Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports
Published in: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Coronary Heart Disease | Cardiac Computed Tomography (B Chow and G Small, Section Editors)

Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in 2019: Past, Present, and Future

Authors: Ramzi Dudum, Omar Dzaye, Steven J. Lahti, Sina Kianoush, Seamus P. Whelton, Michael J. Blaha

Published in: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

In this review, we sought to present a clinically relevant history of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring from its initial introduction, to its more recent widespread adoption and guideline endorsement, to future directions of cutting-edge CAC research.

Recent Findings

Since prior exhaustive reviews on CAC scoring, the introduction of the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCEs) for the assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk has been formative in reframing how clinicians discuss risk and prevention with their patients. However, given weaknesses in the performance of the PCEs, additional risk markers have been tested with none being equal to CAC scoring with its ability to reclassify risk. The use of CAC = 0 as a negative risk factor has proven reliable in diverse populations and has led to increased adoption of CAC scoring by clinical practice guidelines. Newer data explores how CAC scoring can be employed for the quantification of risk in different diseases including modeling the competing risks of ASCVD vs. cancer, how CAC can reclassify risk even on non-ECG gated chest computed tomography, and how the algorithm for scoring a CAC scan can be improved in the future.

Summary

CAC scoring is a powerful adjunct to the PCEs in further characterizing risk, particularly in borderline to intermediate-risk populations. Newer studies suggest that CAC scoring can be adapted to non-ECG gated chest CTs and that newer CAC scores, which take into consideration the number of vessels, the diffusivity of disease, and important gender-specific interactions, can improve on the traditional Agatston method. Future research will continue to explore these newer areas as well as provide models for forecasting the lifetime risks of ASCVD vs. cancer based on age and sex-specific CAC scores.
Literature
1.
Ardehali R, Nasir K, Kolandaivelu A, Budoff MJ, Blumenthal RS. Screening patients for subclinical atherosclerosis with non-contrast cardiac CT. Atherosclerosis. 2007;192:235–42.CrossRefPubMed
2.
McClelland RL, Nasir K, Budoff M, Blumenthal RS, Kronmal RA. Arterial age as a function of coronary artery calcium (from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis [MESA]). Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:59–63.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Coronary artery calcium as a measure of biologic age. Atherosclerosis. 2006;188:112–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, Bild DE, Burke G, Folsom AR, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1336–45.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Budoff MJ, McClelland RL, Nasir K, et al. Cardiovascular events with absent or minimal coronary calcification: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Am Heart J. 2009;158:554–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Blaha M, Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, et al. Absence of coronary artery calcification and all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:692–700.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Nasir K, Shaw LJ, Liu ST, Weinstein SR, Mosler TR, Flores PR, et al. Ethnic differences in the prognostic value of coronary artery calcification for all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:953–60.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology. 2003;228:826–33.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Gibson AO, Blaha MJ, Arnan MK, Sacco RL, Szklo M, Herrington DM, et al. Coronary artery calcium and incident cerebrovascular events in an asymptomatic cohort. The MESA Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:1108–15.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Budoff MJ, Shavelle DM, Lamont DH, Kim HT, Akinwale P, Kennedy JM, et al. Usefulness of electron beam computed tomography scanning for distinguishing ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1173–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Handy CE, Desai CS, Dardari ZA, al-Mallah MH, Miedema MD, Ouyang P, et al. The Association of Coronary Artery Calcium with Noncardiovascular Disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:568–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Arthur S, Agatston WRJ, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–32.CrossRef
13.
Callister TQ, Cooil B, Raya SP, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ, Raggi P. Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology. 1998;208:807–14.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Hong C, Bae KT, Pilgram TK. Coronary artery calcium: accuracy and reproducibility of measurements with multi-detector row CT--assessment of effects of different thresholds and quantification methods. Radiology. 2003;227:795–801.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Alluri K, Joshi PH, Henry TS, Blumenthal RS, Nasir K, Blaha MJ. Scoring of coronary artery calcium scans: history, assumptions, current limitations, and future directions. Atherosclerosis. 2015;239:109–17.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Detrano RC, Anderson M, Nelson J, Wong ND, Carr JJ, McNitt-Gray M, et al. Coronary calcium measurements: effect of CT scanner type and calcium measure on rescan reproducibility--MESA study. Radiology. 2005;236:477–84.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Sabour S, Rutten A, van der Schouw YT, Atsma F, Grobbee DE, Mali WP, et al. Inter-scan reproducibility of coronary calcium measurement using multi detector-row computed tomography (MDCT). Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:235–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Rumberger JA, Schwartz RS, Simons DB, Sheedy PF 3rd, Edwards WD, Fitzpatrick LA. Relation of coronary calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography and lumen narrowing determined by autopsy. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:1169–73.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA. 2004;291:210–5.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Polonsky TS, McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, et al. Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction. JAMA. 2010;303:1610–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Yeboah J, McClelland RL, Polonsky TS, et al. Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals. JAMA. 2012;308:788–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Nasir K, Rubin J, Blaha MJ, Shaw LJ, Blankstein R, Rivera JJ, et al. Interplay of coronary artery calcification and traditional risk factors for the prediction of all-cause mortality in asymptomatic individuals. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:467–73.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S1–45.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Colantonio LD, Richman JS, Carson AP, et al. Performance of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease pooled cohort risk equations by social deprivation status. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(3).
25.
DeFilippis AP, Young R, Carrubba CJ, et al. An analysis of calibration and discrimination among multiple cardiovascular risk scores in a modern multiethnic cohort. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:266–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
DeFilippis AP, Young R, McEvoy JW, et al. Risk score overestimation: the impact of individual cardiovascular risk factors and preventive therapies on the performance of the American Heart Association-American College of Cardiology-Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease risk score in a modern multi-ethnic cohort. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:598–608.PubMed
27.
Rana JS, Tabada GH, Solomon MD, Lo JC, Jaffe MG, Sung SH, et al. Accuracy of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk equation in a large contemporary, multiethnic population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:2118–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Yeboah J, Polonsky TS, Young R, McClelland RL, Delaney JC, Dawood F, et al. Utility of nontraditional risk markers in individuals ineligible for statin therapy according to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines. Circulation. 2015;132:916–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Dudum R, Dzaye O, Mirbolouk M, et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring in low risk patients with family history of coronary heart disease: validation of the SCCT guideline approach in the coronary artery calcium consortium. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. (in press).
30.
Nasir K, Bittencourt MS, Blaha MJ, Blankstein R, Agatson AS, Rivera JJ, et al. Implications of coronary artery calcium testing among statin candidates according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol management guidelines: MESA (multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1657–68.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Blaha MJ, Cainzos-Achirica M, Greenland P, McEvoy JW, Blankstein R, Budoff MJ, et al. Role of coronary artery calcium score of zero and other negative risk markers for cardiovascular disease: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2016;133:849–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, Budoff M, Blaha MJ, Post WS, Kronmal RA, et al. 10-year coronary heart disease risk prediction using coronary artery calcium and traditional risk factors: derivation in the MESA (multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis) with validation in the HNR (Heinz Nixdorf recall) study and the DHS (Dallas heart study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1643–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2999–3058.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2315–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Hecht H, Blaha MJ, Berman DS, Nasir K, Budoff M, Leipsic J, et al. Clinical indications for coronary artery calcium scoring in asymptomatic patients: expert consensus statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11:157–68.CrossRefPubMed
36.
McClelland RL, Chung H, Detrano R, Post W, Kronmal RA. Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender, and age: results from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2006;113:30–7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:e285–350.
38.
Khera A. The New 2018 Cholesterol Guidelines: Filling Gaps and Expanding Opportunities. Circulation. 2019;139:2805–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
41.
Blaha MJ, Mortensen MB, Kianoush S, Tota-Maharaj R, Cainzos-Achirica M. Coronary artery calcium scoring: Is It Time for a Change in Methodology? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:923–37.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Fayad ZA, Fuster V. Clinical imaging of the high-risk or vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Circ Res. 2001;89:305–16.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Williams M, Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Morris D, Vaccarino V, Liu ST, et al. Prognostic value of number and site of calcified coronary lesions compared with the total score. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:61–9.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Bairey Merz CN, Shaw LJ, Reis SE, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-sponsored Women's ischemia syndrome evaluation (WISE) study: part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:S21–9.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Raggi P, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Gender-based differences in the prognostic value of coronary calcification. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2004;13:273–83.CrossRef
46.
Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Ix JH, McClelland RL, Wassel CL, Rifkin DE, et al. Calcium density of coronary artery plaque and risk of incident cardiovascular EventsCoronary artery plaque and cardiovascular EventsCoronary artery plaque and cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2014;311:271–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Tota-Maharaj R, et al. Improving the CAC score by addition of regional measures of calcium distribution: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1407–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Lahti SJ, Feldman DI, Dardari Z, Mirbolouk M, Orimoloye OA, Osei AD, et al. The association between left main coronary artery calcium and cardiovascular-specific and total mortality: the coronary artery calcium consortium. Atherosclerosis. 2019;286:172–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Shaw LJ, Min JK, Nasir K, Xie JX, Berman DS, Miedema MD, et al. Sex differences in calcified plaque and long-term cardiovascular mortality: observations from the CAC consortium. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3727–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
51.
52.
Budoff MJ, Nasir K, Kinney GL, Hokanson JE, Barr RG, Steiner R, et al. Coronary artery and thoracic calcium on noncontrast thoracic CT scans: comparison of ungated and gated examinations in patients from the COPD gene cohort. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:113–8.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Hughes-Austin JM, Dominguez A 3rd, Allison MA, et al. Relationship of coronary calcium on standard chest CT scans with mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:152–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Jacobs PC, Isgum I, Gondrie MJ, et al. Coronary artery calcification scoring in low-dose ungated CT screening for lung cancer: interscan agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1244–9.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Jacobs PC, Prokop M, van der Graaf Y, Gondrie MJ, Janssen KJ, de Koning HJ, et al. Comparing coronary artery calcium and thoracic aorta calcium for prediction of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events on low-dose non-gated computed tomography in a high-risk population of heavy smokers. Atherosclerosis. 2010;209:455–62.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Hecht HS, Cronin P, Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Kazerooni EA, Narula J, et al. 2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of thoracic radiology. J Thorac Imaging. 2017;32:W54–66.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Hecht HS, Blaha MJ, Kazerooni EA, Cury RC, Budoff M, Leipsic J, et al. CAC-DRS: coronary artery calcium data and reporting system. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018;12:185–91.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Dzaye O, Dudum R, Mirbolouk M, Orimoloye OA, Osei AD, Dardari ZA, et al. Validation of the coronary artery calcium data and reporting system (CAC-DRS): dual importance of CAC score and CAC distribution from the coronary artery calcium (CAC) consortium. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. (in press).
59.
Matthew C. Hooks, Prabhjot Nijjar, Ko-Hsuan Chen et al. Abstract 1331–416: Rates of clinical reporting and actions taken based on coronary calcium on cancer computed tomography scans in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease after potentially cardiotoxic cancer treatment.: American College of Cardiology Scientific Session; March 16–18, 2019; New Orleans, 2019.
60.
Williams KA Sr, Kim JT, Holohan KM. Frequency of unrecognized, unreported, or underreported coronary artery and cardiovascular calcification on noncardiac chest CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013;7:167–72.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in 2019: Past, Present, and Future
Authors
Ramzi Dudum
Omar Dzaye
Steven J. Lahti
Sina Kianoush
Seamus P. Whelton
Michael J. Blaha
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1941-9066
Electronic ISSN: 1941-9074
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-019-9511-7

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch now

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits