Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Ultrasound Journal 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Letter to the Editor

Time to correct the flow of corrected flow time

Authors: Igor Barjaktarevic, Alan Chiem, Maxime Cannesson

Published in: The Ultrasound Journal | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Recently published study of Ma et al. evaluates two relatively novel measures of fluid responsiveness, carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time (ccFT). Both measures have been recently quoted as possibly useful, technically simple, and noninvasive dynamic tools in predicting fluid responsiveness. Recently, more research interest has been focused on ccFT and, intrigued by the data presented in this study, we discuss here the impact of the data presented in the paper of Ma et al. to the significance of this metric as a potential tool in the assessment of fluid responsiveness.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ma IWY et al (2017) Correlation of carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time with invasive cardiac output measurements. Crit Ultrasound J 9(1):10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ma IWY et al (2017) Correlation of carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time with invasive cardiac output measurements. Crit Ultrasound J 9(1):10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Blehar DJ, Glazier S, Gaspari RJ (2014) Correlation of corrected flow time in the carotid artery with changes in intravascular volume status. J Crit Care 29(4):486–488CrossRefPubMed Blehar DJ, Glazier S, Gaspari RJ (2014) Correlation of corrected flow time in the carotid artery with changes in intravascular volume status. J Crit Care 29(4):486–488CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Marik PE et al (2013) The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients. Chest 143(2):364–370CrossRefPubMed Marik PE et al (2013) The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients. Chest 143(2):364–370CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference de Waal KA (2012) The methodology of Doppler-derived central blood flow measurements in newborn infants. Int J Pediatr 2012:680162PubMedPubMedCentral de Waal KA (2012) The methodology of Doppler-derived central blood flow measurements in newborn infants. Int J Pediatr 2012:680162PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Lee JH et al (2007) Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth 99(3):343–348CrossRefPubMed Lee JH et al (2007) Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth 99(3):343–348CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Reant P et al (2010) Systolic time intervals as simple echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic performance: correlation with ejection fraction and longitudinal two-dimensional strain. Eur J Echocardiogr 11(10):834–844CrossRefPubMed Reant P et al (2010) Systolic time intervals as simple echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic performance: correlation with ejection fraction and longitudinal two-dimensional strain. Eur J Echocardiogr 11(10):834–844CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Shokoohi H et al (2017) The diagnostic utility of sonographic carotid flow time in determining volume responsiveness. J Crit Care 38:231–235CrossRefPubMed Shokoohi H et al (2017) The diagnostic utility of sonographic carotid flow time in determining volume responsiveness. J Crit Care 38:231–235CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mackenzie DC et al (2015) Carotid flow time changes with volume status in acute blood loss. Ann Emerg Med 66(3):277–282CrossRefPubMed Mackenzie DC et al (2015) Carotid flow time changes with volume status in acute blood loss. Ann Emerg Med 66(3):277–282CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hossein-Nejad H et al (2017) Assessment of corrected flow time in carotid artery via point-of-care ultrasonography: reference values and the influential factors. J Crit Care 40:46–51CrossRefPubMed Hossein-Nejad H et al (2017) Assessment of corrected flow time in carotid artery via point-of-care ultrasonography: reference values and the influential factors. J Crit Care 40:46–51CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ostergaard M et al (2005) Precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 49(3):366–372CrossRefPubMed Ostergaard M et al (2005) Precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 49(3):366–372CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cecconi M et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40(12):1795–1815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cecconi M et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40(12):1795–1815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Time to correct the flow of corrected flow time
Authors
Igor Barjaktarevic
Alan Chiem
Maxime Cannesson
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2524-8987
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0076-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

The Ultrasound Journal 1/2017 Go to the issue