Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Public involvement and health research system governance: a qualitative study

Authors: Fiona Alice Miller, Sarah J. Patton, Mark Dobrow, Deborah A. Marshall, Whitney Berta

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Interest in public involvement in health research projects has led to increased attention on the coordination of public involvement through research organisations, networks and whole systems. We draw on previous work using the ‘health research system’ framework to explore organisational actors and stewardship functions relevant to governance for public involvement.

Methods

To inform efforts in Ontario, Canada, to mobilise public involvement across the provincial health research enterprise, we conducted an exploratory, qualitative descriptive study of efforts in two jurisdictions (England, United Kingdom, and Alberta, Canada) where there were active policy efforts to support public involvement, alongside jurisdiction-wide efforts to mobilise health research. Focusing on the efforts of public sector organisations with responsibility for funding health research, enabling public involvement, and using research results, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 26 expert informants and used a qualitative thematic approach to explore how the involvement of publics in health research has been embedded and supported.

Results

We identified three sets of common issues in efforts to advance public involvement. First, the initial aim to embed public involvement leveraged efforts to build self-conscious research ‘systems’, and mobilised policy guidance, direction, investment and infrastructure. Second, efforts to sustain public involvement aimed to deepen involvement activity and tackle diversity limitations, while managing the challenges of influencing research priorities and forging common purpose on the evaluation of public involvement. Finally, public involvement was itself an influential force, with the potential to reinforce – or complicate – the ties that link actors within research systems, and to support – or constrain – the research system’s capacity to serve and strengthen health systems.

Conclusions

Despite differences in the two jurisdictions analysed and in the organisation of public involvement within them, the supporters and stewards of public involvement sought to leverage research systems to advance public involvement, anticipated similar opportunities for improvement in involvement processes and identified similar challenges for future involvement activities. This suggests the value of a health research system framework in governance for public involvement, and the importance of public involvement for the success of health research systems and the health systems they aim to serve.
Footnotes
1
According to Pang et al. [26], health research systems exist to serve health systems, including healthcare systems, public health systems and cognate systems that are directly aimed at protecting or promoting health (e.g. seat belt policy for transportation).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Staley K, Buckland SA, Hayes H, Tarpey M. ‘The missing links’: understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research. Health Expect. 2014;17(6):755–64.CrossRefPubMed Staley K, Buckland SA, Hayes H, Tarpey M. ‘The missing links’: understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research. Health Expect. 2014;17(6):755–64.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JE, Bunders JF. Patient partnership in decision-making on biomedical research: changing the network. Sci Technol Human Values. 2007;32(3):339–68.CrossRef Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JE, Bunders JF. Patient partnership in decision-making on biomedical research: changing the network. Sci Technol Human Values. 2007;32(3):339–68.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2001;14(2):182–97.CrossRefPubMed Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2001;14(2):182–97.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ahmed SM, Beck B, Maurana CA, Newton G. Overcoming barriers to effective community-based participatory research in US medical schools. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004;17(2):141–51.CrossRef Ahmed SM, Beck B, Maurana CA, Newton G. Overcoming barriers to effective community-based participatory research in US medical schools. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004;17(2):141–51.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JE, Bunders JF. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(11):2575–84.CrossRefPubMed Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JE, Bunders JF. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(11):2575–84.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy. 2002;61(2):213–36.CrossRefPubMed Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy. 2002;61(2):213–36.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Staley K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. London: National Institute for Health Research; 2009. Staley K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. London: National Institute for Health Research; 2009.
10.
go back to reference Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient. 2014;7(4):387–95.CrossRefPubMed Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient. 2014;7(4):387–95.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Berta W, Virani T, Bajnok I, Edwards N, Rowan M. Understanding whole systems change in health care: insights into system level diffusion from nursing service delivery innovations–a multiple case study. Evid Policy. 2014;10(3):313–36.CrossRef Berta W, Virani T, Bajnok I, Edwards N, Rowan M. Understanding whole systems change in health care: insights into system level diffusion from nursing service delivery innovations–a multiple case study. Evid Policy. 2014;10(3):313–36.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):391–9.CrossRefPubMed Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):391–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sophie S, Ade A, Rosemary B, Peter B, Louca-Mai B, Jo B, et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact. Int J Consum Stud. 2011;35(6):628–32.CrossRef Sophie S, Ade A, Rosemary B, Peter B, Louca-Mai B, Jo B, et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact. Int J Consum Stud. 2011;35(6):628–32.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brett J, Staniszewska S, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e016948.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brett J, Staniszewska S, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e016948.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
16.
go back to reference Evans D. Patient and public involvement in research in the English NHS: a documentary analysis of the complex interplay of evidence and policy. Evid Policy. 2014;10(3):361–77.CrossRef Evans D. Patient and public involvement in research in the English NHS: a documentary analysis of the complex interplay of evidence and policy. Evid Policy. 2014;10(3):361–77.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Saunders C, Girgis A. Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8(1):34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saunders C, Girgis A. Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8(1):34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference O’Donnell M, Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in research projects: the activities of research funders. Health Policy. 2004;69(2):229–38.CrossRefPubMed O’Donnell M, Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in research projects: the activities of research funders. Health Policy. 2004;69(2):229–38.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Van Bekkum JE, Hilton S. UK research funding bodies’ views towards public participation in health-related research decisions: an exploratory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Van Bekkum JE, Hilton S. UK research funding bodies’ views towards public participation in health-related research decisions: an exploratory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Van Bekkum JE, Fergie GM, Hilton S. Health and medical research funding agencies’ promotion of public engagement within research: a qualitative interview study exploring the United Kingdom context. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Van Bekkum JE, Fergie GM, Hilton S. Health and medical research funding agencies’ promotion of public engagement within research: a qualitative interview study exploring the United Kingdom context. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Hanney S, Kuruvilla S, Soper B, Mays N. Who needs what from a national health research system: lessons from reforms to the English Department of Health's R&D system. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hanney S, Kuruvilla S, Soper B, Mays N. Who needs what from a national health research system: lessons from reforms to the English Department of Health's R&D system. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Hanney SR, González-Block MA. Organising health research systems as a key to improving health: the world health report 2013 and how to make further progress. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013;11:47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hanney SR, González-Block MA. Organising health research systems as a key to improving health: the world health report 2013 and how to make further progress. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013;11:47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
25.
go back to reference Saltman RB, Ferroussier-Davis O. The concept of stewardship in health policy. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(6):732–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Saltman RB, Ferroussier-Davis O. The concept of stewardship in health policy. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(6):732–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Pang T, Sadana R, Hanney S, Bhutta ZA, Hyder AA, Simon J. Knowledge for better health: a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(11):815–20.PubMed Pang T, Sadana R, Hanney S, Bhutta ZA, Hyder AA, Simon J. Knowledge for better health: a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(11):815–20.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Milewa T, Buxton M, Hanney S. Lay involvement in the public funding of medical research: expertise and counter-expertise in empirical and analytical perspective. Crit Public Health. 2008;18(3):357–66.CrossRef Milewa T, Buxton M, Hanney S. Lay involvement in the public funding of medical research: expertise and counter-expertise in empirical and analytical perspective. Crit Public Health. 2008;18(3):357–66.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousnad Oaks: Sage Publicatins; 2009. Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousnad Oaks: Sage Publicatins; 2009.
31.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press; 2006. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press; 2006.
32.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers; 2009. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers; 2009.
33.
go back to reference Thorne S. Data analysis in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2000;3(3):68–70.CrossRef Thorne S. Data analysis in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2000;3(3):68–70.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Shklarov S, Marshall DA, Wasylak T, Marlett NJ. “Part of the Team”: Mapping the outcomes of training patients for new roles in health research and planning. Health Expect. 2017;20(6):1428–36. Shklarov S, Marshall DA, Wasylak T, Marlett NJ. “Part of the Team”: Mapping the outcomes of training patients for new roles in health research and planning. Health Expect. 2017;20(6):1428–36.
42.
go back to reference Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, Wang Z, Elraiyah TA, Nabhan M, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1151–66.CrossRefPubMed Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, Wang Z, Elraiyah TA, Nabhan M, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1151–66.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Pratt B, Merritt M, Hyder AA. Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting: a working model. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:215–24.CrossRefPubMed Pratt B, Merritt M, Hyder AA. Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting: a working model. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:215–24.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Petit-Zeman S, Firkins L, Scadding JW. The James Lind Alliance: tackling research mismatches. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):667–9.CrossRefPubMed Petit-Zeman S, Firkins L, Scadding JW. The James Lind Alliance: tackling research mismatches. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):667–9.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Abelson J, Li K, Wilson G, Shields K, Schneider C, Boesveld S. Supporting quality public and patient engagement in health system organizations: development and usability testing of the public and patient engagement evaluation tool. Health Expect. 2016;19(4):817–27.CrossRefPubMed Abelson J, Li K, Wilson G, Shields K, Schneider C, Boesveld S. Supporting quality public and patient engagement in health system organizations: development and usability testing of the public and patient engagement evaluation tool. Health Expect. 2016;19(4):817–27.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Abelson J, Gauvin F-P. Assessing the Impacts of Public Participation: Concepts, Evidence and Policy Implications. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks; 2006. Abelson J, Gauvin F-P. Assessing the Impacts of Public Participation: Concepts, Evidence and Policy Implications. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks; 2006.
Metadata
Title
Public involvement and health research system governance: a qualitative study
Authors
Fiona Alice Miller
Sarah J. Patton
Mark Dobrow
Deborah A. Marshall
Whitney Berta
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0361-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018 Go to the issue