Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Sleeve Gastrectomy | Original Contributions

Management of 69 Gastric Leakages after 4294 Consecutive Sleeve: The Experience of a High Volume Bariatric Center

Authors: Stefano Olmi, Giovanni Cesana, Carolina Rubicondo, Alberto Oldani, Matteo Uccelli, Stefano De Carli, Francesca Ciccarese, Riccardo Giorgi, Roberta Villa, Adelinda Zanoni, Ayman Ismail

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To propose an algorithm of treatment for leakage after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

Materials and Methods

Sixty-nine patients who developed gastric leakage out of 4294 patients who underwent LSG from 2010 to 2018 were considered in this study. Patients’ outcomes in terms of incidence of resolution and time to leakage resolution were compared by leakage characteristics and type of treatment. Three patients were lost to follow up.

Results

Leakage occurred in a median of 6 days from surgery, and for majority of patients (80.3%), it was in the upper part of the sleeve. The median dimension of leakage was 6.5 mm. Low level leakage resulted in a lower time of resolution (p < 0.001). Patients with clinical leakage were treated with surgery or endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS). The median time of leakage resolution was 42 days. The hospitalization time for SEMS was shorter with a 68.3% of complete resolution compared with the 29.4% of surgery. In patients with subclinical and small leakage, a conservative treatment was successful in 87.5%. Overall 39.4% of patients needed a second line treatment after that the first failed.

Conclusion

Leakage could be treated conservatively if subclinical and < 5 mm. Surgery is mandatory if a perigastric collection is present or an organ lesion is suspected. SEMS seems to be the best option to treat high level leakage.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P, et al. The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg. 2004;14(10):1290–8. Review. Erratum in: Obes Surg. 2013 Dec;23(12):2124CrossRefPubMed Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P, et al. The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg. 2004;14(10):1290–8. Review. Erratum in: Obes Surg. 2013 Dec;23(12):2124CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fernandez Jr AZ, DeMaria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Experience with over 3,000 open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures: multivariate analysis of factors related to leak and resultant mortality. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(2):193–7. ReviewCrossRefPubMed Fernandez Jr AZ, DeMaria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Experience with over 3,000 open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures: multivariate analysis of factors related to leak and resultant mortality. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(2):193–7. ReviewCrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gonzalez R, Sarr MG, Smith CD, et al. Diagnosis and contemporary management of anastomotic leaks after gastric bypass for obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(1):47–55.CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez R, Sarr MG, Smith CD, et al. Diagnosis and contemporary management of anastomotic leaks after gastric bypass for obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(1):47–55.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Foschi D, De Luca M, Sarro G, et al. Linee guida di Chirurgia dell’Obesità. Edizione 2016. SICOB. Foschi D, De Luca M, Sarro G, et al. Linee guida di Chirurgia dell’Obesità. Edizione 2016. SICOB.
Metadata
Title
Management of 69 Gastric Leakages after 4294 Consecutive Sleeve: The Experience of a High Volume Bariatric Center
Authors
Stefano Olmi
Giovanni Cesana
Carolina Rubicondo
Alberto Oldani
Matteo Uccelli
Stefano De Carli
Francesca Ciccarese
Riccardo Giorgi
Roberta Villa
Adelinda Zanoni
Ayman Ismail
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04658-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Obesity Surgery 8/2020 Go to the issue