Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 1/2020

Open Access 01-02-2020

Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer

Authors: AnneClaire G. N. M. Zaman, Kristien M. A. J. Tytgat, Jean H. G. Klinkenbijl, Angela G. E. M. de Boer, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To perform a process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer.

Methods

The intervention comprised three tailored psychosocial work-related support meetings. To outline the process evaluation of this intervention, we used six key components: recruitment, context, reach, dose delivered, dose received and fidelity. Data were collected using questionnaires, checklists and research logbooks and were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Results

In total, 16 hospitals, 33 nurses and 7 oncological occupational physicians (OOPs) participated. Analysis of the six key components revealed that the inclusion rate of eligible patients was 47%. Thirty-eight intervention patients were included: 35 actually had a first meeting, 32 had a second and 17 had a third. For 31 patients (89%), the first meeting was face to face, as per protocol. However, in only 32% of the cases referred to support type A (oncological nurse) and 13% of the cases referred to support type B (OOP), the first meeting was before the start of the treatment, as per protocol. The average duration of the support type A meetings was around the pre-established 30 min; for the OOPs, the average was 50 min. Protocol was easy to follow according to the healthcare professionals. Overall, the patients considered the intervention useful.

Conclusions

This study has shown that the strategy of tailored work-related support is appreciated by both patients and healthcare professionals and applicable in clinical practice.

Implications for Cancer survivors

The intervention was appreciated by patients; however, whether the timing of the work-related support was adequate (i.e. before treatment was started) requires further research.

Trial registration

NTR5022.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374–403.CrossRef Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374–403.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.CrossRef Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ahlberg K, Ekman T, Gaston-Johansson F, Mock V. Assessment and management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Lancet. 2003;362(9384):640–50.CrossRef Ahlberg K, Ekman T, Gaston-Johansson F, Mock V. Assessment and management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Lancet. 2003;362(9384):640–50.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wagner LI, Cella D. Fatigue and cancer: causes, prevalence and treatment approaches. Br J Cancer. 2004;91(5):822–8.CrossRef Wagner LI, Cella D. Fatigue and cancer: causes, prevalence and treatment approaches. Br J Cancer. 2004;91(5):822–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Duijts SF, van der Beek AJ, Boelhouwer IG, Schagen SB. Cancer-related cognitive impairment and patients’ ability to work: a current perspective. Curr Opon Support Palliat Care. 2017;11(1):19–23.CrossRef Duijts SF, van der Beek AJ, Boelhouwer IG, Schagen SB. Cancer-related cognitive impairment and patients’ ability to work: a current perspective. Curr Opon Support Palliat Care. 2017;11(1):19–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Eaker S, Wigertz A, Lambert PC, Bergkvist L, Ahlgren J, Lambe M. Breast cancer, sickness absence, income and marital status. A study on life situation 1 year prior diagnosis compared to 3 and 5 years after diagnosis. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e18040.CrossRef Eaker S, Wigertz A, Lambert PC, Bergkvist L, Ahlgren J, Lambe M. Breast cancer, sickness absence, income and marital status. A study on life situation 1 year prior diagnosis compared to 3 and 5 years after diagnosis. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e18040.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Carlsen K, Harling H, Pedersen J, Christensen KB, Osler M. The transition between work, sickness absence and pension in a cohort of Danish colorectal cancer survivors. BMJ Open. 2013;3(2).CrossRef Carlsen K, Harling H, Pedersen J, Christensen KB, Osler M. The transition between work, sickness absence and pension in a cohort of Danish colorectal cancer survivors. BMJ Open. 2013;3(2).CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hoon LS, Chi Sally CW, Hong-Gu H. Effect of psychosocial interventions on outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer: a review of the literature. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(6):883–91.CrossRef Hoon LS, Chi Sally CW, Hong-Gu H. Effect of psychosocial interventions on outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer: a review of the literature. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(6):883–91.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Taskila T, Lindbohm ML. Factors affecting cancer survivors’ employment and work ability. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(4):446–51.CrossRef Taskila T, Lindbohm ML. Factors affecting cancer survivors’ employment and work ability. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(4):446–51.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference de Boer AG, Taskila TK, Tamminga SJ, Feuerstein M, Frings-Dresen MH, Verbeek JH. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD007569. de Boer AG, Taskila TK, Tamminga SJ, Feuerstein M, Frings-Dresen MH, Verbeek JH. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD007569.
12.
go back to reference Tamminga SJ, de Boer AG, Verbeek JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Return-to-work interventions integrated into cancer care: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(9):639–48.CrossRef Tamminga SJ, de Boer AG, Verbeek JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Return-to-work interventions integrated into cancer care: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(9):639–48.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Desiron HA, Crutzen R, Godderis L, Van Hoof E, de Rijk A. Bridging health care and the workplace: formulation of a return-to-work intervention for breast cancer patients using an intervention mapping approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(3):350–65.CrossRef Desiron HA, Crutzen R, Godderis L, Van Hoof E, de Rijk A. Bridging health care and the workplace: formulation of a return-to-work intervention for breast cancer patients using an intervention mapping approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(3):350–65.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bilodeau K, Tremblay D, Durand MJ. Exploration of return-to-work interventions for breast cancer patients: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(6):1993–2007.CrossRef Bilodeau K, Tremblay D, Durand MJ. Exploration of return-to-work interventions for breast cancer patients: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(6):1993–2007.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zaman A, Tytgat K, van Hezel S, Klinkenbijl JHG, de Boer A, Frings-Dresen MHW. Development of a tailored work-related support intervention for gastrointestinal cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care. 2018;27(2):e12782.CrossRef Zaman A, Tytgat K, van Hezel S, Klinkenbijl JHG, de Boer A, Frings-Dresen MHW. Development of a tailored work-related support intervention for gastrointestinal cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care. 2018;27(2):e12782.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference de Boer AG, Bruinvels DJ, Tytgat KM, Schoorlemmer A, Klinkenbijl JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Employment status and work-related problems of gastrointestinal cancer patients at diagnosis: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2011;1(2):e000190.PubMedPubMedCentral de Boer AG, Bruinvels DJ, Tytgat KM, Schoorlemmer A, Klinkenbijl JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Employment status and work-related problems of gastrointestinal cancer patients at diagnosis: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2011;1(2):e000190.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Hulscher ME, Laurant MG, Grol RP. Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(1):40–6.CrossRef Hulscher ME, Laurant MG, Grol RP. Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(1):40–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bakker FC, Persoon A, Schoon Y, Olde Rikkert MG. Uniform presentation of process evaluation results facilitates the evaluation of complex interventions: development of a graph. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(1):97–102.CrossRef Bakker FC, Persoon A, Schoon Y, Olde Rikkert MG. Uniform presentation of process evaluation results facilitates the evaluation of complex interventions: development of a graph. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(1):97–102.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Linnan L, Steckler S. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: an overview. United States of America: Jossey- Bass; 2002. p. 1–23. Linnan L, Steckler S. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: an overview. United States of America: Jossey- Bass; 2002. p. 1–23.
22.
go back to reference Nielsen K, Fredslund H, Christensen KB, Albertsen K. Success or failure? Interpreting and understanding the impact of interventions in four similar worksites. Work Stress. 2006;20(3):272–87.CrossRef Nielsen K, Fredslund H, Christensen KB, Albertsen K. Success or failure? Interpreting and understanding the impact of interventions in four similar worksites. Work Stress. 2006;20(3):272–87.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tamminga SJ, de Boer AG, Bos MM, Fons G, Kitzen JJ, Plaisier PW, et al. A hospital-based work support intervention to enhance the return to work of cancer patients: a process evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):565–78.CrossRef Tamminga SJ, de Boer AG, Bos MM, Fons G, Kitzen JJ, Plaisier PW, et al. A hospital-based work support intervention to enhance the return to work of cancer patients: a process evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):565–78.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference van Egmond MP, Duijts SF, Scholten AP, van der Beek AJ, Anema JR. Offering a tailored return to work program to cancer survivors with job loss: a process evaluation. BMC Public Health. 2016;15:940.CrossRef van Egmond MP, Duijts SF, Scholten AP, van der Beek AJ, Anema JR. Offering a tailored return to work program to cancer survivors with job loss: a process evaluation. BMC Public Health. 2016;15:940.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Leensen MCJ, Groeneveld IF, Rejda T, Groenenboom P, van Berkel S, Brandon T, et al. Feasibility of a multidisciplinary intervention to help cancer patients return to work. Eur J Cancer Care. 2018;27(2):e12690.CrossRef Leensen MCJ, Groeneveld IF, Rejda T, Groenenboom P, van Berkel S, Brandon T, et al. Feasibility of a multidisciplinary intervention to help cancer patients return to work. Eur J Cancer Care. 2018;27(2):e12690.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):413–6.CrossRef Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):413–6.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Zaman AG, Tytgat KM, Klinkenbijl JH, Frings-Dresen MH, de Boer AG. Design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a tailored clinical support intervention to enhance return to work for gastrointestinal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:303.CrossRef Zaman AG, Tytgat KM, Klinkenbijl JH, Frings-Dresen MH, de Boer AG. Design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a tailored clinical support intervention to enhance return to work for gastrointestinal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:303.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Perera R, Heneghan C, Yudkin P. Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2007;334(7585):127–9.CrossRef Perera R, Heneghan C, Yudkin P. Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2007;334(7585):127–9.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Krebs J, Katrin Brust A, Tesini S, Guler M, Mueller G, Velstra IM, et al. Study participation rate of patients with acute spinal cord injury early during rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(10):738–42.CrossRef Krebs J, Katrin Brust A, Tesini S, Guler M, Mueller G, Velstra IM, et al. Study participation rate of patients with acute spinal cord injury early during rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(10):738–42.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Suman A, Schaafsma FG, Bamarni J, van Tulder MW, Anema JR. A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):200.CrossRef Suman A, Schaafsma FG, Bamarni J, van Tulder MW, Anema JR. A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):200.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Velthuis MJ, May AM, Monninkhof EM, van der Wall E, Peeters PH. Alternatives for randomization in lifestyle intervention studies in cancer patients were not better than conventional randomization. J Clin Eepidemiol. 2012;65(3):288–92.CrossRef Velthuis MJ, May AM, Monninkhof EM, van der Wall E, Peeters PH. Alternatives for randomization in lifestyle intervention studies in cancer patients were not better than conventional randomization. J Clin Eepidemiol. 2012;65(3):288–92.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hubbard G, Gray NM, Ayansina D, Evans JM, Kyle RG. Case management vocational rehabilitation for women with breast cancer after surgery: a feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:175.CrossRef Hubbard G, Gray NM, Ayansina D, Evans JM, Kyle RG. Case management vocational rehabilitation for women with breast cancer after surgery: a feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:175.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Duijts S, Dalton SO, Lundh MH, Horsboel TA, Johansen C. Cancer survivors and return to work: current knowledge and future research. Psychooncology. 2017;26(5):715–7.CrossRef Duijts S, Dalton SO, Lundh MH, Horsboel TA, Johansen C. Cancer survivors and return to work: current knowledge and future research. Psychooncology. 2017;26(5):715–7.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Stergiou-Kita M, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, Milosevic E, Hebert D, Phan S, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(4):657–70.CrossRef Stergiou-Kita M, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, Milosevic E, Hebert D, Phan S, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(4):657–70.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.CrossRef Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference McGrath C, Mihala G, Beesley VL, Lynch BM, Graves N, Gordon LG. “Cancer put my life on hold”: work-related challenges among middle-aged adults 12 months after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2017;40(2):160–7.CrossRef McGrath C, Mihala G, Beesley VL, Lynch BM, Graves N, Gordon LG. “Cancer put my life on hold”: work-related challenges among middle-aged adults 12 months after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2017;40(2):160–7.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6(2):134–47.CrossRef Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6(2):134–47.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Treanor C, Donnelly M. Late effects of cancer and cancer treatment--the perspective of the patient. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(1):337–46.CrossRef Treanor C, Donnelly M. Late effects of cancer and cancer treatment--the perspective of the patient. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(1):337–46.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bennion AE, Molassiotis A. Qualitative research into the symptom experiences of adult cancer patients after treatments: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(1):9–25.CrossRef Bennion AE, Molassiotis A. Qualitative research into the symptom experiences of adult cancer patients after treatments: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(1):9–25.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Bains M, Munir F, Yarker J, Steward W, Thomas A. Return-to-work guidance and support for colorectal cancer patients: a feasibility study. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(6):E1–12.CrossRef Bains M, Munir F, Yarker J, Steward W, Thomas A. Return-to-work guidance and support for colorectal cancer patients: a feasibility study. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(6):E1–12.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):141.CrossRef May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):141.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Datta J, Petticrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:568.CrossRef Datta J, Petticrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:568.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer
Authors
AnneClaire G. N. M. Zaman
Kristien M. A. J. Tytgat
Jean H. G. Klinkenbijl
Angela G. E. M. de Boer
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 1/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine