Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Preventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studies

Authors: Stefanie Förderreuther, Qi Zhang, Virginia L. Stauffer, Sheena K. Aurora, Miguel J. A. Láinez

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Maintenance of effect following treatment with galcanezumab compared to placebo in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine was evaluated.

Methods

In 2 similarly designed studies of patients with episodic migraine (6 months) and 1 study of patients with chronic migraine (3 months), patients randomized in a 1:1:2 ratio received a subcutaneous injection of galcanezumab 120 mg/month (after an initial loading dose of 240 mg) or 240 mg/month or placebo. Maintenance of effect during the double-blind phase was evaluated based on a comparison of the percentages of galcanezumab- and placebo-treated patients with maintenance of 30, 50, 75, and 100% response (defined as ≥30, ≥50, ≥75, and 100% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine headache days [MHD]) at an individual patient level. Logistic regression analyses were used for between treatment comparisons.

Results

A total of 1773 adult patients with episodic migraine (n = 444 for galcanezumab 120 mg; n = 435 for galcanezumab 240 mg; n = 894 for placebo for 2 studies pooled) and 1113 patients with chronic migraine (n = 278 for galcanezumab 120 mg; n = 277 for galcanezumab 240 mg; n = 558 for placebo) were evaluated. In patients with episodic migraine, ≥50% response was maintained in 41.5 and 41.1% of galcanezumab-treated patients (120 mg and 240 mg, respectively) for ≥3 consecutive months (until patient’s endpoint) and 19.0 and 20.5%, respectively, for 6 consecutive months and was significantly greater than the 21.4 and 8.0% of placebo-treated patients at ≥3 and 6 months consecutively (P < 0.001). Approximately 6% of galcanezumab-treated patients maintained ≥75% response all 6 months versus 2% of placebo-treated patients. Few galcanezumab-treated patients maintained 100% response. In patients with chronic migraine, 29% of galcanezumab-treated patients maintained ≥30% response all 3 months compared to 16% of placebo patients while ≥50% response was maintained in 16.8 and 14.6% of galcanezumab-treated patients (120 mg and 240 mg) and was greater than placebo (6.3%; p < 0.001). Few patients maintained ≥75% response.

Conclusions

Treatment with galcanezumab 120 mg or 240 mg demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful persistence of effect in patients with episodic migraine (≥3 and 6 consecutive months) and in patients with chronic migraine (for 3 months).

Study identification and trial registration

Study Identification: EVOLVE-1 (I5Q-MC-CGAG); EVOLVE-2 (I5Q-MC-CGAH); REGAIN (I5Q-MC-CGAI)

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.​gov; NCT02614183 (EVOLVE-1); NCT02614196 (EVOLVE-2); NCT02614261 (REGAIN)
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benschop RJ, Collins EC, Darling RJ, Allan BW, Leung D, Conner EM et al (2014) Development of a novel antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide for the treatment of osteoarthritis-related pain. Osteoarthr Cartil 22:578–585CrossRef Benschop RJ, Collins EC, Darling RJ, Allan BW, Leung D, Conner EM et al (2014) Development of a novel antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide for the treatment of osteoarthritis-related pain. Osteoarthr Cartil 22:578–585CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR (2018) Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurology 75:1080–1088CrossRef Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR (2018) Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurology 75:1080–1088CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, Ossipov MH, Kim BK, Yang JY (2018) Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia 38:1442–1454CrossRef Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, Ossipov MH, Kim BK, Yang JY (2018) Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia 38:1442–1454CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK (2018) Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology [Epub ahead of print, November 16] Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK (2018) Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology [Epub ahead of print, November 16]
5.
go back to reference Diener HC, Bussone G, Van Oene JC, Lahaye M, Schwalen S, Goadsby PJ, TOPMAT-MIG-201(TOP-CHROME) study group (2007) Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia 27:814–823CrossRef Diener HC, Bussone G, Van Oene JC, Lahaye M, Schwalen S, Goadsby PJ, TOPMAT-MIG-201(TOP-CHROME) study group (2007) Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia 27:814–823CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Doležil D, Silberstein S et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 16:425–434CrossRef Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Doležil D, Silberstein S et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 16:425–434CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Lanteri-Minet M, Osipova V et al (2018) ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia 38:1026–1037CrossRef Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Lanteri-Minet M, Osipova V et al (2018) ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia 38:1026–1037CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brandes JL, Saper JR, Diamond M, Couch JR, Lewis DW, Schmitt J et al (2004) Topiramate for migraine prevention a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291:965–973CrossRef Brandes JL, Saper JR, Diamond M, Couch JR, Lewis DW, Schmitt J et al (2004) Topiramate for migraine prevention a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291:965–973CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Aurora SK, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB et al (2010) OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 50:921–936CrossRef Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Aurora SK, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB et al (2010) OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 50:921–936CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Halker Singh RB, Aycardi E, Bigal ME, Loupe PS, McDonald M et al (2018) Sustained reductions in migraine days, moderate-to-severe headache days and days with acute medication use for HFEM and CM patients taking fremanezumab: post-hoc analyses from phase 2 trials. Cephalalgia:333102418772585 [Epub ahead of print] Halker Singh RB, Aycardi E, Bigal ME, Loupe PS, McDonald M et al (2018) Sustained reductions in migraine days, moderate-to-severe headache days and days with acute medication use for HFEM and CM patients taking fremanezumab: post-hoc analyses from phase 2 trials. Cephalalgia:333102418772585 [Epub ahead of print]
11.
go back to reference Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, Dahlöf C, D'Amico D, Diener HC et al (2012) Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia 32:6–38CrossRef Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, Dahlöf C, D'Amico D, Diener HC et al (2012) Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia 32:6–38CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J et al (2008) Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 28:484–495CrossRef Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J et al (2008) Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 28:484–495CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tassorelli C, Diener HC, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Ashina M et al (2018) Guidelines of the international headache society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 38:815–832CrossRef Tassorelli C, Diener HC, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Ashina M et al (2018) Guidelines of the international headache society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 38:815–832CrossRef
14.
go back to reference [ICHD-3] Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629-808. [ICHD-3] Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629-808.
15.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc (2017) SAS/STAT® 14.3 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary SAS Institute Inc (2017) SAS/STAT® 14.3 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary
16.
go back to reference Diener HC, Schorn CF, Bingel U, Dodick DW (2008) The importance of placebo in headache research. Cephalalgia 28(10):1003–1011CrossRef Diener HC, Schorn CF, Bingel U, Dodick DW (2008) The importance of placebo in headache research. Cephalalgia 28(10):1003–1011CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Diener HC (2010) Placebo effects in treating migraine and other headaches. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 11(7):735–739PubMed Diener HC (2010) Placebo effects in treating migraine and other headaches. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 11(7):735–739PubMed
18.
go back to reference Meissner K, Fässler M, Rücker G, Kleijnen J, Hróbjartsson A, Schneider A et al (2013) Differential effectiveness of placebo treatments: a systematic review of migraine prophylaxis. JAMA Intern Med 173:1941–1951CrossRef Meissner K, Fässler M, Rücker G, Kleijnen J, Hróbjartsson A, Schneider A et al (2013) Differential effectiveness of placebo treatments: a systematic review of migraine prophylaxis. JAMA Intern Med 173:1941–1951CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Diener HC, DeGryse RE, Lipton RB et al (2015) Percent of patients with chronic migraine who responded per onabotulinumtoxinA treatment cycle: PREEMPT. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86:996–1001CrossRef Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Diener HC, DeGryse RE, Lipton RB et al (2015) Percent of patients with chronic migraine who responded per onabotulinumtoxinA treatment cycle: PREEMPT. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86:996–1001CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bhoi SK, Kalita J, Misra UK (2013) Is 6 months of migraine prophylaxis adequate? Neurol Res 35:1009–1014CrossRef Bhoi SK, Kalita J, Misra UK (2013) Is 6 months of migraine prophylaxis adequate? Neurol Res 35:1009–1014CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wöber C, Wöber-Bingöl C, Koch G, Wessely P (1991) Long-term results of migraine prophylaxis with flunarizine and beta-blockers. Cephalalgia 11(6):251–256CrossRef Wöber C, Wöber-Bingöl C, Koch G, Wessely P (1991) Long-term results of migraine prophylaxis with flunarizine and beta-blockers. Cephalalgia 11(6):251–256CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pascual J, El Berdei Y, Gómez-Sánchez JC (2007) How many migraine patients need prolonged (>1 year) preventive treatment? Experience with topiramate. J Headache Pain 8(2):90–93CrossRef Pascual J, El Berdei Y, Gómez-Sánchez JC (2007) How many migraine patients need prolonged (>1 year) preventive treatment? Experience with topiramate. J Headache Pain 8(2):90–93CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Silva-Néto RP, Almeida KJ, Bernardino SN (2014) Analysis of the duration of migraine prophylaxis. J Neurol Sci 337(1–2):38–41CrossRef Silva-Néto RP, Almeida KJ, Bernardino SN (2014) Analysis of the duration of migraine prophylaxis. J Neurol Sci 337(1–2):38–41CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studies
Authors
Stefanie Förderreuther
Qi Zhang
Virginia L. Stauffer
Sheena K. Aurora
Miguel J. A. Láinez
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0951-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2018 Go to the issue