Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Migraine | Research article

Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) in the acute treatment of migraine: a comparison with usual care and acute migraine medications

Authors: Alan M. Rapoport, Jo H. Bonner, Tamar Lin, Dagan Harris, Yaron Gruper, Alon Ironi, Robert P. Cowan

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a significant unmet need for new, effective and well tolerated acute migraine treatments. A recent study has demonstrated that a novel remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) treatment provides superior clinically meaningful pain relief with a low rate of device-related adverse events. The results reported herein compare the efficacy of REN with current standard of care in the acute treatments of migraine.

Methods

We performed a post-hoc analysis on a subgroup of participants with migraine from a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled, multicenter study on acute care. The original study included a 2–4 weeks run-in phase, in which migraine attacks were treated according to patient preference (i.e., usual care) and reported in an electronic diary; next, participants entered a double-blind treatment phase in which they treated the attacks with an active or sham device. The efficacy of REN was compared to the efficacy of usual care or pharmacological treatments in the run-in phase in a within-subject design that included participants who treated at least one attack with the active REN device and reported pain intensity at 2 h post-treatment.

Results

Of the 252 patients randomized, there were 99 participants available for analysis. At 2 h post-treatment, pain relief was achieved in 66.7% of the participants using REN versus 52.5% participants with usual care (p < 0.05). Pain relief at 2 h in at least one of two attacks was achieved by 84.4% of participants versus 68.9% in usual care (p < 0.05). REN and usual care were similarly effective for pain-free status at 2 h. The results also demonstrate the non-inferiority of REN compared with acute pharmacological treatments and its non-dependency on preventive medication use.

Conclusion

REN is an effective acute treatment for migraine with non-inferior efficacy compared to current acute migraine therapies. Together with a very favorable safety profile, these findings suggest that REN may offer a promising alternative for the acute treatment of migraine and could be considered first line treatment in some patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03361423. Registered 18 November 2017.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH et al (2017) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet 390:1211–1259CrossRef Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH et al (2017) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet 390:1211–1259CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Society (IHS) HCC of the IH (2013) The international classification of headache disorders, (beta version). Cephalalgia 33:629–808CrossRef Society (IHS) HCC of the IH (2013) The international classification of headache disorders, (beta version). Cephalalgia 33:629–808CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yarnitsky D, Volokh L, Ironi A et al (2017) Nonpainful remote electrical stimulation alleviates episodic migraine pain. Neurology 88:1250–1255CrossRef Yarnitsky D, Volokh L, Ironi A et al (2017) Nonpainful remote electrical stimulation alleviates episodic migraine pain. Neurology 88:1250–1255CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nir R-R, Yarnitsky D (2015) Conditioned pain modulation. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 9:131–137CrossRef Nir R-R, Yarnitsky D (2015) Conditioned pain modulation. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 9:131–137CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tassorelli C, Grazzi L, de Tommaso M et al (2018) Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation as acute therapy for migraine: the randomized PRESTO study. Neurology 91:e364–e373CrossRef Tassorelli C, Grazzi L, de Tommaso M et al (2018) Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation as acute therapy for migraine: the randomized PRESTO study. Neurology 91:e364–e373CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Spierings EL, Brandes JL, Kudrow DB et al (2018) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study of the safety and efficacy of ADAM zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia 38:215–224CrossRef Spierings EL, Brandes JL, Kudrow DB et al (2018) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study of the safety and efficacy of ADAM zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia 38:215–224CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD et al (2010) Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 9:373–380 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70054-5CrossRef Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD et al (2010) Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 9:373–380 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1474-4422(10)70054-5CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wietecha LA, Kuca B, Asafu-Adjei J, Aurora SK (2018) Phase 3 studies (SAMURAI, SPARTAN) of Lasmiditan compared to placebo for acute treatment of migraine (S50. 008). AAN Enterprises Wietecha LA, Kuca B, Asafu-Adjei J, Aurora SK (2018) Phase 3 studies (SAMURAI, SPARTAN) of Lasmiditan compared to placebo for acute treatment of migraine (S50. 008). AAN Enterprises
Metadata
Title
Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) in the acute treatment of migraine: a comparison with usual care and acute migraine medications
Authors
Alan M. Rapoport
Jo H. Bonner
Tamar Lin
Dagan Harris
Yaron Gruper
Alon Ironi
Robert P. Cowan
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1033-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2019 Go to the issue