Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Review

Uncovering the mechanisms of research capacity development in health and social care: a realist synthesis

Authors: Jo Cooke, Paolo Gardois, Andrew Booth

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Research capacity development (RCD) is considered fundamental to closing the evidence–practice gap, thereby contributing to health, wealth and knowledge for practice. Numerous frameworks and models have been proposed for RCD, but there is little evidence of what works for whom and under what circumstances. There is a need to identify mechanisms by which candidate interventions or clusters of interventions might achieve RCD and contribute to societal impact, thereby proving meaningful to stakeholders.

Methods

A realist synthesis was used to develop programme theories for RCD. Structured database searches were conducted across seven databases to identify papers examining RCD in a health or social care context (1998–2013). In addition, citation searches for 10 key articles (citation pearls) were conducted across Google Scholar and Web of Science. Of 214 included articles, 116 reported on specific interventions or initiatives or their evaluation. The remaining 98 articles were discussion papers or explicitly sought to make a theoretical contribution. A core set of 36 RCD theoretical and conceptual papers were selected and analysed to generate mechanisms that map across macro contexts (individual, team, organisational, network). Data were extracted by means of ‘If-Then’ statements into an Excel spreadsheet. Models and frameworks were deconstructed into their original elements.

Results

Eight overarching programme theories were identified featuring mechanisms that were triggered across multiple contexts. Three of these fulfilled a symbolic role in signalling the importance of RCD (e.g. positive role models, signal importance, make a difference), whilst the remainder were more functional (e.g. liberate talents, release resource, exceed sum of parts, learning by doing and co-production of knowledge). Outcomes from one mechanism produced changes in context to stimulate mechanisms in other activities. The eight programme theories were validated with findings from 10 systematic reviews (2014–2017).

Conclusions

This realist synthesis is the starting point for constructing an RCD framework shaped by these programme theories. Future work is required to further test and refine these findings against empirical data from intervention studies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lansang MA, Dennis R. Building capacity in health research in the developing world. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(10):764–70.PubMedPubMedCentral Lansang MA, Dennis R. Building capacity in health research in the developing world. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(10):764–70.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Gorard S, Taylor C. Welcome to Building Research Capacity. ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme Research Capacity Building Network. 2002. Gorard S, Taylor C. Welcome to Building Research Capacity. ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme Research Capacity Building Network. 2002.
3.
go back to reference Whitworth A, Haining S, Stringer H. Enhancing research capacity across healthcare and higher education sectors: development and evaluation of an integrated model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:287.CrossRef Whitworth A, Haining S, Stringer H. Enhancing research capacity across healthcare and higher education sectors: development and evaluation of an integrated model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:287.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Albert E, Mickan S. Closing the gap and widening the scope. New directions for research capacity building in primary health care. Aust Fam Physician. 2003;32(12):1038–40. 1043PubMed Albert E, Mickan S. Closing the gap and widening the scope. New directions for research capacity building in primary health care. Aust Fam Physician. 2003;32(12):1038–40. 1043PubMed
5.
go back to reference Mahmood S, Hort K, Ahmed S, Salam M, Cravioto A. Strategies for capacity building for health research in Bangladesh: role of core funding and a common monitoring and evaluation framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011;9:31.CrossRef Mahmood S, Hort K, Ahmed S, Salam M, Cravioto A. Strategies for capacity building for health research in Bangladesh: role of core funding and a common monitoring and evaluation framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011;9:31.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jenerette CM, Funk M, Ruff C, Grey M, Adderley-Kelly B, McCorkle R. Models of inter-institutional collaboration to build research capacity for reducing health disparities. Nurs Outlook. 2008;56(1):16–24.CrossRef Jenerette CM, Funk M, Ruff C, Grey M, Adderley-Kelly B, McCorkle R. Models of inter-institutional collaboration to build research capacity for reducing health disparities. Nurs Outlook. 2008;56(1):16–24.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Department of Health. Best Research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy. London: Department of Health; 2006. Department of Health. Best Research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy. London: Department of Health; 2006.
8.
go back to reference Condell SL, Begley C. Capacity building: a concept analysis of the term applied to research. Int J Nurs Pract. 2007;13(5):268–75.CrossRef Condell SL, Begley C. Capacity building: a concept analysis of the term applied to research. Int J Nurs Pract. 2007;13(5):268–75.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cooke J. A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:44.CrossRef Cooke J. A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:44.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cooke J, Booth A, Nancarrow S, Wilkinson A, Askew D. Re:cap – Identifying the Evidence-base for research capacity development in health and social care. A scoping review of the literature. Sheffield: Trent Research & Development Support Unit, University of Sheffield; 2006. Cooke J, Booth A, Nancarrow S, Wilkinson A, Askew D. Re:cap – Identifying the Evidence-base for research capacity development in health and social care. A scoping review of the literature. Sheffield: Trent Research & Development Support Unit, University of Sheffield; 2006.
11.
go back to reference Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marušić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. Jama. 2006;296(9):1103–15.CrossRef Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marušić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. Jama. 2006;296(9):1103–15.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cooke J, Ariss S, Smith C, Read J. On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:25.CrossRef Cooke J, Ariss S, Smith C, Read J. On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:25.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Levine R, Russ-Eft D, Burling A, Stephens J, Downey J. Evaluating health services research capacity building programs: implications for health services and human resource development. Eval Program Plann. 2013;37:1–11.CrossRef Levine R, Russ-Eft D, Burling A, Stephens J, Downey J. Evaluating health services research capacity building programs: implications for health services and human resource development. Eval Program Plann. 2013;37:1–11.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Macfarlane F, Shaw S, Greenhalgh T, Carter YH. General practices as emergent research organizations: a qualitative study into organizational development. Fam Pract. 2005;22(3):298–304.CrossRef Macfarlane F, Shaw S, Greenhalgh T, Carter YH. General practices as emergent research organizations: a qualitative study into organizational development. Fam Pract. 2005;22(3):298–304.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nuyens Y. Setting priorities for health research: lessons from low-and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(4):319–21.CrossRef Nuyens Y. Setting priorities for health research: lessons from low-and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(4):319–21.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gadsby EW. Research capacity strengthening: donor approaches to improving and assessing its impact in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2011;26(1):89–106.CrossRef Gadsby EW. Research capacity strengthening: donor approaches to improving and assessing its impact in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2011;26(1):89–106.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Willis C, Riley B, Lewis M, Stockton L, Yessis J. Guidance for organisational strategy on knowledge to action from conceptual frameworks and practice. Evid Policy. 2017;13(2):317–41.CrossRef Willis C, Riley B, Lewis M, Stockton L, Yessis J. Guidance for organisational strategy on knowledge to action from conceptual frameworks and practice. Evid Policy. 2017;13(2):317–41.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Del Mar C, Askew D. Building family/general practice research capacity. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(Suppl 2):S35–40.CrossRef Del Mar C, Askew D. Building family/general practice research capacity. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(Suppl 2):S35–40.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Farmer E, Weston K. A conceptual model for capacity building in Australian primary health care research. Aust Fam Physician. 2002;31(12):1139–42.PubMed Farmer E, Weston K. A conceptual model for capacity building in Australian primary health care research. Aust Fam Physician. 2002;31(12):1139–42.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Johnson K, Kennedy SB, Harris AO, Lincoln A, Neace W, Collins D. Strengthening the HIV/AIDS service delivery system in Liberia: an international research capacity-building strategy. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(3):257–73.CrossRef Johnson K, Kennedy SB, Harris AO, Lincoln A, Neace W, Collins D. Strengthening the HIV/AIDS service delivery system in Liberia: an international research capacity-building strategy. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(3):257–73.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Breen C, Jaganyi J, Van Wilgen B, Van Wyk E. Research projects and capacity building. Water SA. 2004;30(4):429–34.CrossRef Breen C, Jaganyi J, Van Wilgen B, Van Wyk E. Research projects and capacity building. Water SA. 2004;30(4):429–34.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016;10(1_Suppl):21–34. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016;10(1_Suppl):21–34.
23.
go back to reference Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, DeCorby K, Bucknall TK, Kent B, Schultz A, Snelgrove-Clarke E, Stetler CB, Titler M, Wallin L, Wilson V. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci 2012;7:33. Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, DeCorby K, Bucknall TK, Kent B, Schultz A, Snelgrove-Clarke E, Stetler CB, Titler M, Wallin L, Wilson V. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci 2012;7:33.
24.
go back to reference Kavanagh J, Trouton A, Oakley A, Powell C. A scoping review of the evidence for incentive schemes to encourage positive health and other social behaviours in young people. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London: London; 2005. Kavanagh J, Trouton A, Oakley A, Powell C. A scoping review of the evidence for incentive schemes to encourage positive health and other social behaviours in young people. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London: London; 2005.
25.
go back to reference Booth A, Carroll C. Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable? Health Inf Libr J. 2015;32(3):220–35.CrossRef Booth A, Carroll C. Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable? Health Inf Libr J. 2015;32(3):220–35.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Jones A, Burgess TA, Farmer EA, Fuller J, Stocks NP, Taylor JE, Waters RL. Building research capacity. An exploratory model of GPs’ training needs and barriers to research involvement. Aust Fam Physician. 2003;32(11):957–60.PubMed Jones A, Burgess TA, Farmer EA, Fuller J, Stocks NP, Taylor JE, Waters RL. Building research capacity. An exploratory model of GPs’ training needs and barriers to research involvement. Aust Fam Physician. 2003;32(11):957–60.PubMed
27.
go back to reference North American Primary Care Research Group Committee on Building Research Capacity. What does it mean to build research capacity? Fam Med. 2002;34(9):678–84. North American Primary Care Research Group Committee on Building Research Capacity. What does it mean to build research capacity? Fam Med. 2002;34(9):678–84.
28.
go back to reference Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev. 2012;1:28.CrossRef Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev. 2012;1:28.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: the promise of realist synthesis. Evaluation. 2002;8(3):340–58.CrossRef Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: the promise of realist synthesis. Evaluation. 2002;8(3):340–58.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Booth A, Sutton A, Papaioannou D. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. 2nd edn. London: Sage; 2016. Booth A, Sutton A, Papaioannou D. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. 2nd edn. London: Sage; 2016.
31.
go back to reference Coen SE, Bottorff JL, Johnson JL, Ratner PA. A relational conceptual framework for multidisciplinary health research Centre infrastructure. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:29.CrossRef Coen SE, Bottorff JL, Johnson JL, Ratner PA. A relational conceptual framework for multidisciplinary health research Centre infrastructure. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:29.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Patton M. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002. Patton M. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.
33.
go back to reference Borkowski D, McKinstry C, Cotchett M, Williams C, Haines T. Research culture in allied health: a systematic review. Aust J Prim Health. 2016;22(4):294–303.CrossRef Borkowski D, McKinstry C, Cotchett M, Williams C, Haines T. Research culture in allied health: a systematic review. Aust J Prim Health. 2016;22(4):294–303.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lode K, Sørensen EE, Salmela S, Holm AL, Severinsson E. Clinical nurses’ research capacity building in practice—a systematic review. Open J Nurs. 2015;5(07):664.CrossRef Lode K, Sørensen EE, Salmela S, Holm AL, Severinsson E. Clinical nurses’ research capacity building in practice—a systematic review. Open J Nurs. 2015;5(07):664.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Gagliardi AR, Webster F, Perrier L, Bell M, Straus S. Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review. Implement Sci. 2014;9:122.CrossRef Gagliardi AR, Webster F, Perrier L, Bell M, Straus S. Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review. Implement Sci. 2014;9:122.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Faden RR, Kass NE, Goodman SN, Pronovost P, Tunis S, Beauchamp TL. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hast Cent Rep. 2013;43(s1):S16–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.134. Faden RR, Kass NE, Goodman SN, Pronovost P, Tunis S, Beauchamp TL. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hast Cent Rep. 2013;43(s1):S16–27. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hast.​134.
38.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392–429.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392–429.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Bucknall T, Graham ID, Hutchinson AM, Stacey D. Collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(4):221.CrossRef Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Bucknall T, Graham ID, Hutchinson AM, Stacey D. Collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(4):221.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Boaz A, Hanney S, Jones T, Soper B. Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009415.CrossRef Boaz A, Hanney S, Jones T, Soper B. Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009415.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Dalkin SM, Greenhalgh J, Jones D, Cunningham B, Lhussier M. What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):49.CrossRef Dalkin SM, Greenhalgh J, Jones D, Cunningham B, Lhussier M. What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):49.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Realist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute? Med Educ. 2012;46(1):89–96.CrossRef Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Realist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute? Med Educ. 2012;46(1):89–96.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Van Belle S, van de Pas R, Marchal B. Towards an agenda for implementation science in global health: there is nothing more practical than good (social science) theories. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(2):e000181.CrossRef Van Belle S, van de Pas R, Marchal B. Towards an agenda for implementation science in global health: there is nothing more practical than good (social science) theories. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(2):e000181.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Gee M, Cooke J. How do NHS organisations plan research capacity development? Strategies, strengths, and opportunities for improvement. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):198.CrossRef Gee M, Cooke J. How do NHS organisations plan research capacity development? Strategies, strengths, and opportunities for improvement. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):198.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Marjanovic S, Cochrane G, Robin E, Sewankambo N, Ezeh A, Nyirenda M, Bonfoh B, Rweyemamu M, Chataway J. Evaluating a complex research capacity-building intervention: reflections on an evaluation of the African Institutions Initiative. Evaluation. 2017;23(1):80–101. Marjanovic S, Cochrane G, Robin E, Sewankambo N, Ezeh A, Nyirenda M, Bonfoh B, Rweyemamu M, Chataway J. Evaluating a complex research capacity-building intervention: reflections on an evaluation of the African Institutions Initiative. Evaluation. 2017;23(1):80–101.
46.
go back to reference Wenke RJ, Ward EC, Hickman I, Hulcombe J, Phillips R, Mickan S. Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):6. Wenke RJ, Ward EC, Hickman I, Hulcombe J, Phillips R, Mickan S. Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):6.
48.
go back to reference Franzen SR, Chandler C, Lang T. Health research capacity development in low and middle income countries: reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1):e012332. Franzen SR, Chandler C, Lang T. Health research capacity development in low and middle income countries: reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1):e012332.
49.
go back to reference Conn VS, Porter RT, McDaniel RW, Rantz MJ, Maas ML. Building research productivity in an academic setting. Nurs Outlook. 2005;53(5):224–31.CrossRef Conn VS, Porter RT, McDaniel RW, Rantz MJ, Maas ML. Building research productivity in an academic setting. Nurs Outlook. 2005;53(5):224–31.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Cooke A, Green B. Developing the research capacity of departments of nursing and midwifery based in higher education: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(1):57–65.CrossRef Cooke A, Green B. Developing the research capacity of departments of nursing and midwifery based in higher education: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(1):57–65.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Edwards N, Webber J, Mill J, Kahwa E, Roelofs S. Building capacity for nurse-led research. Int Nurs Rev. 2009;56(1):88–94.CrossRef Edwards N, Webber J, Mill J, Kahwa E, Roelofs S. Building capacity for nurse-led research. Int Nurs Rev. 2009;56(1):88–94.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Fenton E, Harvey J, Griffiths F, Wild A, Sturt J. Reflections from organization science on the development of primary health care research networks. Fam Pract. 2001;18(5):540–4.CrossRef Fenton E, Harvey J, Griffiths F, Wild A, Sturt J. Reflections from organization science on the development of primary health care research networks. Fam Pract. 2001;18(5):540–4.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Fenton E, Harvey J, Sturt J. Evaluating primary care research networks. Health Serv Manag Res. 2007;20(3):162–73.CrossRef Fenton E, Harvey J, Sturt J. Evaluating primary care research networks. Health Serv Manag Res. 2007;20(3):162–73.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Fitzgerald M, Milberger P, Tomlinson PS, Peden-mcalpine C, Meiers SJ, Sherman S. Clinical nurse specialist participation on a collaborative research project: barriers and benefits. Clin Nurse Spec. 2003;17(1):44–9.CrossRef Fitzgerald M, Milberger P, Tomlinson PS, Peden-mcalpine C, Meiers SJ, Sherman S. Clinical nurse specialist participation on a collaborative research project: barriers and benefits. Clin Nurse Spec. 2003;17(1):44–9.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Golenko X, Pager S, Holden L. A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:276.CrossRef Golenko X, Pager S, Holden L. A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:276.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Green B, Segrott J, Priest H, Rout A, McIvor M, Douglas J, Flood Y, Morris S, Rushton C. Research capacity for everyone? A case study of two academic nursing schools’ capacity building strategies. J Res Nurs. 2007;12(3):247–65.CrossRef Green B, Segrott J, Priest H, Rout A, McIvor M, Douglas J, Flood Y, Morris S, Rushton C. Research capacity for everyone? A case study of two academic nursing schools’ capacity building strategies. J Res Nurs. 2007;12(3):247–65.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Nchinda TC. Research capacity strengthening in the south. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(11):1699–711.CrossRef Nchinda TC. Research capacity strengthening in the south. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(11):1699–711.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference O'Byrne L, Smith S. Models to enhance research capacity and capability in clinical nurses: a narrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(9–10):1365–71.CrossRef O'Byrne L, Smith S. Models to enhance research capacity and capability in clinical nurses: a narrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(9–10):1365–71.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Pickstone C, Nancarrow SA, Cooke JM, Vernon W, Mountain GA, Boyce RA, Campbell J. Building research capacity in the allied health professions. Evid Policy. 2008;4(1):53–68.CrossRef Pickstone C, Nancarrow SA, Cooke JM, Vernon W, Mountain GA, Boyce RA, Campbell J. Building research capacity in the allied health professions. Evid Policy. 2008;4(1):53–68.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Priest H, Segrott J, Green B, Rout A. Harnessing collaboration to build nursing research capacity: a research team journey. Nurse Educ Today. 2007;27(6):577–87.CrossRef Priest H, Segrott J, Green B, Rout A. Harnessing collaboration to build nursing research capacity: a research team journey. Nurse Educ Today. 2007;27(6):577–87.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Raghunath A, Innes A. The case for multidisciplinary research in primary care. Prim Health Care Rese Dev. 2004;5(3):264–73.CrossRef Raghunath A, Innes A. The case for multidisciplinary research in primary care. Prim Health Care Rese Dev. 2004;5(3):264–73.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Ried K, Fuller J. Building a culture of research dissemination in primary health care: the south Australian experience of supporting the novice researcher. Aust Health Rev. 2005;29(1):6–11.CrossRef Ried K, Fuller J. Building a culture of research dissemination in primary health care: the south Australian experience of supporting the novice researcher. Aust Health Rev. 2005;29(1):6–11.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Ried K, Farmer EA, Weston KM. Setting directions for capacity building in primary health care: a survey of a research network. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:8.CrossRef Ried K, Farmer EA, Weston KM. Setting directions for capacity building in primary health care: a survey of a research network. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:8.CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Ried K, Farmer EA, Weston KM. Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:19.CrossRef Ried K, Farmer EA, Weston KM. Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:19.CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Sarre G, Cooke J. Developing indicators for measuring research capacity development in primary care organizations: a consensus approach using a nominal group technique. Health Soc Care Community. 2009;17(3):244–53.CrossRef Sarre G, Cooke J. Developing indicators for measuring research capacity development in primary care organizations: a consensus approach using a nominal group technique. Health Soc Care Community. 2009;17(3):244–53.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Segrott J, McIvor M, Green B. Challenges and strategies in developing nursing research capacity: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(5):637–51.CrossRef Segrott J, McIvor M, Green B. Challenges and strategies in developing nursing research capacity: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(5):637–51.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Stephens J, Levine R, Burling A, Russ-Eft D. An Organizational Guide to Building Health Services Research Capacity, Final Report (AHRQ Publication No 11 (12)-0095-EF). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. Stephens J, Levine R, Burling A, Russ-Eft D. An Organizational Guide to Building Health Services Research Capacity, Final Report (AHRQ Publication No 11 (12)-0095-EF). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.
68.
go back to reference van Weel C, Rosser WW. Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(Suppl 2):S5–16.CrossRef van Weel C, Rosser WW. Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(Suppl 2):S5–16.CrossRef
69.
go back to reference Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
70.
go back to reference Green B, Segrott J, Hewitt J. Developing nursing and midwifery research capacity in a university department: case study. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(3):302–13.CrossRef Green B, Segrott J, Hewitt J. Developing nursing and midwifery research capacity in a university department: case study. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(3):302–13.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Beresford P. Developing the theoretical basis for service user/survivor-led research and equal involvement in research. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2005;14(1):4–9.CrossRef Beresford P. Developing the theoretical basis for service user/survivor-led research and equal involvement in research. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2005;14(1):4–9.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Boyle D, Harris M. The Challenges of Co-Production: How Equal Partnerships between Professionals and the Public are Crucial to Improving Public Services. London: Nesta; 2009. Boyle D, Harris M. The Challenges of Co-Production: How Equal Partnerships between Professionals and the Public are Crucial to Improving Public Services. London: Nesta; 2009.
73.
go back to reference Heaton J, Day J, Britten N. Inside the “black box” of a knowledge translation program in applied health research. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(11):1477–91.CrossRef Heaton J, Day J, Britten N. Inside the “black box” of a knowledge translation program in applied health research. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(11):1477–91.CrossRef
74.
go back to reference Cole DC, Aslanyan G, Dunn A, Boyd A, Bates I. Dilemmas of evaluation: health research capacity initiatives. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(12):920–1.CrossRef Cole DC, Aslanyan G, Dunn A, Boyd A, Bates I. Dilemmas of evaluation: health research capacity initiatives. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(12):920–1.CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Ried K, Montgomery BD, Stocks NP, Farmer EA. General practice research training: impact of the Australian Registrar Research Workshop on research skills, confidence, interest and involvement of participants, 2002-2006. Fam Pract. 2008;25(2):119–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn010. Ried K, Montgomery BD, Stocks NP, Farmer EA. General practice research training: impact of the Australian Registrar Research Workshop on research skills, confidence, interest and involvement of participants, 2002-2006. Fam Pract. 2008;25(2):119–26. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​fampra/​cmn010.
76.
go back to reference Perry L, Grange A, Heyman B, Noble P. Stakeholders’ perceptions of a research capacity development project for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals. J Nurs Manag. 2008;16(3):315–26.CrossRef Perry L, Grange A, Heyman B, Noble P. Stakeholders’ perceptions of a research capacity development project for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals. J Nurs Manag. 2008;16(3):315–26.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Dean L, Gregorius S, Bates I, Pulford J. Advancing the science of health research capacity strengthening in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the published literature, 2000-2016. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e018718.CrossRef Dean L, Gregorius S, Bates I, Pulford J. Advancing the science of health research capacity strengthening in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the published literature, 2000-2016. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e018718.CrossRef
78.
go back to reference Ekeroma A, Kenealy T, Shulruf B, Hill A. Educational and wider interventions that increase research activity and capacity of clinicians in low to middle income countries: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Res Dev. 2015;3(1):1000120. Ekeroma A, Kenealy T, Shulruf B, Hill A. Educational and wider interventions that increase research activity and capacity of clinicians in low to middle income countries: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Res Dev. 2015;3(1):1000120.
79.
go back to reference Huber J, Bauer D, Hoelscher M, Kapungu J, Kroidl A, Lennemann T, Maganga L, Opitz O, Salehe O, Sigauke A, et al. Evaluation of health research capacity strengthening trainings on individual level: validation of a questionnaire. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(4):390–5.CrossRef Huber J, Bauer D, Hoelscher M, Kapungu J, Kroidl A, Lennemann T, Maganga L, Opitz O, Salehe O, Sigauke A, et al. Evaluation of health research capacity strengthening trainings on individual level: validation of a questionnaire. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(4):390–5.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Kahwa E, Edwards N, Mortley N. Research capacity building: a literature review and the theoretical framework. In: Edwards N, Kaseje D, Kahwa E, editors. Building and evaluating research capacity in healthcare systems: case studies and innovative models. Ottawa: UCT Press; 2016. p. 1–260. Kahwa E, Edwards N, Mortley N. Research capacity building: a literature review and the theoretical framework. In: Edwards N, Kaseje D, Kahwa E, editors. Building and evaluating research capacity in healthcare systems: case studies and innovative models. Ottawa: UCT Press; 2016. p. 1–260.
81.
go back to reference Mugabo L, Rouleau D, Odhiambo J, Nisingizwe MP, Amoroso C, Barebwanuwe P, Warugaba C, Habumugisha L, Hedt-Gauthier BL. Approaches and impact of non-academic research capacity strengthening training models in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:30.CrossRef Mugabo L, Rouleau D, Odhiambo J, Nisingizwe MP, Amoroso C, Barebwanuwe P, Warugaba C, Habumugisha L, Hedt-Gauthier BL. Approaches and impact of non-academic research capacity strengthening training models in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Uncovering the mechanisms of research capacity development in health and social care: a realist synthesis
Authors
Jo Cooke
Paolo Gardois
Andrew Booth
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0363-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018 Go to the issue