Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Migraine | Research article

Treatment benefit among migraine patients taking fremanezumab: results from a post hoc responder analysis of two placebo-controlled trials

Authors: Stephen D. Silberstein, Joshua M. Cohen, Ronghua Yang, Sanjay K. Gandhi, Evelyn Du, Adelene E. Jann, Michael J. Marmura

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, including the fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) fremanezumab, have demonstrated safety and efficacy for migraine prevention. Clinical trials include responders and nonresponders; efficacy outcomes describe mean values across both groups and thus provide little insight into the clinical benefit in responders. Clinicians and their patients want to understand the extent of clinical improvement in patients who respond. This post hoc analysis of fremanezumab treatment attempts to answer this question: what is the benefit in subjects who responded to treatment during the two, phase 3 HALO clinical trials?

Methods

We included subjects with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) who received fremanezumab quarterly (675 mg/placebo/placebo) or monthly (EM: 225 mg/225 mg/225 mg; CM: 675 mg/225 mg/225 mg) during the 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled HALO EM and HALO CM clinical trials. EM and CM responders were defined as participants with a reduction of ≥ 2 or ≥ 4 monthly migraine days, respectively. Treatment benefits evaluated included reductions in monthly migraine days, acute headache medication use, and headache-related disability, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Results

Overall, 857 participants from the HALO trials were identified as responders (EM: 429 [73.8%]; CM: 428 [56.7%]). Reductions in the monthly average number of migraine days were greater among EM (quarterly: 5.4 days; monthly: 5.5 days) and CM (quarterly: 8.7 days; monthly: 9.1 days) responders compared with the overall population. The proportion of participants achieving ≥ 50% reduction in the average monthly number of migraine days was also greater in responders (EM: quarterly, 59.8%; monthly, 63.7%; CM: quarterly, 52.8%; monthly, 59.0%) than in the overall population. Greater reductions in the average number of days of acute headache medication use, greater reductions in headache-related disability scores, and larger improvements in HRQoL were observed among EM and CM responders compared with the overall populations.

Conclusions

Fremanezumab responders achieved clinically meaningful improvements in all outcomes. The magnitude of improvements with fremanezumab across efficacy outcomes was far greater in responders than in the overall trial population, providing insight into expected treatment benefits in participants who respond to fremanezumab in clinical practice.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.​gov identifiers: NCT02629861 (HALO EM) and NCT02621931 (HALO CM).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tepper SJ (2018) History and review of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) therapies: from translational research to treatment. Headache. 58:238–275CrossRef Tepper SJ (2018) History and review of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) therapies: from translational research to treatment. Headache. 58:238–275CrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Tassorelli C, Diener HC, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Ashina M et al (2018) Guidelines of the international headache society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. 38:815–832CrossRef Tassorelli C, Diener HC, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Ashina M et al (2018) Guidelines of the international headache society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. 38:815–832CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J et al (2008) Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. 28:484–495CrossRef Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J et al (2008) Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. 28:484–495CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Silberstein SD (2015) Preventive migraine treatment. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 21:973–989 Silberstein SD (2015) Preventive migraine treatment. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 21:973–989
6.
go back to reference AJOVY® (fremanezumab-vfrm) injection [packet insert]. North Wales: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; 2019 AJOVY® (fremanezumab-vfrm) injection [packet insert]. North Wales: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; 2019
7.
go back to reference AJOVY® (fremanezumab) [Summary of Product Characteristics]. Ulm: Teva Pharmaceuticals GmbH; 2019 AJOVY® (fremanezumab) [Summary of Product Characteristics]. Ulm: Teva Pharmaceuticals GmbH; 2019
8.
go back to reference Bigal ME, Edvinsson L, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, Spierings EL, Diener HC et al (2015) Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study. Lancet Neurol 14:1091–1100CrossRef Bigal ME, Edvinsson L, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, Spierings EL, Diener HC et al (2015) Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study. Lancet Neurol 14:1091–1100CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bigal ME, Dodick DW, Rapoport AM, Silberstein SD, Ma Y, Yang R et al (2015) Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of high-frequency episodic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study. Lancet Neurol 14:1081–1090CrossRef Bigal ME, Dodick DW, Rapoport AM, Silberstein SD, Ma Y, Yang R et al (2015) Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of high-frequency episodic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study. Lancet Neurol 14:1081–1090CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T et al (2018) Effect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 319:1999–2008CrossRef Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T et al (2018) Effect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 319:1999–2008CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T et al (2017) Fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. N Engl J Med 377:2113–2122CrossRef Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T et al (2017) Fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. N Engl J Med 377:2113–2122CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Sawyer J, Edmeads JG (2001) Clinical utility of an instrument assessing migraine disability: the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache. 41:854–861 Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Sawyer J, Edmeads JG (2001) Clinical utility of an instrument assessing migraine disability: the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache. 41:854–861
13.
go back to reference Rendas-Baum R, Yang M, Varon SF, Bloudek LM, DeGryse RE, Kosinski M (2014) Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in patients with chronic migraine. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:117 Rendas-Baum R, Yang M, Varon SF, Bloudek LM, DeGryse RE, Kosinski M (2014) Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in patients with chronic migraine. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:117
14.
go back to reference Bagley CL, Rendas-Baum R, Maglinte GA, Yang M, Varon SF, Lee J et al (2012) Validating migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire v2.1 in episodic and chronic migraine. Headache. 52:409–421CrossRef Bagley CL, Rendas-Baum R, Maglinte GA, Yang M, Varon SF, Lee J et al (2012) Validating migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire v2.1 in episodic and chronic migraine. Headache. 52:409–421CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kristoffersen ES, Lundqvist C (2014) Medication-overuse headache: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Ther Adv Drug Saf 5:87–99CrossRef Kristoffersen ES, Lundqvist C (2014) Medication-overuse headache: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Ther Adv Drug Saf 5:87–99CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lanteri-Minet M, Duru G, Mudge M, Cottrell S (2011) Quality of life impairment, disability and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache, focusing on chronic migraine with or without medication overuse: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 31:837–850CrossRef Lanteri-Minet M, Duru G, Mudge M, Cottrell S (2011) Quality of life impairment, disability and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache, focusing on chronic migraine with or without medication overuse: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 31:837–850CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Probyn K, Bowers H, Caldwell F, Mistry D, Underwood M, Matharu M et al (2017) Prognostic factors for chronic headache: a systematic review. Neurology. 89:291–301CrossRef Probyn K, Bowers H, Caldwell F, Mistry D, Underwood M, Matharu M et al (2017) Prognostic factors for chronic headache: a systematic review. Neurology. 89:291–301CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vandenbussche N, Laterza D, Lisicki M, Lloyd J, Lupi C, Tischler H et al (2018) Medication-overuse headache: a widely recognized entity amidst ongoing debate. J Headache Pain 19:50CrossRef Vandenbussche N, Laterza D, Lisicki M, Lloyd J, Lupi C, Tischler H et al (2018) Medication-overuse headache: a widely recognized entity amidst ongoing debate. J Headache Pain 19:50CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Da Silva AN, Lake AE 3rd. (2014) Clinical aspects of medication overuse headaches. Headache. 54:211–217CrossRef Da Silva AN, Lake AE 3rd. (2014) Clinical aspects of medication overuse headaches. Headache. 54:211–217CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 38:1–211 Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 38:1–211
21.
go back to reference Coeytaux RR, Kaufman JS, Chao R, Mann JD, Devellis RF (2006) Four methods of estimating the minimal important difference score were compared to establish a clinically significant change in Headache Impact Test. J Clin Epidemiol 59:374–380 Coeytaux RR, Kaufman JS, Chao R, Mann JD, Devellis RF (2006) Four methods of estimating the minimal important difference score were compared to establish a clinically significant change in Headache Impact Test. J Clin Epidemiol 59:374–380
22.
go back to reference American Headache Society (2019) The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 59:1–18 American Headache Society (2019) The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 59:1–18
23.
go back to reference Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Chia J, Matthew N, Gillard P et al (2017) Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: a retrospective claims analysis. Cephalalgia. 37:470–485CrossRef Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Chia J, Matthew N, Gillard P et al (2017) Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: a retrospective claims analysis. Cephalalgia. 37:470–485CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF (2014) Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm 20:22–33CrossRef Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF (2014) Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm 20:22–33CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, Becker WJ, Buse DC, Varon SF, Maglinte GA et al (2013) Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS-II). Headache. 53:644–655 Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, Becker WJ, Buse DC, Varon SF, Maglinte GA et al (2013) Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS-II). Headache. 53:644–655
26.
go back to reference Cowan R, Cohen JM, Rosenman E, Iyer R (2019) Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention. J Headache Pain 20:50CrossRef Cowan R, Cohen JM, Rosenman E, Iyer R (2019) Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention. J Headache Pain 20:50CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Treatment benefit among migraine patients taking fremanezumab: results from a post hoc responder analysis of two placebo-controlled trials
Authors
Stephen D. Silberstein
Joshua M. Cohen
Ronghua Yang
Sanjay K. Gandhi
Evelyn Du
Adelene E. Jann
Michael J. Marmura
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01212-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2021 Go to the issue