation surgery and irradiation in early stage breast carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;17:733–8.PubMed Schmidt-Ullrich R, Wazer DE, Tercilla O, et al. Tumor margin assessment as a guide to optimal conservation surgery and irradiation in early stage breast carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;17:733–8.PubMed
65.
go back to reference Thind CR, Desmond S, Harris O, et al. Radio-guided localization of clinically occult breast lesions (ROLL): a DGH experience. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:681–6.PubMedCrossRef Thind CR, Desmond S, Harris O, et al. Radio-guided localization of clinically occult breast lesions (ROLL): a DGH experience. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:681–6.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Kelly P, Winslow EH. Needle wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: sensations, anxiety levels, and informational needs. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:639–45.PubMed Kelly P, Winslow EH. Needle wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: sensations, anxiety levels, and informational needs. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:639–45.PubMed
67.
go back to reference Haid A, Knauer M, Dunzinger S, et al. Intra-operative sonography: a valuable aid during breast-conserving surgery for occult breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3090–101.PubMedCrossRef Haid A, Knauer M, Dunzinger S, et al. Intra-operative sonography: a valuable aid during breast-conserving surgery for occult breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3090–101.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Ngo C, Pollet AG, Laperrelle J, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2485–9.PubMedCrossRef Ngo C, Pollet AG, Laperrelle J, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2485–9.PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Bennett IC, Greenslade J, Chiam H. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. World J Surg. 2005;29:369–74.PubMedCrossRef Bennett IC, Greenslade J, Chiam H. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. World J Surg. 2005;29:369–74.PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Rahusen FD, Bremers AJ, Fabry HF, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:994–8.PubMedCrossRef Rahusen FD, Bremers AJ, Fabry HF, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:994–8.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Moore MM, Whitney LA, Cerilli L, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2001;233:761–8.PubMedCrossRef Moore MM, Whitney LA, Cerilli L, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2001;233:761–8.PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Klimberg VS. Advances in the diagnosis and excision of breast cancer. Am Surg. 2003;69:11–4.PubMed Klimberg VS. Advances in the diagnosis and excision of breast cancer. Am Surg. 2003;69:11–4.PubMed
73.
go back to reference Smith LF, Rubio IT, Henry-Tillman R, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:419–23.PubMedCrossRef Smith LF, Rubio IT, Henry-Tillman R, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:419–23.PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Karni T, Pappo I, Sandbank J, et al. A device for real-time, intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery. Am J Surg. 2007;194:467–73.PubMedCrossRef Karni T, Pappo I, Sandbank J, et al. A device for real-time, intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery. Am J Surg. 2007;194:467–73.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Allweis TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2008;196:483–9.PubMedCrossRef Allweis TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2008;196:483–9.PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Huynh PT, Jarolimek AM, Daye S. The false-negative mammogram. Radiographics. 1998;18:1137–54.PubMed Huynh PT, Jarolimek AM, Daye S. The false-negative mammogram. Radiographics. 1998;18:1137–54.PubMed
77.
go back to reference Lee CH, Carter D. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:81–6.PubMed Lee CH, Carter D. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:81–6.PubMed
78.
go back to reference Tafra L, Fine R, Whitworth P, et al. Prospective randomized study comparing cryo-assisted and needle-wire localization of ultrasound-visible breast tumors. Am J Surg. 2006;192:462–70.PubMedCrossRef Tafra L, Fine R, Whitworth P, et al. Prospective randomized study comparing cryo-assisted and needle-wire localization of ultrasound-visible breast tumors. Am J Surg. 2006;192:462–70.PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Weber S, Storm FK, Stitt J, et al. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery. Cancer J Sci Am. 1997;3:273–7.PubMed Weber S, Storm FK, Stitt J, et al. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery. Cancer J Sci Am. 1997;3:273–7.PubMed
80.
go back to reference Riedl O, Fitzal F, Mader N, et al. Intraoperative frozen section analysis for breast-conserving therapy in 1016 patients with breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:264–70.PubMed Riedl O, Fitzal F, Mader N, et al. Intraoperative frozen section analysis for breast-conserving therapy in 1016 patients with breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:264–70.PubMed
81.
go back to reference Cendan JC, Coco D, Copeland EM. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:194–8.PubMedCrossRef Cendan JC, Coco D, Copeland EM. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:194–8.PubMedCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Olson TP, Harter J, Munoz A, et al. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2953–60.PubMedCrossRef Olson TP, Harter J, Munoz A, et al. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2953–60.PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Camp ER, McAuliffe PF, Gilroy JS, et al. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:855–61.PubMedCrossRef Camp ER, McAuliffe PF, Gilroy JS, et al. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:855–61.PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:220–6.PubMedCrossRef Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:220–6.PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Valdes EK, Boolbol SK, Ali I, et al. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2940–5.PubMed Valdes EK, Boolbol SK, Ali I, et al. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2940–5.PubMed
86.
go back to reference Bakhshandeh M, Tutuncuoglu SO, Fischer G, et al. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:656–9.PubMedCrossRef Bakhshandeh M, Tutuncuoglu SO, Fischer G, et al. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:656–9.PubMedCrossRef
87.
go back to reference Weinberg E, Cox C, Dupont E, et al. Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation. Am J Surg. 2004;188:349–54.PubMedCrossRef Weinberg E, Cox C, Dupont E, et al. Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation. Am J Surg. 2004;188:349–54.PubMedCrossRef
88.
go back to reference Malik HZ, George WD, Mallon EA, et al. Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:464–9.PubMedCrossRef Malik HZ, George WD, Mallon EA, et al. Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:464–9.PubMedCrossRef
89.
go back to reference Huston TL, Pigalarga R, Osborne MP, et al. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;192:509–12.PubMedCrossRef Huston TL, Pigalarga R, Osborne MP, et al. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;192:509–12.PubMedCrossRef
90.
go back to reference Janes SE, Stankhe M, Singh S, et al. Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2006;15:326–30.PubMedCrossRef Janes SE, Stankhe M, Singh S, et al. Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2006;15:326–30.PubMedCrossRef
91.
go back to reference Hall NC, Povoski SP, Murrey DA, et al. Combined approach of perioperative 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and intraoperative 18F-FDG handheld gamma probe detection for tumor localization and verification of complete tumor resection in breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5:143.PubMedCrossRef Hall NC, Povoski SP, Murrey DA, et al. Combined approach of perioperative 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and intraoperative 18F-FDG handheld gamma probe detection for tumor localization and verification of complete tumor resection in breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5:143.PubMedCrossRef
92.
go back to reference Gulec SA, Hoenie E, Hostetter R, et al. PET probe-guided surgery: applications and clinical protocol. World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5:65.PubMedCrossRef Gulec SA, Hoenie E, Hostetter R, et al. PET probe-guided surgery: applications and clinical protocol. World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5:65.PubMedCrossRef
93.
go back to reference Gulec SA, Daghighian F, Essner R. PET-Probe: evaluation of technical performance and clinical utility of a handheld high-energy gamma probe in oncologic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jul 24 (Epub ahead of print). Gulec SA, Daghighian F, Essner R. PET-Probe: evaluation of technical performance and clinical utility of a handheld high-energy gamma probe in oncologic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jul 24 (Epub ahead of print).
94.
go back to reference Brown RS, Wahl RL. Overexpression of Glut-1 glucose transporter in human breast cancer. An immunohistochemical study. Cancer. 1993;72:2979–85.PubMedCrossRef Brown RS, Wahl RL. Overexpression of Glut-1 glucose transporter in human breast cancer. An immunohistochemical study. Cancer. 1993;72:2979–85.PubMedCrossRef
95.
go back to reference Brown RS, Leung JY, Fisher SJ, et al. Intratumoral distribution of tritiated-FDG in breast carcinoma: correlation between Glut-1 expression and FDG uptake. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1042–7.PubMed Brown RS, Leung JY, Fisher SJ, et al. Intratumoral distribution of tritiated-FDG in breast carcinoma: correlation between Glut-1 expression and FDG uptake. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1042–7.PubMed
96.
go back to reference Schulze T, Bembenek A, Schlag PM. Sentinel lymph node biopsy progress in surgical treatment of cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389:532–50.PubMedCrossRef Schulze T, Bembenek A, Schlag PM. Sentinel lymph node biopsy progress in surgical treatment of cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389:532–50.PubMedCrossRef
97.
go back to reference Strong VE, Humm J, Russo P, et al. A novel method to localize antibody-targeted cancer deposits intraoperatively using handheld PET beta and gamma probes. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:386–91.PubMedCrossRef Strong VE, Humm J, Russo P, et al. A novel method to localize antibody-targeted cancer deposits intraoperatively using handheld PET beta and gamma probes. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:386–91.PubMedCrossRef
98.
go back to reference Cohn DE, Hall NC, Povoski SP, et al. Novel perioperative imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT and intraoperative 18F-FDG detection using a handheld gamma probe in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110:152–7.PubMedCrossRef Cohn DE, Hall NC, Povoski SP, et al. Novel perioperative imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT and intraoperative 18F-FDG detection using a handheld gamma probe in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110:152–7.PubMedCrossRef
99.
go back to reference Piert M, Burian M, Meisetschlager G, et al. Positron detection for the intraoperative localisation of cancer deposits. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1534–44.PubMedCrossRef Piert M, Burian M, Meisetschlager G, et al. Positron detection for the intraoperative localisation of cancer deposits. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1534–44.PubMedCrossRef
100.
go back to reference Kaida H, Ishibashi M, Fuji T, et al. Improved breast cancer detection of prone breast fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in 118 patients. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:885–93.PubMedCrossRef Kaida H, Ishibashi M, Fuji T, et al. Improved breast cancer detection of prone breast fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in 118 patients. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:885–93.PubMedCrossRef
101.
go back to reference Heckathorne E, Dimock C, Dahlbom M. Radiation dose to surgical staff from positron-emitter-based localization and radiosurgery of tumors. Health Phys. 2008;95:220–6.PubMedCrossRef Heckathorne E, Dimock C, Dahlbom M. Radiation dose to surgical staff from positron-emitter-based localization and radiosurgery of tumors. Health Phys. 2008;95:220–6.PubMedCrossRef
102.
go back to reference Wahl RL. Current status of PET in breast cancer imaging, staging, and therapy. Semin Roentgenol. 2001;36:250–60.PubMedCrossRef Wahl RL. Current status of PET in breast cancer imaging, staging, and therapy. Semin Roentgenol. 2001;36:250–60.PubMedCrossRef
103.
go back to reference Perez CA. Conservation therapy in T1-T2 breast cancer: past, current issues, and future challenges and opportunities. Cancer J. 2003;9:442–53.PubMedCrossRef Perez CA. Conservation therapy in T1-T2 breast cancer: past, current issues, and future challenges and opportunities. Cancer J. 2003;9:442–53.PubMedCrossRef
104.
go back to reference Kumar R, Alavi A. Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in the management of breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42:1113–22, ix.PubMedCrossRef Kumar R, Alavi A. Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in the management of breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42:1113–22, ix.PubMedCrossRef
105.
go back to reference Luini A, Zurrida S, Paganelli G, et al. Comparison of radioguided excision with wire localization of occult breast lesions. Br J Surg. 1999;86:522–5.PubMedCrossRef Luini A, Zurrida S, Paganelli G, et al. Comparison of radioguided excision with wire localization of occult breast lesions. Br J Surg. 1999;86:522–5.PubMedCrossRef
106.
go back to reference De Cicco C, Pizzamiglio M, Trifiro G, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) and surgical biopsy in breast cancer. Technical aspects. Q J Nucl Med. 2002;46:145–51.PubMed De Cicco C, Pizzamiglio M, Trifiro G, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) and surgical biopsy in breast cancer. Technical aspects. Q J Nucl Med. 2002;46:145–51.PubMed
107.
go back to reference Rampaul RS, Bagnall M, Burrell H, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing radioisotope occult lesion localization and wire-guided excision for biopsy of occult breast lesions. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1575–7.PubMedCrossRef Rampaul RS, Bagnall M, Burrell H, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing radioisotope occult lesion localization and wire-guided excision for biopsy of occult breast lesions. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1575–7.PubMedCrossRef
108.
go back to reference Machado RH, Oliveira AC, Rocha AC, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and excision of breast lesions using technetium-99 m-macroaggregate albumin and air injection control. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2007;26:323–7.PubMed Machado RH, Oliveira AC, Rocha AC, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and excision of breast lesions using technetium-99 m-macroaggregate albumin and air injection control. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2007;26:323–7.PubMed
109.
go back to reference Cortes RM, Pardo GR, Soriano CA, et al. Radioguided occult breast lesion location (ROLL). Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2005;24:374–9.CrossRef Cortes RM, Pardo GR, Soriano CA, et al. Radioguided occult breast lesion location (ROLL). Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2005;24:374–9.CrossRef
110.
go back to reference Sarlos D, Frey LD, Haueisen H, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) for treatment and diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions combined with sentinel node biopsy: A prospective clinical trial with 100 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;35:403–8.PubMed Sarlos D, Frey LD, Haueisen H, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) for treatment and diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions combined with sentinel node biopsy: A prospective clinical trial with 100 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;35:403–8.PubMed
111.
go back to reference Paredes P, Vidal-Sicart S, Zanon G, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localisation in breast cancer using an intraoperative portable gamma camera: first results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:230–5.PubMedCrossRef Paredes P, Vidal-Sicart S, Zanon G, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localisation in breast cancer using an intraoperative portable gamma camera: first results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:230–5.PubMedCrossRef
112.
go back to reference Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:711–5.PubMedCrossRef Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:711–5.PubMedCrossRef
113.
go back to reference Hughes JH, Mason MC, Gray RJ, et al. A multi-site validation trial of radioactive seed localization as an alternative to wire localization. Breast J. 2008;14:153–7.PubMedCrossRef Hughes JH, Mason MC, Gray RJ, et al. A multi-site validation trial of radioactive seed localization as an alternative to wire localization. Breast J. 2008;14:153–7.PubMedCrossRef
114.
go back to reference Nadeem R, Chagla LS, Harris O, et al. Occult breast lesions: a comparison between radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) vs. wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL). Breast. 2005;14:283–9.PubMedCrossRef Nadeem R, Chagla LS, Harris O, et al. Occult breast lesions: a comparison between radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) vs. wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL). Breast. 2005;14:283–9.PubMedCrossRef
115.
go back to reference van Esser S, Hobbelink MG, van der Ploeg IM, et al. Radio guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) for non-palpable invasive breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:526–9.PubMedCrossRef van Esser S, Hobbelink MG, van der Ploeg IM, et al. Radio guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) for non-palpable invasive breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:526–9.PubMedCrossRef
116.
go back to reference van Esser S, Hobbelink MG, Peeters PH, et al. The efficacy of ‘radio guided occult lesion localization’ (ROLL) versus ‘wire-guided localization’ (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial —ROLL study. BMC Surg. 2008;8:9.PubMedCrossRef van Esser S, Hobbelink MG, Peeters PH, et al. The efficacy of ‘radio guided occult lesion localization’ (ROLL) versus ‘wire-guided localization’ (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial —ROLL study. BMC Surg. 2008;8:9.PubMedCrossRef
117.
go back to reference Luker GD, Luker KE. Optical imaging: current applications and future directions. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1–4.PubMedCrossRef Luker GD, Luker KE. Optical imaging: current applications and future directions. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1–4.PubMedCrossRef
118.
go back to reference Tromberg BJ, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD, et al. Assessing the future of diffuse optical imaging technologies for breast cancer management. Med Phys. 2008;35:2443–51.PubMedCrossRef Tromberg BJ, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD, et al. Assessing the future of diffuse optical imaging technologies for breast cancer management. Med Phys. 2008;35:2443–51.PubMedCrossRef
119.
120.
go back to reference von Burstin J, Eser S, Seidler B, et al. Highly sensitive detection of early-stage pancreatic cancer by multimodal near-infrared molecular imaging in living mice. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:2138–47.CrossRef von Burstin J, Eser S, Seidler B, et al. Highly sensitive detection of early-stage pancreatic cancer by multimodal near-infrared molecular imaging in living mice. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:2138–47.CrossRef
121.
go back to reference Kirsch DG, Dinulescu DM, Miller JB, et al. A spatially and temporally restricted mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma. Nat Med. 2007;13:992–7.PubMedCrossRef Kirsch DG, Dinulescu DM, Miller JB, et al. A spatially and temporally restricted mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma. Nat Med. 2007;13:992–7.PubMedCrossRef
122.
go back to reference Tagaya N, Yamazaki R, Nakagawa A, et al. Intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes by near-infrared fluorescence imaging in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;195:850–3.PubMedCrossRef Tagaya N, Yamazaki R, Nakagawa A, et al. Intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes by near-infrared fluorescence imaging in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;195:850–3.PubMedCrossRef
123.
go back to reference Sevick-Muraca EM, Sharma R, Rasmussen JC, et al. Imaging of lymph flow in breast cancer patients after microdose administration of a near-infrared fluorophore: feasibility study. Radiology. 2008;246:734–41.PubMedCrossRef Sevick-Muraca EM, Sharma R, Rasmussen JC, et al. Imaging of lymph flow in breast cancer patients after microdose administration of a near-infrared fluorophore: feasibility study. Radiology. 2008;246:734–41.PubMedCrossRef
124.
go back to reference Ogasawara Y, Ikeda H, Takahashi M, et al. Evaluation of breast lymphatic pathways with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in patients with breast cancer. World J Surg. 2008;32:1924-9.PubMedCrossRef Ogasawara Y, Ikeda H, Takahashi M, et al. Evaluation of breast lymphatic pathways with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in patients with breast cancer. World J Surg. 2008;32:1924-9.PubMedCrossRef
125.
go back to reference Brandt MG, Moore CC, Jordan K. Randomized control trial of fluorescence-guided surgical excision of nonmelanotic cutaneous malignancies. J Otolaryngol. 2007;36:148–55.PubMedCrossRef Brandt MG, Moore CC, Jordan K. Randomized control trial of fluorescence-guided surgical excision of nonmelanotic cutaneous malignancies. J Otolaryngol. 2007;36:148–55.PubMedCrossRef
126.
go back to reference Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T, et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:392–401.PubMedCrossRef Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T, et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:392–401.PubMedCrossRef
127.
go back to reference Backer MV, Levashova Z, Patel V, et al. Molecular imaging of VEGF receptors in angiogenic vasculature with single-chain VEGF-based probes. Nat Med. 2007;13:504–9.PubMedCrossRef Backer MV, Levashova Z, Patel V, et al. Molecular imaging of VEGF receptors in angiogenic vasculature with single-chain VEGF-based probes. Nat Med. 2007;13:504–9.PubMedCrossRef
128.
go back to reference Chen K, Li ZB, Wang H, et al. Dual-modality optical and positron emission tomography imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor on tumor vasculature using quantum dots. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:2235–44.PubMedCrossRef Chen K, Li ZB, Wang H, et al. Dual-modality optical and positron emission tomography imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor on tumor vasculature using quantum dots. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:2235–44.PubMedCrossRef
129.
go back to reference Sampath L, Kwon S, Ke S, et al. Dual-labeled trastuzumab-based imaging agent for the detection of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1501–10.PubMedCrossRef Sampath L, Kwon S, Ke S, et al. Dual-labeled trastuzumab-based imaging agent for the detection of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1501–10.PubMedCrossRef
130.
go back to reference Ke S, Wen X, Gurfinkel M, et al. Near-infrared optical imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor in breast cancer xenografts. Cancer Res. 2003;63:7870–5.PubMed Ke S, Wen X, Gurfinkel M, et al. Near-infrared optical imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor in breast cancer xenografts. Cancer Res. 2003;63:7870–5.PubMed
131.
go back to reference Lee SB, Hassan M, Fisher R, et al. Affibody molecules for in vivo characterization of HER2-positive tumors by near-infrared imaging. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3840–9.PubMedCrossRef Lee SB, Hassan M, Fisher R, et al. Affibody molecules for in vivo characterization of HER2-positive tumors by near-infrared imaging. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3840–9.PubMedCrossRef
132.
go back to reference Gee MS, Upadhyay R, Bergquist H, et al. Human breast cancer tumor models: molecular imaging of drug susceptibility and dosing during HER2/neu-targeted therapy. Radiology. 2008;248:925–35.PubMedCrossRef Gee MS, Upadhyay R, Bergquist H, et al. Human breast cancer tumor models: molecular imaging of drug susceptibility and dosing during HER2/neu-targeted therapy. Radiology. 2008;248:925–35.PubMedCrossRef
133.
go back to reference Weissleder R. Molecular imaging: exploring the next frontier. Radiology. 1999;212:609–14.PubMed Weissleder R. Molecular imaging: exploring the next frontier. Radiology. 1999;212:609–14.PubMed
134.
go back to reference Bremer C, Ntziachristos V, Weitkamp B, et al. Optical imaging of spontaneous breast tumors using protease sensing ‘smart’ optical probes. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:321–7.PubMedCrossRef Bremer C, Ntziachristos V, Weitkamp B, et al. Optical imaging of spontaneous breast tumors using protease sensing ‘smart’ optical probes. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:321–7.PubMedCrossRef
135.
go back to reference Tung CH, Mahmood U, Bredow S, et al. In vivo imaging of proteolytic enzyme activity using a novel molecular reporter. Cancer Res. 2000;60:4953–8.PubMed Tung CH, Mahmood U, Bredow S, et al. In vivo imaging of proteolytic enzyme activity using a novel molecular reporter. Cancer Res. 2000;60:4953–8.PubMed
136.
go back to reference Bremer C, Ntziachristos V, Weissleder R. Optical-based molecular imaging: contrast agents and potential medical applications. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:231–43.PubMed Bremer C, Ntziachristos V, Weissleder R. Optical-based molecular imaging: contrast agents and potential medical applications. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:231–43.PubMed
137.
go back to reference Stanciute D, Didziapetriene J, Kadziauskas J. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases in patients with malignant tumors. Medicina (Kaunas). 2004;40:1143–50. Stanciute D, Didziapetriene J, Kadziauskas J. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases in patients with malignant tumors. Medicina (Kaunas). 2004;40:1143–50.
138.
go back to reference Veiseh M, Gabikian P, Bahrami SB, et al. Tumor paint: a chlorotoxin:Cy5.5 bioconjugate for intraoperative visualization of cancer foci. Cancer Res. 2007;67:6882–8.PubMedCrossRef Veiseh M, Gabikian P, Bahrami SB, et al. Tumor paint: a chlorotoxin:Cy5.5 bioconjugate for intraoperative visualization of cancer foci. Cancer Res. 2007;67:6882–8.PubMedCrossRef
139.
140.
go back to reference Ntziachristos V, Bremer C, Weissleder R. Fluorescence imaging with near-infrared light: new technological advances that enable in vivo molecular imaging. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:195–208.PubMed Ntziachristos V, Bremer C, Weissleder R. Fluorescence imaging with near-infrared light: new technological advances that enable in vivo molecular imaging. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:195–208.PubMed
141.
go back to reference Ntziachristos V, Ripoll J, Wang LV, et al. Looking and listening to light: the evolution of whole-body photonic imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:313–20.PubMedCrossRef Ntziachristos V, Ripoll J, Wang LV, et al. Looking and listening to light: the evolution of whole-body photonic imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:313–20.PubMedCrossRef
142.
go back to reference Bremer C, Tung CH, Weissleder R. In vivo molecular target assessment of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Nat Med. 2001;7:743–8.PubMedCrossRef Bremer C, Tung CH, Weissleder R. In vivo molecular target assessment of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Nat Med. 2001;7:743–8.PubMedCrossRef
143.
go back to reference Bornhop DJ, Contag CH, Licha K, et al. Advance in contrast agents, reporters, and detection. J Biomed Opt. 2001;6:106–10.PubMedCrossRef Bornhop DJ, Contag CH, Licha K, et al. Advance in contrast agents, reporters, and detection. J Biomed Opt. 2001;6:106–10.PubMedCrossRef
144.
go back to reference Soubret A, Ntziachristos V. Fluorescence molecular tomography in the presence of background fluorescence. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:3983–4001.PubMedCrossRef Soubret A, Ntziachristos V. Fluorescence molecular tomography in the presence of background fluorescence. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:3983–4001.PubMedCrossRef
145.
go back to reference Godavarty A, Eppstein MJ, Zhang C, et al. Detection of single and multiple targets in tissue phantoms with fluorescence-enhanced optical imaging: feasibility study. Radiology. 2005;235:148–54.PubMedCrossRef Godavarty A, Eppstein MJ, Zhang C, et al. Detection of single and multiple targets in tissue phantoms with fluorescence-enhanced optical imaging: feasibility study. Radiology. 2005;235:148–54.PubMedCrossRef
146.
go back to reference Gulben K, Berberoglu U, Cengiz A, et al. Prognostic factors affecting locoregional recurrence in patients with stage IIIB noninflammatory breast cancer. World J Surg. 2007;31:1724–30.PubMedCrossRef Gulben K, Berberoglu U, Cengiz A, et al. Prognostic factors affecting locoregional recurrence in patients with stage IIIB noninflammatory breast cancer. World J Surg. 2007;31:1724–30.PubMedCrossRef
147.
go back to reference Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:331–7.PubMedCrossRef Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:331–7.PubMedCrossRef
148.
go back to reference Cefaro GA, Genovesi D, Marchese R, et al. Predictors of local recurrence after conservative surgery and whole-breast irradiation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;98:329–35.PubMedCrossRef Cefaro GA, Genovesi D, Marchese R, et al. Predictors of local recurrence after conservative surgery and whole-breast irradiation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;98:329–35.PubMedCrossRef
149.
go back to reference Smitt MC, Horst K. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1040–4.PubMedCrossRef Smitt MC, Horst K. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1040–4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Obtaining Adequate Surgical Margins in Breast-Conserving Therapy for Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Current Modalities and Future Directions
Authors
Rick G. Pleijhuis, BSc
Maurits Graafland, BSc
Jakob de Vries, MD, PhD
Joost Bart, MD, PhD
Johannes S. de Jong, MD, PhD
Gooitzen M. van Dam, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-10-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0609-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2009 Go to the issue