Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 1/2017

Open Access 01-01-2017 | Review Article

Enhanced Recovery after Bariatric Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Piotr Małczak, Magdalena Pisarska, Major Piotr, Michał Wysocki, Andrzej Budzyński, Michał Pędziwiatr

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is well established in many surgical disciplines and leads to a decrease in the length of hospital stay and morbidity. Multimodal protocols have also been introduced to bariatric surgery. This review aims to evaluate the current literature on ERAS in obesity surgery and to conduct a meta-analysis of primary and secondary outcomes. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Key journals were hand-searched. We analysed data up to May 2016. Eligible studies had to contain four described ERAS protocol elements. The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay; the secondary outcomes included overall morbidity, specific complications, mortality, readmissions and costs. Random effect meta-analyses were undertaken. The initial search yielded 1151 articles. Thorough evaluation resulted in 11 papers, which were analysed. The meta-analysis of the length of stay presented a significant reduction standard mean difference (Std. MD) = −2.39 (−3.89, −0.89), p = 0.002. The analysis of overall morbidity, specific complications and Clavien-Dindo classification showed no significant variations among the study groups. ERAS protocol in bariatric surgery leads to the reduction of the length of hospital stay while maintaining no or low influence on morbidity.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nguyen NT et al. Changes in the makeup of bariatric surgery: a national increase in use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(2):252–7.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT et al. Changes in the makeup of bariatric surgery: a national increase in use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(2):252–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606–17.CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606–17.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ni TG et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(30):9209–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ni TG et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(30):9209–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Coolsen MM et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies. World J Surg. 2013;37(8):1909–18.CrossRefPubMed Coolsen MM et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies. World J Surg. 2013;37(8):1909–18.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Greco M et al. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1531–41.CrossRefPubMed Greco M et al. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1531–41.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Thorell, A., et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2016. Thorell, A., et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2016.
8.
go back to reference Ronellenfitsch U et al. The effect of clinical pathways for bariatric surgery on perioperative quality of care. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):732–9.CrossRefPubMed Ronellenfitsch U et al. The effect of clinical pathways for bariatric surgery on perioperative quality of care. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):732–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Proczko M et al. Implementing enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocol: a retrospective study. J Anesth. 2016;30(1):170–3.CrossRefPubMed Proczko M et al. Implementing enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocol: a retrospective study. J Anesth. 2016;30(1):170–3.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pimenta GP, Capellan DA, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE. Sleeve gastrectomy with or without a multimodal perioperative care. A randomized pilot study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(9):1639–46.CrossRefPubMed Pimenta GP, Capellan DA, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE. Sleeve gastrectomy with or without a multimodal perioperative care. A randomized pilot study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(9):1639–46.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Petrick AT et al. Feasibility and impact of an evidence-based program for gastric bypass surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(5):855–62.CrossRefPubMed Petrick AT et al. Feasibility and impact of an evidence-based program for gastric bypass surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(5):855–62.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mannaerts GH et al. Results of implementing an enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) protocol. Obes Surg. 2016;26(2):303–12.CrossRefPubMed Mannaerts GH et al. Results of implementing an enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) protocol. Obes Surg. 2016;26(2):303–12.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lemanu DP et al. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(4):482–9.CrossRefPubMed Lemanu DP et al. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(4):482–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Geubbels N et al. Fast track care for gastric bypass patients decreases length of stay without increasing complications in an unselected patient cohort. Obes Surg. 2014;24(3):390–6.CrossRefPubMed Geubbels N et al. Fast track care for gastric bypass patients decreases length of stay without increasing complications in an unselected patient cohort. Obes Surg. 2014;24(3):390–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dogan K et al. Fast-track bariatric surgery improves perioperative care and logistics compared to conventional care. Obes Surg. 2015;25(1):28–35.CrossRefPubMed Dogan K et al. Fast-track bariatric surgery improves perioperative care and logistics compared to conventional care. Obes Surg. 2015;25(1):28–35.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Campillo-Soto A et al. Evaluation of the clinical pathway for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;18(4):395–400.CrossRefPubMed Campillo-Soto A et al. Evaluation of the clinical pathway for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;18(4):395–400.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cooney RN et al. The impact of a clinical pathway for gastric bypass surgery on resource utilization. J Surg Res. 2001;98(2):97–101.CrossRefPubMed Cooney RN et al. The impact of a clinical pathway for gastric bypass surgery on resource utilization. J Surg Res. 2001;98(2):97–101.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Barreca M et al. Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):119–26.CrossRefPubMed Barreca M et al. Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):119–26.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
21.
go back to reference Stroup DF et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.CrossRefPubMed Stroup DF et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rebibo L et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery (without overnight hospitalization). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):335–42.CrossRefPubMed Rebibo L et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery (without overnight hospitalization). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):335–42.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Billing PS et al. Outpatient laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center: first 250 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(1):101–5.CrossRefPubMed Billing PS et al. Outpatient laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center: first 250 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(1):101–5.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Beamish AJ et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in gastric cancer surgery. Int J Surg. 2015;19:46–54.CrossRefPubMed Beamish AJ et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in gastric cancer surgery. Int J Surg. 2015;19:46–54.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Elliott JA et al. Fast-track laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Updat Surg. 2013;65(2):85–94.CrossRef Elliott JA et al. Fast-track laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Updat Surg. 2013;65(2):85–94.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lemanu DP et al. Optimizing perioperative care in bariatric surgery patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22(6):979–90.CrossRefPubMed Lemanu DP et al. Optimizing perioperative care in bariatric surgery patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22(6):979–90.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pędziwiatr M et al. Early implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol—compliance improves outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;21:75–81.CrossRefPubMed Pędziwiatr M et al. Early implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol—compliance improves outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;21:75–81.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Aahlin EK et al. Functional recovery is considered the most important target: a survey of dedicated professionals. Perioper Med (Lond). 2014;3:5.CrossRef Aahlin EK et al. Functional recovery is considered the most important target: a survey of dedicated professionals. Perioper Med (Lond). 2014;3:5.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lemanu DP et al. A systematic review to assess cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in colorectal surgery. Color Dis. 2014;16(5):338–46.CrossRef Lemanu DP et al. A systematic review to assess cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in colorectal surgery. Color Dis. 2014;16(5):338–46.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Joliat GR et al. Cost-benefit analysis of an enhanced recovery protocol for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102(13):1676–83.CrossRefPubMed Joliat GR et al. Cost-benefit analysis of an enhanced recovery protocol for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102(13):1676–83.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Roulin D et al. Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):1108–14.CrossRefPubMed Roulin D et al. Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):1108–14.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Nelson G et al. Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) across a provincial healthcare system: the ERAS Alberta Colorectal Surgery Experience. World J Surg. 2016;40(5):1092–103.CrossRefPubMed Nelson G et al. Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) across a provincial healthcare system: the ERAS Alberta Colorectal Surgery Experience. World J Surg. 2016;40(5):1092–103.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Rausa E et al. Rate of death and complications in laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis on 69,494 patients. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1956–63.CrossRefPubMed Rausa E et al. Rate of death and complications in laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis on 69,494 patients. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1956–63.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Group EC. The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1153–9.CrossRef Group EC. The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1153–9.CrossRef
35.
36.
go back to reference Durrand JW, Batterham AM, Danjoux GR. Pre-habilitation. I: aggregation of marginal gains. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(5):403–6.CrossRefPubMed Durrand JW, Batterham AM, Danjoux GR. Pre-habilitation. I: aggregation of marginal gains. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(5):403–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Enhanced Recovery after Bariatric Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
Piotr Małczak
Magdalena Pisarska
Major Piotr
Michał Wysocki
Andrzej Budzyński
Michał Pędziwiatr
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2438-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Obesity Surgery 1/2017 Go to the issue