Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Mental health research priorities in Australia: a consumer and carer agenda

Authors: Michelle A. Banfield, Alyssa R. Morse, Amelia Gulliver, Kathleen M. Griffiths

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The perspectives of mental health consumers and carers are increasingly recognised as important to the development and conduct of research. However, research directions are still most commonly developed without consumer and carer input. This project aimed to establish priorities for mental health research driven by the views of consumers and carers in Australia.

Method

The project was conducted in two studies. Firstly, a face-to-face discussion forum held in the Australian Capital Territory (Study 1; n = 25), followed by a national online survey (Study 2; n = 70). Participants in both studies were members of the community who identified as a mental health consumer, carer or both. In Study 1, participants developed topics for mental health research in small group discussions, then voted on which topics, developed across all groups and sorted into thematic areas, were a priority. An online survey was developed from these research topics. Study 2 participants were asked to rate topics on a 5-point priority scale and rank the relative importance of the highest-rated topics.

Results

At the forum, 79 topics were generated and grouped into 14 thematic areas. Votes on priorities were spread across a large number of topics, with the greatest overall support for research relating to integrating care that is sensitive to past experiences of trauma into mental health service delivery (trauma-informed care). Survey responses were similarly spread, with the majority of research topics rated as important by at least 50% of participants and no clear individual priorities for research identified. Amongst items rated as important by approximately 80% of participants, key research areas included the delivery of services, and consumer and carer involvement.

Conclusions

Australian mental health consumers and carers demonstrate a strong understanding of the mental health system and its inadequacies. Although clear specific priorities are difficult to establish, consistent areas of focus are services and the role consumers and carers can play in their improvement. However, for consumer and carer views to be at the forefront of research, it is important to regularly update research agendas and work in partnership across the whole research process.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Caldon LJM, Marshall-Cork H, Speed G, Reed MWR, Collins K. Consumers as researchers – innovative experiences in UK National Health Service Research. Int J Consum Stud. 2010;34:547–50.CrossRef Caldon LJM, Marshall-Cork H, Speed G, Reed MWR, Collins K. Consumers as researchers – innovative experiences in UK National Health Service Research. Int J Consum Stud. 2010;34:547–50.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Banfield MA, Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Christensen HM. SCOPE for Research: mental health consumers’ priorities for research compared with recent research in Australia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(12):1078–85.CrossRef Banfield MA, Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Christensen HM. SCOPE for Research: mental health consumers’ priorities for research compared with recent research in Australia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(12):1078–85.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Banfield MA, Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Christensen HM. Australian mental health consumers’ priorities for research: qualitative findings from the SCOPE for Research project. Health Expect. 2014;17:365–75.CrossRef Banfield MA, Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Christensen HM. Australian mental health consumers’ priorities for research: qualitative findings from the SCOPE for Research project. Health Expect. 2014;17:365–75.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Griffiths KM, Jorm AF, Christensen H, Medway J, Dear KB. Research priorities in mental health, Part 2: an evaluation of the current research effort against stakeholders’ priorities. Aust New Zealand J Psychiatry. 2002;36(3):327–39.CrossRef Griffiths KM, Jorm AF, Christensen H, Medway J, Dear KB. Research priorities in mental health, Part 2: an evaluation of the current research effort against stakeholders’ priorities. Aust New Zealand J Psychiatry. 2002;36(3):327–39.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Griffiths KM. Promoting consumer participation in mental health research: a national workshop. Canberra: Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University; 2004. Griffiths KM. Promoting consumer participation in mental health research: a national workshop. Canberra: Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University; 2004.
6.
go back to reference Griffiths KM, Jorm AF, Christensen HM. Academic consumer researchers: a bridge between consumers and researchers. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004;38(4):191–6.CrossRef Griffiths KM, Jorm AF, Christensen HM. Academic consumer researchers: a bridge between consumers and researchers. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004;38(4):191–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Robotham D, Wykes T, Rose D, Doughty L, Strange S, Neale J, Hotopf M. Service user and carer priorities in a Biomedical Research Centre for mental health. J Ment Health. 2016;25(3):185–8.CrossRef Robotham D, Wykes T, Rose D, Doughty L, Strange S, Neale J, Hotopf M. Service user and carer priorities in a Biomedical Research Centre for mental health. J Ment Health. 2016;25(3):185–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rose D, Fleischman P, Wykes T. What are mental health service users’ priorities for research in the UK? J Ment Health. 2008;17(5):520–30.CrossRef Rose D, Fleischman P, Wykes T. What are mental health service users’ priorities for research in the UK? J Ment Health. 2008;17(5):520–30.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference National Health and Medical Research Council & Consumers Health Forum: Statement on Consumer and Community Participation in Health and Medical Research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2002. National Health and Medical Research Council & Consumers Health Forum: Statement on Consumer and Community Participation in Health and Medical Research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2002.
10.
go back to reference Hancock N, Bundy A, Tamsett S, McMahon M. Participation of mental health consumers in research: Training addressed and reliability assessed. Aust Occup Ther J. 2012;59(3):218–24.CrossRef Hancock N, Bundy A, Tamsett S, McMahon M. Participation of mental health consumers in research: Training addressed and reliability assessed. Aust Occup Ther J. 2012;59(3):218–24.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wykes T, Haro JM, Belli SR, Obradors-Tarragó C, Arango C, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Bitter I, Brunn M, Chevreul K, Demotes-Mainard J, et al. Mental health research priorities for Europe. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(11):1036–42.CrossRef Wykes T, Haro JM, Belli SR, Obradors-Tarragó C, Arango C, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Bitter I, Brunn M, Chevreul K, Demotes-Mainard J, et al. Mental health research priorities for Europe. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(11):1036–42.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Happell B, Roper C. Consumer Participation in Mental Health Research: Articulating a Model to Guide Practice. Australas Psychiatry. 2007;15(3):237–41.CrossRef Happell B, Roper C. Consumer Participation in Mental Health Research: Articulating a Model to Guide Practice. Australas Psychiatry. 2007;15(3):237–41.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Banfield M, Randall R, O’Brien M, Hope S, Gulliver A, Forbes O, Morse AR, Griffiths K. Lived experience researchers partnering with consumers and carers to improve mental health research: Reflections from an Australian initiative. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018;27(4):1219–29.CrossRef Banfield M, Randall R, O’Brien M, Hope S, Gulliver A, Forbes O, Morse AR, Griffiths K. Lived experience researchers partnering with consumers and carers to improve mental health research: Reflections from an Australian initiative. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018;27(4):1219–29.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1990. Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1990.
17.
go back to reference Maley T. Participatory budgeting and the radical imagination: in Europe but not in Canada? Affinities. 2010;4(2):107–38. Maley T. Participatory budgeting and the radical imagination: in Europe but not in Canada? Affinities. 2010;4(2):107–38.
18.
go back to reference Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics, International Edition. 5th Edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education; 2007. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics, International Edition. 5th Edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education; 2007.
19.
go back to reference Howell DC. Statistical Methods for Psychology. 7th ed. Belmont: Thomas Wadsworth; 2010. Howell DC. Statistical Methods for Psychology. 7th ed. Belmont: Thomas Wadsworth; 2010.
20.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess B, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 173–94. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess B, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 173–94.
21.
go back to reference Owens C, Ley A, Aitken P. Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities? A four-arm Delphi study. Health Expect. 2008;11(4):418–31.CrossRef Owens C, Ley A, Aitken P. Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities? A four-arm Delphi study. Health Expect. 2008;11(4):418–31.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Williams TM, Smith GP. Can the National Disability Insurance Scheme work for mental health? Aust New Zealand J Psychiatry. 2014;48(5):391–4.CrossRef Williams TM, Smith GP. Can the National Disability Insurance Scheme work for mental health? Aust New Zealand J Psychiatry. 2014;48(5):391–4.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Muskett C. Trauma-informed care in inpatient mental health settings: a review of the literature. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014;23:51–9.CrossRef Muskett C. Trauma-informed care in inpatient mental health settings: a review of the literature. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014;23:51–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Reeves E. A synthesis of the literature on trauma-informed care. Issues Mental Health Nurs. 2015;36(9):698–709.CrossRef Reeves E. A synthesis of the literature on trauma-informed care. Issues Mental Health Nurs. 2015;36(9):698–709.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Griffiths KM, Mendoza J, Carron-Arthur B. Whereto mental health reform in Australia: is anyone listening to our independent auditors. Med J Aust. 2015;202(4):172–4.CrossRef Griffiths KM, Mendoza J, Carron-Arthur B. Whereto mental health reform in Australia: is anyone listening to our independent auditors. Med J Aust. 2015;202(4):172–4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mental health research priorities in Australia: a consumer and carer agenda
Authors
Michelle A. Banfield
Alyssa R. Morse
Amelia Gulliver
Kathleen M. Griffiths
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0395-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018 Go to the issue