Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2010

Open Access 01-12-2010 | Review

Who needs what from a national health research system:lessons from reforms to the English Department of Health's R&D system

Authors: Stephen Hanney, Shyama Kuruvilla, Bryony Soper, Nicholas Mays

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Health research systems consist of diverse groups who have some role in health research, but the boundaries around such a system are not clear-cut. To explore what various stakeholders need we reviewed the literature including that on the history of English health R&D reforms, and we also applied some relevant conceptual frameworks.
We first describe the needs and capabilities of the main groups of stakeholders in health research systems, and explain key features of policymaking systems within which these stakeholders operate in the UK. The five groups are policymakers (and health care managers), health professionals, patients and the general public, industry, and researchers. As individuals and as organisations they have a range of needs from the health research system, but should also develop specific capabilities in order to contribute effectively to the system and benefit from it.
Second, we discuss key phases of reform in the development of the English health research system over four decades - especially that of the English Department of Health's R&D system - and identify how far legitimate demands of key stakeholder interests were addressed.
Third, in drawing lessons we highlight points emerging from contemporary reports, but also attempt to identify issues through application of relevant conceptual frameworks. The main lessons are: the importance of comprehensively addressing the diverse needs of various interacting institutions and stakeholders; the desirability of developing facilitating mechanisms at interfaces between the health research system and its various stakeholders; and the importance of additional money in being able to expand the scope of the health research system whilst maintaining support for basic science.
We conclude that the latest health R&D strategy in England builds on recent progress and tackles acknowledged weaknesses. The strategy goes a considerable way to identifying and more effectively meeting the needs of key groups such as medical academics, patients and industry, and has been remarkably successful in increasing the funding for health research. There are still areas that might benefit from further recognition and resourcing, but the lessons identified, and progress made by the reforms are relevant for the design and coordination of national health research systems beyond England.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pang T, Sadana R, Hanney S, Bhutta Z, Hyder A, Simon J: Knowledge for better health - a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems. Bull World Health Organ. 2003, 81: 815-820.PubMed Pang T, Sadana R, Hanney S, Bhutta Z, Hyder A, Simon J: Knowledge for better health - a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems. Bull World Health Organ. 2003, 81: 815-820.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Polyani M: The Republic of Science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva. 1962, 1 (54): 73- Polyani M: The Republic of Science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva. 1962, 1 (54): 73-
3.
go back to reference Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M: The New Production of Knowledge. 1994, London: Sage Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M: The New Production of Knowledge. 1994, London: Sage
4.
go back to reference Denis JL, Lomas J: Convergent evolution: the academic and policy roots of collaborative research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003, 8 (S2): 1-6. 10.1258/135581903322405108.CrossRefPubMed Denis JL, Lomas J: Convergent evolution: the academic and policy roots of collaborative research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003, 8 (S2): 1-6. 10.1258/135581903322405108.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Irwin A: Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science. 2001, 10: 1-18. 10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/301.CrossRef Irwin A: Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science. 2001, 10: 1-18. 10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/301.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kuruvilla S, Mays N: Reorienting health-research communication. Lancet. 2005, 366: 1416-1418. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67580-0.CrossRefPubMed Kuruvilla S, Mays N: Reorienting health-research communication. Lancet. 2005, 366: 1416-1418. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67580-0.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M: Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. 2001, Oxford: Policy Press Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M: Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. 2001, Oxford: Policy Press
8.
go back to reference Frederiksen LF, Hansson F, Wenneberg SB: The Agora and the role of research evaluation. Evaluation. 2003, 9 (2): 149-172. 10.1177/1356389003009002003.CrossRef Frederiksen LF, Hansson F, Wenneberg SB: The Agora and the role of research evaluation. Evaluation. 2003, 9 (2): 149-172. 10.1177/1356389003009002003.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Department of Health: Best Research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy - The NHS Contribution to Health Research in England. 2006, London: Research and Development Directorate, Department of Health Department of Health: Best Research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy - The NHS Contribution to Health Research in England. 2006, London: Research and Development Directorate, Department of Health
10.
go back to reference Shergold M, Grant J: Freedom and need: The evolution of public strategy for biomedical and health research in England. Health Res Policy Sys. 2008, 6: 2-10.1186/1478-4505-6-2.CrossRef Shergold M, Grant J: Freedom and need: The evolution of public strategy for biomedical and health research in England. Health Res Policy Sys. 2008, 6: 2-10.1186/1478-4505-6-2.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kogan M, Henkel M: Government and Research: The Rothschild Experiment in a Government Department. 1983, London: Heinemann Kogan M, Henkel M: Government and Research: The Rothschild Experiment in a Government Department. 1983, London: Heinemann
12.
go back to reference Kogan M, Henkel M, Hanney S: Government and Research: Thirty years of Evolution. 2006, Dordtrecht: Springer, SecondCrossRef Kogan M, Henkel M, Hanney S: Government and Research: Thirty years of Evolution. 2006, Dordtrecht: Springer, SecondCrossRef
13.
go back to reference House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology: Priorities in medical research. HL Paper 54-1. 1988 House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology: Priorities in medical research. HL Paper 54-1. 1988
14.
go back to reference Black N: National strategy for research and development: Lessons from England. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997, 18: 485-505. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.485.CrossRefPubMed Black N: National strategy for research and development: Lessons from England. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997, 18: 485-505. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.485.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Harrison A, New B: Public Interest, Private Decisions: Health-related Research in the UK. 2002, London: King's Fund Harrison A, New B: Public Interest, Private Decisions: Health-related Research in the UK. 2002, London: King's Fund
16.
go back to reference Hanney S, Gonzalez-Block M, Buxton M, Kogan M: The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Res Policy Sys. 2003, 1: 2-10.1186/1478-4505-1-2.CrossRef Hanney S, Gonzalez-Block M, Buxton M, Kogan M: The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Res Policy Sys. 2003, 1: 2-10.1186/1478-4505-1-2.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Department of Health: Research for Health. A Research and Development Strategy for the NHS. 1991, London: HMSO Department of Health: Research for Health. A Research and Development Strategy for the NHS. 1991, London: HMSO
18.
go back to reference Kennedy A, Khoja T, Abou-Zeid S, Ghannem H, IJsselmuiden C: National Health Research System Mapping in Ten Eastern Mediterranean Countries. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2008, 14: 502-517.PubMed Kennedy A, Khoja T, Abou-Zeid S, Ghannem H, IJsselmuiden C: National Health Research System Mapping in Ten Eastern Mediterranean Countries. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2008, 14: 502-517.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kennedy A, IJsselmuiden C: Building and Strengthening National Health Research Systems: A Manager's Guide to Developing and Managing Effective Health Research Systems. 2007, Geneva: COHRED Kennedy A, IJsselmuiden C: Building and Strengthening National Health Research Systems: A Manager's Guide to Developing and Managing Effective Health Research Systems. 2007, Geneva: COHRED
20.
go back to reference Kogan M, Hanney S: Reforming Higher Education. 2000, London: Jessica Kingsley Kogan M, Hanney S: Reforming Higher Education. 2000, London: Jessica Kingsley
21.
go back to reference Department of Health: Best research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy - The NHS Contribution to Health Research in England: A consultation. 2005, London: Department of Health Department of Health: Best research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy - The NHS Contribution to Health Research in England: A consultation. 2005, London: Department of Health
22.
go back to reference Haldane R: Report of the Machinery of Government Committee. 1918, London: HMSO Haldane R: Report of the Machinery of Government Committee. 1918, London: HMSO
23.
go back to reference Hargreaves I, Lewis J, Speers T: Toward a Better Map: Science, The Public and The Media. 2003, Swindon: Economic & Social Research Council Hargreaves I, Lewis J, Speers T: Toward a Better Map: Science, The Public and The Media. 2003, Swindon: Economic & Social Research Council
24.
go back to reference Brown J, Walsh-Childers K: Effects of media on personal and public health. Media effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Edited by: Bryant JZ, Mahwah D. 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 453-489. 2 Brown J, Walsh-Childers K: Effects of media on personal and public health. Media effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Edited by: Bryant JZ, Mahwah D. 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 453-489. 2
25.
go back to reference Grilli R, Ramsay C, Minozzi S: Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation [Review]. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2002 Grilli R, Ramsay C, Minozzi S: Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation [Review]. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2002
26.
go back to reference West E, Barron DN, Dowsett J, Newton JN: Hierarchies and cliques in the social network of health care professionals: implications for the design of dissemination strategies. Soc Sci Med. 1999, 48: 633-646. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00361-X.CrossRefPubMed West E, Barron DN, Dowsett J, Newton JN: Hierarchies and cliques in the social network of health care professionals: implications for the design of dissemination strategies. Soc Sci Med. 1999, 48: 633-646. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00361-X.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lomas J: Finding audiences, changing beliefs: the structure of research use in Canadian health policy. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990, 15: 525-542. 10.1215/03616878-15-3-525.CrossRefPubMed Lomas J: Finding audiences, changing beliefs: the structure of research use in Canadian health policy. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990, 15: 525-542. 10.1215/03616878-15-3-525.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Weiss C: The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review. 1979, 39: 426-431. 10.2307/3109916.CrossRef Weiss C: The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review. 1979, 39: 426-431. 10.2307/3109916.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pelz DC: Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy. Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View. Edited by: Yinger JM, Cutler SJ. 1978, New York: Free Press, 346-357. Pelz DC: Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy. Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View. Edited by: Yinger JM, Cutler SJ. 1978, New York: Free Press, 346-357.
30.
go back to reference Lavis JN, Ross SE, Hurley JE, Hohenadel JM, Stoddart GL, Woodward CA, Abelson J: Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. The Milbank Quarterly. 2002, 80: 125-154. 10.1111/1468-0009.00005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lavis JN, Ross SE, Hurley JE, Hohenadel JM, Stoddart GL, Woodward CA, Abelson J: Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. The Milbank Quarterly. 2002, 80: 125-154. 10.1111/1468-0009.00005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Walt G: Describing the impacts of health services and policy research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007, 12 (Suppl 1): 23-31. 10.1258/135581907780318374.CrossRef Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Walt G: Describing the impacts of health services and policy research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007, 12 (Suppl 1): 23-31. 10.1258/135581907780318374.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dash P: Increasing the Impact of Health Services Research on Health Services Improvement. 2003, London: The Health Foundation and the Nuffield Trust Dash P: Increasing the Impact of Health Services Research on Health Services Improvement. 2003, London: The Health Foundation and the Nuffield Trust
33.
go back to reference Lomas J: Using 'Linkage and Exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff. 2000, 19: 236-240. 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.236.CrossRef Lomas J: Using 'Linkage and Exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff. 2000, 19: 236-240. 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.236.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Foy R, Robinson N, Eccles MP, Wensing M, Durieux P, Légaré F, Neilson CP, Adily A: Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. Milbank Quarterly. 2008, 86: 125-155. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00515.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Foy R, Robinson N, Eccles MP, Wensing M, Durieux P, Légaré F, Neilson CP, Adily A: Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. Milbank Quarterly. 2008, 86: 125-155. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00515.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Denis JL, Lomas J, Stipich N: Creating receptor capacity for research in the health system: the Executive Training for Research Application (EXTRA) program in Canada. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008, 13 (Suppl 1): 1-7. 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007123.CrossRefPubMed Denis JL, Lomas J, Stipich N: Creating receptor capacity for research in the health system: the Executive Training for Research Application (EXTRA) program in Canada. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008, 13 (Suppl 1): 1-7. 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007123.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M: Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ. 2004, 82: 724-731.PubMedPubMedCentral Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M: Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ. 2004, 82: 724-731.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Halladay M, Bero L: Implementing evidence-based practice in health care. Public Money Manag. 2000, 20 (4): 43-49. 10.1111/1467-9302.00235.CrossRef Halladay M, Bero L: Implementing evidence-based practice in health care. Public Money Manag. 2000, 20 (4): 43-49. 10.1111/1467-9302.00235.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Buxton M, Hanney S, Packwood T, Roberts S, Youll P: Assessing benefits from Department of Health and National Health Service Research and Development. Public Money Manag. 2000, 20 (4): 29-34. 10.1111/1467-9302.00233.CrossRef Buxton M, Hanney S, Packwood T, Roberts S, Youll P: Assessing benefits from Department of Health and National Health Service Research and Development. Public Money Manag. 2000, 20 (4): 29-34. 10.1111/1467-9302.00233.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Buxton M, Hanney S: How can payback from health research be assessed?. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996, 1: 35-43.PubMed Buxton M, Hanney S: How can payback from health research be assessed?. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996, 1: 35-43.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, Dwyer N, Rees M, Abrams KR, Horsley S, Cowley D, Kidson C, Kirwin C: Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002, 288: 2701-2708. 10.1001/jama.288.21.2701.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, Dwyer N, Rees M, Abrams KR, Horsley S, Cowley D, Kidson C, Kirwin C: Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002, 288: 2701-2708. 10.1001/jama.288.21.2701.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant A, Greer D: Health Literacy: Can the Public be Healthy Without It?. 2006, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant A, Greer D: Health Literacy: Can the Public be Healthy Without It?. 2006, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University
44.
go back to reference Milewa T, Buxton M, Hanney S: Lay involvement in the public funding of medical research: expertise and counter-expertise in empirical and analytical perspectives. Critical Public Health. 2008, 18: 357-66. 10.1080/09581590802084838.CrossRef Milewa T, Buxton M, Hanney S: Lay involvement in the public funding of medical research: expertise and counter-expertise in empirical and analytical perspectives. Critical Public Health. 2008, 18: 357-66. 10.1080/09581590802084838.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Stateley K: Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. 2009, Eastleigh: INVOLVE Stateley K: Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. 2009, Eastleigh: INVOLVE
47.
go back to reference Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, Milne R, Buchanan P, Gabbay J, Gyte G, Oakley A, Stein K: Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: Developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess. 2004, 8: 15-CrossRef Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, Milne R, Buchanan P, Gabbay J, Gyte G, Oakley A, Stein K: Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: Developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess. 2004, 8: 15-CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Saunders C, Girgis A, Butow P, Crossing S, Penman A: From inclusion to independence - Training consumers to review research. Health Res Policy Sys. 2008, 6: 3-10.1186/1478-4505-6-3.CrossRef Saunders C, Girgis A, Butow P, Crossing S, Penman A: From inclusion to independence - Training consumers to review research. Health Res Policy Sys. 2008, 6: 3-10.1186/1478-4505-6-3.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference McCourt C, Morgan PA, Youll P: Evaluation of a 'virtual' approach to commissioning health research. Health Res Policy and Sys. 2006, 4: 9-10.1186/1478-4505-4-9.CrossRef McCourt C, Morgan PA, Youll P: Evaluation of a 'virtual' approach to commissioning health research. Health Res Policy and Sys. 2006, 4: 9-10.1186/1478-4505-4-9.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Soper B, Hanney S: Lessons from the evaluation of the UK's NHS R&D Implementation Methods Programme. Implementation Science. 2007, 2: 7-10.1186/1748-5908-2-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Soper B, Hanney S: Lessons from the evaluation of the UK's NHS R&D Implementation Methods Programme. Implementation Science. 2007, 2: 7-10.1186/1748-5908-2-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Cohen W, Levinthal D: Innovation and Learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic J. 1989, 99: 569-596. 10.2307/2233763.CrossRef Cohen W, Levinthal D: Innovation and Learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic J. 1989, 99: 569-596. 10.2307/2233763.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O: Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003, 326: 1167-1170. 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O: Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003, 326: 1167-1170. 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
go back to reference Diethelm PA, Rielle JC, McKee M: The whole truth and nothing but the truth? The research that Philip Morris did not want you to see. Lancet. 2005, 366: 86-92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66474-4.CrossRefPubMed Diethelm PA, Rielle JC, McKee M: The whole truth and nothing but the truth? The research that Philip Morris did not want you to see. Lancet. 2005, 366: 86-92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66474-4.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Hanney S, Buxton M, Green C, Coulson DJR: An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. Health Technol Assess. 2007, 11: 53-CrossRef Hanney S, Buxton M, Green C, Coulson DJR: An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. Health Technol Assess. 2007, 11: 53-CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Report Rothschild: The Organisation and Management of Government R & D. Cnmd 4814. 1971, London: HMSO Report Rothschild: The Organisation and Management of Government R & D. Cnmd 4814. 1971, London: HMSO
57.
go back to reference Peckham M: Research and development for the National Health Service. Lancet. 1991, 338: 367-371. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90494-A.CrossRefPubMed Peckham M: Research and development for the National Health Service. Lancet. 1991, 338: 367-371. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90494-A.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Cooksey D: A Review of UK Health Research Funding. 2006, London: HM Treasury, UK Government Cooksey D: A Review of UK Health Research Funding. 2006, London: HM Treasury, UK Government
59.
go back to reference Pawson R, Tilley N: Realistic Evaluation. 1997, London: Sage Publications Ltd Pawson R, Tilley N: Realistic Evaluation. 1997, London: Sage Publications Ltd
60.
go back to reference Mays N: Clout and credibility? The new Director of Research and Development in the Department of Health. Critical Public Health. 1990, 3: 26-32. 10.1080/09581599008406782.CrossRef Mays N: Clout and credibility? The new Director of Research and Development in the Department of Health. Critical Public Health. 1990, 3: 26-32. 10.1080/09581599008406782.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Hanney SPT, Buxton M: Evaluating the benefits from health R&D centres: A categorization, a model, and examples of utilization. Evaluation: the International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice. 2000, 6: 137-160.CrossRef Hanney SPT, Buxton M: Evaluating the benefits from health R&D centres: A categorization, a model, and examples of utilization. Evaluation: the International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice. 2000, 6: 137-160.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Department of Health: Review of the Role of Department of Health Funded Research Units: The Williams Report. 1992, London: Department of Health Department of Health: Review of the Role of Department of Health Funded Research Units: The Williams Report. 1992, London: Department of Health
64.
go back to reference McLachan G: A Fresh Look at Policies for Health Services Research and its Relevance to Management. 1985, London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust McLachan G: A Fresh Look at Policies for Health Services Research and its Relevance to Management. 1985, London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust
65.
go back to reference Peckham M: Developing the National Health Service: a model for public services. Lancet. 1999, 354: 1539-1545. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08417-2.CrossRefPubMed Peckham M: Developing the National Health Service: a model for public services. Lancet. 1999, 354: 1539-1545. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08417-2.CrossRefPubMed
66.
go back to reference Department of Health: Research for Health. 1993, London: Department of Health Department of Health: Research for Health. 1993, London: Department of Health
67.
go back to reference Department of Health: Assessing the Effects of Health Technologies: Principles, Practice and Proposals. 1992, London: Department of Health Department of Health: Assessing the Effects of Health Technologies: Principles, Practice and Proposals. 1992, London: Department of Health
69.
go back to reference Wilson B, Thornton JG, Hewison J, Lilford RJ, Watt I, Braunholtz D, Robinson M: The Leeds University Maternity Audit project. Int Jr Quality Health Care. 2002, 14: 175-181.CrossRef Wilson B, Thornton JG, Hewison J, Lilford RJ, Watt I, Braunholtz D, Robinson M: The Leeds University Maternity Audit project. Int Jr Quality Health Care. 2002, 14: 175-181.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Steel R: Involving the Public in NHS, Public Health, and Social Care Research: Briefing Notes for Researchers. 2003, Eastleigh: INVOLVE Steel R: Involving the Public in NHS, Public Health, and Social Care Research: Briefing Notes for Researchers. 2003, Eastleigh: INVOLVE
71.
go back to reference Buxton M, Hanney S: Evaluating the NHS Research and Development Programme: Will the programme give value for money?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1998, 91 (Suppl 35): 2-6.PubMedPubMedCentral Buxton M, Hanney S: Evaluating the NHS Research and Development Programme: Will the programme give value for money?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1998, 91 (Suppl 35): 2-6.PubMedPubMedCentral
72.
go back to reference Holland W: Health technology assessment and public health: a commentary. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004, 20: 77-80. 10.1017/S0266462304000820.CrossRefPubMed Holland W: Health technology assessment and public health: a commentary. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004, 20: 77-80. 10.1017/S0266462304000820.CrossRefPubMed
73.
go back to reference Culyer A: Supporting Research and Development in the NHS. Report of the Department of Health Research and Development Task Force. 1994, London: HMSO Culyer A: Supporting Research and Development in the NHS. Report of the Department of Health Research and Development Task Force. 1994, London: HMSO
74.
go back to reference Academy of Medical Sciences: Clinical Academic Medicine In Jeopardy: Recommendations For Change. 2002, London: Academy of Medical Sciences Academy of Medical Sciences: Clinical Academic Medicine In Jeopardy: Recommendations For Change. 2002, London: Academy of Medical Sciences
75.
go back to reference Academy of Medical Sciences: Strengthening Clinical Research. 2003, London: Academy of Medical Sciences Academy of Medical Sciences: Strengthening Clinical Research. 2003, London: Academy of Medical Sciences
76.
go back to reference Biosciences Innovation and Growth Team: Bioscience 2015: Improving National Health, Increasing National Wealth. 2003, London: BioIndustry Association, DTI, DH Biosciences Innovation and Growth Team: Bioscience 2015: Improving National Health, Increasing National Wealth. 2003, London: BioIndustry Association, DTI, DH
77.
go back to reference Department of Health: Research for Patient Benefit Working Party - final report. 2004, London: Department of Health Department of Health: Research for Patient Benefit Working Party - final report. 2004, London: Department of Health
78.
go back to reference National Institute for Health Research: Transforming Health Research: the first two years. National Institute for Health Progress Report 2006-2008. 2008, London: NIHR National Institute for Health Research: Transforming Health Research: the first two years. National Institute for Health Progress Report 2006-2008. 2008, London: NIHR
79.
go back to reference Department of Health: Delivering Health Research: National Institute for Health Research Progress Report 2008/9. 2009, London: Department of Health Department of Health: Delivering Health Research: National Institute for Health Research Progress Report 2008/9. 2009, London: Department of Health
81.
go back to reference UK Clinical Research Collaboration: UKCRC Progress Report. 2006, London: UKCRC UK Clinical Research Collaboration: UKCRC Progress Report. 2006, London: UKCRC
82.
go back to reference Darbyshire J: Update on the UK Clinical Research Network. HTA Conference: 2007; London. 2007 Darbyshire J: Update on the UK Clinical Research Network. HTA Conference: 2007; London. 2007
83.
go back to reference Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Pleasant A, Walt G: Describing the impacts of health research: a Research Impact Framework. BMC Health Services Research. 2006, 6: 134-10.1186/1472-6963-6-134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Pleasant A, Walt G: Describing the impacts of health research: a Research Impact Framework. BMC Health Services Research. 2006, 6: 134-10.1186/1472-6963-6-134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
84.
go back to reference NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme: HTA Update 2007. 2007, Southampton: NCCHTA NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme: HTA Update 2007. 2007, Southampton: NCCHTA
85.
go back to reference Service Delivery Organisation (SDO): SDO News. No. 13. 2007, London: SDO Service Delivery Organisation (SDO): SDO News. No. 13. 2007, London: SDO
86.
go back to reference Peckham S, Willmott M: The Impact of the NHS Service and Delivery and Organisation Research and Development programme 2001-2006. 2007, London: National Coordinating Centre for Service Delivery and Organisation Peckham S, Willmott M: The Impact of the NHS Service and Delivery and Organisation Research and Development programme 2001-2006. 2007, London: National Coordinating Centre for Service Delivery and Organisation
87.
go back to reference NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme: Annual Report 2008. 2008, London: National Coordinating Centre Service Delivery and Organisation NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme: Annual Report 2008. 2008, London: National Coordinating Centre Service Delivery and Organisation
88.
go back to reference Fulop N, Allen P, Clarke A, Black N: Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services. 2001, London: Routledge Fulop N, Allen P, Clarke A, Black N: Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services. 2001, London: Routledge
89.
go back to reference Mays N, Pope C, Popay J: Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005, 10 (Suppl 1): 6-20. 10.1258/1355819054308576.CrossRefPubMed Mays N, Pope C, Popay J: Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005, 10 (Suppl 1): 6-20. 10.1258/1355819054308576.CrossRefPubMed
90.
go back to reference Pope C, Mays N, Popay J: Synthesising Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods. 2007, Maidenhead: Open University Press Pope C, Mays N, Popay J: Synthesising Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods. 2007, Maidenhead: Open University Press
91.
go back to reference Lavis J, Davies H, Oxman A, Denis JL, Golden-Biddle K, Ferlie E: Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005, 10 (Suppl 1): 35-48. 10.1258/1355819054308549.CrossRefPubMed Lavis J, Davies H, Oxman A, Denis JL, Golden-Biddle K, Ferlie E: Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005, 10 (Suppl 1): 35-48. 10.1258/1355819054308549.CrossRefPubMed
93.
go back to reference Wanless D, Appleby J, Harrison A, Patel D: Our Future Health Secured? A review of NHS funding and performance. 2007, London: King's Fund Wanless D, Appleby J, Harrison A, Patel D: Our Future Health Secured? A review of NHS funding and performance. 2007, London: King's Fund
94.
go back to reference Davies S: Academic health centres: what is the agenda for research?. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008, 13: 3-4. 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007128.CrossRefPubMed Davies S: Academic health centres: what is the agenda for research?. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008, 13: 3-4. 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007128.CrossRefPubMed
95.
go back to reference Black N: The Cooksey Review of UK health research funding. BMJ. 2006, 333: 1230-1231. 10.1136/bmj.39036.739236.43.CrossRef Black N: The Cooksey Review of UK health research funding. BMJ. 2006, 333: 1230-1231. 10.1136/bmj.39036.739236.43.CrossRef
96.
go back to reference Office for Strategic Coordination of Health Research (OSCHR): Chairman's First Progress Report. 2008, Norwich: The Stationery Office Office for Strategic Coordination of Health Research (OSCHR): Chairman's First Progress Report. 2008, Norwich: The Stationery Office
Metadata
Title
Who needs what from a national health research system:lessons from reforms to the English Department of Health's R&D system
Authors
Stephen Hanney
Shyama Kuruvilla
Bryony Soper
Nicholas Mays
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2010
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-8-11

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2010 Go to the issue