Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Vaccination | Research article

Safety of a bivalent, killed, whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in pregnant women in Bangladesh: evidence from a randomized placebo-controlled trial

Authors: Ashraful Islam Khan, Mohammad Ali, Julia Lynch, Alamgir Kabir, Jean-Louis Excler, Md. Arifuzzaman Khan, Md. Taufiqul Islam, Afroza Akter, Fahima Chowdhury, Amit Saha, Iqbal Ansary Khan, Sachin N. Desai, Deok Ryun Kim, Nirod Chandra Saha, Ajit P. Singh, John D. Clemens, Firdausi Qadri

Published in: BMC Infectious Diseases | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cholera increases the risk of harmful effects on foetuses. We prospectively followed pregnant women unaware of their pregnancy status who received a study agent in a clinical trial evaluating the association between exposure to an oral cholera vaccine (OCV) and foetal survival.

Methods

Study participants were selected from a randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The vaccination campaign was conducted between January 10 and February 4, 2014. We enrolled women who were exposed to an OCV or placebo during pregnancy (Cohort 1) and women who were pregnant after the vaccination was completed (Cohort 2). Our primary endpoint was pregnancy loss (spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth), and the secondary endpoints were preterm delivery and low birth weight. We employed a log-binomial regression to calculate the relative risk of having adverse outcomes among OCV recipients compared to that among placebo recipients.

Result

There were 231 OCV and 234 placebo recipients in Cohort 1 and 277 OCV and 299 placebo recipients in Cohort 2. In Cohort 1, the incidence of pregnancy loss was 113/1000 and 115/1000 among OCV and placebo recipients, respectively. The adjusted relative risk for pregnancy loss was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.58–1.61; p = 0.91) in Cohort 1. We did not observe any variation in the risk of pregnancy loss between the two cohorts. The risks for preterm delivery and low birth weight were not significantly different between the groups in both cohorts.

Conclusions

Our study provides additional evidence that exposure to an OCV during pregnancy does not increase the risk of pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, or low birth weight, suggesting that pregnant women in cholera-affected regions should not be excluded in a mass vaccination campaign.

Trial registration

The study is registered at (http://​clinicaltrials.​gov). Identifier: NCT02027207.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lindenbaum J, Greenough WB, Islam M. Antibiotic therapy of cholera in children. Bull World Health Organ. 1967;37(4):529.PubMedPubMedCentral Lindenbaum J, Greenough WB, Islam M. Antibiotic therapy of cholera in children. Bull World Health Organ. 1967;37(4):529.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Hirschhorn N, Chowdhury AA, Lindenbaum J. Cholera in pregnant women. Lancet. 1969;293(7608):1230–2.CrossRef Hirschhorn N, Chowdhury AA, Lindenbaum J. Cholera in pregnant women. Lancet. 1969;293(7608):1230–2.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tran N-T, et al. Cholera in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fetal, neonatal, and maternal mortality. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132920.CrossRef Tran N-T, et al. Cholera in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fetal, neonatal, and maternal mortality. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132920.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Proegler C. Cholera, and its relation to pregnancy and child-birth. Boston Med Surg J. 1871;85(13):200–2.CrossRef Proegler C. Cholera, and its relation to pregnancy and child-birth. Boston Med Surg J. 1871;85(13):200–2.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Khan P. Asiatic cholera in pregnancy. Int Surg. 1969;51(2):138–41.PubMed Khan P. Asiatic cholera in pregnancy. Int Surg. 1969;51(2):138–41.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ayangade O. The significance of cholera outbreak in the prognosis of pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1981;19(5):403–7.CrossRef Ayangade O. The significance of cholera outbreak in the prognosis of pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1981;19(5):403–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Saona P, et al. Cólera en gestantes en el Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima-Perú. Rev méd hered. 1991;2(3):112–6. Saona P, et al. Cólera en gestantes en el Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima-Perú. Rev méd hered. 1991;2(3):112–6.
8.
go back to reference Grados P, Battilana CA. El tratamiento de la diarrea coleriforme en la gestación; 1994. Grados P, Battilana CA. El tratamiento de la diarrea coleriforme en la gestación; 1994.
9.
go back to reference Diop S, et al. Cholera and pregnancy: epidemiological, clinical, and evolutionary aspects. Med Maladies Infectieuses. 2007;37(12):816–20.CrossRef Diop S, et al. Cholera and pregnancy: epidemiological, clinical, and evolutionary aspects. Med Maladies Infectieuses. 2007;37(12):816–20.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ciglenecki I, et al. Cholera in pregnancy: outcomes from a specialized cholera treatment unit for pregnant women in Léogâne, Haiti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(8):e2368.CrossRef Ciglenecki I, et al. Cholera in pregnancy: outcomes from a specialized cholera treatment unit for pregnant women in Léogâne, Haiti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(8):e2368.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Qadri F, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of oral cholera vaccine in an urban endemic setting in Bangladesh: a cluster randomised open-label trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10001):1362–71.CrossRef Qadri F, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of oral cholera vaccine in an urban endemic setting in Bangladesh: a cluster randomised open-label trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10001):1362–71.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sur D, et al. Efficacy and safety of a modified killed-whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1694–702.CrossRef Sur D, et al. Efficacy and safety of a modified killed-whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1694–702.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bhattacharya SK, et al. 5 year efficacy of a bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Kolkata, India: a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(12):1050–6.CrossRef Bhattacharya SK, et al. 5 year efficacy of a bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Kolkata, India: a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(12):1050–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sur D, et al. Efficacy of a low-cost, inactivated whole-cell oral cholera vaccine: results from 3 years of follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(10):e1289.CrossRef Sur D, et al. Efficacy of a low-cost, inactivated whole-cell oral cholera vaccine: results from 3 years of follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(10):e1289.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference WHO, Weekly epidemiological record. 2017. 34 (92): p. 477–500. WHO, Weekly epidemiological record. 2017. 34 (92): p. 477–500.
16.
go back to reference Hashim R, et al. Safety of the recombinant cholera toxin B subunit, killed whole-cell (rBS-WC) oral cholera vaccine in pregnancy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(7):e1743.CrossRef Hashim R, et al. Safety of the recombinant cholera toxin B subunit, killed whole-cell (rBS-WC) oral cholera vaccine in pregnancy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(7):e1743.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Grout L, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after a mass vaccination campaign with an oral cholera vaccine in Guinea: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(12):e0004274.CrossRef Grout L, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after a mass vaccination campaign with an oral cholera vaccine in Guinea: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(12):e0004274.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Khan AI, et al. Safety of the oral cholera vaccine in pregnancy: retrospective findings from a subgroup following mass vaccination campaign in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Vaccine. 2017;35(11):1538–43.CrossRef Khan AI, et al. Safety of the oral cholera vaccine in pregnancy: retrospective findings from a subgroup following mass vaccination campaign in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Vaccine. 2017;35(11):1538–43.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ali M, et al. Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(5):538–44.CrossRef Ali M, et al. Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(5):538–44.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Qadri F, et al. Efficacy of a single-dose, inactivated oral cholera vaccine in Bangladesh. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(18):1723–32.CrossRef Qadri F, et al. Efficacy of a single-dose, inactivated oral cholera vaccine in Bangladesh. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(18):1723–32.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference DaVanzo J, et al. Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;114(9):1079–87.CrossRef DaVanzo J, et al. Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;114(9):1079–87.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wang H, et al. Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1725–74.CrossRef Wang H, et al. Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1725–74.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Peduzzi P, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–9.CrossRef Peduzzi P, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference STOPCHOLERA, Cholera and the use of OCV in pregant women. 2016. STOPCHOLERA, Cholera and the use of OCV in pregant women. 2016.
25.
go back to reference Shamim AA, et al. First-trimester plasma tocopherols are associated with risk of miscarriage in rural Bangladesh. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101(2):294–301.CrossRef Shamim AA, et al. First-trimester plasma tocopherols are associated with risk of miscarriage in rural Bangladesh. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101(2):294–301.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Taksande A, et al. Congenital malformations at birth in Central India: a rural medical college hospital based data. Indian J Hum Genet. 2010;16(3):159.CrossRef Taksande A, et al. Congenital malformations at birth in Central India: a rural medical college hospital based data. Indian J Hum Genet. 2010;16(3):159.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sur DK, Wallis DH, O'Connell TX. Vaccinations in pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(2):299–304.PubMed Sur DK, Wallis DH, O'Connell TX. Vaccinations in pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(2):299–304.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Clemens JD, et al. Field trial of oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh: results from three-year follow-up. Lancet. 1990;335(8684):270–3.CrossRef Clemens JD, et al. Field trial of oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh: results from three-year follow-up. Lancet. 1990;335(8684):270–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Safety of a bivalent, killed, whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in pregnant women in Bangladesh: evidence from a randomized placebo-controlled trial
Authors
Ashraful Islam Khan
Mohammad Ali
Julia Lynch
Alamgir Kabir
Jean-Louis Excler
Md. Arifuzzaman Khan
Md. Taufiqul Islam
Afroza Akter
Fahima Chowdhury
Amit Saha
Iqbal Ansary Khan
Sachin N. Desai
Deok Ryun Kim
Nirod Chandra Saha
Ajit P. Singh
John D. Clemens
Firdausi Qadri
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2334
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4006-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2019 Go to the issue