Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2022

01-02-2022 | Operative Gynecology | Original Article

An interdisciplinary team-training protocol for robotic gynecologic surgery improves operating time and costs: analysis of a 4-year experience in a university hospital setting

Authors: Francesco Vigo, Rosalind Egg, Adreas Schoetzau, Celine Montavon, Midhat Brezak, Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz, Tilemachos Kavvadias

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Main aim of this study is to assess the effect of a structured, interdisciplinary, surgical, team-training protocol in robotic gynecologic surgery, with the gradual integration of an advanced nurse practitioner. Data from all robotic surgical procedures were prospectively acquired. The surgical team consisted of one experienced surgeon and two surgical fellows and the scrub nurse team from three advance nurse practitioners, specialized in robotic surgery. The training was performed in a four-phase manner over 4 years and included theoretical training, hands-on training and team-communication skills enhancement. Scrub nurses increasingly adopted an active role during surgery. For a period of 4 years, 175 patients could be included in the analysis. All of them underwent a robotic gynecologic procedure. Mean docking time decreased from 45.3 to 27.3 min (p < 0.001), mean operating time from 235 to 179 min (p = 0.0071) and costs per case from 17,891 to 14,731 Swiss Francs (p = 0.035). There were no statistically significant changes in perioperative complications and conversions to laparotomy. An interdisciplinary long-term training protocol for high specialized robotic surgery within a “fixed” team with the gradually addition of an advanced study nurse improves the efficacy of the procedure in terms of time and costs. Although the surgery is performed quicker, the same performance and quality of surgical care could be reached.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Payne TN, Pitter MC (2011) Robotic-assisted surgery for the community gynecologist: can it be adopted? Clin Obstet Gynecol 54(3):391–411CrossRef Payne TN, Pitter MC (2011) Robotic-assisted surgery for the community gynecologist: can it be adopted? Clin Obstet Gynecol 54(3):391–411CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN et al (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. J Am Med Assoc 309(7):689–698CrossRef Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN et al (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. J Am Med Assoc 309(7):689–698CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Paley PJ, Veljovich DS, Shah CA et al (2011) Surgical out-comes in gynecologic oncology in the era of robotics: analysis of first 1000 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(6):551.e1-551.e9CrossRef Paley PJ, Veljovich DS, Shah CA et al (2011) Surgical out-comes in gynecologic oncology in the era of robotics: analysis of first 1000 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(6):551.e1-551.e9CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Swenson CW, Kamdar NS, Harris JA, Uppal SM, Campbell DA Jr, Morgann DM (2016) Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215(5):650CrossRef Swenson CW, Kamdar NS, Harris JA, Uppal SM, Campbell DA Jr, Morgann DM (2016) Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215(5):650CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Silverio E, Spinillo A (2010) Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches. Obstet Gynecol 116:1422–1423CrossRef Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Silverio E, Spinillo A (2010) Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches. Obstet Gynecol 116:1422–1423CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New Technology and Health Care Costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 701:363–368 Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New Technology and Health Care Costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 701:363–368
9.
go back to reference Tapper AM, Hannola M, Zeitlin R, Isojärvi J, Sintonen H, Ikonen TS (2014) A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 177:1–10CrossRef Tapper AM, Hannola M, Zeitlin R, Isojärvi J, Sintonen H, Ikonen TS (2014) A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 177:1–10CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A (2012) Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery:a systematic review. Surg Endosc 26:598–606CrossRef Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A (2012) Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery:a systematic review. Surg Endosc 26:598–606CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1998) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1998) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
12.
go back to reference Gamboa AJ, Santos RT, Sargent ER et al (2009) Long term impact of a robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy mini fellowship training program on postgraduate urological practice patterns. J Urol 181:778–782CrossRef Gamboa AJ, Santos RT, Sargent ER et al (2009) Long term impact of a robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy mini fellowship training program on postgraduate urological practice patterns. J Urol 181:778–782CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Thomas AA, Derboghossians A, Chang A, Karia R, Finley DS, Slezak J, Jacobsen SJ, Chien GW (2013) Impact of trainee involvement with robotic-assisted robotic prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 7:289–293CrossRef Thomas AA, Derboghossians A, Chang A, Karia R, Finley DS, Slezak J, Jacobsen SJ, Chien GW (2013) Impact of trainee involvement with robotic-assisted robotic prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 7:289–293CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brusco J (2012) Establishing an effective robotic surgical team. AORN J 95(5):10–11 Brusco J (2012) Establishing an effective robotic surgical team. AORN J 95(5):10–11
15.
go back to reference Rowe C, Pierce M, Tecci K, Houck C, Mandell J, Retik AB, Nguyen HT (2012) A comparative direct sot analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive? J Endourol 26:871–877CrossRef Rowe C, Pierce M, Tecci K, Houck C, Mandell J, Retik AB, Nguyen HT (2012) A comparative direct sot analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive? J Endourol 26:871–877CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Casella DP, Fox JA, Schneck FX, Cannon GM, Ost MC (2013) Cost analysis of pediatric robot assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 189:1083–1086CrossRef Casella DP, Fox JA, Schneck FX, Cannon GM, Ost MC (2013) Cost analysis of pediatric robot assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 189:1083–1086CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dunn OJ (1964) Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241–252CrossRef Dunn OJ (1964) Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241–252CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic chol-ecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and ananalysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165(9–14):12 Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic chol-ecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and ananalysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165(9–14):12
20.
go back to reference Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O et al (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinalhernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827CrossRef Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O et al (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinalhernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Toker A, Tanju S, Ziyade S et al (2008) Learning curve in videothoracoscopic thymectomy: how many operations and in which situations? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34(1):155–158CrossRef Toker A, Tanju S, Ziyade S et al (2008) Learning curve in videothoracoscopic thymectomy: how many operations and in which situations? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34(1):155–158CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252:943–951CrossRef Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252:943–951CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mark AM, Thomas WB, Andrew TJ, Mary EK, Frank RL Jr (2013) Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ 70(6):783–788CrossRef Mark AM, Thomas WB, Andrew TJ, Mary EK, Frank RL Jr (2013) Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ 70(6):783–788CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Green CA, Chu SN, Huang E, Chern H, O’Sullivan P (2020) Teaching in the robotic environment: use of alternative approaches to guide operative instruction. Am J Surg 219(1):191–219CrossRef Green CA, Chu SN, Huang E, Chern H, O’Sullivan P (2020) Teaching in the robotic environment: use of alternative approaches to guide operative instruction. Am J Surg 219(1):191–219CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Green CA, Sullivan SO, Sarin A, Chern H (2018) Microanalysis of video from a robotic surgical procedure: implications for observational learning in the robotic environment. J Robot Surg 13:449–454CrossRef Green CA, Sullivan SO, Sarin A, Chern H (2018) Microanalysis of video from a robotic surgical procedure: implications for observational learning in the robotic environment. J Robot Surg 13:449–454CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ahmed K, Khan R, Alexandre M, Lovegrove C, Abaza R, Ahlawat R et al (2015) Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts. BJU Int 116:93–101CrossRef Ahmed K, Khan R, Alexandre M, Lovegrove C, Abaza R, Ahlawat R et al (2015) Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts. BJU Int 116:93–101CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Honaker MD, Paton BL, Stefanidis D, Schiffern LM (2015) Can robotic surgery be done efficiently while training residents? J Surg Educ 72(3):377–380CrossRef Honaker MD, Paton BL, Stefanidis D, Schiffern LM (2015) Can robotic surgery be done efficiently while training residents? J Surg Educ 72(3):377–380CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Korkiakangas T, Weldon SM, Bezemer J, Kneebone R (2014) Nurse–surgeon object transfer: video analysis of communication and situation awareness in the operating theatre. Int J Nurs Stud 51:1195–1206CrossRef Korkiakangas T, Weldon SM, Bezemer J, Kneebone R (2014) Nurse–surgeon object transfer: video analysis of communication and situation awareness in the operating theatre. Int J Nurs Stud 51:1195–1206CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Tabor W (2007) On the cutting edge of robotic surgery. Nursing 37(2):48–50CrossRef Tabor W (2007) On the cutting edge of robotic surgery. Nursing 37(2):48–50CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Zender J, Thell C (2010) Developing a successful robotic surgery program in a rural hospital. AORN J 92(1):72–86CrossRef Zender J, Thell C (2010) Developing a successful robotic surgery program in a rural hospital. AORN J 92(1):72–86CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Uslu Y, Altınbaş Y, Özercan T, van Giersbergen MY (2019) The process of nurse adaptation to robotic surgery: a qualitative study. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 15:e1996CrossRef Uslu Y, Altınbaş Y, Özercan T, van Giersbergen MY (2019) The process of nurse adaptation to robotic surgery: a qualitative study. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 15:e1996CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tan SB, Pena G, Altree M, Maddern GJ (2014) Multidisciplinary team simulation for the operating theatre: a review of the literature. ANZ J Surg 84(7–8):515–522CrossRef Tan SB, Pena G, Altree M, Maddern GJ (2014) Multidisciplinary team simulation for the operating theatre: a review of the literature. ANZ J Surg 84(7–8):515–522CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An interdisciplinary team-training protocol for robotic gynecologic surgery improves operating time and costs: analysis of a 4-year experience in a university hospital setting
Authors
Francesco Vigo
Rosalind Egg
Adreas Schoetzau
Celine Montavon
Midhat Brezak
Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Tilemachos Kavvadias
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01209-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue