Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Technical advance

Assessing the effect of a partly unobserved, exogenous, binary time-dependent covariate on survival probabilities using generalised pseudo-values

Authors: Ulrike Pötschger, Harald Heinzl, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Martina Mittlböck

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Investigating the impact of a time-dependent intervention on the probability of long-term survival is statistically challenging. A typical example is stem-cell transplantation performed after successful donor identification from registered donors. Here, a suggested simple analysis based on the exogenous donor availability status according to registered donors would allow the estimation and comparison of survival probabilities. As donor search is usually ceased after a patient’s event, donor availability status is incompletely observed, so that this simple comparison is not possible and the waiting time to donor identification needs to be addressed in the analysis to avoid bias. It is methodologically unclear, how to directly address cumulative long-term treatment effects without relying on proportional hazards while avoiding waiting time bias.

Methods

The pseudo-value regression technique is able to handle the first two issues; a novel generalisation of this technique also avoids waiting time bias. Inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting is used to account for the partly unobserved exogenous covariate donor availability.

Results

Simulation studies demonstrate unbiasedness and satisfying coverage probabilities of the new method. A real data example demonstrates that study results based on generalised pseudo-values have a clear medical interpretation which supports the clinical decision making process.

Conclusions

The proposed generalisation of the pseudo-value regression technique enables to compare survival probabilities between two independent groups where group membership becomes known over time and remains partly unknown. Hence, cumulative long-term treatment effects are directly addressed without relying on proportional hazards while avoiding waiting time bias.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Klein JP. Statistical challenges in comparing chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation as a treatment for leukemia. In: Jewell NP, editor. Lifetime data: models in reliability and survival analysis, vol. 1996. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 175–85.CrossRef Klein JP. Statistical challenges in comparing chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation as a treatment for leukemia. In: Jewell NP, editor. Lifetime data: models in reliability and survival analysis, vol. 1996. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 175–85.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Marubini E, Valsecchi MG: Analysing Survival Data from Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Wiley; 2004. Marubini E, Valsecchi MG: Analysing Survival Data from Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Wiley; 2004.
3.
go back to reference Wheatley K, Gray R. Commentary: Mendelian randomization--an update on its use to evaluate allogeneic stem cell transplantation in leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(1):15–7.CrossRefPubMed Wheatley K, Gray R. Commentary: Mendelian randomization--an update on its use to evaluate allogeneic stem cell transplantation in leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(1):15–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gray R, Wheatley K. How to avoid biases when comparing bone marrow transplantation with chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1991;7(S 3):9–12.PubMed Gray R, Wheatley K. How to avoid biases when comparing bone marrow transplantation with chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1991;7(S 3):9–12.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Balduzzi A, Valsecchi MG, Uderzo C, De Lorenzo P, Klingebiel T, Peters C, Stary J, Felice MS, Magyarosy E, Conter V, et al. Chemotherapy versus allogeneic transplantation for very-high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission: comparison by genetic randomisation in an international prospective study. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):635–42.CrossRefPubMed Balduzzi A, Valsecchi MG, Uderzo C, De Lorenzo P, Klingebiel T, Peters C, Stary J, Felice MS, Magyarosy E, Conter V, et al. Chemotherapy versus allogeneic transplantation for very-high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission: comparison by genetic randomisation in an international prospective study. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):635–42.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Schemper M, Wakounig S, Heinze G. The estimation of average hazard ratios by weighted Cox regression. Stat Med. 2009;28(19):2473–89.CrossRefPubMed Schemper M, Wakounig S, Heinze G. The estimation of average hazard ratios by weighted Cox regression. Stat Med. 2009;28(19):2473–89.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Xu R, O'Quigley J. Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards. Biostatistics. 2000;1(4):423–39.CrossRefPubMed Xu R, O'Quigley J. Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards. Biostatistics. 2000;1(4):423–39.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sasieni P. Some new estimators for Cox regression. Ann Stat. 1993;21(4):1721–59.CrossRef Sasieni P. Some new estimators for Cox regression. Ann Stat. 1993;21(4):1721–59.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Perperoglou A. Reduced rank hazard regression with fixed and time-varying effects of the covariates. Biom J. 2013;55(1):38–51.CrossRefPubMed Perperoglou A. Reduced rank hazard regression with fixed and time-varying effects of the covariates. Biom J. 2013;55(1):38–51.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Binder H, Sauerbrei W, Royston P. Comparison between splines and fractional polynomials for multivariable model building with continuous covariates: a simulation study with continuous response. Stat Med. 2013;32(13):2262–77.CrossRefPubMed Binder H, Sauerbrei W, Royston P. Comparison between splines and fractional polynomials for multivariable model building with continuous covariates: a simulation study with continuous response. Stat Med. 2013;32(13):2262–77.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sauerbrei W, Royston P, Look M. A new proposal for multivariable Modelling of time-varying effects in survival data based on fractional polynomial time-transformation. Biom J. 2007;49(3):453–73.CrossRefPubMed Sauerbrei W, Royston P, Look M. A new proposal for multivariable Modelling of time-varying effects in survival data based on fractional polynomial time-transformation. Biom J. 2007;49(3):453–73.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Heinzl H, Kaider A. Gaining more flexibility in Cox proportional hazards regression models with cubic spline functions. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 1997;54(3):201–8.CrossRef Heinzl H, Kaider A. Gaining more flexibility in Cox proportional hazards regression models with cubic spline functions. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 1997;54(3):201–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Meier-Hirmer C, Schumacher M. Multi-state model for studying an intermediate event using time-dependent covariates: application to breast cancer. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meier-Hirmer C, Schumacher M. Multi-state model for studying an intermediate event using time-dependent covariates: application to breast cancer. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Klein JP, Logan B, Harhoff M, Andersen PK. Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time. Stat Med. 2007;26(24):4505–19.CrossRefPubMed Klein JP, Logan B, Harhoff M, Andersen PK. Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time. Stat Med. 2007;26(24):4505–19.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Logan BR, Klein JP, Zhang MJ. Comparing treatments in the presence of crossing survival curves: an application to bone marrow transplantation. Biometrics. 2008:733–40. Logan BR, Klein JP, Zhang MJ. Comparing treatments in the presence of crossing survival curves: an application to bone marrow transplantation. Biometrics. 2008:733–40.
16.
go back to reference Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD. Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol. 1983;1(11):710–9.CrossRefPubMed Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD. Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol. 1983;1(11):710–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Simon R, Makuch RW. A non-parametric graphical representation of the relationship between survival and the occurrence of an event: application to responder versus non-responder bias. Stat Med. 1984;3(1):35–44.CrossRefPubMed Simon R, Makuch RW. A non-parametric graphical representation of the relationship between survival and the occurrence of an event: application to responder versus non-responder bias. Stat Med. 1984;3(1):35–44.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Snapinn SM, Jiang Q, Iglewicz B. Illustrating the impact of a time-varying covariate with an extended Kaplan-Meier estimator. Am Stat. 2005;59(4):301–7.CrossRef Snapinn SM, Jiang Q, Iglewicz B. Illustrating the impact of a time-varying covariate with an extended Kaplan-Meier estimator. Am Stat. 2005;59(4):301–7.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Beyersmann J, Allignol A, Schumacher M. Competing risks and multistate models with R. In: Use R! New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; 2012. Beyersmann J, Allignol A, Schumacher M. Competing risks and multistate models with R. In: Use R! New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; 2012.
20.
go back to reference Van Houwelingen H, van Houwelingen JC, Putter H: Dynamic Prediction in Clinical Survival Analysis: CRC Press; 2011. Van Houwelingen H, van Houwelingen JC, Putter H: Dynamic Prediction in Clinical Survival Analysis: CRC Press; 2011.
21.
go back to reference Sposto R. Cure model analysis in cancer: an application to data from the Children's cancer group. Stat Med. 2002;21(2):293–312.CrossRefPubMed Sposto R. Cure model analysis in cancer: an application to data from the Children's cancer group. Stat Med. 2002;21(2):293–312.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wei G, Schaubel DE. Estimating cumulative treatment effects in the presence of nonproportional hazards. Biometrics. 2008;64(3):724–32.CrossRefPubMed Wei G, Schaubel DE. Estimating cumulative treatment effects in the presence of nonproportional hazards. Biometrics. 2008;64(3):724–32.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Schaubel DE, Wei G. Double inverse-weighted estimation of cumulative treatment effects under nonproportional hazards and dependent censoring. Biometrics. 2011;67(1):29–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schaubel DE, Wei G. Double inverse-weighted estimation of cumulative treatment effects under nonproportional hazards and dependent censoring. Biometrics. 2011;67(1):29–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Dong B, Matthews DE. Empirical likelihood for cumulative hazard ratio estimation with covariate adjustment. Biometrics. 2012;68(2):408–18.CrossRefPubMed Dong B, Matthews DE. Empirical likelihood for cumulative hazard ratio estimation with covariate adjustment. Biometrics. 2012;68(2):408–18.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Andersen PK, Pohar Perme M. Pseudo-observations in survival analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010;19(1):71–99.CrossRefPubMed Andersen PK, Pohar Perme M. Pseudo-observations in survival analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010;19(1):71–99.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Andersen PK, Klein JP. Regression analysis for multistate models based on a pseudo-value approach, with applications to bone marrow transplantation studies. Scand J Stat. 2007;34(1):3–16.CrossRef Andersen PK, Klein JP. Regression analysis for multistate models based on a pseudo-value approach, with applications to bone marrow transplantation studies. Scand J Stat. 2007;34(1):3–16.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Andersen PK, Klein JP, Rosthoj S. Generalized linear models for correlated pseudo-observations with applications to multi-state models. Biometrika. 2003;90:15–27.CrossRef Andersen PK, Klein JP, Rosthoj S. Generalized linear models for correlated pseudo-observations with applications to multi-state models. Biometrika. 2003;90:15–27.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Andersen PK, Hansen MG, Klein JP. Regression analysis of restricted mean survival time based on pseudo-observations. Lifetime Data Anal. 2004;10(4):335–50.CrossRefPubMed Andersen PK, Hansen MG, Klein JP. Regression analysis of restricted mean survival time based on pseudo-observations. Lifetime Data Anal. 2004;10(4):335–50.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Klein JP, Gerster M, Andersen PK, Tarima S, Pohar Perme M. SAS and R functions to compute pseudo-values for censored data regression. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2008;89(3):289–300.CrossRef Klein JP, Gerster M, Andersen PK, Tarima S, Pohar Perme M. SAS and R functions to compute pseudo-values for censored data regression. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2008;89(3):289–300.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pohar Perme M, Andersen PK. Checking hazard regression models using pseudo-observations. Stat Med. 2008;27(25):5309–28.CrossRef Pohar Perme M, Andersen PK. Checking hazard regression models using pseudo-observations. Stat Med. 2008;27(25):5309–28.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL: The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, 2nd edn: Wiley; 2002. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL: The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, 2nd edn: Wiley; 2002.
32.
go back to reference Graw F, Gerds TA, Schumacher M. On pseudo-values for regression analysis in competing risks models. Lifetime Data Anal. 2009;15(2):241–55.CrossRefPubMed Graw F, Gerds TA, Schumacher M. On pseudo-values for regression analysis in competing risks models. Lifetime Data Anal. 2009;15(2):241–55.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Jacobsen M, Martinussen T. A note on the large sample properties of estimators based on generalized linear models for correlated pseudo-observations. Scand J Stat. 2016;43(3):845–62.CrossRef Jacobsen M, Martinussen T. A note on the large sample properties of estimators based on generalized linear models for correlated pseudo-observations. Scand J Stat. 2016;43(3):845–62.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Overgaard M, Thorlund E, Petersen J. Asymptotic theory of generalized estimating equations based on Jack-knife pseudo-observations. Ann Stat. 2017;45(5):1988-2015. Overgaard M, Thorlund E, Petersen J. Asymptotic theory of generalized estimating equations based on Jack-knife pseudo-observations. Ann Stat. 2017;45(5):1988-2015.
35.
go back to reference Rotnitzky A, Robins JM: Inverse Probability Weighting in Survival Analysis. In: Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Edited by Armitage P, Colton T: John Wiley; 2005. Rotnitzky A, Robins JM: Inverse Probability Weighting in Survival Analysis. In: Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Edited by Armitage P, Colton T: John Wiley; 2005.
36.
go back to reference Bender R, Augustin T, Blettner M. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Stat Med. 2005;24(11):1713–23.CrossRefPubMed Bender R, Augustin T, Blettner M. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Stat Med. 2005;24(11):1713–23.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Gale RP, Hehlmann R, Zhang MJ, Hasford J, Goldman JM, Heimpel H, Hochhaus A, Klein JP, Kolb HJ, McGlave PB, et al. Survival with bone marrow transplantation versus hydroxyurea or interferon for chronic myelogenous leukemia. The German CML study group. Blood. 1998;91(5):1810–9.PubMed Gale RP, Hehlmann R, Zhang MJ, Hasford J, Goldman JM, Heimpel H, Hochhaus A, Klein JP, Kolb HJ, McGlave PB, et al. Survival with bone marrow transplantation versus hydroxyurea or interferon for chronic myelogenous leukemia. The German CML study group. Blood. 1998;91(5):1810–9.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, Tallman MS, Buck G, Fielding AK, Burnett AK, Chopra R, Wiernik PH, Foroni L, et al. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the international ALL trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood. 2008;111(4):1827–33.CrossRefPubMed Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, Tallman MS, Buck G, Fielding AK, Burnett AK, Chopra R, Wiernik PH, Foroni L, et al. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the international ALL trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood. 2008;111(4):1827–33.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Locasciulli A, Oneto R, Bacigalupo A, Socie G, Korthof E, Bekassy A, Schrezenmeier H, Passweg J, Fuhrer M. Outcome of patients with acquired aplastic anemia given first line bone marrow transplantation or immunosuppressive treatment in the last decade: a report from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Haematologica. 2007;92(1):11–8.CrossRefPubMed Locasciulli A, Oneto R, Bacigalupo A, Socie G, Korthof E, Bekassy A, Schrezenmeier H, Passweg J, Fuhrer M. Outcome of patients with acquired aplastic anemia given first line bone marrow transplantation or immunosuppressive treatment in the last decade: a report from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Haematologica. 2007;92(1):11–8.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Arico M, Schrappe M, Hunger SP, Carroll WL, Conter V, Galimberti S, Manabe A, Saha V, Baruchel A, Vettenranta K, et al. Clinical outcome of children with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated between 1995 and 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4755–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arico M, Schrappe M, Hunger SP, Carroll WL, Conter V, Galimberti S, Manabe A, Saha V, Baruchel A, Vettenranta K, et al. Clinical outcome of children with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated between 1995 and 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4755–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Assessing the effect of a partly unobserved, exogenous, binary time-dependent covariate on survival probabilities using generalised pseudo-values
Authors
Ulrike Pötschger
Harald Heinzl
Maria Grazia Valsecchi
Martina Mittlböck
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0430-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2018 Go to the issue