Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Research

Subgroups of High-Cost Medicare Advantage Patients: an Observational Study

Authors: Brian W. Powers, MD, MBA, Jiali Yan, MS, Jingsan Zhu, MS, MBA, Kristin A. Linn, PhD, Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA, Jennifer L. Kowalski, MS, Amol S. Navathe, MD, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a growing focus on improving the quality and value of health care delivery for high-cost patients. Compared to fee-for-service Medicare, less is known about the clinical composition of high-cost Medicare Advantage populations.

Objective

To describe a high-cost Medicare Advantage population and identify clinically and operationally significant subgroups of patients.

Design

We used a density-based clustering algorithm to group high-cost patients (top 10% of spending) according to 161 distinct demographic, clinical, and claims-based variables. We then examined rates of utilization, spending, and mortality among subgroups.

Participants

Sixty-one thousand five hundred forty-six Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.

Main Measures

Spending, utilization, and mortality.

Key Results

High-cost patients (n = 6154) accounted for 55% of total spending. High-cost patients were more likely to be younger, male, and have higher rates of comorbid illnesses. We identified ten subgroups of high-cost patients: acute exacerbations of chronic disease (mixed); end-stage renal disease (ESRD); recurrent gastrointestinal bleed (GIB); orthopedic trauma (trauma); vascular disease (vascular); surgical infections and other complications (complications); cirrhosis with hepatitis C (liver); ESRD with increased medical and behavioral comorbidity (ESRD+); cancer with high-cost imaging and radiation therapy (oncology); and neurologic disorders (neurologic). The average number of inpatient days ranged from 3.25 (oncology) to 26.09 (trauma). Preventable spending (as a percentage of total spending) ranged from 0.8% (oncology) to 9.5% (complications) and the percentage of spending attributable to prescription medications ranged from 7.9% (trauma and oncology) to 77.0% (liver). The percentage of patients who were persistently high-cost ranged from 11.8% (trauma) to 100.0% (ESRD+). One-year mortality ranged from 0.0% (liver) to 25.8% (ESRD+).

Conclusions

We identified clinically distinct subgroups of patients within a heterogeneous high-cost Medicare Advantage population using cluster analysis. These subgroups, defined by condition-specific profiles and illness trajectories, had markedly different patterns of utilization, spending, and mortality, holding important implications for clinical strategy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Riley GF. Long-term trends in the concentration of Medicare spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(3):808–816.CrossRefPubMed Riley GF. Long-term trends in the concentration of Medicare spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(3):808–816.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference National Academy of Medicine. Effective care for high-need patients. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2017. National Academy of Medicine. Effective care for high-need patients. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2017.
4.
go back to reference Hong CS, Abrams MK, Ferris TG. Toward increased adoption of complex care management. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(6):491–493.CrossRefPubMed Hong CS, Abrams MK, Ferris TG. Toward increased adoption of complex care management. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(6):491–493.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Clough JD, Riley GF, Cohen M, et al. Patterns of care for clinically distinct segments of high cost Medicare beneficiaries. Healthc (Amst). 2016;4(3):160–165.CrossRefPubMed Clough JD, Riley GF, Cohen M, et al. Patterns of care for clinically distinct segments of high cost Medicare beneficiaries. Healthc (Amst). 2016;4(3):160–165.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Joynt KE, Figueroa JF, Beaulieu N, Wild RC, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Segmenting high-cost Medicare patients into potentially actionable cohorts. Healthc (Amst). 2017;5(1–2):62–67.CrossRefPubMed Joynt KE, Figueroa JF, Beaulieu N, Wild RC, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Segmenting high-cost Medicare patients into potentially actionable cohorts. Healthc (Amst). 2017;5(1–2):62–67.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Blumenthal D, Abrams MK. Tailoring complex care management for high-need, high-cost patients. JAMA. 2016;316(16):1657–1658.CrossRefPubMed Blumenthal D, Abrams MK. Tailoring complex care management for high-need, high-cost patients. JAMA. 2016;316(16):1657–1658.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lynn J, Straube BM, Bell KM, Jencks SF, Kambic RT. Using population segmentation to provide better health care for all: the “Bridges to Health” model. Milbank Q. 2007;85(2):185–208; discussion 209-112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lynn J, Straube BM, Bell KM, Jencks SF, Kambic RT. Using population segmentation to provide better health care for all: the “Bridges to Health” model. Milbank Q. 2007;85(2):185–208; discussion 209-112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–1139.CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–1139.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Choudhry NK, Shrank WH, Levin RL, et al. Measuring concurrent adherence to multiple related medications. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(7):457–464.PubMedPubMedCentral Choudhry NK, Shrank WH, Levin RL, et al. Measuring concurrent adherence to multiple related medications. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(7):457–464.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Joynt KE, Gawande AA, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Contribution of preventable acute care spending to total spending for high-cost Medicare patients. JAMA. 2013;309(24):2572–2578.CrossRefPubMed Joynt KE, Gawande AA, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Contribution of preventable acute care spending to total spending for high-cost Medicare patients. JAMA. 2013;309(24):2572–2578.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Figueroa JF, Joynt Maddox KE, Beaulieu N, Wild RC, Jha AK. Concentration of Potentially Preventable Spending Among High-Cost Medicare Subpopulations: An Observational Study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(10):706–713.CrossRefPubMed Figueroa JF, Joynt Maddox KE, Beaulieu N, Wild RC, Jha AK. Concentration of Potentially Preventable Spending Among High-Cost Medicare Subpopulations: An Observational Study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(10):706–713.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Yan J, Linn KA, Powers BW, et al. Applying Machine Learning Algorithms to Segment High-Cost Patient Populations. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. Yan J, Linn KA, Powers BW, et al. Applying Machine Learning Algorithms to Segment High-Cost Patient Populations. J Gen Intern Med. 2018.
24.
go back to reference Van Der Maaten L. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15(1):3221–3245. Van Der Maaten L. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15(1):3221–3245.
25.
go back to reference Maaten Lvd, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res. 2008;9(Nov):2579–2605. Maaten Lvd, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res. 2008;9(Nov):2579–2605.
26.
go back to reference Ester M, Kriegel H-P, Sander J, Xu X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters a density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 1996; Portland, Oregon. Ester M, Kriegel H-P, Sander J, Xu X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters a density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 1996; Portland, Oregon.
27.
go back to reference Ankerst M, Breunig MM, Kriegel H-P, #246, Sander r. OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. SIGMOD Rec. 1999;28(2):49–60. Ankerst M, Breunig MM, Kriegel H-P, #246, Sander r. OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. SIGMOD Rec. 1999;28(2):49–60.
28.
go back to reference Congressional Budget Office. High-Cost Medicare Beneficiaries. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office;2005. Congressional Budget Office. High-Cost Medicare Beneficiaries. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office;2005.
30.
go back to reference Powers BW, Chaguturu SK, Ferris TG. Optimizing high-risk care management. JAMA. 2015;313(8):795–796.CrossRefPubMed Powers BW, Chaguturu SK, Ferris TG. Optimizing high-risk care management. JAMA. 2015;313(8):795–796.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Figueroa JF, Jha AK. Approach for achieving effective care for high-need patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. Figueroa JF, Jha AK. Approach for achieving effective care for high-need patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2018.
32.
go back to reference Newcomer SR, Steiner JF, Bayliss EA. Identifying subgroups of complex patients with cluster analysis. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):e324–332.PubMed Newcomer SR, Steiner JF, Bayliss EA. Identifying subgroups of complex patients with cluster analysis. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):e324–332.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Lee NS, Whitman N, Vakharia N, Ph DG, Rothberg MB. High-cost patients: hot-spotters don’t explain the half of it. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(1):28–34.CrossRefPubMed Lee NS, Whitman N, Vakharia N, Ph DG, Rothberg MB. High-cost patients: hot-spotters don’t explain the half of it. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(1):28–34.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Subgroups of High-Cost Medicare Advantage Patients: an Observational Study
Authors
Brian W. Powers, MD, MBA
Jiali Yan, MS
Jingsan Zhu, MS, MBA
Kristin A. Linn, PhD
Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA
Jennifer L. Kowalski, MS
Amol S. Navathe, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4759-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2019 Go to the issue