Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-02-2022 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Predictors of complications occurring after open and robot-assisted prostate cancer surgery: a retrospective evaluation of 1062 consecutive patients treated in a tertiary referral high volume center

Authors: Antonio Benito Porcaro, Alessandro Tafuri, Riccardo Rizzetto, Nelia Amigoni, Marco Sebben, Aliasger Shakir, Katia Odorizzi, Alessandra Gozzo, Sebastian Gallina, Alberto Bianchi, Paola Irene Ornaghi, Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli, Vincenzo Lacola, Matteo Brunelli, Filippo Migliorini, Maria Angela Cerruto, Salvatore Siracusano, Walter Artibani, Alessandro Antonelli

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

To investigate factors associated with the risk of major complications after radical prostatectomy (RP) by the open (ORP) or robot-assisted (RARP) approach for prostate cancer (PCa) in a tertiary referral center. 1062 consecutive patients submitted to RP were prospectively collected. The following outcomes were addressed: (1) overall postoperative complications: subjects with Clavien-Dindo System (CD) one through five versus cases without any complication; (2) moderate to major postoperative complications: cases with CD < 2 vs.  ≥ 2, and 3) major post-operative complications: subjects with CDS CD ≥  3 vs.  < 3. The association of pre-operative and intra-operative factors with the risk of postoperative complications was assessed by the logistic regression model. Overall, complications occurred in 310 out of 1062 subjects (29.2%). Major complications occurred in 58 cases (5.5%). On multivariate analysis, major complications were predicted by PCa surgery and intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL). ORP compared to RARP increased the risk of major CD complications from 2.8 to 19.3% (OR = 8283; p < 0.0001). Performing ePLND increased the risk of major complications from 2.4 to 7.4% (OR = 3090; p < 0.0001). Assessing intraoperative blood loss, the risk of major postoperative complications was increased by BL above the third quartile when compared to subjects with intraoperative blood loss up to the third quartile (10.2% vs. 4.6%; OR = 2239; 95%CI: 1233–4064). In the present cohort, radical prostatectomy showed major postoperative complications that were independently predicted by the open approach, extended lymph-node dissection, and excessive intraoperative blood loss.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Oberlin DT et al (2016) The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists. Urologic oncology seminars and original investigations. Elsevier, Amsterdam Oberlin DT et al (2016) The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists. Urologic oncology seminars and original investigations. Elsevier, Amsterdam
3.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mitropoulos D et al (2013) Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. ActasUrol Esp 37(1):1–11 Mitropoulos D et al (2013) Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. ActasUrol Esp 37(1):1–11
5.
go back to reference Gan ZS et al (2020) Correlation of relative value units with surgical complexity and physician workload in urology. Urology 139:71–77CrossRef Gan ZS et al (2020) Correlation of relative value units with surgical complexity and physician workload in urology. Urology 139:71–77CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sebben M et al (2020) Open approach, extended pelvic lymph node dissection, and seminal vesicle invasion are independent predictors of hospital readmission after prostate cancer surgery: a large retrospective study. Minerva UrolNefrol 72(1):72–81 Sebben M et al (2020) Open approach, extended pelvic lymph node dissection, and seminal vesicle invasion are independent predictors of hospital readmission after prostate cancer surgery: a large retrospective study. Minerva UrolNefrol 72(1):72–81
7.
go back to reference Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J (2003) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 169(6):2289–2292CrossRef Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J (2003) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 169(6):2289–2292CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Walsh PC (1998) Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 160(6 Pt 2):2418–2424PubMed Walsh PC (1998) Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 160(6 Pt 2):2418–2424PubMed
9.
go back to reference Briganti A et al (2012) Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. EurUrol 61(3):480–487 Briganti A et al (2012) Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. EurUrol 61(3):480–487
10.
go back to reference Porcaro AB et al (2018) Clinical factors stratifying the risk of tumor upgrading to high-grade disease in low-risk prostate cancer. Tumori J 104(2):111–115CrossRef Porcaro AB et al (2018) Clinical factors stratifying the risk of tumor upgrading to high-grade disease in low-risk prostate cancer. Tumori J 104(2):111–115CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Porcaro AB et al (2016) Low-risk prostate cancer and tumor upgrading to higher patterns in the surgical specimen. Analysis of clinical factors predicting tumor upgrading to higher Gleason patterns in a contemporary series of patients who have been evaluated according to the modified Gleason score grading system. Urol Int 97(1):32–41CrossRef Porcaro AB et al (2016) Low-risk prostate cancer and tumor upgrading to higher patterns in the surgical specimen. Analysis of clinical factors predicting tumor upgrading to higher Gleason patterns in a contemporary series of patients who have been evaluated according to the modified Gleason score grading system. Urol Int 97(1):32–41CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Porcaro AB et al (2017) Clinical factors of disease reclassification or progression in a contemporary cohort of prostate cancer patients elected to active surveillance. Urol Int 98(1):32–39CrossRef Porcaro AB et al (2017) Clinical factors of disease reclassification or progression in a contemporary cohort of prostate cancer patients elected to active surveillance. Urol Int 98(1):32–39CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Porcaro AB et al (2019) Lymph nodes invasion of marcille’s fossa associates with high metastatic load in prostate cancer patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the role of “Marcillectomy.” Urol Int 103(1):25–32CrossRef Porcaro AB et al (2019) Lymph nodes invasion of marcille’s fossa associates with high metastatic load in prostate cancer patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the role of “Marcillectomy.” Urol Int 103(1):25–32CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cacciamani GE et al (2019) Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: should the Cloquet’s nodes dissection be considered only an option? Minerva UrolNefrol 71(2):136–145 Cacciamani GE et al (2019) Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: should the Cloquet’s nodes dissection be considered only an option? Minerva UrolNefrol 71(2):136–145
15.
go back to reference Freire MP et al (2009) Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. EurUrol 56(6):972–980 Freire MP et al (2009) Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. EurUrol 56(6):972–980
17.
go back to reference Epstein JI et al (2016) The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J SurgPathol 40(2):244–252CrossRef Epstein JI et al (2016) The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J SurgPathol 40(2):244–252CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pierorazio PM et al (2013) Prognostic G leason grade grouping: data based on the modified G leason scoring system. BJU Int 111(5):753–760CrossRef Pierorazio PM et al (2013) Prognostic G leason grade grouping: data based on the modified G leason scoring system. BJU Int 111(5):753–760CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mottet N et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. EurUrol 71(4):618–629 Mottet N et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. EurUrol 71(4):618–629
20.
go back to reference Pompe RS et al (2018) Postoperative complications of contemporary open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using standardised reporting systems. BJU Int 122(5):801–807CrossRef Pompe RS et al (2018) Postoperative complications of contemporary open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using standardised reporting systems. BJU Int 122(5):801–807CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yaxley JW et al (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 388(10049):1057–1066CrossRef Yaxley JW et al (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 388(10049):1057–1066CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wallerstedt Lantz A et al (2019) 90-Day readmission after radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison between robot-assisted and open surgery. Scand J Urol 53(1):26–33CrossRef Wallerstedt Lantz A et al (2019) 90-Day readmission after radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison between robot-assisted and open surgery. Scand J Urol 53(1):26–33CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Moschini M et al (2017) Incidence and predictors of 30-day readmission after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. ClinGenitourin Cancer 15(1):67–71 Moschini M et al (2017) Incidence and predictors of 30-day readmission after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. ClinGenitourin Cancer 15(1):67–71
24.
go back to reference Xia L et al (2017) Predischarge predictors of readmissions and postdischarge complications in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 31(9):864–871CrossRef Xia L et al (2017) Predischarge predictors of readmissions and postdischarge complications in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 31(9):864–871CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fracalanza S et al (2008) Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 101(9):1145–1149CrossRef Fracalanza S et al (2008) Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 101(9):1145–1149CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Porcaro AB et al (2016) Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy accelerates postoperative stress recovery: Final results of a contemporary prospective study assessing pathophysiology of cortisol peri-operative kinetics in prostate cancer surgery. Asian J Urol 3(2):88–95CrossRef Porcaro AB et al (2016) Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy accelerates postoperative stress recovery: Final results of a contemporary prospective study assessing pathophysiology of cortisol peri-operative kinetics in prostate cancer surgery. Asian J Urol 3(2):88–95CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Porcaro AB et al (2015) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is less stressful than the open approach: results of a contemporary prospective study evaluating pathophysiology of cortisol stress-related kinetics in prostate cancer surgery. J Robot Surg 9(3):249–255CrossRef Porcaro AB et al (2015) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is less stressful than the open approach: results of a contemporary prospective study evaluating pathophysiology of cortisol stress-related kinetics in prostate cancer surgery. J Robot Surg 9(3):249–255CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Boscolo-Berto R et al (2020) The underestimated posterior lymphatic drainage of the prostate: an historical overview and preliminary anatomical study on cadaver. Prostate 80(2):153–161CrossRef Boscolo-Berto R et al (2020) The underestimated posterior lymphatic drainage of the prostate: an historical overview and preliminary anatomical study on cadaver. Prostate 80(2):153–161CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gil-Vernet JM (1996) Prostate cancer: anatomical and surgical considerations. Br J Urol 78(2):161–168CrossRef Gil-Vernet JM (1996) Prostate cancer: anatomical and surgical considerations. Br J Urol 78(2):161–168CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Porcaro AB et al (2017) Bilateral lymph node micrometastases and seminal vesicle invasion associated with same clinical predictors in localized prostate cancer. Tumori 103(3):299–306CrossRef Porcaro AB et al (2017) Bilateral lymph node micrometastases and seminal vesicle invasion associated with same clinical predictors in localized prostate cancer. Tumori 103(3):299–306CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Montorsi F et al (2012) Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. EurUrol 62(3):368–381 Montorsi F et al (2012) Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. EurUrol 62(3):368–381
33.
go back to reference Porcaro AB et al (2020) High body mass index predicts multiple prostate cancer lymph node metastases after radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Asian J Androl 22(3):323CrossRef Porcaro AB et al (2020) High body mass index predicts multiple prostate cancer lymph node metastases after radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Asian J Androl 22(3):323CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Porcaro AB et al (2019) Body mass index is an independent predictor of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications in patients undergoing robot assisted radical prostatectomy with extensive pelvic lymph node dissection. J Robot Surg 13(1):83–89CrossRef Porcaro AB et al (2019) Body mass index is an independent predictor of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications in patients undergoing robot assisted radical prostatectomy with extensive pelvic lymph node dissection. J Robot Surg 13(1):83–89CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictors of complications occurring after open and robot-assisted prostate cancer surgery: a retrospective evaluation of 1062 consecutive patients treated in a tertiary referral high volume center
Authors
Antonio Benito Porcaro
Alessandro Tafuri
Riccardo Rizzetto
Nelia Amigoni
Marco Sebben
Aliasger Shakir
Katia Odorizzi
Alessandra Gozzo
Sebastian Gallina
Alberto Bianchi
Paola Irene Ornaghi
Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli
Vincenzo Lacola
Matteo Brunelli
Filippo Migliorini
Maria Angela Cerruto
Salvatore Siracusano
Walter Artibani
Alessandro Antonelli
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01192-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue