Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dermatology and Therapy 2/2022

Open Access 01-02-2022 | Metastasis | Case Series

Clinical Utility of the 40-Gene Expression Profile (40-GEP) Test for Improved Patient Management Decisions and Disease-Related Outcomes when Combined with Current Clinicopathological Risk Factors for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC): Case Series

Authors: Jeremiah H. Au, Perry B. Hooper, Alison L. Fitzgerald, Ally-Khan Somani

Published in: Dermatology and Therapy | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

While improvements have been made to risk assessment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) patients, there is a critical need for a uniform and more precise stratification system of their care. To address this unmet clinical need, a prognostic 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) test has recently been developed and independently validated to show improved stratification of metastatic risk in high-risk cSCC patients compared with current staging systems.

Methods

Two cSCC cases, both male with similar patient profiles and the same staging status across two different staging systems, yet with opposing outcomes, were chosen for retrospective review of their primary biopsy using the 40-GEP test.

Results

Case 1 declined further treatment, even when presented with evidence of a small focus of cSCC found in the last layer of nonmarginal tissue obtained from Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Case 1 remained recurrence free, and retrospective analysis of the initial biopsy with the 40-GEP test provided a Class 1 result (low likelihood of metastasis). Case 2, even with subsequent clearing of the primary cSCC with MMS, noted another metastatic cSCC 3 months later. Case 2, after multimodal adjuvant treatments, died due to disease progression. Retrospective analysis of the initial biopsy with the 40-GEP test provided a Class 2B result (high likelihood of metastasis).

Conclusions

The cases discussed highlight the utility in 40-GEP to provide additional information to guide treatment decisions and improve outcomes. Integrating novel molecular prognostication with traditional clinicopathological risk factors can improve stratification of high-risk cSCC patients and may inform selection of risk-appropriate treatment and surveillance strategies.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Thompson AK, Kelley BF, Prokop LJ, et al. Risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:419–28.PubMedPubMedCentral Thompson AK, Kelley BF, Prokop LJ, et al. Risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:419–28.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Porceddu SV, Bressel M, Poulsen MG, et al. Postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: the randomized phase III TROG 05.01 trial. JCO. 2018;36:1275–83.CrossRef Porceddu SV, Bressel M, Poulsen MG, et al. Postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: the randomized phase III TROG 05.01 trial. JCO. 2018;36:1275–83.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Smile TD, Xiong DX, Varra V, et al. Disease progression in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients with satellitosis and in-transit metastasis. Anticancer Res. 2021;41:289–95.CrossRef Smile TD, Xiong DX, Varra V, et al. Disease progression in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients with satellitosis and in-transit metastasis. Anticancer Res. 2021;41:289–95.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Karia PS, Han J, Schmults CD. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: estimated incidence of disease, nodal metastasis, and deaths from disease in the United States, 2012. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68:957–66.CrossRef Karia PS, Han J, Schmults CD. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: estimated incidence of disease, nodal metastasis, and deaths from disease in the United States, 2012. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68:957–66.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, et al editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2017. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, et al editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
8.
go back to reference Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Kanetsky PA, Karia PS, et al. Evaluation of AJCC tumor staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and a proposed alternative tumor staging system. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:402.CrossRef Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Kanetsky PA, Karia PS, et al. Evaluation of AJCC tumor staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and a proposed alternative tumor staging system. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:402.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wysong A, Newman JG, Covington KR, et al. Validation of a 40-gene expression profile test to predict metastatic risk in localized high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:361–9.CrossRef Wysong A, Newman JG, Covington KR, et al. Validation of a 40-gene expression profile test to predict metastatic risk in localized high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:361–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cañueto J, Burguillo J, Moyano-Bueno D, et al. Comparing the eighth and the seventh editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and the Brigham and Women’s Hospital alternative staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Implications for clinical practice. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:106-113.e2.CrossRef Cañueto J, Burguillo J, Moyano-Bueno D, et al. Comparing the eighth and the seventh editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and the Brigham and Women’s Hospital alternative staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Implications for clinical practice. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:106-113.e2.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Claveau J, Archambault J, Ernst DS, et al. Multidisciplinary management of locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Oncol. 2020;27:e399–407.CrossRef Claveau J, Archambault J, Ernst DS, et al. Multidisciplinary management of locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Oncol. 2020;27:e399–407.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Hess SD, Katz KA, et al. Uncertainty in the perioperative management of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma among mohs surgeons. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:1225–31.CrossRef Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Hess SD, Katz KA, et al. Uncertainty in the perioperative management of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma among mohs surgeons. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:1225–31.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Miller CJ, Quon H, et al. Surgical monotherapy versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of outcomes. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:574–84.CrossRef Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Miller CJ, Quon H, et al. Surgical monotherapy versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of outcomes. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:574–84.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Colman H, Zhang L, Sulman EP, et al. A multigene predictor of outcome in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2010;12:49–57.CrossRef Colman H, Zhang L, Sulman EP, et al. A multigene predictor of outcome in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2010;12:49–57.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Francis P, Namlos HM, Muller C, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic gene expression signatures in 177 soft tissue sarcomas: hypoxia-induced transcription profile signifies metastatic potential. BMC Genom. 2007;8:73.CrossRef Francis P, Namlos HM, Muller C, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic gene expression signatures in 177 soft tissue sarcomas: hypoxia-induced transcription profile signifies metastatic potential. BMC Genom. 2007;8:73.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Onken MD, Worley LA, Char DH, et al. Collaborative ocular oncology group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1596–603.CrossRef Onken MD, Worley LA, Char DH, et al. Collaborative ocular oncology group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1596–603.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2817–26.CrossRef Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2817–26.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gerami P, Cook RW, Wilkinson J, et al. Development of a prognostic genetic signature to predict the metastatic risk associated with cutaneous melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:175–83.CrossRef Gerami P, Cook RW, Wilkinson J, et al. Development of a prognostic genetic signature to predict the metastatic risk associated with cutaneous melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:175–83.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical Utility of the 40-Gene Expression Profile (40-GEP) Test for Improved Patient Management Decisions and Disease-Related Outcomes when Combined with Current Clinicopathological Risk Factors for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC): Case Series
Authors
Jeremiah H. Au
Perry B. Hooper
Alison L. Fitzgerald
Ally-Khan Somani
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Dermatology and Therapy / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 2193-8210
Electronic ISSN: 2190-9172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-021-00665-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Dermatology and Therapy 2/2022 Go to the issue