Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2022

01-12-2022 | Migraine | Research article

Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the preventive treatment of difficult-to-treat migraine: a 12-month prospective analysis

Authors: J.O. Lloyd, B. Hill, M. Murphy, A. Al-Kaisy, A. P. Andreou, G. Lambru

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Initial evidence have shown the short-term efficacy of sTMS in the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. It is unknown whether this treatment approach in the long-term is effective and well tolerated in difficult-to-treat migraine.

Methods

This is a prospective, single centre, open-label, real-world analysis conducted in difficult-to-treat patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM) with and without medication overuse headache (MOH), who were exposed to sTMS therapy. Patients responding to a three-month sTMS treatment, continued the treatment and were assessed again at month 12. The cut-off outcome for treatment continuation was reduction in the monthly moderate to severe headache days (MHD) of at least 30% (headache frequency responders) and/or a ≥ 4-point reduction in headache disability using the Headache Impact test-6 (HIT-6) (headache disability responders).

Results

One hundred fifty-three patients were included in the analysis (F:M = 126:27, median age 43, IQR 32.3–56.8). At month 3, 93 out of 153 patients (60%) were responders to treatment. Compared to baseline, the median reduction in monthly headache days (MHD) for all patients at month 3 was 5.0 days, from 18.0 (IQR: 12.0–26.0) to 13.0 days (IQR: 5.75–24.0) (P = 0.002, r = − 0.29) and the median reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) was 4.0 days, from 13.0 (IQR: 8.75–22.0) to 9.0 (IQR: 4.0–15.25) (P = 0.002, r = − 0.29). Sixty-nine out of 153 patients (45%) reported a sustained response to sTMS treatment at month 12. The percentage of patients with MOH was reduced from 52% (N = 79/153) at baseline to 19% (N = 29/153) at month 3, to 8% (N = 7/87) at month 12. There was an overall median 4-point reduction in HIT-6 score, from 66 (IQR: 64–69) at baseline to 62 at month 3 (IQR: 56–65) (P < 0.001, r = − 0.51). A total of 35 mild/moderate adverse events were reported by 23 patients (15%). One patient stopped sTMS treatment due to scalp sensitivity.

Conclusions

This open label analysis suggests that sTMS may be an effective, well-tolerated treatment option for the long-term prevention of difficult-to-treat CM and HFEM.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF (2014) Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm 20(1):22–33CrossRefPubMed Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF (2014) Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm 20(1):22–33CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rahimtoola H, Buurma H, Tijssen C, Leufkens H, Egberts A (2003) Migraine prophylactic medication usage patterns in the Netherlands. Cephalalgia 23(4):293–301CrossRefPubMed Rahimtoola H, Buurma H, Tijssen C, Leufkens H, Egberts A (2003) Migraine prophylactic medication usage patterns in the Netherlands. Cephalalgia 23(4):293–301CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ford JH, Jackson J, Milligan G, Cotton S, Ahl J et al (2017) A Real-World Analysis of Migraine: A Cross-Sectional Study of Disease Burden and Treatment Patterns The Journal of Head Face Pain 57(10):1532–1544 Ford JH, Jackson J, Milligan G, Cotton S, Ahl J et al (2017) A Real-World Analysis of Migraine: A Cross-Sectional Study of Disease Burden and Treatment Patterns The Journal of Head Face Pain 57(10):1532–1544
5.
go back to reference Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Chia J, Matthew N et al (2017) Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: a retrospective claims analysis. Cephalalgia 37(5):470–485CrossRefPubMed Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Chia J, Matthew N et al (2017) Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: a retrospective claims analysis. Cephalalgia 37(5):470–485CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Andreou AP, Fuccaro M, Lambru G (2020) The role of erenumab in the treatment of migraine Ther Adv Neurol Disord 13:1756286420927119PubMed Andreou AP, Fuccaro M, Lambru G (2020) The role of erenumab in the treatment of migraine Ther Adv Neurol Disord 13:1756286420927119PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kanaan S, Hettie G, Loder E, Burch R (2020) Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of erenumab: a retrospective cohort study. Cephalalgia 40(13):1511–1522CrossRefPubMed Kanaan S, Hettie G, Loder E, Burch R (2020) Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of erenumab: a retrospective cohort study. Cephalalgia 40(13):1511–1522CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lambru G, Hill B, Murphy M, Tylova I, Andreou AP (2020) A prospective real-world analysis of erenumab in refractory chronic migraine. J Headache Pain 21(1):61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lambru G, Hill B, Murphy M, Tylova I, Andreou AP (2020) A prospective real-world analysis of erenumab in refractory chronic migraine. J Headache Pain 21(1):61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Lanteri-Minet M et al (2018) ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia 38(6):1026–1037CrossRefPubMed Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Lanteri-Minet M et al (2018) ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia 38(6):1026–1037CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lambru G, Lanteri-Minet M (2019) Neuromodulation in headache and facial pain management: principles. Springer Nature, Rationale and Clinical Data Lambru G, Lanteri-Minet M (2019) Neuromodulation in headache and facial pain management: principles. Springer Nature, Rationale and Clinical Data
11.
go back to reference Trimboli M, Al-Kaisy A, Andreou AP, Murphy M, Lambru G (2018) Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the management of refractory primary chronic headaches: a real-world experience. Cephalalgia 38(7):1276–1285CrossRefPubMed Trimboli M, Al-Kaisy A, Andreou AP, Murphy M, Lambru G (2018) Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the management of refractory primary chronic headaches: a real-world experience. Cephalalgia 38(7):1276–1285CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Moisset X, Bouhassira D, Couturier JA, Alchaar H, Conradi S et al (2020) Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: systematic review and French recommendations. Rev Neurol (Paris) 176(5):325–352CrossRef Moisset X, Bouhassira D, Couturier JA, Alchaar H, Conradi S et al (2020) Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: systematic review and French recommendations. Rev Neurol (Paris) 176(5):325–352CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Andreou AP, Holland PR, Akerman S, Summ O, Fredrick J et al (2016) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and potential cortical and trigeminothalamic mechanisms in migraine. Brain 139(7):2002–2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Andreou AP, Holland PR, Akerman S, Summ O, Fredrick J et al (2016) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and potential cortical and trigeminothalamic mechanisms in migraine. Brain 139(7):2002–2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Saper JR, Aurora SK et al (2010) Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Neurology 9(4):373–380CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Saper JR, Aurora SK et al (2010) Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Neurology 9(4):373–380CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Starling AJ, Tepper SJ, Marmura MJ, Shamim EA, Robbins MS et al (2018) A multicenter, prospective, single arm, open label, observational study of sTMS for migraine prevention (ESPOUSE study). Cephalalgia 38(6):1038–1048CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Starling AJ, Tepper SJ, Marmura MJ, Shamim EA, Robbins MS et al (2018) A multicenter, prospective, single arm, open label, observational study of sTMS for migraine prevention (ESPOUSE study). Cephalalgia 38(6):1038–1048CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference IHS (2018) International classification of headache disorders. Lancet Neurol 17(5):396–397CrossRef IHS (2018) International classification of headache disorders. Lancet Neurol 17(5):396–397CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Andreou A, Trimboli M, Al-Kaisy A, Murphy M, Palmisani S et al (2018) Prospective real-world analysis of OnabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine post-National Institute for Health and Care Excellence UK technology appraisal. Eur J Neurol 25(8):1069–1e83CrossRefPubMed Andreou A, Trimboli M, Al-Kaisy A, Murphy M, Palmisani S et al (2018) Prospective real-world analysis of OnabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine post-National Institute for Health and Care Excellence UK technology appraisal. Eur J Neurol 25(8):1069–1e83CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chalmer MA, Hansen TF, Lebedeva ER, Dodick DW, Lipton RB, Olesen J (2020) Proposed new diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 40(4):399–406CrossRefPubMed Chalmer MA, Hansen TF, Lebedeva ER, Dodick DW, Lipton RB, Olesen J (2020) Proposed new diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 40(4):399–406CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Sacco S, Braschinsky M, Ducros A, Lampl C, Little P et al (2020) European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine. J Headache Pain 21(1):1–12CrossRef Sacco S, Braschinsky M, Ducros A, Lampl C, Little P et al (2020) European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine. J Headache Pain 21(1):1–12CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Brüggenjürgen B, Baker T, Bhogal R, Ahmed F (2016) Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting. SpringerPlus 5(1):1249CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brüggenjürgen B, Baker T, Bhogal R, Ahmed F (2016) Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting. SpringerPlus 5(1):1249CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Doležil D et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 16(6):425–434CrossRefPubMed Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Doležil D et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 16(6):425–434CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Förderreuther S, Zhang Q, Stauffer VL, Aurora SK, Láinez MJA (2018) Preventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studies. J Headache Pain 19(1):121CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Förderreuther S, Zhang Q, Stauffer VL, Aurora SK, Láinez MJA (2018) Preventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studies. J Headache Pain 19(1):121CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Deng H, Gg L, Nie H, Yy F, Gy G et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of calcitonin-gene-related peptide binding monoclonal antibodies for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine – an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurology 20(1):57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Deng H, Gg L, Nie H, Yy F, Gy G et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of calcitonin-gene-related peptide binding monoclonal antibodies for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine – an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurology 20(1):57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Rodrigo D, Acin P, Bermejo P (2017) Occipital nerve stimulation for refractory chronic migraine: results of a long-term prospective study. Pain Phys 20(1):E151–E1E9CrossRef Rodrigo D, Acin P, Bermejo P (2017) Occipital nerve stimulation for refractory chronic migraine: results of a long-term prospective study. Pain Phys 20(1):E151–E1E9CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Miller S, Watkins L, Matharu M (2016) Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients. J Headache Pain 17(1):68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miller S, Watkins L, Matharu M (2016) Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients. J Headache Pain 17(1):68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Rapoport A, Mauskop A, Diener HC, Schwalen S, Pfeil J (2006) Long-term migraine prevention with topiramate: open-label extension of pivotal trials headache: the journal of head and face. Pain 46(7):1151–1160 Rapoport A, Mauskop A, Diener HC, Schwalen S, Pfeil J (2006) Long-term migraine prevention with topiramate: open-label extension of pivotal trials headache: the journal of head and face. Pain 46(7):1151–1160
36.
go back to reference Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Dodick DW et al (2021) Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: results from a 5-year, open-label treatment phase of a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Neurol 28(5):1716–1725CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Dodick DW et al (2021) Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: results from a 5-year, open-label treatment phase of a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Neurol 28(5):1716–1725CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Tassorelli C, Diener H, Dodick D, Silberstein S, Lipton R et al (2018) International headache society clinical trials standing committee. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 38(5):815–832CrossRefPubMed Tassorelli C, Diener H, Dodick D, Silberstein S, Lipton R et al (2018) International headache society clinical trials standing committee. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 38(5):815–832CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Ford JH, Foster SA, Nichols RM, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A, Ye W et al (2020) A real-world analysis of patient-reported outcomes in patients with migraine by preventive treatment eligibility status in the US and Europe. J Patient-Reported Outcomes 4(1):1–11CrossRef Ford JH, Foster SA, Nichols RM, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A, Ye W et al (2020) A real-world analysis of patient-reported outcomes in patients with migraine by preventive treatment eligibility status in the US and Europe. J Patient-Reported Outcomes 4(1):1–11CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Blumenfeld AM, Patel AT, Turner IM, Mullin KB, Manack Adams A et al (2020) Patient-reported outcomes from a 1-year, real-world, head-to-head comparison of onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate for headache prevention in adults with chronic migraine journal of primary Care & Community. Health 11:2150132720959936 Blumenfeld AM, Patel AT, Turner IM, Mullin KB, Manack Adams A et al (2020) Patient-reported outcomes from a 1-year, real-world, head-to-head comparison of onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate for headache prevention in adults with chronic migraine journal of primary Care & Community. Health 11:2150132720959936
40.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Tepper SJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Stewart WF et al (2019) Erenumab in chronic migraine: patient-reported outcomes in a randomized double-blind study. Neurology 92(19):e2250–e2e60CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lipton RB, Tepper SJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Stewart WF et al (2019) Erenumab in chronic migraine: patient-reported outcomes in a randomized double-blind study. Neurology 92(19):e2250–e2e60CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Smelt AF, Assendelft WJ, Terwee CB, Ferrari MD, Blom JW (2014) What is a clinically relevant change on the HIT-6 questionnaire? An estimation in a primary-care population of migraine patients. Cephalalgia 34(1):29–36CrossRefPubMed Smelt AF, Assendelft WJ, Terwee CB, Ferrari MD, Blom JW (2014) What is a clinically relevant change on the HIT-6 questionnaire? An estimation in a primary-care population of migraine patients. Cephalalgia 34(1):29–36CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Houts CR, Wirth R, McGinley JS, Cady R, Lipton RB (2020) Determining thresholds for meaningful change for the headache impact test (HIT-6) Total and item-specific scores in chronic migraine headache: the journal of head and face. Pain 60(9):2003–2013 Houts CR, Wirth R, McGinley JS, Cady R, Lipton RB (2020) Determining thresholds for meaningful change for the headache impact test (HIT-6) Total and item-specific scores in chronic migraine headache: the journal of head and face. Pain 60(9):2003–2013
43.
go back to reference Diener H, Dodick DW, Aurora S, Turkel C, DeGryse R et al (2010) OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia 30(7):804–814CrossRefPubMed Diener H, Dodick DW, Aurora S, Turkel C, DeGryse R et al (2010) OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia 30(7):804–814CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Diener H-C, Bussone G, Oene JV, Lahaye M, Schwalen S et al (2007) Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Cephalalgia 27(7):814–823CrossRefPubMed Diener H-C, Bussone G, Oene JV, Lahaye M, Schwalen S et al (2007) Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Cephalalgia 27(7):814–823CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ et al (2017) Fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. N Engl J Med 377(22):2113–2122CrossRefPubMed Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ et al (2017) Fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. N Engl J Med 377(22):2113–2122CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ et al (2018) Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology 91(24):e2211–e2e21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ et al (2018) Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology 91(24):e2211–e2e21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith J, Schaeffler BA, Biondi DM et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine: PROMISE-2. Neurology 94(13):e1365–e1e77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith J, Schaeffler BA, Biondi DM et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine: PROMISE-2. Neurology 94(13):e1365–e1e77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the preventive treatment of difficult-to-treat migraine: a 12-month prospective analysis
Authors
J.O. Lloyd
B. Hill
M. Murphy
A. Al-Kaisy
A. P. Andreou
G. Lambru
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01428-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2022 Go to the issue