Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dermatology and Therapy 1/2021

Open Access 01-02-2021 | Atopic Dermatitis | Original Research

Development and Content Validation of Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) in Adolescents and Adults with Moderate-to-Severe AD

Authors: Rebecca Hall, Mark G. Lebwohl, Andrew G. Bushmakin, Eric L. Simpson, Melinda J. Gooderham, Andreas Wollenberg, Adam Gater, Jane R. Wells, Joseph C. Cappelleri, Ming-Ann Hsu, Jocelyn Papacharalambous, Elena Peeva, Anna M. Tallman, Weidong Zhang, Linda Chen

Published in: Dermatology and Therapy | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Most patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments that measure atopic dermatitis (AD) symptoms do not have sufficient documented evidence of content validity to satisfy regulatory agency guidance for inclusion in product-labelling claims in the USA or Europe. The objective of this study was to develop a PRO instrument in accordance with regulatory agency guidance to assess daily AD symptoms during the course of therapy and to establish its content validity and psychometric properties.

Methods

The Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) daily diary was developed based on qualitative interviews with US adolescents and adults with mild-to-severe AD. Content validity, test–retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, clinically important difference, clinically important responder, convergent validity, and known-group validity were evaluated using correlational and regression methods from phase 2b data from US adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were treated with abrocitinib.

Results

Patient interviews conducted with US adolescents and adults with mild-to-severe AD identified 11 relevant symptoms (itch, dryness, redness, flaking, discolouration, pain, bleeding, cracking, bumps, swelling, and weeping/oozing) for inclusion in the PSAAD instrument. All PSAAD psychometric parameters were acceptable based on phase 2b data from US adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Convergent validity and known-group validity were confirmed by significant correlations between PSAAD and six other PRO measures (r = 0.24–0.91, all p ≤ 0.01) and Dermatology Life Quality Index category (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively.

Conclusions

Evidence supports the PSAAD instrument validity, reliability, responsiveness and definitions of clinically important changes/differences for adults with moderate-to-severe AD.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hay RJ, Johns NE, Williams HC, et al. The global burden of skin disease in 2010: an analysis of the prevalence and impact of skin conditions. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:1527–34.CrossRef Hay RJ, Johns NE, Williams HC, et al. The global burden of skin disease in 2010: an analysis of the prevalence and impact of skin conditions. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:1527–34.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wei W, Anderson P, Gadkari A, et al. Extent and consequences of inadequate disease control among adults with a history of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol. 2018;45:150–7.CrossRef Wei W, Anderson P, Gadkari A, et al. Extent and consequences of inadequate disease control among adults with a history of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol. 2018;45:150–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wei W, Anderson P, Gadkari A, et al. Discordance between physician- and patient-reported disease severity in adults with atopic dermatitis: a US cross-sectional survey. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18:825–35.CrossRef Wei W, Anderson P, Gadkari A, et al. Discordance between physician- and patient-reported disease severity in adults with atopic dermatitis: a US cross-sectional survey. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18:825–35.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Magin PJ, Pond CD, Smith WT, et al. Correlation and agreement of self-assessed and objective skin disease severity in a cross-sectional study of patients with acne, psoriasis, and atopic eczema. Int J Dermatol. 2011;50:1486–90.CrossRef Magin PJ, Pond CD, Smith WT, et al. Correlation and agreement of self-assessed and objective skin disease severity in a cross-sectional study of patients with acne, psoriasis, and atopic eczema. Int J Dermatol. 2011;50:1486–90.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Torrelo A, Ortiz J, Alomar A, et al. Atopic dermatitis: impact on quality of life and patients’ attitudes toward its management. Eur J Dermatol. 2012;22:97–105.CrossRef Torrelo A, Ortiz J, Alomar A, et al. Atopic dermatitis: impact on quality of life and patients’ attitudes toward its management. Eur J Dermatol. 2012;22:97–105.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chalmers JR, Schmitt J, Apfelbacher C, et al. Report from the third international consensus meeting to harmonise core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis clinical trials (HOME). Br J Dermatol. 2014;171:1318–25.CrossRef Chalmers JR, Schmitt J, Apfelbacher C, et al. Report from the third international consensus meeting to harmonise core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis clinical trials (HOME). Br J Dermatol. 2014;171:1318–25.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schmitt J, Spuls P, Boers M, et al. Towards global consensus on outcome measures for atopic eczema research: results of the HOME II meeting. Allergy. 2012;67:1111–7.CrossRef Schmitt J, Spuls P, Boers M, et al. Towards global consensus on outcome measures for atopic eczema research: results of the HOME II meeting. Allergy. 2012;67:1111–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gooderham MJ, Forman SB, Bissonnette R, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor abrocitinib for patients with atopic dermatitis: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:1371–9.CrossRef Gooderham MJ, Forman SB, Bissonnette R, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor abrocitinib for patients with atopic dermatitis: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:1371–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? Field Methods. 2016;18:59–82.CrossRef Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? Field Methods. 2016;18:59–82.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25:1229–45.CrossRef Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25:1229–45.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Turner-Bowker DM, Lamoureux RE, Stokes J, et al. Informing a priori sample size estimation in qualitative concept elicitation interview studies for clinical outcome assessment instrument development. Value Health. 2018;21:839–42.CrossRef Turner-Bowker DM, Lamoureux RE, Stokes J, et al. Informing a priori sample size estimation in qualitative concept elicitation interview studies for clinical outcome assessment instrument development. Value Health. 2018;21:839–42.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 1980;60:44–7. Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 1980;60:44–7.
16.
go back to reference Cappelleri J, Zou K, Bushmakin A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes: measurement, implementation and interpretation. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2013.CrossRef Cappelleri J, Zou K, Bushmakin A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes: measurement, implementation and interpretation. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2013.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG. Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Stat Methods Med Res. 2014;23:460–83.CrossRef Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG. Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Stat Methods Med Res. 2014;23:460–83.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chassany O, Sagnier P, Marquis P, et al. Patient-reported outcomes: the example of health-related quality of life—a European guidance document for the improved integration of health-related quality of life assessment in the drug regulatory process. Drug Info J. 2016;36:209–38.CrossRef Chassany O, Sagnier P, Marquis P, et al. Patient-reported outcomes: the example of health-related quality of life—a European guidance document for the improved integration of health-related quality of life assessment in the drug regulatory process. Drug Info J. 2016;36:209–38.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.CrossRef Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:945–52.CrossRef Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:945–52.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration. Discussion Document for Patient-Focused Drug Development Guidance Public Workshop on Guidance 3: select, develop or modify fit-for-purpose clinical outcomes assessments. Workshop date. 2018. https://www.fda.gov/media/116277/download. Accessed 17 Jul 2020. US Food and Drug Administration. Discussion Document for Patient-Focused Drug Development Guidance Public Workshop on Guidance 3: select, develop or modify fit-for-purpose clinical outcomes assessments. Workshop date. 2018. https://​www.​fda.​gov/​media/​116277/​download. Accessed 17 Jul 2020.
22.
go back to reference Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.PubMed Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2004;4:581–5.CrossRef Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2004;4:581–5.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schram ME, Spuls PI, Leeflang MM, et al. EASI, (objective) SCORAD and POEM for atopic eczema: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference. Allergy. 2012;67:99–106.CrossRef Schram ME, Spuls PI, Leeflang MM, et al. EASI, (objective) SCORAD and POEM for atopic eczema: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference. Allergy. 2012;67:99–106.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
27.
go back to reference Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)—a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19:210–6.CrossRef Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)—a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19:210–6.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Charman CR, Venn AJ, Williams HC. The patient-oriented eczema measure: development and initial validation of a new tool for measuring atopic eczema severity from the patients’ perspective. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:1513–9.CrossRef Charman CR, Venn AJ, Williams HC. The patient-oriented eczema measure: development and initial validation of a new tool for measuring atopic eczema severity from the patients’ perspective. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:1513–9.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Chamlin SL, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:338–51.CrossRef Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Chamlin SL, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:338–51.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and Content Validation of Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) in Adolescents and Adults with Moderate-to-Severe AD
Authors
Rebecca Hall
Mark G. Lebwohl
Andrew G. Bushmakin
Eric L. Simpson
Melinda J. Gooderham
Andreas Wollenberg
Adam Gater
Jane R. Wells
Joseph C. Cappelleri
Ming-Ann Hsu
Jocelyn Papacharalambous
Elena Peeva
Anna M. Tallman
Weidong Zhang
Linda Chen
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Dermatology and Therapy / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2193-8210
Electronic ISSN: 2190-9172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-020-00474-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Dermatology and Therapy 1/2021 Go to the issue