Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Getting research into policy and practice in healthcare is a recognised, world-wide concern. As an attempt to bridge the gap between research and practice, research funders are requesting more interdisciplinary and collaborative research, while actual experiences of such processes have been less studied. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to gain more knowledge on the interdisciplinary, collaborative and partnership research process by investigating researchers’ experiences of and approaches to the process, based on their participation in an inventive national research programme. The programme aimed to boost collaborative and partnership research and build learning structures, while improving ways to lead, manage and develop practices in Swedish health and social services.

Methods

Interviews conducted with project leaders and/or lead researchers and documentation from 20 projects were analysed using directed and conventional content analysis.

Results

Collaborative approaches were achieved by design, e.g. action research, or by involving practitioners from several levels of the healthcare system in various parts of the research process. The use of dual roles as researcher/clinician or practitioner/PhD student or the use of education designed especially for practitioners or ‘student researchers’ were other approaches. The collaborative process constituted the area for the main lessons learned as well as the main problems. Difficulties concerned handling complexity and conflicts between different expectations and demands in the practitioner’s and researcher’s contexts, and dealing with human resource issues and group interactions when forming collaborative and interdisciplinary research teams. The handling of such challenges required time, resources, knowledge, interactive learning and skilled project management.

Conclusions

Collaborative approaches are important in the study of complex phenomena. Results from this study show that allocated time, arenas for interactions and skills in project management and communication are needed during research collaboration to ensure support and build trust and understanding with involved practitioners at several levels in the healthcare system. For researchers, dealing with this complexity takes time and energy from the scientific process. For practitioners, this puts demands on understanding a research process and how it fits with on-going organisational agendas and activities and allocating time. Some of the identified factors may be overlooked by funders and involved stakeholders when designing, performing and evaluating interdisciplinary, collaborative and partnership research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine. BMJ Brit Med J. 1996;313:170.CrossRef Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine. BMJ Brit Med J. 1996;313:170.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference McIntyre D. Bridging the gap between research and practice. Camb J Educ. 2005;35(3):357–82.CrossRef McIntyre D. Bridging the gap between research and practice. Camb J Educ. 2005;35(3):357–82.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Aita M, Richer MC, Héon M. Illuminating the processes of knowledge transfer in nursing. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4:146–55.CrossRefPubMed Aita M, Richer MC, Héon M. Illuminating the processes of knowledge transfer in nursing. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4:146–55.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–30.CrossRefPubMed Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–30.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001;39:8. Suppl. 2, II46–II54CrossRef Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001;39:8. Suppl. 2, II46–II54CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Tetroe J. Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004;24:31–7.CrossRef Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Tetroe J. Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004;24:31–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cabana M, Rand C, Powe N, Wu M, Abbound P, Rubin H. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65.CrossRefPubMed Cabana M, Rand C, Powe N, Wu M, Abbound P, Rubin H. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Uzochukwu BC, Onwujekwe OE, Mbachu CO, Okwuosa C, Etiaba E, Nyström ME, Gilson L. The challenge of bridging the gap between researchers and policy makers: Experiences of a Health Policy Research Group in engaging policy makers to support evidence informed policy making in Nigeria. Glob Health. 2016;12:67.CrossRef Uzochukwu BC, Onwujekwe OE, Mbachu CO, Okwuosa C, Etiaba E, Nyström ME, Gilson L. The challenge of bridging the gap between researchers and policy makers: Experiences of a Health Policy Research Group in engaging policy makers to support evidence informed policy making in Nigeria. Glob Health. 2016;12:67.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature, FMHI Publication. Tampa: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network, University of South Florida; 2005. p. 231. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature, FMHI Publication. Tampa: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network, University of South Florida; 2005. p. 231.
13.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Robert G, MacFarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovation in service organisations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581–629.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greenhalgh T, Robert G, MacFarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovation in service organisations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581–629.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:174–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:174–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Van de Ven AH, Johnson PE. Knowledge for theory and practice. Acad Manag Rev. 2006;31:802–21.CrossRef Van de Ven AH, Johnson PE. Knowledge for theory and practice. Acad Manag Rev. 2006;31:802–21.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Golden-Biddle K, Reay T, Petz S. Toward a communicative perspective of collaborating in research: the case of the researcher-decision-maker partnership. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(Suppl 2):20–5.CrossRefPubMed Golden-Biddle K, Reay T, Petz S. Toward a communicative perspective of collaborating in research: the case of the researcher-decision-maker partnership. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(Suppl 2):20–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID. Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:6–10.CrossRefPubMed Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID. Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:6–10.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Perry BW. Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q. 2007;85:729–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Perry BW. Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q. 2007;85:729–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Thompson GN, Estabrooks CA, Degner LF. Clarifying the concepts in knowledge transfer: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53:691–701.CrossRefPubMed Thompson GN, Estabrooks CA, Degner LF. Clarifying the concepts in knowledge transfer: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53:691–701.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Oborn E. Facilitating implementation of the translational research pipeline in neurological rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25:676–81.CrossRefPubMed Oborn E. Facilitating implementation of the translational research pipeline in neurological rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25:676–81.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bowen S, Graham ID. Integrated knowledge translation. In: Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving from Evidence to Practice, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2013. p. 14–23. Bowen S, Graham ID. Integrated knowledge translation. In: Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving from Evidence to Practice, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2013. p. 14–23.
22.
go back to reference Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge translation in healthcare: moving from evidence to practice. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2013. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge translation in healthcare: moving from evidence to practice. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2013.
24.
go back to reference Mitchell P, Pirkis J, Hall J, Haas M. Partnerships for knowledge exchange in health services research, policy and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009;14:104–11.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell P, Pirkis J, Hall J, Haas M. Partnerships for knowledge exchange in health services research, policy and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009;14:104–11.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Boaz A, Fitzpatrick S, Shaw B. Assessing the impact of research on policy: a literature review. Sci Public Policy. 2009;36:255–70.CrossRef Boaz A, Fitzpatrick S, Shaw B. Assessing the impact of research on policy: a literature review. Sci Public Policy. 2009;36:255–70.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rycroft-Malone J, Wilkinson JE, Burton CR, Andrews G, Ariss S, Baker R, Dopson S, Graham I, Harvey G, Martin G, McCormack BG, Staniszewska S, Thompson C. Implementing health research through academic and clinical partnerships: a realistic evaluation of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC). Implement Sci. 2011;6:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rycroft-Malone J, Wilkinson JE, Burton CR, Andrews G, Ariss S, Baker R, Dopson S, Graham I, Harvey G, Martin G, McCormack BG, Staniszewska S, Thompson C. Implementing health research through academic and clinical partnerships: a realistic evaluation of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC). Implement Sci. 2011;6:74. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1748-5908-6-74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference DeVoe JE, Likumahuwa S, Eiff MP, Nelson CA, Carroll JE, Hill CN, Gold R, Kullberg PA. Lessons learned and challenges ahead: report from the OCHIN Safety Net West practice-based research network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25:560–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeVoe JE, Likumahuwa S, Eiff MP, Nelson CA, Carroll JE, Hill CN, Gold R, Kullberg PA. Lessons learned and challenges ahead: report from the OCHIN Safety Net West practice-based research network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25:560–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Nagykaldi Z, Mold JW, Robinson A, Niebauer L, Ford A. Practice facilitators and practice-based research networks. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19:506–10.CrossRefPubMed Nagykaldi Z, Mold JW, Robinson A, Niebauer L, Ford A. Practice facilitators and practice-based research networks. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19:506–10.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Gold M, Taylor EF. Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program. Implement Sci. 2007;2:1–9.CrossRef Gold M, Taylor EF. Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program. Implement Sci. 2007;2:1–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Smits PA, Denis JL. How research funding agencies support science integration into policy and practice: an international overview. Implement Sci. 2014;9:1.CrossRef Smits PA, Denis JL. How research funding agencies support science integration into policy and practice: an international overview. Implement Sci. 2014;9:1.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lomas J. Using ‘linkage and exchange’ to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff. 2000;19:236–40.CrossRef Lomas J. Using ‘linkage and exchange’ to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff. 2000;19:236–40.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health. 2001;14:182–97.CrossRef Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health. 2001;14:182–97.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(Suppl. 1):40–6.CrossRef Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(Suppl. 1):40–6.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ross SE, Lavis JN, Rodriguez C, Woodside JM, Denis JL. Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(Suppl 2):26–34.CrossRefPubMed Ross SE, Lavis JN, Rodriguez C, Woodside JM, Denis JL. Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(Suppl 2):26–34.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Cordero C, Delino R, Jeyaseelan L, Lansang MA, Lozano JM, Kumar S, Moreno S, Pietersen M, Quirino J, Thamlikitkul V, Welch VA, Tetroe J, ter Kuile A, Graham ID, Grimshaw J, Neufeld V, Wells G, Tugwell P. Funding agencies in low-and middle-income countries: support for knowledge translation. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(7):524–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cordero C, Delino R, Jeyaseelan L, Lansang MA, Lozano JM, Kumar S, Moreno S, Pietersen M, Quirino J, Thamlikitkul V, Welch VA, Tetroe J, ter Kuile A, Graham ID, Grimshaw J, Neufeld V, Wells G, Tugwell P. Funding agencies in low-and middle-income countries: support for knowledge translation. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(7):524–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Bowen S, Botting I, Graham ID, Huebner LA. Beyond “two cultures”: Guidance for establishing effective researcher/health system partnerships. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(1):27.CrossRef Bowen S, Botting I, Graham ID, Huebner LA. Beyond “two cultures”: Guidance for establishing effective researcher/health system partnerships. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(1):27.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Huberman M. Research utilization: the state of the art. Knowledge Policy. 1994;7:22–42. Huberman M. Research utilization: the state of the art. Knowledge Policy. 1994;7:22–42.
40.
go back to reference Lomas J. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. Br Med J. 2007;334:129–32.CrossRef Lomas J. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. Br Med J. 2007;334:129–32.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Knight C, Lyall C. Knowledge brokers: the role of intermediaries in producing research impact. Evid Policy. 2013;9:309–16.CrossRef Knight C, Lyall C. Knowledge brokers: the role of intermediaries in producing research impact. Evid Policy. 2013;9:309–16.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Nyström ME, Hansson J, Garvare R, Andersson Bäck M. Locally based research and development units as knowledge brokers and change facilitators in health and social care of older people in Sweden. Evid Policy. 2015;11:57–80.CrossRef Nyström ME, Hansson J, Garvare R, Andersson Bäck M. Locally based research and development units as knowledge brokers and change facilitators in health and social care of older people in Sweden. Evid Policy. 2015;11:57–80.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Michaels S. Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings. Environ Sci Pol. 2009;12:994–1011.CrossRef Michaels S. Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings. Environ Sci Pol. 2009;12:994–1011.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Martin S. Co-production of social research: strategies for engaged scholarship. Public Money Manag. 2010;30:211–8.CrossRef Martin S. Co-production of social research: strategies for engaged scholarship. Public Money Manag. 2010;30:211–8.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference King G, Currie M, Smith L, Servais M, McDougall J. A framework of operating models for interdisciplinary research programs in clinical service organisations. Eval Prog Plann. 2008;31:160–73.CrossRef King G, Currie M, Smith L, Servais M, McDougall J. A framework of operating models for interdisciplinary research programs in clinical service organisations. Eval Prog Plann. 2008;31:160–73.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Øvretveit J, Hempel S, Magnabosco J, Mittman B, Rubenstein L, Ganz D. Guidance for Research-Practice Partnerships (R-PPs) and Collaborative Research. J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28:115–26.CrossRefPubMed Øvretveit J, Hempel S, Magnabosco J, Mittman B, Rubenstein L, Ganz D. Guidance for Research-Practice Partnerships (R-PPs) and Collaborative Research. J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28:115–26.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Svensson L, Ellström PE, Brulin G. Introduction on interactive research. Int J Action Res. 2007;3:233–49. Svensson L, Ellström PE, Brulin G. Introduction on interactive research. Int J Action Res. 2007;3:233–49.
48.
go back to reference Nyström ME, Höög E, Garvare R, Weinehall L, Ivarsson A. Change and learning strategies in large scale change programs: describing the variation of strategies used in a health promotion program. J Organ Chang Manag. 2013;26:1020–44.CrossRef Nyström ME, Höög E, Garvare R, Weinehall L, Ivarsson A. Change and learning strategies in large scale change programs: describing the variation of strategies used in a health promotion program. J Organ Chang Manag. 2013;26:1020–44.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Elden M, Chisholm RF. Emerging varieties of action research: introduction to the special issue. Hum Relat. 1993;46:121–42.CrossRef Elden M, Chisholm RF. Emerging varieties of action research: introduction to the special issue. Hum Relat. 1993;46:121–42.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Aagaard Nielsen K, Svensson L. Action and Interactive Research. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing BV; 2006. Aagaard Nielsen K, Svensson L. Action and Interactive Research. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing BV; 2006.
52.
go back to reference Westlander G. Researcher roles in action research. In: Aagaard Nielsen K, Svensson L, editors. Action and Interactive Research. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing BV; 2006. Westlander G. Researcher roles in action research. In: Aagaard Nielsen K, Svensson L, editors. Action and Interactive Research. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing BV; 2006.
53.
go back to reference vom Brocke J, Lippe S. Managing collaborative research projects: A synthesis of project management literature and directives for future research. Int J Proj Manag. 2015;33:1022–39.CrossRef vom Brocke J, Lippe S. Managing collaborative research projects: A synthesis of project management literature and directives for future research. Int J Proj Manag. 2015;33:1022–39.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Creswell J, Tashakkori A. Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. J Mixed Method Res. 2007;1:303–8.CrossRef Creswell J, Tashakkori A. Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. J Mixed Method Res. 2007;1:303–8.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Estabrooks CA. Research utilization and qualitative research. In: Morse J, Swanson J, Kuzel A, editors. The Nature of Qualitative Evidence. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001. p. 275–98. Estabrooks CA. Research utilization and qualitative research. In: Morse J, Swanson J, Kuzel A, editors. The Nature of Qualitative Evidence. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001. p. 275–98.
58.
go back to reference Loomis M. Knowledge utilization and research utilization in nursing. J Nurs Scholarsh. 1985;17:35–9.CrossRef Loomis M. Knowledge utilization and research utilization in nursing. J Nurs Scholarsh. 1985;17:35–9.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Scott-Findlay S, Golden-Biddle K. Understanding how organisational culture shapes research use. J Nurs Admin. 2005;35:359–65.CrossRef Scott-Findlay S, Golden-Biddle K. Understanding how organisational culture shapes research use. J Nurs Admin. 2005;35:359–65.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Willis CD, Best A, Riley B, Herbert CP, Millar J, Howland D. Systems thinking for transformational change in health. Evid Policy. 2014;10:113–26.CrossRef Willis CD, Best A, Riley B, Herbert CP, Millar J, Howland D. Systems thinking for transformational change in health. Evid Policy. 2014;10:113–26.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage; 1994. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage; 1994.
64.
go back to reference Estabrooks CA, Norton P, Birdsell JM, Newton MS, Adewale AJ, Thornley R. Knowledge translation and research careers: Mode I and Mode II activity among health researchers. Res Policy. 2008;37:1066–78.CrossRef Estabrooks CA, Norton P, Birdsell JM, Newton MS, Adewale AJ, Thornley R. Knowledge translation and research careers: Mode I and Mode II activity among health researchers. Res Policy. 2008;37:1066–78.CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Brewer GD. The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sci. 1999;32:327–37.CrossRef Brewer GD. The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sci. 1999;32:327–37.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Bromme R. Beyond one’s own perspective: the psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In: Weingart P, Stehr N, editors. Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2000. p. 115–33. Bromme R. Beyond one’s own perspective: the psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In: Weingart P, Stehr N, editors. Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2000. p. 115–33.
67.
go back to reference Giacomini M. Interdisciplinarity in health services research: dreams and nightmares, maladies and remedies. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004;9:177–83.CrossRefPubMed Giacomini M. Interdisciplinarity in health services research: dreams and nightmares, maladies and remedies. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004;9:177–83.CrossRefPubMed
68.
69.
go back to reference Van Rijnsoever FJ, Hessels LK, Vandeberg RLJ. A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Res Policy. 2008;37:1255–66.CrossRef Van Rijnsoever FJ, Hessels LK, Vandeberg RLJ. A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Res Policy. 2008;37:1255–66.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Van Rijnsoever FJ, Hessels LK. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Res Policy. 2011;40:463–72.CrossRef Van Rijnsoever FJ, Hessels LK. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Res Policy. 2011;40:463–72.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Rhoten D, Pfirman S. Women in interdisciplinary science: exploring preferences and consequences. Res Policy. 2007;36:56–75.CrossRef Rhoten D, Pfirman S. Women in interdisciplinary science: exploring preferences and consequences. Res Policy. 2007;36:56–75.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Gorard S. Current contexts for research in educational leadership and management. Educ Manag Adm Lead. 2005;33:155–64.CrossRef Gorard S. Current contexts for research in educational leadership and management. Educ Manag Adm Lead. 2005;33:155–64.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Symonds JE, Gorard S. Death of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft. Eval Res Educ. 2010;23:121–36.CrossRef Symonds JE, Gorard S. Death of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft. Eval Res Educ. 2010;23:121–36.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects
Publication date
01-12-2018
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018 Go to the issue