Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Anti-bacterial efficacy of alcoholic hand rubs in the Kenyan market, 2015

Authors: Missiani Ochwoto, Lucy Muita, Keith Talaam, Cecilia Wanjala, Frank Ogeto, Faith Wachira, Saida Osman, James Kimotho, Linus Ndegwa

Published in: Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hand hygiene is known to be effective in preventing hospital and community-acquired infections. The increasing number of hand sanitizer brands in Kenyan hospitals and consumer outlets is of concern. Thus the main aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-bacterial efficacy and organoleptic properties of these hand sanitizers in Kenya.

Methods

This was an experimental, laboratory-based study of 14 different brands of hand sanitizers (coded HS1-14) available in various retail outlets and hospitals in Kenya. Efficacy was evaluated using standard non-pathogenic Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) as per the European Standard (EN). The logarithmic reduction factors (RF) were assessed at baseline and after treatment, and log reduction then calculated. Ten and 25 healthy volunteers participated in the efficacy and organoleptic studies respectively.

Results

Four (28.6%) hand sanitizers (HS12, HS9, HS13 and HS14) showed a 5.9 reduction factor on all the three bacteria strains. Seven (50%) hand sanitizers had efficacies of <3 against all the three bacteria strains used. Efficacy on E. Coli was higher compared to the other pathogens. Three hand sanitizers were efficacious on one of the pathogens and not the other. In terms of organoleptic properties, gel-based formulations were rated far higher than the liquid based formulations brands.

Conclusion

Fifty percent (50%) of the selected hand sanitizers in the Kenyan market have efficacy that falls below the World Health Organization (WHO) and DIN EN 1500:2013. Of the 14 hand sanitizers found in the Kenyan market, only four showed efficacies that were comparable to the WHO-formulation. There is a need to evaluate how many of these products with <3 efficacy that have been incorporated into the health system for hand hygiene and the country’s policy on regulations on their usage.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ayliffe GA, Babb JR, Davies JG, Lilly HA. Hand disinfection: a comparison of various agents in laboratory and ward studies. J Hosp Infect. 1988;11:226–43.CrossRefPubMed Ayliffe GA, Babb JR, Davies JG, Lilly HA. Hand disinfection: a comparison of various agents in laboratory and ward studies. J Hosp Infect. 1988;11:226–43.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dharan S, Hugonnet S, Sax H, Pittet D. Comparison of waterless hand antisepsis agents at short application times: raising the flag of concern. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24:160–4.CrossRefPubMed Dharan S, Hugonnet S, Sax H, Pittet D. Comparison of waterless hand antisepsis agents at short application times: raising the flag of concern. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24:160–4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Edmond S, Macinga DR. Meeting health Canada standard for alcohol based rub efficacy: formulation matters. 2011. Edmond S, Macinga DR. Meeting health Canada standard for alcohol based rub efficacy: formulation matters. 2011.
4.
go back to reference European standard DIN EN 1500. Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Hygienic handrub. Test method and requirements. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2013. European standard DIN EN 1500. Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Hygienic handrub. Test method and requirements. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2013.
6.
go back to reference Kampf G, Kramer A. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clinical Microbiology Review. 2004;17:863–93.CrossRef Kampf G, Kramer A. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clinical Microbiology Review. 2004;17:863–93.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kramer A, Rudolph P, Kampf G, Pittet D. Limited efficacy of alcohol-based hand gels. Lancet. 2002;359:1489–90.CrossRefPubMed Kramer A, Rudolph P, Kampf G, Pittet D. Limited efficacy of alcohol-based hand gels. Lancet. 2002;359:1489–90.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Larson EL, Morton HE. Alcohols. In: Block SS, editor. Disinfection, sterilization and preservation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1991. p. 191–203. Larson EL, Morton HE. Alcohols. In: Block SS, editor. Disinfection, sterilization and preservation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1991. p. 191–203.
10.
11.
go back to reference National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing. NCCLS document. 1999. M2-A6, M100-S9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing. NCCLS document. 1999. M2-A6, M100-S9.
12.
go back to reference Ndegwa LK, Katz MA, McCormick K, Nganga Z, Mungai A, Emukule G, Kollmann MK, Mayieka L, Otieno J, Breiman RF, Mott JA, Ellingson K. Surveillance for respiratory health care-associated infections among inpatients in 3 Kenyan hospitals, 2010–2012. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(9):985–90. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2014.05.022.CrossRefPubMed Ndegwa LK, Katz MA, McCormick K, Nganga Z, Mungai A, Emukule G, Kollmann MK, Mayieka L, Otieno J, Breiman RF, Mott JA, Ellingson K. Surveillance for respiratory health care-associated infections among inpatients in 3 Kenyan hospitals, 2010–2012. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(9):985–90. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajic.​2014.​05.​022.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Oke MA, Bello AB, Odebisi MB, Ahmed El-Imam AM, Kazeem MO. Evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of some alcohol-based hand sanitizers sold in Ilorin (North-Central Nigeria). IFE J Sci. 2013;15(1):111–7. Oke MA, Bello AB, Odebisi MB, Ahmed El-Imam AM, Kazeem MO. Evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of some alcohol-based hand sanitizers sold in Ilorin (North-Central Nigeria). IFE J Sci. 2013;15(1):111–7.
14.
go back to reference Rotter M. Hand washing and hand disinfection. In: Mayhall CG, editor. Hospital epidemiology and infection control. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 1339–55. Rotter M. Hand washing and hand disinfection. In: Mayhall CG, editor. Hospital epidemiology and infection control. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 1339–55.
15.
go back to reference Sandora TJ, Taveras EM, Shih M-C, Resnick EA, Lee GM, Ross-Degnan D. Hand sanitizer reduces illness transmission in the home [abstract 106]. In: Abstracts of the 42nd annual meeting of the Infectious Disease Society of America; Boston, Massachusetts; 2004 Sept 30–Oct 3. Alexandria: Infectious Disease Society of America; 2004. Sandora TJ, Taveras EM, Shih M-C, Resnick EA, Lee GM, Ross-Degnan D. Hand sanitizer reduces illness transmission in the home [abstract 106]. In: Abstracts of the 42nd annual meeting of the Infectious Disease Society of America; Boston, Massachusetts; 2004 Sept 30–Oct 3. Alexandria: Infectious Disease Society of America; 2004.
Metadata
Title
Anti-bacterial efficacy of alcoholic hand rubs in the Kenyan market, 2015
Authors
Missiani Ochwoto
Lucy Muita
Keith Talaam
Cecilia Wanjala
Frank Ogeto
Faith Wachira
Saida Osman
James Kimotho
Linus Ndegwa
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2047-2994
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0174-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control 1/2017 Go to the issue