Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Quality of randomized controlled trials of new generation antidepressants and antipsychotics identified in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI): a literature and telephone interview study

Authors: Zheng Tong, Fangzhou Li, Yusuke Ogawa, Norio Watanabe, Toshi A. Furukawa

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We are witnessing an exponential increase in the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported from mainland China. The increase is particularly notable in the field of new generation antidepressants and antipsychotics. Several previous studies have raised doubts regarding their quality. However, the quality of most recent RCTs published in China may have improved.

Methods

We searched RCTs that examined new generation antidepressants and antipsychotics published between 2013 and 2016 in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the largest database of scientific publications in China. We interviewed the authors of a random subset of the identified references. We assessed the methodological rigor of each study based on the published reports and telephone interviews with the authors using six methodological domains adapted from the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool.

Results

The final sample consisted of 138 studies, for which we interviewed 58 authors; the authors of 51 studies declined the interview, and the authors of 29 studies could not be contacted. The 51 studies with refused interviews were significantly less likely to be reported from university-affiliated hospitals and were less likely to be published in Chinese core journals. Based on the published reports, most of the 58 studies were assessed to be at unclear risk of bias in most methodological domains. After the interview, only 10 studies were assessed to be at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment. Assuming that the studies for which the authors declined interviews had an unclear risk, the proportion of RCTs at low risk of bias in both sequence generation and allocation concealment was 9.2% (10/109, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.0 to 16.2). The interviews indicated that the studies were at high risk of bias for most of the other domains.

Conclusion

In general, RCTs that evaluate new generation antidepressants or antipsychotics and are indexed in the CNKI continue to be of low quality. When conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in this field, it would be wise to include a specialist from China as a coresearcher to help assess the risk of bias in the identified studies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pu QH, Lyu QJ, Su HY. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011623.CrossRefPubMedCentral Pu QH, Lyu QJ, Su HY. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011623.CrossRefPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Chen K, Yao Q, Sun J, He ZF, Yao L, Liu ZY. International publication trends and collaboration performance of China in healthcare science and services research. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016;5(1). Chen K, Yao Q, Sun J, He ZF, Yao L, Liu ZY. International publication trends and collaboration performance of China in healthcare science and services research. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016;5(1).
3.
go back to reference Zou Y, Li Q, Xu W. Scientific research output in orthopaedics from China and other top-ranking countries: a 10-year survey of the literature. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e011605.CrossRefPubMedCentral Zou Y, Li Q, Xu W. Scientific research output in orthopaedics from China and other top-ranking countries: a 10-year survey of the literature. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e011605.CrossRefPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Becker T, Ma Y, Koesters M. A systematic review of Chinese randomized clinical trials of SSRI treatment of depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:245.CrossRefPubMedCentral Zhang Y, Becker T, Ma Y, Koesters M. A systematic review of Chinese randomized clinical trials of SSRI treatment of depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:245.CrossRefPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Khanna P, Suo T, Komossa K, Ma H, Rummel-Kluge C, El-Sayeh HG, Leucht S, Xia J. Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(1):Cd006569. Khanna P, Suo T, Komossa K, Ma H, Rummel-Kluge C, El-Sayeh HG, Leucht S, Xia J. Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(1):Cd006569.
6.
go back to reference Komossa K, Rummel-Kluge C, Schmid F, Hunger H, Schwarz S, El-Sayeh HG, Kissling W, Leucht S. Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD006569. Komossa K, Rummel-Kluge C, Schmid F, Hunger H, Schwarz S, El-Sayeh HG, Kissling W, Leucht S. Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD006569.
7.
go back to reference Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Wang J, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM. Should we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews? Syst Rev. 2015;4:23.CrossRefPubMedCentral Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Wang J, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM. Should we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews? Syst Rev. 2015;4:23.CrossRefPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Wu T, Li Y, Bian Z, Liu G, Moher D. Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized? Trials. 2009;10:46.CrossRefPubMedCentral Wu T, Li Y, Bian Z, Liu G, Moher D. Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized? Trials. 2009;10:46.CrossRefPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Zhang D, Freemantle N, Cheng KK. Are randomized trials conducted in China or India biased? A comparative empirical analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):90–5.CrossRefPubMedCentral Zhang D, Freemantle N, Cheng KK. Are randomized trials conducted in China or India biased? A comparative empirical analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):90–5.CrossRefPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Zhang D, Yin P, Freemantle N, Jordan R, Zhong N, Cheng KK. An assessment of the quality of randomised controlled trials conducted in China. Trials. 2008;9:22.CrossRefPubMedCentral Zhang D, Yin P, Freemantle N, Jordan R, Zhong N, Cheng KK. An assessment of the quality of randomised controlled trials conducted in China. Trials. 2008;9:22.CrossRefPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Koesters M, Zhang Y, Ma YC, Weinmann S, Becker T, Jin WD. What can we learn from Chinese randomized controlled trials? A systematic review and meta-analysis of Chinese venlafaxine studies. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011;31(2):194–200.CrossRefPubMedCentral Koesters M, Zhang Y, Ma YC, Weinmann S, Becker T, Jin WD. What can we learn from Chinese randomized controlled trials? A systematic review and meta-analysis of Chinese venlafaxine studies. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011;31(2):194–200.CrossRefPubMedCentral
15.
16.
go back to reference Liu XT, Zhang X, Wen S, Peng L, Hong Q, Kang D. Impact of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) checklist on reporting of randomized clinical trials in traditional Chinese medicine. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8(4):192–208.CrossRef Liu XT, Zhang X, Wen S, Peng L, Hong Q, Kang D. Impact of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) checklist on reporting of randomized clinical trials in traditional Chinese medicine. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8(4):192–208.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lu LM, He J, Zeng JC, Liao MX, Jia C, Pan HH. Impact evaluation of CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines on reporting quality for randomized controlled trials of acupuncture conducted in China. Chin J Integr Med. 2017;23(1):10–7.CrossRef Lu LM, He J, Zeng JC, Liao MX, Jia C, Pan HH. Impact evaluation of CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines on reporting quality for randomized controlled trials of acupuncture conducted in China. Chin J Integr Med. 2017;23(1):10–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Xia J, Wright J, Adams CE. Five large Chinese biomedical bibliographic databases: accessibility and coverage. Health Inf Libr J. 2008;25(1):55–61.CrossRef Xia J, Wright J, Adams CE. Five large Chinese biomedical bibliographic databases: accessibility and coverage. Health Inf Libr J. 2008;25(1):55–61.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wang M, Zhou Z, Fang H, Liu X. The bibliometric characteristics of Chinese medical core journals. Ser Rev. 2013;37(1):9–13. Wang M, Zhou Z, Fang H, Liu X. The bibliometric characteristics of Chinese medical core journals. Ser Rev. 2013;37(1):9–13.
20.
go back to reference JMP®, Version <12.2.0>. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2007. JMP®, Version <12.2.0>. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2007.
21.
go back to reference Wu T, Bian Z, Shang H, Li Y. Innovation of clinical trials in China: commentary on the publication of “CONSORT extension for Chinese herbal medicine formulas 2017: recommendations, explanation, and elaboration”. J Evid Based Med. 2017;10(3):155–62.CrossRefPubMedCentral Wu T, Bian Z, Shang H, Li Y. Innovation of clinical trials in China: commentary on the publication of “CONSORT extension for Chinese herbal medicine formulas 2017: recommendations, explanation, and elaboration”. J Evid Based Med. 2017;10(3):155–62.CrossRefPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Liao J, Bi S: Clinical studies should be prospective: an interview to biomedical statistical expert professor Hu Lianping (廖杰, 碧石. 临床研究要有前瞻性——访生物统计学专家胡良平教授. 中国医学论坛报). China Medical Tribune 2005. Liao J, Bi S: Clinical studies should be prospective: an interview to biomedical statistical expert professor Hu Lianping (廖杰, 碧石. 临床研究要有前瞻性——访生物统计学专家胡良平教授. 中国医学论坛报). China Medical Tribune 2005.
23.
go back to reference DuBois JM, Anderson EE, Chibnall J, Carroll K, Gibb T, Ogbuka C, Rubbelke T. Understanding research misconduct: a comparative analysis of 120 cases of professional wrongdoing. Account Res. 2013;20(5–6):320–38.CrossRefPubMedCentral DuBois JM, Anderson EE, Chibnall J, Carroll K, Gibb T, Ogbuka C, Rubbelke T. Understanding research misconduct: a comparative analysis of 120 cases of professional wrongdoing. Account Res. 2013;20(5–6):320–38.CrossRefPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5738.CrossRefPubMedCentral Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5738.CrossRefPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference A consensus statement on research misconduct in the UK. BMJ 2012, 344:e1111. A consensus statement on research misconduct in the UK. BMJ 2012, 344:e1111.
27.
go back to reference Bolland MJ, Avenell A, Gamble GD, Grey A. Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials. Neurology. 2016;87(23):2391–402.CrossRefPubMedCentral Bolland MJ, Avenell A, Gamble GD, Grey A. Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials. Neurology. 2016;87(23):2391–402.CrossRefPubMedCentral
28.
29.
go back to reference Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Lengeler C, Antes G. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet. 1997;350(9074):326–9.CrossRefPubMedCentral Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Lengeler C, Antes G. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet. 1997;350(9074):326–9.CrossRefPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Furukawa TA, Inada T, Adams CE, McGuire H, Inagaki A, Nozaki S. Are the Cochrane group registers comprehensive? A case study of Japanese psychiatry trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2(1):6.CrossRefPubMedCentral Furukawa TA, Inada T, Adams CE, McGuire H, Inagaki A, Nozaki S. Are the Cochrane group registers comprehensive? A case study of Japanese psychiatry trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2(1):6.CrossRefPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, Hrobjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.CrossRefPubMedCentral Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, Hrobjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.CrossRefPubMedCentral
32.
33.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.CrossRefPubMedCentral Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.CrossRefPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Reforming research in China. Lancet 2007, 369(9565):880. Reforming research in China. Lancet 2007, 369(9565):880.
Metadata
Title
Quality of randomized controlled trials of new generation antidepressants and antipsychotics identified in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI): a literature and telephone interview study
Authors
Zheng Tong
Fangzhou Li
Yusuke Ogawa
Norio Watanabe
Toshi A. Furukawa
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0554-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2018 Go to the issue