Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 3/2018

01-12-2018 | Editorial

CABG versus PCI—‘evidence’ and ‘practice’ not the flip side!

Author: Om Prakash Yadava

Published in: Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Special Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

Almost a year of hard work, half perspiration and the rest inspiration of the Guest Editor, Prof. David Taggart and here we are with the special issue on ‘Surgical Myocardial Revascularisation’. This issue was mooted as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has not been given a fair deal and the volumes have been dwindling. Newer techniques and advances are not being highlighted and not adequate stress has been paid on total arterial revascularisation (TAR). More literature on CABG seems to have emanated from cardiology journals than surgical. No wonder then, that it is more often than not skewed, if not blatantly biased. Whenever percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is compared with CABG, it is the best of stents, in the best of hands, in high-volume centres, under the rigours of a trial setting, versus, by default, a ‘run of the mill’ left internal mammary artery-left anterior descending (LIMA-LAD) and balance saphenous vein revascularisation, which we all know is an archaic sub-optimum surgery. PCI should be compared to TAR, and the latter should in fact become a quality metrics for myocardial revascularisation. Further, the trial should not be abbreviated, but allowed to run through a period sufficient to allow events, which should be cardio-specific and meaningful such as survival, to unfold. Therefore, even guidelines, which are based on these trials, do not guide us, and though they may look balanced in ‘letter’, but certainly are not well intended in ‘spirit’. This featured issue thus attempts to present what an ideal CABG operation should and could be, if we stuck to the right tenets and principles of surgical myocardial revascularisation. That is the only way, of leading from the front, that the lost glory of CABG can be restored, and PCI challenged, and if not stopped, at least fathomed in its tracks. PCI certainly has a salutary complementary role to CABG, and that is where it should be, in the pecking order of myocardial revascularisation. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Freemantle N, Ruel M, Gaudino MFL, Pagano D. On the pooling and sub grouping of data from percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting trials: a call to circumspection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53:915–8.CrossRefPubMed Freemantle N, Ruel M, Gaudino MFL, Pagano D. On the pooling and sub grouping of data from percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting trials: a call to circumspection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53:915–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Windecker S, Stortecky S, Stefanini GG, et al. Revascularisation versus medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;348:g3859.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Windecker S, Stortecky S, Stefanini GG, et al. Revascularisation versus medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;348:g3859.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J, et al. Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2018;391:939–48.CrossRefPubMed Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J, et al. Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2018;391:939–48.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Milojevic M, Head SJ, Parasca CA, et al. Causes of death following PCI versus CABG in complex CAD 5-year follow-up of SYNTAX. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:42–55.CrossRefPubMed Milojevic M, Head SJ, Parasca CA, et al. Causes of death following PCI versus CABG in complex CAD 5-year follow-up of SYNTAX. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:42–55.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
CABG versus PCI—‘evidence’ and ‘practice’ not the flip side!
Author
Om Prakash Yadava
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Issue Special Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0970-9134
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7723
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-018-0733-0

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2018

Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue