Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dermatology and Therapy 8/2022

Open Access 07-07-2022 | Plaque Psoriasis | Original Research

Efficacy of Bimekizumab and Other Biologics in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Network Meta-Analysis

Authors: April Armstrong, Kyle Fahrbach, Craig Leonardi, Matthias Augustin, Binod Neupane, Paulina Kazmierska, Marissa Betts, Andreas Freitag, Sandeep Kiri, Vanessa Taieb, Mahmoud Slim, Natalie Nunez Gomez, Richard B. Warren

Published in: Dermatology and Therapy | Issue 8/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Biologic treatments are increasingly being used in the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PSO). Bimekizumab is a selective inhibitor of both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F approved for the treatment of moderate to severe PSO. Although bimekizumab trials provide comparisons to secukinumab, adalimumab and ustekinumab, there are no further head-to-head comparisons of bimekizumab to other biologics. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the short-term efficacy of bimekizumab versus other biologic systemic therapies for moderate to severe PSO.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with moderate to severe PSO. MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Database of Systematic Reviews and PsycINFO were searched on July 1, 2020. An enhanced multinomial Bayesian NMA model was used to evaluate the comparative efficacy in 50%, 75%, 90% and 100% improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50/75/90/100) at 10–16 weeks. The model was also adjusted for baseline risk, given the variable placebo responses across the trials.

Results

Eighty-six RCTs (including 34,476 patients) were included in the NMA. IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors were the most effective treatments across all PASI levels. At 10–16 weeks, bimekizumab had the highest probability of achieving PASI 75 (92.3%), PASI 90 (84.0%) and PASI 100 (57.8%). Bimekizumab demonstrated statistical superiority over all biologics in achieving PASI 90 and PASI 100 thresholds. For PASI 75, the benefit of bimekizumab was statistically significant compared to all other treatments except risankizumab and ixekizumab.

Conclusion

This analysis demonstrated that IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors were highly effective in achieving short-term improvement among patients with moderate to severe PSO. Patients receiving bimekizumab were significantly more likely to achieve PASI 90 or PASI 100 within 10–16 weeks of the first injection than all other biologics.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Griffiths CE, Barker JN. Pathogenesis and clinical features of psoriasis. Lancet. 2007;370(9583):263–71.CrossRef Griffiths CE, Barker JN. Pathogenesis and clinical features of psoriasis. Lancet. 2007;370(9583):263–71.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gottlieb A, Korman NJ, Gordon KB, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 2. Psoriatic arthritis: overview and guidelines of care for treatment with an emphasis on the biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):851–64. Gottlieb A, Korman NJ, Gordon KB, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 2. Psoriatic arthritis: overview and guidelines of care for treatment with an emphasis on the biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):851–64.
3.
go back to reference Parisi R, Iskandar IYK, Kontopantelis E, et al. National, regional, and worldwide epidemiology of psoriasis: systematic analysis and modelling study. BMJ. 2020;369: m1590.CrossRef Parisi R, Iskandar IYK, Kontopantelis E, et al. National, regional, and worldwide epidemiology of psoriasis: systematic analysis and modelling study. BMJ. 2020;369: m1590.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):826–50. Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):826–50.
5.
go back to reference Mrowietz U, Kragballe K, Reich K, et al. Definition of treatment goals for moderate to severe psoriasis: a European consensus. Arch Dermatol Res. 2011;303(1):1–10.CrossRef Mrowietz U, Kragballe K, Reich K, et al. Definition of treatment goals for moderate to severe psoriasis: a European consensus. Arch Dermatol Res. 2011;303(1):1–10.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gelfand JM, Troxel AB, Lewis JD, et al. The risk of mortality in patients with psoriasis: results from a population-based study. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(12):1493–9.CrossRef Gelfand JM, Troxel AB, Lewis JD, et al. The risk of mortality in patients with psoriasis: results from a population-based study. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(12):1493–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Smith CH, Anstey AV, Barker JN, et al. British association of dermatologists’ guidelines for biologic interventions for psoriasis 2009. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(5):987–1019.CrossRef Smith CH, Anstey AV, Barker JN, et al. British association of dermatologists’ guidelines for biologic interventions for psoriasis 2009. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(5):987–1019.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Menter A, Gelfand JM, Connor C, et al. Joint American academy of dermatology-national psoriasis foundation guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis with systemic nonbiologic therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(6):1445–86.CrossRef Menter A, Gelfand JM, Connor C, et al. Joint American academy of dermatology-national psoriasis foundation guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis with systemic nonbiologic therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(6):1445–86.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Smith CH, Yiu ZZN, Bale T, et al. British association of dermatologists guidelines for biologic therapy for psoriasis 2020: a rapid update. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(4):628–37.CrossRef Smith CH, Yiu ZZN, Bale T, et al. British association of dermatologists guidelines for biologic therapy for psoriasis 2020: a rapid update. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(4):628–37.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Balak DMW, Gerdes S, Parodi A, Salgado-Boquete L. Long-term safety of oral systemic therapies for psoriasis: a comprehensive review of the literature. Dermatol Therapy. 2020;10(4):589–613.CrossRef Balak DMW, Gerdes S, Parodi A, Salgado-Boquete L. Long-term safety of oral systemic therapies for psoriasis: a comprehensive review of the literature. Dermatol Therapy. 2020;10(4):589–613.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Menter ASB, Kaplan DH, et al. Joint AAD-NPF guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(4):P1029–72.CrossRef Menter ASB, Kaplan DH, et al. Joint AAD-NPF guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(4):P1029–72.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ronholt K, Iversen L. Old and New Biological Therapies for Psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(11). Ronholt K, Iversen L. Old and New Biological Therapies for Psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(11).
15.
go back to reference BIMZELX[®] (bimekizumab) Approved in Japan for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis, Generalized Pustular Psoriasis and Psoriatic Erythroderma [press release]. 24 January 2022. BIMZELX[®] (bimekizumab) Approved in Japan for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis, Generalized Pustular Psoriasis and Psoriatic Erythroderma [press release]. 24 January 2022.
18.
go back to reference Adams R, Maroof A, Baker T, et al. Bimekizumab, a Novel Humanized IgG1 Antibody That Neutralizes Both IL-17A and IL-17F. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1894.CrossRef Adams R, Maroof A, Baker T, et al. Bimekizumab, a Novel Humanized IgG1 Antibody That Neutralizes Both IL-17A and IL-17F. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1894.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Papp KA, Merola JF, Gottlieb AB, et al. Dual neutralization of both interleukin 17A and interleukin 17F with bimekizumab in patients with psoriasis: Results from BE ABLE 1, a 12-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(2):277–86 e10. Papp KA, Merola JF, Gottlieb AB, et al. Dual neutralization of both interleukin 17A and interleukin 17F with bimekizumab in patients with psoriasis: Results from BE ABLE 1, a 12-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(2):277–86 e10.
20.
go back to reference Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Bimekizumab versus ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE VIVID): efficacy and safety from a 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, active comparator and placebo controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10273):487–98.CrossRef Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Bimekizumab versus ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE VIVID): efficacy and safety from a 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, active comparator and placebo controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10273):487–98.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Reich K, Warren RB, Lebwohl M, et al. Bimekizumab versus Secukinumab in Plaque Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2):142–52.CrossRef Reich K, Warren RB, Lebwohl M, et al. Bimekizumab versus Secukinumab in Plaque Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2):142–52.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Warren RB, Blauvelt A, Bagel J, et al. Bimekizumab versus Adalimumab in Plaque Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2):130–41.CrossRef Warren RB, Blauvelt A, Bagel J, et al. Bimekizumab versus Adalimumab in Plaque Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2):130–41.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Higgins JPTTJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019. Higgins JPTTJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
24.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535
25.
go back to reference UCB. Protocol PS0008 Amendment 2: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study with an active-controlled initial treatment period followed by a dose-blind maintenance treatment period to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in adult subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis phase 3. 2018. UCB. Protocol PS0008 Amendment 2: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study with an active-controlled initial treatment period followed by a dose-blind maintenance treatment period to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in adult subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis phase 3. 2018.
26.
go back to reference UCB. Protocol PS0013 Amendment 3: A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an initial treatment period followed by a randomizedwithdrawal period to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in adult subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis phase 3. 2019. UCB. Protocol PS0013 Amendment 3: A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an initial treatment period followed by a randomizedwithdrawal period to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in adult subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis phase 3. 2019.
27.
go back to reference UCB. Protocol PS0009 Amendment 4: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in adult subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis phase 3. 2019. UCB. Protocol PS0009 Amendment 4: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in adult subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis phase 3. 2019.
28.
go back to reference UCB. Protocol PS0015 Amendment 4: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, secukinumab-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in adult subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis phase 3b. 2020. UCB. Protocol PS0015 Amendment 4: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, secukinumab-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in adult subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis phase 3b. 2020.
29.
go back to reference Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366: l4898.CrossRef Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366: l4898.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Salanti G. Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):80–97.CrossRef Salanti G. Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):80–97.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cameron C, Hutton B, Druchok C, et al. Importance of assessing and adjusting for cross-study heterogeneity in network meta-analysis: a case study of psoriasis. J Comp Eff Res. 2018;7(11):1037–51.CrossRef Cameron C, Hutton B, Druchok C, et al. Importance of assessing and adjusting for cross-study heterogeneity in network meta-analysis: a case study of psoriasis. J Comp Eff Res. 2018;7(11):1037–51.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Fahrbach K, Sarri G, Phillippo DM, et al. Short-term efficacy of biologic therapies in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic literature review and an enhanced multinomial network meta-analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021;11(6):1965–98.CrossRef Fahrbach K, Sarri G, Phillippo DM, et al. Short-term efficacy of biologic therapies in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic literature review and an enhanced multinomial network meta-analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021;11(6):1965–98.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Spiegelhalter D, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Stat Methodol Ser B. 2002;64(4):583–639.CrossRef Spiegelhalter D, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Stat Methodol Ser B. 2002;64(4):583–639.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Antiga E, Volpi W, Chiarini C, et al. The role of etanercept on the expression of markers of T helper 17 cells and their precursors in skin lesions of patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2010;23(3):767–74.CrossRef Antiga E, Volpi W, Chiarini C, et al. The role of etanercept on the expression of markers of T helper 17 cells and their precursors in skin lesions of patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2010;23(3):767–74.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Langley RG, Elewski BE, Lebwohl M, et al. Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis–results of two phase 3 trials. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(4):326–38.CrossRef Langley RG, Elewski BE, Lebwohl M, et al. Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis–results of two phase 3 trials. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(4):326–38.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Heydendael VM, Spuls PI, Opmeer BC, et al. Methotrexate versus cyclosporine in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(7):658–65.CrossRef Heydendael VM, Spuls PI, Opmeer BC, et al. Methotrexate versus cyclosporine in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(7):658–65.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Gisondi P, Del Giglio M, Cotena C, Girolomoni G. Combining etanercept and acitretin in the therapy of chronic plaque psoriasis: a 24-week, randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded pilot trial. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(6):1345–9.CrossRef Gisondi P, Del Giglio M, Cotena C, Girolomoni G. Combining etanercept and acitretin in the therapy of chronic plaque psoriasis: a 24-week, randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded pilot trial. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(6):1345–9.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Torii H, Nakagawa H, Japanese Infliximab Study i. Infliximab monotherapy in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. J Dermatol Sci. 2010;59(1):40–9. Torii H, Nakagawa H, Japanese Infliximab Study i. Infliximab monotherapy in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. J Dermatol Sci. 2010;59(1):40–9.
43.
go back to reference Armstrong AW, Soliman AM, Betts KA, et al. Comparative efficacy and relative ranking of biologics and oral therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021;11(3):885–905.CrossRef Armstrong AW, Soliman AM, Betts KA, et al. Comparative efficacy and relative ranking of biologics and oral therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021;11(3):885–905.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Sawyer LM, Malottki K, Sabry-Grant C, et al. Assessing the relative efficacy of interleukin-17 and interleukin-23 targeted treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of PASI response. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8): e0220868.CrossRef Sawyer LM, Malottki K, Sabry-Grant C, et al. Assessing the relative efficacy of interleukin-17 and interleukin-23 targeted treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of PASI response. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8): e0220868.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Wright E, Yasmeen N, Malottki K, et al. Assessing the quality and coherence of network meta-analyses of biologics in plaque psoriasis: What does all this evidence synthesis tell us? Dermatol Therapy. 2021;11(1):181–220.CrossRef Wright E, Yasmeen N, Malottki K, et al. Assessing the quality and coherence of network meta-analyses of biologics in plaque psoriasis: What does all this evidence synthesis tell us? Dermatol Therapy. 2021;11(1):181–220.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Chiricozzi A, Romanelli P, Volpe E, Borsellino G, Romanelli M. Scanning the Immunopathogenesis of Psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(1). Chiricozzi A, Romanelli P, Volpe E, Borsellino G, Romanelli M. Scanning the Immunopathogenesis of Psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(1).
47.
go back to reference Gordon KB, Strober B, Lebwohl M, et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2018;392(10148):650–61.CrossRef Gordon KB, Strober B, Lebwohl M, et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2018;392(10148):650–61.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CE, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):405–17.CrossRef Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CE, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):405–17.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Tildrakizumab versus placebo or etanercept for chronic plaque psoriasis (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2): results from two randomised controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):276–88.CrossRef Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Tildrakizumab versus placebo or etanercept for chronic plaque psoriasis (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2): results from two randomised controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):276–88.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Jones SA, Sutton CE, Cua D, Mills KH. Therapeutic potential of targeting IL-17. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(11):1022–5.CrossRef Jones SA, Sutton CE, Cua D, Mills KH. Therapeutic potential of targeting IL-17. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(11):1022–5.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Armstrong AW, Read C, Leonardi C, Kircik L. IL-23 Versus IL-17 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis: there is more to the story than IL-17A. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(8):S202–8. Armstrong AW, Read C, Leonardi C, Kircik L. IL-23 Versus IL-17 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis: there is more to the story than IL-17A. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(8):S202–8.
52.
go back to reference Gordon KB, Blauvelt A, Papp KA, et al. Phase 3 trials of ixekizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):345–56.CrossRef Gordon KB, Blauvelt A, Papp KA, et al. Phase 3 trials of ixekizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):345–56.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Kolbinger F, Loesche C, Valentin MA, et al. beta-Defensin 2 is a responsive biomarker of IL-17A-driven skin pathology in patients with psoriasis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(3):923–32 e8. Kolbinger F, Loesche C, Valentin MA, et al. beta-Defensin 2 is a responsive biomarker of IL-17A-driven skin pathology in patients with psoriasis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(3):923–32 e8.
54.
go back to reference Johansen C, Usher PA, Kjellerup RB, Lundsgaard D, Iversen L, Kragballe K. Characterization of the interleukin-17 isoforms and receptors in lesional psoriatic skin. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160(2):319–24.CrossRef Johansen C, Usher PA, Kjellerup RB, Lundsgaard D, Iversen L, Kragballe K. Characterization of the interleukin-17 isoforms and receptors in lesional psoriatic skin. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160(2):319–24.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Sbidian E, Chaimani A, Afach S, et al. Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1:CD011535. Sbidian E, Chaimani A, Afach S, et al. Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1:CD011535.
56.
go back to reference Shear NH, Betts KA, Soliman AM, et al. Comparative safety and benefit-risk profile of biologics and oral treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis of clinical trial data. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(3):572–81.CrossRef Shear NH, Betts KA, Soliman AM, et al. Comparative safety and benefit-risk profile of biologics and oral treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis of clinical trial data. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(3):572–81.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Jabbar-Lopez ZK, Yiu ZZN, Ward V, et al. Quantitative evaluation of biologic therapy options for psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(8):1646–54.CrossRef Jabbar-Lopez ZK, Yiu ZZN, Ward V, et al. Quantitative evaluation of biologic therapy options for psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(8):1646–54.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Bai F, Li GG, Liu Q, Niu X, Li R, Ma H. Short-Term efficacy and safety of IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors brodalumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Immunol Res. 2019;2019:2546161.CrossRef Bai F, Li GG, Liu Q, Niu X, Li R, Ma H. Short-Term efficacy and safety of IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors brodalumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Immunol Res. 2019;2019:2546161.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Xu S, Zhang X, Pan M, Shuai Z, Xu S, Pan F. Treatment of plaque psoriasis with IL-23p19 blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;75: 105841.CrossRef Xu S, Zhang X, Pan M, Shuai Z, Xu S, Pan F. Treatment of plaque psoriasis with IL-23p19 blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;75: 105841.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Wright E, Yasmeen N, Malottki K, et al. Assessing the quality and coherence of network meta-analyses of biologics in plaque psoriasis: what does all this evidence synthesis tell us? Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021;11(1):181–220.CrossRef Wright E, Yasmeen N, Malottki K, et al. Assessing the quality and coherence of network meta-analyses of biologics in plaque psoriasis: what does all this evidence synthesis tell us? Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021;11(1):181–220.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of Bimekizumab and Other Biologics in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Network Meta-Analysis
Authors
April Armstrong
Kyle Fahrbach
Craig Leonardi
Matthias Augustin
Binod Neupane
Paulina Kazmierska
Marissa Betts
Andreas Freitag
Sandeep Kiri
Vanessa Taieb
Mahmoud Slim
Natalie Nunez Gomez
Richard B. Warren
Publication date
07-07-2022
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Dermatology and Therapy / Issue 8/2022
Print ISSN: 2193-8210
Electronic ISSN: 2190-9172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00760-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2022

Dermatology and Therapy 8/2022 Go to the issue