Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Leg Pain | Research article

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Slovenian version of the Core outcome measures index for low back pain

Authors: Matevž Topolovec, David Vozlič, Nejc Plohl, Rok Vengust, Miha Vodičar, Anne Frances Mannion

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To conduct a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in the Slovenian language, for use in patients with low back pain.

Methods

The English version of COMI was translated into Slovene following established guidelines. Three hundred fifty-three patients with chronic low back pain were recruited from the Orthopedic clinic department of a tertiary care teaching institution. Data quality, construct validity, responsiveness, and test-retest reliability of the COMI were assessed.

Results

The questionnaire was generally well accepted with no missing values. The majority of items exhibited only mild ceiling effects (below 20.0%) and somewhat more prominent floor effects, which were similar to previous studies (4.5–78.8%). Correlations with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were high (ρ = 0.76 between overall COMI and ODI scores), suggesting that the Slovene version of COMI had high construct validity. Additionally, the Slovene version of COMI successfully captured surgical patients’ improvement in their low back problem after surgery (overall COMI score change: Z = − 9.34, p < .001, r = − 0.53) and showed acceptable test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86).

Conclusions

The Slovene version of COMI showed good psychometric properties, comparable to those of previously tested language versions. It represents a valuable instrument for the use in future domestic and multicenter clinical studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine. 1998;23:2003–13.CrossRef Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine. 1998;23:2003–13.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.CrossRef McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lamping DL, et al. The Quebec Back pain disability scale. Measurement Properties Spine. 1995;20:341–52.PubMed Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lamping DL, et al. The Quebec Back pain disability scale. Measurement Properties Spine. 1995;20:341–52.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25:2940–52 discussion 2952.CrossRef Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25:2940–52 discussion 2952.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Klemenc-Ketiš Z. Disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: validation of the Slovene version of the Oswestry disability index. SJPH. 2011;50:87–94. Klemenc-Ketiš Z. Disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: validation of the Slovene version of the Oswestry disability index. SJPH. 2011;50:87–94.
6.
go back to reference Kim H-J, Yeom JS, Nam Y, Lee N-K, Heo YW, Lee SY, et al. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Core outcome measures index in patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:2804–13.CrossRef Kim H-J, Yeom JS, Nam Y, Lee N-K, Heo YW, Lee SY, et al. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Core outcome measures index in patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:2804–13.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Miekisiak G, Kollataj M, Dobrogowski J, Kloc W, Libionka W, Banach M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the polish version of the core outcome measures index for low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:995–1001.CrossRef Miekisiak G, Kollataj M, Dobrogowski J, Kloc W, Libionka W, Banach M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the polish version of the core outcome measures index for low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:995–1001.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, et al. The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(Suppl 3):367–73.CrossRef Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, et al. The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(Suppl 3):367–73.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, et al. The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(Suppl 3):374–9.CrossRef Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, et al. The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(Suppl 3):374–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lozano-Álvarez C, Pérez-Prieto D, Saló G, Molina A, Lladó A, Ramírez M. Usefulness of the core outcome measures index in daily clinical practice for assessing patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:474685.CrossRef Lozano-Álvarez C, Pérez-Prieto D, Saló G, Molina A, Lladó A, Ramírez M. Usefulness of the core outcome measures index in daily clinical practice for assessing patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:474685.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Röder C, Chavanne A, Mannion AF, Grob D, Aebi M. SSE spine tango--content, workflow, set-up. www.eurospine.org-Spine tango. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:920–4.CrossRef Röder C, Chavanne A, Mannion AF, Grob D, Aebi M. SSE spine tango--content, workflow, set-up. www.eurospine.org-Spine tango. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:920–4.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.CrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pochon L, Kleinstück FS, Porchet F, Mannion AF. Influence of gender on patient-oriented outcomes in spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:235–46.CrossRef Pochon L, Kleinstück FS, Porchet F, Mannion AF. Influence of gender on patient-oriented outcomes in spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:235–46.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Damasceno LHF, Rocha PAG, Barbosa ES, Barros CAM, Canto FT, Defino HLA, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core outcome measures index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:1273–82.CrossRef Damasceno LHF, Rocha PAG, Barbosa ES, Barros CAM, Canto FT, Defino HLA, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core outcome measures index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:1273–82.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12 Suppl 2):S15–20.CrossRef Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12 Suppl 2):S15–20.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.CrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Feise RJ, Menke JM. Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine. 2001;26:78–86 discussion 87.CrossRef Feise RJ, Menke JM. Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine. 2001;26:78–86 discussion 87.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Klemencsics I, Lazary A, Valasek T, Szoverfi Z, Bozsodi A, Eltes P, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Core outcome measures index for the Back (COMI Back). Eur Spine J. 2016;25:257–64.CrossRef Klemencsics I, Lazary A, Valasek T, Szoverfi Z, Bozsodi A, Eltes P, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Core outcome measures index for the Back (COMI Back). Eur Spine J. 2016;25:257–64.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (version 12). Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin; 2005. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (version 12). Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin; 2005.
20.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–8.CrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M, Rozenberg S, De Goumoëns P, Faundez A, et al. Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core outcome measures index (COMI) in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:130–7.CrossRef Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M, Rozenberg S, De Goumoëns P, Faundez A, et al. Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core outcome measures index (COMI) in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:130–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Storheim K, Brox JI, Løchting I, Werner EL, Grotle M. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core outcome measures index for low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:2539–49.CrossRef Storheim K, Brox JI, Løchting I, Werner EL, Grotle M. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core outcome measures index for low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:2539–49.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.CrossRef Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25:3115–24.CrossRef Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25:3115–24.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fekete TF, Haschtmann D, Kleinstück FS, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, Mannion AF. What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders? Spine J. 2016;16(4 Suppl):S12–8.CrossRef Fekete TF, Haschtmann D, Kleinstück FS, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, Mannion AF. What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders? Spine J. 2016;16(4 Suppl):S12–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, et al. Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J. 2005;14:1014–26.CrossRef Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, et al. Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J. 2005;14:1014–26.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2002;82:8–24.CrossRef Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2002;82:8–24.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Slovenian version of the Core outcome measures index for low back pain
Authors
Matevž Topolovec
David Vozlič
Nejc Plohl
Rok Vengust
Miha Vodičar
Anne Frances Mannion
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03280-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020 Go to the issue