Top

Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Published in:

01-12-2018 | Review Article

Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in coronary bypass surgery: is there a benefit?

Authors: Jeremy R. Leonard, Ahmed A. Abouarab, David P. Taggart, Mario F. L. Gaudino

Published in: Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Special Issue 3/2018

Abstract

Purpose

Over the past three decades, there have been a plethora of retrospective observational data and meta-analyses which support the hypothesis of improved clinical outcomes using bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) when compared to saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). However, recently published results have brought this thinking into doubt. We discuss the existing literature on the subject and attempt to clarify the appropriate use of BITA in coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).

Methods

A review of all existing meta-analyses on BITA was conducted to better understand the utility of BITA in CABG. A review of the largest randomized controlled trials on the subject was then compared to the observational data.

Results

In all existing meta-analyses, BITA shows a significant advantage over the use of a single internal thoracic artery (SITA) with SVGs. The two largest randomized controlled trials evaluating BITA failed to show a survival advantage and brought into question the complications associated with BITA.

Conclusions

At present, the use of multiple arterial grafts remains a reasonable choice, particularly in young patients, provided that their use does not increase the operative risk. Further evidence currently being collected may lend a definitive answer in the near future.

Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198601023140101.CrossRefPubMed

Benedetto U, Caputo M, Gaudino M, et al. Right internal thoracic artery or radial artery? A propensity-matched comparison on the second-best arterial conduit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.08.060.CrossRefPubMed

Locker C, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Multiple arterial grafts improve late survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery : analysis of 8622 patients with multivessel disease. Circulation. 2012;126:1023–30. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084624.CrossRefPubMed

Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:855–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70365-X.CrossRefPubMed

Leonard JR, Abouarab AA, Tam DY, Girardi LN, Gaudino MFL, Fremes SE. The radial artery: Results and technical considerations. J Card Surg. 2018;33:213–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.13533.CrossRefPubMed

Benedetto U, Altman DG, Gerry S, et al. Pedicled and skeletonized single and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts and the incidence of sternal wound complications: Insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:270–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.056.CrossRefPubMed

Buttar SN, Yan TD, Taggart DP, Tian DH. Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis. Heart. 2017;103:1419–26. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310864.CrossRefPubMed

Gaudino M, Di Franco A, Rahouma M, et al. Unmeasured confounders in observational studies comparing bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008010. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rizzoli G, Schiavon L, Bellini P. Does the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to the use of a single IMA graft? A meta-analysis approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:781–6.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Taggart DP, D’Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet. 2001;358:870–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06069-X.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Takagi H, Goto S, Watanabe T, Mizuno Y, Kawai N, Umemoto T. A meta-analysis of adjusted hazard ratios from 20 observational studies of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1282–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.01.010.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Weiss AJ, Zhao S, Tian DH, Taggart DP, Yan TD. A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:390–400. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Yi G, Shine B, Rehman SM, Altman DG, Taggart DP. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach. Circulation. 2014;130:539–45. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004255.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al. Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2540–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1610021.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Gansera B, Gillrath G, Lieber M, Angelis I, Schmidtler F, Kemkes BM. Are men treated better than women? outcome of male versus female patients after CABG using bilateral internal thoracic arteries. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;52:261–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-821154.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kinoshita T, Asai T, Suzuki T. Off-pump bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150:315–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.04.058.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Raza S, Sabik JF, Masabni K, Ainkaran P, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH. Surgical revascularization techniques that minimize surgical risk and maximize late survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1257–1266.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.058.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Nasso G, Coppola R, Bonifazi R, Piancone F, Bozzetti G, Speziale G. Arterial revascularization in primary coronary artery bypass grafting: Direct comparison of 4 strategies—Results of the Stand-in-Y Mammary Study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:1093–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.029.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Gaudino M, Crea F, Cammertoni F, Massetti M. The radial artery: a forgotten conduit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:1479–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.045.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Benedetto U, Raja SG, Albanese A, Amrani M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Frati G. Searching for the second best graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu111.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Gaudino MFL, Ruel M, Taggart DP. Blaise Pascal and the evidence on the use of multiple arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass surgery after the interim analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Trial. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2018;33:245–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000000492.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Gaudino M, Alexander JH, Bakaeen FG, et al. Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: the ROMA trial—rationale and study protocol. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:1031–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx358.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Dimitrova KR, Hoffman DM, Geller CM, Dincheva G, Ko W, Tranbaugh RF. Arterial grafts protect the native coronary vessels from atherosclerotic disease progression. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:475–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.035.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in coronary bypass surgery: is there a benefit?
Authors: Jeremy R. Leonard
Ahmed A. Abouarab
David P. Taggart
Mario F. L. Gaudino
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: Springer Singapore
Published in: Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Issue Special Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0970-9134
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7723
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-018-0693-4

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in coronary bypass surgery: is there a benefit?

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2018

Genetics, coronary artery disease, and myocardial revascularization: will novel genetic risk scores bring new answers?

The effect of storage solutions on endothelial function and saphenous vein graft patency

Heart Team—the Indian perspective

Myocardial revascularization: the evolution of the STS database and quality measurement for improvement

CABG versus PCI—‘evidence’ and ‘practice’ not the flip side!

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting—a surreal controversy?