Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 3/2020

Open Access 01-09-2020 | Original Article

Incidence of the diagnosis of factitious disorders – Nationwide comparison study between Germany and Norway

Authors: Julian Geile, Jan Aasly, Burkhard Madea, Harald Schrader

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Factitious disorders (FD) like Munchausen syndrome are well known to most physicians, yet the corresponding ICD-10 diagnosis F68.1 remains severely under-assigned and often misdiagnosed. To approach this problem, we conducted a nationwide inquiry for Germany and Norway as well as a comparison between these two countries regarding the incidence of diagnosis of FD. The assignment rates of F68.1 in somatic hospitals from 2008 to 2016 were analyzed based on the Diagnosis Related Groups statistic from the German Federal Statistical Office and the data provided from the Norwegian Patient Registry. The Norwegian data also included information on individual patients whereas the German data only contained the total number of F68.1 assignment due to strict medical confidentiality laws. The incidence of the diagnosis of FD in Germany and Norway showed similar assignment rates with 3.71 and 3.18 per 100,000, respectively. The mean age was 39.4 years for German patients and 35.6 years for Norwegian patients. The gender distribution was almost equal for the individual patients’ rate (49% female and 51% male). Furthermore, our results indicate that female patients with FD tend to demand healthcare services more frequently than male patients. Smaller studies focusing on the diagnosis of FD have significantly higher assignment rates compared to nationwide inquiries. Our results illustrate substantial differences between estimations of the incidence of FD and the need for further studies. Besides the many obstacles associated with diagnosis of FD, strict medical confidentiality laws prevent reliable and scientific investigations of this matter.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Bauer M, Boegner F. Neurological syndromes in factitious disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996;184:281–8.CrossRef Bauer M, Boegner F. Neurological syndromes in factitious disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996;184:281–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ferrara P, Vitelli O, Bottaro G, et al. Factitious disorders and Munchausen syndrome: the tip of the iceberg. J Child Health Care. 2013;17:366–74.CrossRef Ferrara P, Vitelli O, Bottaro G, et al. Factitious disorders and Munchausen syndrome: the tip of the iceberg. J Child Health Care. 2013;17:366–74.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bock KD, Overkamp F. Factitious disorders. Report on forty-four cases in a medical department and a proposal for subclassification. Klin Wochenschr. 1986;64:149–64.CrossRef Bock KD, Overkamp F. Factitious disorders. Report on forty-four cases in a medical department and a proposal for subclassification. Klin Wochenschr. 1986;64:149–64.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eisendrath SJ, McNiel DE. Factitious physical disorders, litigation, and mortality. Psychosomatics. 2004;45:350–3.CrossRef Eisendrath SJ, McNiel DE. Factitious physical disorders, litigation, and mortality. Psychosomatics. 2004;45:350–3.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jaghab K, Skodnek KB, Padder TA. Munchausen's syndrome and other factitious disorders in children: case series and literature review. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2006;3:46–55.PubMedCentral Jaghab K, Skodnek KB, Padder TA. Munchausen's syndrome and other factitious disorders in children: case series and literature review. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2006;3:46–55.PubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Schrader H, Aasly JO, Bøhmer T. Utfordringer ved Münchhausens syndrom. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017;137:696–7.CrossRef Schrader H, Aasly JO, Bøhmer T. Utfordringer ved Münchhausens syndrom. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017;137:696–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Feldman MD. Munchausen by internet: detecting factitious illness and crisis on the internet. South Med J. 2000;93:669–72.CrossRef Feldman MD. Munchausen by internet: detecting factitious illness and crisis on the internet. South Med J. 2000;93:669–72.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hamilton JC, Eger M, Razzak S, Feldman MD, Hallmark N, Cheek S. Somatoform, factitious, and related diagnoses in the national hospital discharge survey: addressing the proposed DSM-5 revision. Psychosomatics. 2013;54:142–8.CrossRef Hamilton JC, Eger M, Razzak S, Feldman MD, Hallmark N, Cheek S. Somatoform, factitious, and related diagnoses in the national hospital discharge survey: addressing the proposed DSM-5 revision. Psychosomatics. 2013;54:142–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schrader H, Bøhmer T, Aasly J. The incidence of diagnosis of Munchausen syndrome, other factitious disorders, and malingering. Behav Neurol. 2019;2019:3891809.CrossRef Schrader H, Bøhmer T, Aasly J. The incidence of diagnosis of Munchausen syndrome, other factitious disorders, and malingering. Behav Neurol. 2019;2019:3891809.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sutherland AJ, Rodin GM. Factitious disorders in a general hospital setting. Psychosomatics. 1990;31:392–9.CrossRef Sutherland AJ, Rodin GM. Factitious disorders in a general hospital setting. Psychosomatics. 1990;31:392–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kapfhammer H, Rothenhäusler H, Dietrich E, et al. Artifactual disorders–between deception and self-mutilation. Experiences in consultation psychiatry at a university clinic. Nervenarzt. 1998;69:401.CrossRef Kapfhammer H, Rothenhäusler H, Dietrich E, et al. Artifactual disorders–between deception and self-mutilation. Experiences in consultation psychiatry at a university clinic. Nervenarzt. 1998;69:401.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rumans LW, Vosti KL. Factitious and fraudulent fever. Am J Med. 1978;65:745–55.CrossRef Rumans LW, Vosti KL. Factitious and fraudulent fever. Am J Med. 1978;65:745–55.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Bevölkerungsfortschreibung auf Grundlage des Zensus 2011. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), 2016. Fachserie 1 Reihe 1.3. Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Bevölkerungsfortschreibung auf Grundlage des Zensus 2011. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), 2016. Fachserie 1 Reihe 1.3.
18.
go back to reference Taylor S, Hyler SE. Update on factitious disorders. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1993;23:81–94.CrossRef Taylor S, Hyler SE. Update on factitious disorders. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1993;23:81–94.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yates GP, Feldman MD. Factitious disorder: a systematic review of 455 cases in the professional literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;41:20–8.CrossRef Yates GP, Feldman MD. Factitious disorder: a systematic review of 455 cases in the professional literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;41:20–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Caselli I, Poloni N, Ielmini M, Diurni M, Callegari C. Epidemiology and evolution of the diagnostic classification of factitious disorders in DSM-5. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2017;10:387–94.CrossRef Caselli I, Poloni N, Ielmini M, Diurni M, Callegari C. Epidemiology and evolution of the diagnostic classification of factitious disorders in DSM-5. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2017;10:387–94.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kanaan RAA, Wessely SC. Factitious disorders in neurology: an analysis of reported cases. Psychosomatics. 2010;51:47–54.CrossRef Kanaan RAA, Wessely SC. Factitious disorders in neurology: an analysis of reported cases. Psychosomatics. 2010;51:47–54.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference World Health Organization. The sixth revision of the International Statistical Classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death (ICD-6); 1948. World Health Organization. The sixth revision of the International Statistical Classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death (ICD-6); 1948.
23.
go back to reference Bass C, Halligan P. Factitious disorders and malingering: challenges for clinical assessment and management. Lancet. 2014;383:1422–32.CrossRef Bass C, Halligan P. Factitious disorders and malingering: challenges for clinical assessment and management. Lancet. 2014;383:1422–32.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kenedi CA, Shirey KG, Hoffa M, Zanga J, Lee JC, Harrison JD, Preud'homme XA. Laboratory diagnosis of factitious disorder: a systematic review of tools useful in the diagnosis of Munchausen's syndrome. NZ Med J. 2011;124:66–81. Kenedi CA, Shirey KG, Hoffa M, Zanga J, Lee JC, Harrison JD, Preud'homme XA. Laboratory diagnosis of factitious disorder: a systematic review of tools useful in the diagnosis of Munchausen's syndrome. NZ Med J. 2011;124:66–81.
25.
go back to reference Kinns H, Housley D, Freedman DB. Munchausen syndrome and factitious disorder: the role of the laboratory in its detection and diagnosis. Ann Clin Biochem. 2013;50:194–203.CrossRef Kinns H, Housley D, Freedman DB. Munchausen syndrome and factitious disorder: the role of the laboratory in its detection and diagnosis. Ann Clin Biochem. 2013;50:194–203.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Dahale AB, Hatti S, Thippeswamy H, Chaturvedi SK. Factitious disorder-experience at a neuropsychiatric center in southern India. Indian J Psychol Med. 2014;36:62–5.CrossRef Dahale AB, Hatti S, Thippeswamy H, Chaturvedi SK. Factitious disorder-experience at a neuropsychiatric center in southern India. Indian J Psychol Med. 2014;36:62–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Incidence of the diagnosis of factitious disorders – Nationwide comparison study between Germany and Norway
Authors
Julian Geile
Jan Aasly
Burkhard Madea
Harald Schrader
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-020-00272-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 3/2020 Go to the issue