Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Physician perspectives on Choosing Wisely Canada as an approach to reduce unnecessary medical care: a qualitative study

Authors: Mark Embrett, Glen E Randall

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reducing monies spent on unnecessary medical care is one possible target to improve value in healthcare systems. Regional variation in the provision of medical care suggests physician behaviour and patient demands influence the provision of unnecessary medical care. Recently, Choosing Wisely campaigns began using ‘top 5 do-not-do’ lists to target unnecessary medical care by encouraging greater physician and patient dialogue at the point of care. The present study aims to examine the rationale for Choosing Wisely Canada’s (CWC) design and to analyse physician perceptions regarding the features of CWC aimed to reduce unnecessary medical care.

Methods

The study involved semi-structured interviews with 19 key informant physicians with CWC experience and the application of procedures of grounded theory to analyse interview transcripts and develop explanations addressing the objectives.

Results

Participants reported that the CWC was the medical community’s response to three pressures, namely (1) demand for unnecessary medical care from patients during the clinical encounter; (2) public perception that physicians do not always prioritise patients’ needs; and (3) ‘blunt’ government tools aimed to reduce costs rather than improving patient care. Respondents stated that involving the patient in decision-making would help alleviate these pressures by promoting the clinical encounter as the paramount decision-point in achieving necessary care. However, CWC does not address several of the key reasons, from a physician perspective, for providing unnecessary medical care, including time pressures in the clinical encounter, uncertainty about the optimal care pathway and fear of litigation.

Conclusion

This study contributes to our understanding of the perceptions of physicians regarding the CWC campaign. Specifically, physicians believe that CWC does little to address the clinical reasons for unnecessary medical care. Ultimately, because CWC has limited impact on physician behaviour or patient expectations, it is unlikely to have a major influence on unnecessary medical care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fisher ES, Bynum JP, Skinner JS. Slowing the growth of health care costs: Lessons from regional variation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:849–52.CrossRef Fisher ES, Bynum JP, Skinner JS. Slowing the growth of health care costs: Lessons from regional variation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:849–52.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hayward RS, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, McKibbon KA, Carter AO. Canadian physicians’ attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997;156:1715–23.PubMedPubMedCentral Hayward RS, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, McKibbon KA, Carter AO. Canadian physicians’ attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997;156:1715–23.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Anthony DL, Herndon MB, Gallagher PM, Barnato AE, Bynum JP, Gottlieb DJ, et al. How much do patients’ preferences contribute to resource use? Health Aff. 2009;28:864–73.CrossRef Anthony DL, Herndon MB, Gallagher PM, Barnato AE, Bynum JP, Gottlieb DJ, et al. How much do patients’ preferences contribute to resource use? Health Aff. 2009;28:864–73.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chen C, Petterson S, Phillips R, Bazemore A, Mullan F. Spending patterns in region of residency training and subsequent expenditures for care provided by practicing physicians for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2014;312:2385–93.CrossRef Chen C, Petterson S, Phillips R, Bazemore A, Mullan F. Spending patterns in region of residency training and subsequent expenditures for care provided by practicing physicians for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2014;312:2385–93.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brody H. Medicine’s ethical responsibility for health care reform - The top five list. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:283–5.CrossRef Brody H. Medicine’s ethical responsibility for health care reform - The top five list. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:283–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Aguilar I, Berger ZD, Casher D, Choi RY, Green JB, Harding EG, et al. The “top 5” lists in primary care: meeting the responsibility of professionalism. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1385–90.CrossRef Aguilar I, Berger ZD, Casher D, Choi RY, Green JB, Harding EG, et al. The “top 5” lists in primary care: meeting the responsibility of professionalism. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1385–90.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Blumenthal-Barby JS. “Choosing Wisely” to reduce low-value care: a conceptual and ethical analysis. J Med Philos. 2013;38:559–80.CrossRef Blumenthal-Barby JS. “Choosing Wisely” to reduce low-value care: a conceptual and ethical analysis. J Med Philos. 2013;38:559–80.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wolfson D, Santa J, Slass L. Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the choosing wisely campaign. Acad Med. 2014;89:990–995.CrossRef Wolfson D, Santa J, Slass L. Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the choosing wisely campaign. Acad Med. 2014;89:990–995.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Reilly BM. Much ado about (doing) nothing. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:270–2.CrossRef Reilly BM. Much ado about (doing) nothing. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:270–2.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Volpp KG, Loewenstein G, Asch DA. Choosing Wisely: low value services, utilization and patient cost sharing. JAMA. 2012;308:41–3. Volpp KG, Loewenstein G, Asch DA. Choosing Wisely: low value services, utilization and patient cost sharing. JAMA. 2012;308:41–3.
12.
go back to reference Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531–5.CrossRef Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531–5.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2014. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2014.
15.
go back to reference McCallin AM. Designing a grounded theory study: some practicalities. Nurs Crit Care. 2003;8:203–8.CrossRef McCallin AM. Designing a grounded theory study: some practicalities. Nurs Crit Care. 2003;8:203–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2014. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Bloor CM, Wood F. Reliability/Validity. Keywords in Qualittative Methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2006. p. 154–8. Bloor CM, Wood F. Reliability/Validity. Keywords in Qualittative Methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2006. p. 154–8.
18.
go back to reference Price JMC. Coding: Open coding. In: Mills AJ, Durepos G, Wiebe E, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2010. p. 154–6. Price JMC. Coding: Open coding. In: Mills AJ, Durepos G, Wiebe E, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2010. p. 154–6.
19.
go back to reference Ponterotto JG. Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept “thick description”. Qual Rep. 2006;11:538–49. Ponterotto JG. Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept “thick description”. Qual Rep. 2006;11:538–49.
21.
go back to reference Tyssen R, Palmer KS, Solberg IB, Voltmer E, Frank E. Physicians’ perceptions of quality of care, professional autonomy, and job satisfaction in Canada, Norway, and the United States. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:516.CrossRef Tyssen R, Palmer KS, Solberg IB, Voltmer E, Frank E. Physicians’ perceptions of quality of care, professional autonomy, and job satisfaction in Canada, Norway, and the United States. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:516.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:526–35.CrossRef Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:526–35.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wennberg JE, Barnes BA, Zubkoff M. Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16:811–24.CrossRef Wennberg JE, Barnes BA, Zubkoff M. Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16:811–24.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mulley AG. Inconvenient truths about supplier induced demand and unwarranted variation in medical practice decisions. Br Med J. 2009;339:1–7.CrossRef Mulley AG. Inconvenient truths about supplier induced demand and unwarranted variation in medical practice decisions. Br Med J. 2009;339:1–7.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Douven R, Mocking R, Mosca I. The effect of physician remuneration on regional variation in hospital treatments. Int J Heal Econ Manag. 2015;15:215–40.CrossRef Douven R, Mocking R, Mosca I. The effect of physician remuneration on regional variation in hospital treatments. Int J Heal Econ Manag. 2015;15:215–40.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kessler D. Do doctors practice defensive medicine? Q J Econ. 1996;111:353–90.CrossRef Kessler D. Do doctors practice defensive medicine? Q J Econ. 1996;111:353–90.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hermer LD, Brody H. Defensive medicine, cost containment, and reform. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:470–3.CrossRef Hermer LD, Brody H. Defensive medicine, cost containment, and reform. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:470–3.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tilburt JC, Wynia MK, Sheeler RD, Thorsteinsdottir B, James KM, Egginton JS, et al. Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs. JAMA. 2013;310:380–8.CrossRef Tilburt JC, Wynia MK, Sheeler RD, Thorsteinsdottir B, James KM, Egginton JS, et al. Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs. JAMA. 2013;310:380–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Admon DAJ, Cooke DCR. Will Choosing Wisely improve quality and lower costs of care for patients with critical illness? Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(5):823–7.CrossRef Admon DAJ, Cooke DCR. Will Choosing Wisely improve quality and lower costs of care for patients with critical illness? Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(5):823–7.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Id G, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals (Review). 2014. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub3/epdf/full. Accessed 21 Sep 2018. Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Id G, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals (Review). 2014. https://​www.​cochranelibrary.​com/​cdsr/​doi/​10.​1002/​14651858.​CD006732.​pub3/​epdf/​full.​ Accessed 21 Sep 2018.
31.
go back to reference Légaré F, Hébert J, Goh L, Lewis KB, Leiva Portocarrero ME, Robitaille H, et al. Do choosing wisely tools meet criteria for patient decision aids? A descriptive analysis of patient materials. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011918.CrossRef Légaré F, Hébert J, Goh L, Lewis KB, Leiva Portocarrero ME, Robitaille H, et al. Do choosing wisely tools meet criteria for patient decision aids? A descriptive analysis of patient materials. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011918.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physician perspectives on Choosing Wisely Canada as an approach to reduce unnecessary medical care: a qualitative study
Authors
Mark Embrett
Glen E Randall
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0370-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018 Go to the issue