Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2022

01-02-2022 | Bariatric Surgery | Original Article

Intraoperative conversion and complications in robotic assisted primary and redo gastric bypass surgery

Authors: Uwe J. Hesse, Johannes Lenz, Attila Dubecz, Hubert J. Stein

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

The rise of robotic assisted surgery in the treatment of morbidly obese patients has enlarged the armamentarium for surgeons involved in bariatric surgery. This in particular is of great advantage not only in primary cases, but also in patients undergoing revisional procedures following preceding upper GI surgery. In the following, our experience with intraoperative conversions and complications in revisional robotic surgery using the Da Vinci robotic system will be reported and compared to primary robotic bypass surgery and the literature. In a 36-month period, a total of 157 minimally invasive bariatric procedures (48 robotic assisted, 109 laparoscopic) were performed. Out of 43 patients receiving a gastric bypass 32 (74%) were performed robotically. Out of these 20 (62.5%) had previous operations (RRBP): one hiatal mesh repair, one open Mason operation, eight gastric band, nine gastric sleeve, one sleeve with fundoplication. The Da Vinci Xi was used for all surgeries. 3/20 (15%) RRBP were converted to open laparotomy because of a huge left liver lobe (1), extreme adhesions (1) and short mesentery (1) (p = 0.631 vs 1/12 RBP). One out of these had to be reoperated for an insufficiency of the gastroenterostomy. 3/17 (23%) patients (RRBP) without conversion had complications: hemorrhage (1), insufficiency of biliodigestive anastomosis (1), insufficiency of gastroenterostomy (1). There was no mortality and length of hospital stay was 3.5 days in uncomplicated cases and 12.3 days in complicated cases (p < 0.05). This preliminary experience suggests, that robotic revisional surgery can be performed safely even in complicated cases. Conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery may be required when adverse anatomical conditions are present. However, the incidence of complications was not increased when conversion was performed. In this series, the incidence of complications was not greater in case of revisional surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Krawczyk M (2017) Modern surgeons: still masters of their trade or just operators of medical equipment? Ann Surg 266(5):703–705CrossRef Krawczyk M (2017) Modern surgeons: still masters of their trade or just operators of medical equipment? Ann Surg 266(5):703–705CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Knab LM, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ III, Hogg ME (2017) Towards standardized robotic surgery in gastrointestinal oncology. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 402:1003–1014CrossRef Knab LM, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ III, Hogg ME (2017) Towards standardized robotic surgery in gastrointestinal oncology. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 402:1003–1014CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, Safadi BY, Alami RS, Curet MJ (2005) Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:549–554CrossRef Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, Safadi BY, Alami RS, Curet MJ (2005) Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:549–554CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gray KD, Moore MD, Elmously A, Bellorin O, Zarnegar R, Dakin G, Pomp A, Afaneh C (2018) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic revisional bariatric surgery in a complex patient population. Obes Surg 28:1852–1859CrossRef Gray KD, Moore MD, Elmously A, Bellorin O, Zarnegar R, Dakin G, Pomp A, Afaneh C (2018) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic revisional bariatric surgery in a complex patient population. Obes Surg 28:1852–1859CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Beckmann JH, Mehdorn AS, Kersebaum JN, Schönfels W, Taivankhuu T, Laudes M, Egberts JH, Becker T (2020) Pros and cons of robotic revisional bariatric surgery. Visc Med 36:238–245CrossRef Beckmann JH, Mehdorn AS, Kersebaum JN, Schönfels W, Taivankhuu T, Laudes M, Egberts JH, Becker T (2020) Pros and cons of robotic revisional bariatric surgery. Visc Med 36:238–245CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartins N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartins N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hesse U, Giulini L, Thumfahrt L, Stein H (2017) Einführung der Roboterunterstützten Minimalinvasiven Chirurgie (Da Vinci Xi) unter Einbeziehung der bariatrischen Chirurgie in einem Krankenhaus der Maximalversorgung. Érfahrung mit den ersten 100 Fällen. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterol 8:55. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1605315CrossRef Hesse U, Giulini L, Thumfahrt L, Stein H (2017) Einführung der Roboterunterstützten Minimalinvasiven Chirurgie (Da Vinci Xi) unter Einbeziehung der bariatrischen Chirurgie in einem Krankenhaus der Maximalversorgung. Érfahrung mit den ersten 100 Fällen. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterol 8:55. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0037-1605315CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mees ST, Kirchberg J, Weitz J (2017) Robotik in der Chirurgie. Passion Chir 2:7 Mees ST, Kirchberg J, Weitz J (2017) Robotik in der Chirurgie. Passion Chir 2:7
17.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH, Ewing D, Capella RF, Capella JF, Davis D, Schmidt HJ, Wasielewski A, Davies RJ (2005) The learning curve measured by operating times for laparoscopic and open gastric bypass: roles of surgeon’s experience, institutional experience, body mass index and fellowship training. Obes Surg 15(2):172–182CrossRef Ballantyne GH, Ewing D, Capella RF, Capella JF, Davis D, Schmidt HJ, Wasielewski A, Davies RJ (2005) The learning curve measured by operating times for laparoscopic and open gastric bypass: roles of surgeon’s experience, institutional experience, body mass index and fellowship training. Obes Surg 15(2):172–182CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intraoperative conversion and complications in robotic assisted primary and redo gastric bypass surgery
Authors
Uwe J. Hesse
Johannes Lenz
Attila Dubecz
Hubert J. Stein
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01212-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue