Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Offering a tailored return to work program to cancer survivors with job loss: a process evaluation

Authors: M. P. van Egmond, S. F. A. Duijts, A. P. J. Scholten, A. J. van der Beek, J. R. Anema

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In Europe, 1.7 million persons of working age are diagnosed with cancer each year. During or after treatment, cancer survivors (CSs) are vulnerable for job loss, and many CSs struggle with return to work (RTW). When offering RTW interventions to CSs, it is important to conduct a process evaluation to assess such factors as the population reached and implementation problems. Recently, we developed an innovative RTW program, tailored specifically to the needs of CSs with job loss in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to evaluate the likelihood of theory and implementation failure, as well as to evaluate procedures for recruitment, execution and implementation of the tailored RTW program for CSs with job loss.

Methods

Six components were evaluated in the RTW program: Recruitment, Reach, Dosage, Implementation, Satisfaction, and Experienced Barriers. Data were provided by logbooks and questionnaires from participating CSs, occupational health care (OHC) professionals, and re-integration coaches and job hunting officers who delivered the RTW program. SPSS and Excel were used to conduct the analyses.

Results

85 CSs received the tailored RTW program. Their mean age was 47.9 years (SD 8.5). The majority were female (72 %), married (52 %), and of Dutch nationality (91 %). The program reached 88.2 % of the target population and 52 % of participants who started the program received the adequate dosage. The program implementation score was 45.9 %. Participants’ mean overall program duration remained within the protocol boundaries. Re-integration coaches were more satisfied with the program than job hunting officers or OHC professionals. Likewise, participants were more satisfied with the program delivery by the re-integration coaches than with the delivery by the job hunting officers. Reported barriers within the RTW program were a lack of communication, high program intensity and short program duration, and, with regard to the job hunting officers, a lack of experience with cancer-related RTW problems.

Conclusions

Participants, OHC professionals, re-integration coaches and job hunting officers generally had positive experiences with the innovative tailored RTW program. Facilitating communication between the delivering parties, and engaging usual care during program delivery, could be key elements to improved program implementation.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register, registration number NTR3562, registered 07-08-2012.
Literature
1.
Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JWW, Comber H, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–403.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, Bruns GL, Stoler MR, Nassif T, Yu X. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4:415–37.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Hoving JL, Broekhuizen MLA, Frings-Dresen MHW. Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, Pryce J. Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007;16:17–25.CrossRef
6.
Mehnert A. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;77:109–30.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Park JH, Park JH, Kim SG. Effect of cancer diagnosis on patient employment status: a nationwide longitudinal study in Korea. Psychooncology. 2009;18:691–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
de Boer AGEM, Taskila T, Ojajarvi A, van Dijk FJH, Verbeek JHAM. Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA. 2009;301:753–62.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Noeres D, Park-Simon TW, Grabow J, Sperlich S, Koch-Giesselmann H, Jaunzeme J, Geyer S. Return to work after treatment for primary breast cancer over a 6-year period: results from a prospective study comparing patients with the general population. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:1901–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Tamminga SJ, Verbeek JHAM, Bos MMEM, Fons G, Kitzen JJEM, Plaisier PW, Frings-Dresen MHW, de Boer AGEM. Effectiveness of a hospital-based work support intervention for female cancer patients - a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Thijs KM, de Boer AGEM, Vreugdenhil G, van de Wouw AJ, Houterman S, Schep G. Rehabilitation using high-intensity physical training and long-term return-to-work in cancer survivors. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:220–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
de Boer AG, Taskila T, Tamminga SJ, Frings-Dresen MH, Feuerstein M, Verbeek JH. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;CD007569. doi: 10.​1002/​14651858.​CD007569.
13.
Bakker FC, Persoon A, Schoon Y, Olde Rikkert MGM. Uniform presentation of process evaluation results facilitates the evaluation of complex interventions: development of a graph. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:97–102.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. RIPPLE Study Team: process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332:413–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Steckler A, Linnan L. Process evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. An Overview. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2002.
16.
Goldenhar LM, LaMontagne AD, Katz T, Heaney C, Landsbergis P. The intervention research process in occupational safety and health: an overview from the National Occupational Research Agenda Intervention Effectiveness Research team. J Occup Environ Med. 2001;43:616–22.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Wierenga D, Engbers LH, Van Empelen P, Duijts S, Hildebrandt VH, van Mechelen W. What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
van Egmond MP, Duijts SF, Vermeulen SJ, van der Beek AJ, Anema JR. Return to work in sick-listed cancer survivors with job loss: design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
van Egmond M, Duijts S, Loyen A, Vermeulen S, van der Beek A, Anema J: Barriers and facilitators for return to work in cancer survivors with job loss experience: a focus group study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015. doi: 10.​1111/​ecc.​12420.
20.
Vermeulen SJ, Tamminga SJ, Schellart AJ, Ybema JF, Anema JR. Return-to-work of sick-listed workers without an employment contract--what works? BMC Public Health. 2009;9:232.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Hulshof CT, Verbeek JH, van Dijk FJ, van der Weide WE, Braam IT. Evaluation research in occupational health services: general principles and a systematic review of empirical studies. Occup Environ Med. 1999;56:361–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
van Beurden KM, Vermeulen SJ, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. A participatory return-to-work program for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: a process evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:127–40.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Lammerts L, Vermeulen SJ, Schaafsma FG, van Mechelen W, Anema JR. Return to work of workers without a permanent employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder: design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:594.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns. 2001;44:119–27.CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
27.
van Oostrom SH, van Mechelen W, Terluin B, de Vet HCW, Anema JR. A participatory workplace intervention for employees with distress and lost time: a feasibility evaluation within a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:212–22.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Buijs PC, Loisel P, Anema JR. An integrated care program to prevent work disability due to chronic low back pain: a process evaluation within a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Anema JR, Steenstra IA, Urlings IJM, Bongers PM, de Vroome EMM, van Mechelen W. Participatory ergonomics as a return-to-work intervention: a future challenge? Am J Ind Med. 2003;44:273–81.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Lammerts L, Schaafsma F, van Mechelen W, Anema J. Process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a permanent employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2016. Epub ahead of print
31.
Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, Cooper D, Gansler T, Lerro C, Fedewa S, Lin C, Leach C, Cannady RS, Cho H, Scoppa S, Hachey M, Kirch R, Jemal A, Ward E. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:220–41.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Guassora AD, Jarlbaek L, Thorsen T. Preparing general practitioners to receive cancer patients following treatment in secondary care: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
34.
Stapelfeldt CM, Labriola M, Jensen AB, Andersen NT, Momsen AM, Nielsen CV. Municipal return to work management in cancer survivors undergoing cancer treatment: a protocol on a controlled intervention study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:720.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Tamminga SJ, de Boer AGEM, Bos MMEM, Fons G, Kitzen JJEM, Plaisier PW, Verbeek JHAM, Frings-Dresen MHW. A hospital-based work support intervention to enhance the return to work of cancer patients: a process evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:565–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Laxminarayan R, Chow J, Shahid-Salles SA. Intervention cost-effectiveness: overview of main messages; disease control priorities in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2006.
37.
Anema JR, Jettinghoff K, Houtman I, Schoemaker CG, Buijs PC, van den Berg R. Medical care of employees long-term sick listed due to mental health problems: a cohort study to describe and compare the care of the occupational physician and the general practitioner. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:41–52.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Eurofound. Eurofound year book 2012: living and working in Europe. Dublin; 2013.
39.
40.
Harrington CB, Hansen JA, Moskowitz M, Todd BL, Feuerstein M. It’s not over when it’s over: long-term symptoms in cancer survivors--a systematic review. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2010;40:163–81.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Martin MHT, Moefelt L, Dahl Nielsen MB, Rugulies R. Barriers and facilitators for implementation of a return-to-work intervention for sickness absence beneficiaries with mental health problems: results from three Danish municipalities. Scand J Public Health. 2015;43:423–31.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Aust B, Nielsen MB, Grundtvig G, Buchardt HL, Ferm L, Andersen I, Lund TL, Jelle MOC, Andersen MF, Hansen JV, Tverborgvik T, Helverskov T, Bjorner JB, Rugulies R, Orbaek P, Winzor G, Bultmann U, Poulsen OM. Implementation of the Danish return-to-work program: process evaluation of a trial in 21 Danish municipalities. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015;41:529–41.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Kjeldstrom M, Taskila T, Johansen M, Sullivan F, Wilson S, Jackson C, Jones R, Mitchell E. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;MR000013. doi: 10.​1002/​14651858.​MR000013.
Metadata
Title
Offering a tailored return to work program to cancer survivors with job loss: a process evaluation
Authors
M. P. van Egmond
S. F. A. Duijts
A. P. J. Scholten
A. J. van der Beek
J. R. Anema
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3592-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Modelling input-output flows of severe acute respiratory syndrome in mainland China

Research article

Increasing incidence of anogenital warts with an urban–rural divide among males in Manitoba, Canada, 1990–2011

Research article

Maternal, fetal and perinatal alterations associated with obesity, overweight and gestational diabetes: an observational cohort study (PREOBE)

Research article

Exposure to different lengths of sick leave and subsequent work absence among young adults

Research article

A cross-sectional study of the relationship between parents’ and children’s physical activity

Research article

A public health perspective to environmental barriers and accessibility problems for senior citizens living in ordinary housing