Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiation Oncology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Prostate Cancer | Research

The urethral position may shift due to urethral catheter placement in the treatment planning for prostate radiation therapy

Authors: Yasuhiro Dekura, Kentaro Nishioka, Takayuki Hashimoto, Naoki Miyamoto, Ryusuke Suzuki, Takaaki Yoshimura, Ryuji Matsumoto, Takahiro Osawa, Takashige Abe, Yoichi M. Ito, Nobuo Shinohara, Hiroki Shirato, Shinichi Shimizu

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the best method to contour the planning organ at risk volume (PRV) for the urethra, this study aimed to investigate the displacement of a Foley catheter in the urethra with a soft and thin guide-wire.

Methods

For each patient, the study used two sets of computed tomography (CT) images for radiation treatment planning (RT-CT): (1) set with a Foley urethral catheter (4.0 mm diameter) plus a guide-wire (0.46 mm diameter) in the first RT-CT and (2) set with a guide-wire alone in the second CT recorded 2 min after the first RT-CT. Using three fiducial markers in the prostate for image fusion, the displacement between the catheter and the guide-wire in the prostatic urethra was calculated. In 155 consecutive patients treated between 2011 and 2017, 5531 slices of RT-CT were evaluated.

Results

Assuming that ≥3.0 mm of difference between the catheter and the guide-wire position was a significant displacement, the urethra with the catheter was displaced significantly from the urethra with the guide-wire alone in > 20% of the RT-CT slices in 23.2% (36/155) of the patients. The number of patients who showed ≥3.0 mm anterior displacement with the catheter in ≥20% RT-CT slices was significantly larger at the superior segment (38/155) than at the middle (14/155) and inferior segments (18/155) of the prostatic urethra (p < 0.0167).

Conclusions

The urethral position with a Foley catheter is different from the urethral position with a thin and soft guide-wire in a significant proportion of the patients. This should be taken into account for the PRV of the urethra to ensure precise radiotherapy such as in urethra-sparing radiotherapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wolff RF, Ryder S, Bossi A, Briganti A, Crook J, Henry A, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:2345–67.CrossRef Wolff RF, Ryder S, Bossi A, Briganti A, Crook J, Henry A, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:2345–67.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zaorsky NG, Shaikh T, Murphy CT, Hallman MA, Hayes SB, Sobczak ML, et al. Comparison of outcomes and toxicities among radiation therapy treatment options for prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;48:50–60.CrossRef Zaorsky NG, Shaikh T, Murphy CT, Hallman MA, Hayes SB, Sobczak ML, et al. Comparison of outcomes and toxicities among radiation therapy treatment options for prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;48:50–60.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Crehange G, Mirjolet C, Gauthier M, Martin E, Truc G, Peignaux-Casasnovas K, et al. Clinical impact of margin reduction on late toxicity and short-term biochemical control for patients treated with daily on-line image guided IMRT for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:244–6.CrossRef Crehange G, Mirjolet C, Gauthier M, Martin E, Truc G, Peignaux-Casasnovas K, et al. Clinical impact of margin reduction on late toxicity and short-term biochemical control for patients treated with daily on-line image guided IMRT for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:244–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Hoyer M, Lagerlund M, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394:385–95.CrossRef Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Hoyer M, Lagerlund M, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394:385–95.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ruggieri R, Naccarato S, Stavrev P, Stavreva N, Fersino S, Giaj Levra N, et al. Volumetric-modulated arc stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Dosimetric impact of an increased near-maximum target dose and of a rectal spacer. Br J Radiol. 2015;88:7–10.CrossRef Ruggieri R, Naccarato S, Stavrev P, Stavreva N, Fersino S, Giaj Levra N, et al. Volumetric-modulated arc stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Dosimetric impact of an increased near-maximum target dose and of a rectal spacer. Br J Radiol. 2015;88:7–10.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nicosia L, Mazzola R, Rigo M, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Napoli G, et al. Moderate versus extreme hypofractionated radiotherapy: a toxicity comparative analysis in low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019;145:2547–54.CrossRef Nicosia L, Mazzola R, Rigo M, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Napoli G, et al. Moderate versus extreme hypofractionated radiotherapy: a toxicity comparative analysis in low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019;145:2547–54.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Moltzahn F, Pra AD, Furrer M, Thalmann G, Spahn M. Urethral strictures after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Investig Clin Urol. 2016;57:309–15.CrossRef Moltzahn F, Pra AD, Furrer M, Thalmann G, Spahn M. Urethral strictures after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Investig Clin Urol. 2016;57:309–15.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Matta R, Chapple CR, Fisch M, Heidenreich A, Herschorn S, Kodama RT, et al. Pelvic Complications After Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy and Their Management: An International Collaborative Narrative Review (Figure presented.). Eur Urol. 2019;75:464–76.CrossRef Matta R, Chapple CR, Fisch M, Heidenreich A, Herschorn S, Kodama RT, et al. Pelvic Complications After Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy and Their Management: An International Collaborative Narrative Review (Figure presented.). Eur Urol. 2019;75:464–76.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vainshtein J, Abu-Isa E, Olson KB, Ray ME, Sandler HM, Normolle D, et al. Randomized phase II trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:82.CrossRef Vainshtein J, Abu-Isa E, Olson KB, Ray ME, Sandler HM, Normolle D, et al. Randomized phase II trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:82.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shimizu S, Nishioka K, Suzuki R, Shinohara N, Maruyama S, Abe T, et al. Early results of urethral dose reduction and small safety margin in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy (RTRT) system. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:1–8.CrossRef Shimizu S, Nishioka K, Suzuki R, Shinohara N, Maruyama S, Abe T, et al. Early results of urethral dose reduction and small safety margin in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy (RTRT) system. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:1–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Thomsen JB, Arp DT, Carl J. Urethra sparing - potential of combined nickel-titanium stent and intensity modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:256–60.CrossRef Thomsen JB, Arp DT, Carl J. Urethra sparing - potential of combined nickel-titanium stent and intensity modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:256–60.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Litzenberg DW, Muenz DG, Archer PG, Jackson WC, Hamstra DA, Hearn JW, et al. Changes in prostate orientation due to removal of a Foley catheter. Med Phys. 2018;45:1369–78.CrossRef Litzenberg DW, Muenz DG, Archer PG, Jackson WC, Hamstra DA, Hearn JW, et al. Changes in prostate orientation due to removal of a Foley catheter. Med Phys. 2018;45:1369–78.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shimizu S, Shirato H, Kitamura K, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T, Tsukamoto T, et al. Use of an implanted marker and real-time tracking of the marker for the positioning of prostate and bladder cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:1591–7.CrossRef Shimizu S, Shirato H, Kitamura K, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T, Tsukamoto T, et al. Use of an implanted marker and real-time tracking of the marker for the positioning of prostate and bladder cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:1591–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kitamura K, Shirato H, Seppenwoolde Y, Onimaru R, Oda M, Fujita K, et al. Three-dimensional intrafractional movement of prostate measured during real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy in supine and prone treatment positions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:1117–23.CrossRef Kitamura K, Shirato H, Seppenwoolde Y, Onimaru R, Oda M, Fujita K, et al. Three-dimensional intrafractional movement of prostate measured during real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy in supine and prone treatment positions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:1117–23.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shirato H, Harada T, Harabayashi T, Hida K, Endo H, Kitamura K, et al. Feasibility of insertion/implantation of 2.0-mm-diameter gold internal fiducial markers for precise setup and real-time tumor tracking in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:240–7.CrossRef Shirato H, Harada T, Harabayashi T, Hida K, Endo H, Kitamura K, et al. Feasibility of insertion/implantation of 2.0-mm-diameter gold internal fiducial markers for precise setup and real-time tumor tracking in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:240–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kitamura K, Shirato H, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T, Onimaru R, Fujita K, et al. Reduction in acute morbidity using hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy assisted with a fluoroscopic real-time tumor-tracking system for prostate cancer: preliminary results of a phase I/II study. Cancer J. 2003;9:268–76.CrossRef Kitamura K, Shirato H, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T, Onimaru R, Fujita K, et al. Reduction in acute morbidity using hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy assisted with a fluoroscopic real-time tumor-tracking system for prostate cancer: preliminary results of a phase I/II study. Cancer J. 2003;9:268–76.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shirato H, Oita M, Fujita K, Shimizu S, Onimaru R, Uegaki S, et al. Three-dimensional conformal setup (3D-CSU) of patients using the coordinate system provided by three internal fiducial markers and two orthogonal diagnostic X-ray systems in the treatment room. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:607–12.CrossRef Shirato H, Oita M, Fujita K, Shimizu S, Onimaru R, Uegaki S, et al. Three-dimensional conformal setup (3D-CSU) of patients using the coordinate system provided by three internal fiducial markers and two orthogonal diagnostic X-ray systems in the treatment room. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:607–12.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shimizu S, Osaka Y, Shinohara N, Sazawa A, Nishioka K, Suzuki R, et al. Use of implanted markers and interportal adjustment with real-time tracking radiotherapy system to reduce intrafraction prostate motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:393–9.CrossRef Shimizu S, Osaka Y, Shinohara N, Sazawa A, Nishioka K, Suzuki R, et al. Use of implanted markers and interportal adjustment with real-time tracking radiotherapy system to reduce intrafraction prostate motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:393–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Budäus L, Bolla M, Bossi A, Cozzarini C, Crook J, Widmark A, et al. Functional outcomes and complications following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol. 2012;61:112–27.CrossRef Budäus L, Bolla M, Bossi A, Cozzarini C, Crook J, Widmark A, et al. Functional outcomes and complications following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol. 2012;61:112–27.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Waterman FM, Dicker AP. Determination of the urethral dose in prostate brachytherapy when the urethra cannot be visualized in the postimplant CT scan. Med Phys. 2000;27:448–51.CrossRef Waterman FM, Dicker AP. Determination of the urethral dose in prostate brachytherapy when the urethra cannot be visualized in the postimplant CT scan. Med Phys. 2000;27:448–51.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lee HK, D’Souza WD, Yamal JMJ, Pollack A, Lee AK, Palmer MB, et al. Dosimetric consequences of using a surrogate urethra to estimate urethral dose after brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:355–61.CrossRef Lee HK, D’Souza WD, Yamal JMJ, Pollack A, Lee AK, Palmer MB, et al. Dosimetric consequences of using a surrogate urethra to estimate urethral dose after brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:355–61.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kovács G, Pötter R, Loch T, Hammer J, Kolkman-Deurloo IK, De La Rosette JJMCH, et al. GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2005;74:137–48.CrossRef Kovács G, Pötter R, Loch T, Hammer J, Kolkman-Deurloo IK, De La Rosette JJMCH, et al. GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2005;74:137–48.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kataria T, Gupta D, Goyal S, Bisht SS, Chaudhary R, Narang K, et al. Simple diagrammatic method to delineate male urethra in prostate cancer radiotherapy: an MRI based approach. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:1–6. Kataria T, Gupta D, Goyal S, Bisht SS, Chaudhary R, Narang K, et al. Simple diagrammatic method to delineate male urethra in prostate cancer radiotherapy: an MRI based approach. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:1–6.
24.
go back to reference Roach D, Holloway LC, Jameson MG, Dowling JA, Kennedy A, Greer PB, et al. Multi-observer contouring of male pelvic anatomy: highly variable agreement across conventional and emerging structures of interest. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019;63:264–71.CrossRef Roach D, Holloway LC, Jameson MG, Dowling JA, Kennedy A, Greer PB, et al. Multi-observer contouring of male pelvic anatomy: highly variable agreement across conventional and emerging structures of interest. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019;63:264–71.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference McLaughlin PW, Evans C, Feng M, Narayana V. Radiographic and anatomic basis for prostate contouring errors and methods to improve prostate contouring accuracy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:369–78.CrossRef McLaughlin PW, Evans C, Feng M, Narayana V. Radiographic and anatomic basis for prostate contouring errors and methods to improve prostate contouring accuracy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:369–78.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rai R, Sidhom M, Lim K, Ohanessian L, Liney GP. MRI micturating urethrography for improved urethral delineation in prostate radiotherapy planning: a case study. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:3003–10.CrossRef Rai R, Sidhom M, Lim K, Ohanessian L, Liney GP. MRI micturating urethrography for improved urethral delineation in prostate radiotherapy planning: a case study. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:3003–10.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Merrick GS, Butler WM, Dorsey AT, Walbert HL. Prostatic conformal brachytherapy: 125I/103Pd postoperative dosimetric analysis. Radiat Oncol Investig. 1997;5:305–13.CrossRef Merrick GS, Butler WM, Dorsey AT, Walbert HL. Prostatic conformal brachytherapy: 125I/103Pd postoperative dosimetric analysis. Radiat Oncol Investig. 1997;5:305–13.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bucci J, Spadinger I, Hilts M, Sidhu S, Smith C, Keyes M, et al. Urethral and periurethral dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy: is there a convenient surrogate? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:1235–42.CrossRef Bucci J, Spadinger I, Hilts M, Sidhu S, Smith C, Keyes M, et al. Urethral and periurethral dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy: is there a convenient surrogate? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:1235–42.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Nilsson J, Kälkner KM, Berg L, Levitt S, Holmberg C, Nilsson S, et al. Is the use of a surrogate urethra an option in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:36–40.CrossRef Nilsson J, Kälkner KM, Berg L, Levitt S, Holmberg C, Nilsson S, et al. Is the use of a surrogate urethra an option in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:36–40.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Acosta O, Mylona E, Le Dain M, Voisin C, Lizee T, Rigaud B, et al. Multi-atlas-based segmentation of prostatic urethra from planning CT imaging to quantify dose distribution in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2017;125:492–9.CrossRef Acosta O, Mylona E, Le Dain M, Voisin C, Lizee T, Rigaud B, et al. Multi-atlas-based segmentation of prostatic urethra from planning CT imaging to quantify dose distribution in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2017;125:492–9.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Halperin H, Hilts M, Crook J, Batchelar D, Tisseverasinghe S, Tetreault-LaFlamme A, et al. A surrogate urethra for real-time planning of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2019;18:675–82.CrossRef Halperin H, Hilts M, Crook J, Batchelar D, Tisseverasinghe S, Tetreault-LaFlamme A, et al. A surrogate urethra for real-time planning of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2019;18:675–82.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The urethral position may shift due to urethral catheter placement in the treatment planning for prostate radiation therapy
Authors
Yasuhiro Dekura
Kentaro Nishioka
Takayuki Hashimoto
Naoki Miyamoto
Ryusuke Suzuki
Takaaki Yoshimura
Ryuji Matsumoto
Takahiro Osawa
Takashige Abe
Yoichi M. Ito
Nobuo Shinohara
Hiroki Shirato
Shinichi Shimizu
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1424-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Radiation Oncology 1/2019 Go to the issue