Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Bariatric Surgery | Original Contributions

Bariatric Enhanced Recovery Protocol: a Community Quality Perspective

Authors: Nicholas Gastaldo, Ryan Fitzgerald, Kelly Bahr, Joseph N. Gabra, Lance Talmage, Walter Chlysta, Christopher R. Daigle

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Bariatric enhanced recovery protocols can decrease length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs without compromising patient safety. Increased data is needed to compare patient outcomes before and after application of enhanced recovery pathways. We present a bariatric enhanced recovery protocol (BERP) at a community hospital. The objectives were to decrease hospital LOS and reduce schedule II substance use (medications with a high potential for abuse, potentially resulting in psychological or physical dependence), without compromising patient safety.

Methods

This was a combined retrospective and prospective analysis of all patients undergoing bariatric surgery by two surgeons from September 2016 to April 2018. Mann-Whitney U, Pearson chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes.

Results

Two hundred patients were evaluated. Overall median (interquartile range) age was 43.0 (36.0–54.0) years and body mass index (BMI) was 45.0 (40.6–50.3) kg/m2. Pre-protocol mean hospital LOS was 2.3 days while enhanced recovery protocol patients mean LOS was 1.4 days (p < 0.001). Sixty-five percent of BERP patients were discharged on hospital day 1, while no patients prior to the protocol were discharged before hospital day 2. Only 9% of BERP patients were discharged with schedule II medications, compared to 100% of the pre-protocol patients (p < 0.001). Intraoperative, in-hospital, and 30-day complication rates were not statistically significant between the two groups.

Conclusion

Community hospitals can reduce length of stay and narcotic prescribing without compromising safety-related outcomes. Significant reductions in the amount of schedule II medications can be achieved when using multimodal enhanced recovery protocol approaches.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2065–83.CrossRef Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2065–83.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(3):466–77.CrossRef Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(3):466–77.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Awad S, Carter S, Purkayastha S, et al. Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS): clinical outcomes from a tertiary referral bariatric centre. Obes Surg. 2014;24(5):753–8.CrossRef Awad S, Carter S, Purkayastha S, et al. Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS): clinical outcomes from a tertiary referral bariatric centre. Obes Surg. 2014;24(5):753–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Grieco A, Fraker T, et al. Employing Enhanced Recovery Goals in Bariatric Surgery (ENERGY): a national quality improvement project using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(11):1977–89.CrossRef Brethauer SA, Grieco A, Fraker T, et al. Employing Enhanced Recovery Goals in Bariatric Surgery (ENERGY): a national quality improvement project using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(11):1977–89.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Małczak P, Pisarska M, Piotr M, et al. Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):226–35.CrossRef Małczak P, Pisarska M, Piotr M, et al. Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):226–35.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Proczko M, Kaska L, Twardowski P, et al. Implementing enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocol: a retrospective study. J Anesth. 2016;30(1):170–3.CrossRef Proczko M, Kaska L, Twardowski P, et al. Implementing enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocol: a retrospective study. J Anesth. 2016;30(1):170–3.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ma P, Lloyd A, McGrath M, et al. Reduction of opioid use after implementation of enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS). Surg Endosc. 2020;34(5):2184–90.CrossRef Ma P, Lloyd A, McGrath M, et al. Reduction of opioid use after implementation of enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS). Surg Endosc. 2020;34(5):2184–90.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Houlihan DJ. Serotonin syndrome resulting from coadministration of tramadol, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:411–3.CrossRef Houlihan DJ. Serotonin syndrome resulting from coadministration of tramadol, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:411–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bariatric Enhanced Recovery Protocol: a Community Quality Perspective
Authors
Nicholas Gastaldo
Ryan Fitzgerald
Kelly Bahr
Joseph N. Gabra
Lance Talmage
Walter Chlysta
Christopher R. Daigle
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05122-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Obesity Surgery 3/2021 Go to the issue