Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2008

01-10-2008

Using the Experiences of Bereaved Caregivers to Inform Patient- and Caregiver-centered Advance Care Planning

Authors: Terri R. Fried, MD, John R. O’Leary, MA

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Traditional approaches to advance care planning (ACP) have many limitations; new approaches are being developed with the goal of improving end-of-life care.

Objective

To understand how the end-of-life care experiences of older patients and their caregivers can inform the development of new approaches to ACP.

Design

Qualitative cross-sectional study.

Participants

Caregivers of community-dwelling persons age ≥ 60 years who died with advanced cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or heart failure during follow-up in a longitudinal study.

Approach

In-depth interviews were conducted 6 months after the patient’s death with 64 caregivers. Interviews began with open-ended questions to encourage the caregiver to tell the story of the patient’s experiences at the end of life. Additional questions asked about how decisions were made, patient–caregiver, patient–clinician, and caregiver–clinician communication.

Main Results

Although the experiences recounted by caregivers were highly individual, several common themes emerged from the interviews. These included the following: 1) the lack of availability of treatment options for certain patients, prompting patients and caregivers to consider broader end-of-life issues, 2) changes in preferences at the very end of an illness, 3) variability in patient and caregiver desire for and readiness to hear information about the patient’s illness, and 4) difficulties with patient–caregiver communication.

Discussion

The experiences of older patients at the end of life and their caregivers support a form of ACP that includes a broader set of issues than treatment decision-making alone, recognizes the dynamic nature of preferences, and focuses on addressing barriers to patient–caregiver communication.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34:30–42.PubMedCrossRef Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34:30–42.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Winzelberg GS, Hanson LC, Tulsky JA. Beyond autonomy: diversifying end-of-life decision-making approaches to serve patients and families. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1046–50.PubMedCrossRef Winzelberg GS, Hanson LC, Tulsky JA. Beyond autonomy: diversifying end-of-life decision-making approaches to serve patients and families. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1046–50.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kolarik RC, Arnold RM, Fischer GS, Tulsky JA. Objectives for advance care planning. J Palliat Med. 2002;5:697–704.PubMedCrossRef Kolarik RC, Arnold RM, Fischer GS, Tulsky JA. Objectives for advance care planning. J Palliat Med. 2002;5:697–704.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hickman SE, Hammes BJ, Moss AH, Tolle SW. Hope for the future: achieving the original intent of advance directives. Hastings Cent Rep. 2005;35:526–30. Hickman SE, Hammes BJ, Moss AH, Tolle SW. Hope for the future: achieving the original intent of advance directives. Hastings Cent Rep. 2005;35:526–30.
6.
go back to reference Hanson LC, Danis M, Garrett J. What is wrong with end-of-life care? Opinions of bereaved family members. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:1339–44.PubMed Hanson LC, Danis M, Garrett J. What is wrong with end-of-life care? Opinions of bereaved family members. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:1339–44.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Christakis NA, McIntyre LM, Tulsky JA. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:825–32.PubMed Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Christakis NA, McIntyre LM, Tulsky JA. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:825–32.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–82.PubMedCrossRef Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–82.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Aronowitz RA, Asch DA. Cursing the darkness: are there limits to end-of-life research? J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:495–6.PubMedCrossRef Aronowitz RA, Asch DA. Cursing the darkness: are there limits to end-of-life research? J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:495–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Murphy DJ, Knaus WA, Lynn J. Study population in SUPPORT: patients (as defined by disease categories and mortality projections), surrogates, and physicians. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:11S–28S.PubMedCrossRef Murphy DJ, Knaus WA, Lynn J. Study population in SUPPORT: patients (as defined by disease categories and mortality projections), surrogates, and physicians. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:11S–28S.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference The Connecticut Hospice Inc. Summary Guidelines for Initiation of Advanced Care. Branford, CT: John Thompson Institute; 1996. The Connecticut Hospice Inc. Summary Guidelines for Initiation of Advanced Care. Branford, CT: John Thompson Institute; 1996.
12.
go back to reference Fried TR, Byers AL, Gallo WT, et al. Prospective study of health status preferences and changes in preferences over time in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:890–5.PubMedCrossRef Fried TR, Byers AL, Gallo WT, et al. Prospective study of health status preferences and changes in preferences over time in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:890–5.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fried TR, Van Ness PH, Byers AL, Towle VR, O’Leary J, Dubin JA. Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:495–501.PubMedCrossRef Fried TR, Van Ness PH, Byers AL, Towle VR, O’Leary J, Dubin JA. Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:495–501.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fried TR, O’Leary J, Van Ness P, Fraenkel L. Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1007–14.PubMedCrossRef Fried TR, O’Leary J, Van Ness P, Fraenkel L. Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1007–14.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.
16.
go back to reference Ditto PH, Jacobson JA, Smucker WD, Danks JH, Fagerlin A. Context changes choices: a prospective study of the effects of hospitalization on life-sustaining treatment preferences. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:313–22.PubMedCrossRef Ditto PH, Jacobson JA, Smucker WD, Danks JH, Fagerlin A. Context changes choices: a prospective study of the effects of hospitalization on life-sustaining treatment preferences. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:313–22.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Schwarz N, Smith D. Misimagining the unimaginable: the disability paradox and health care decision making. Health Psychol. 2005;24:S57–62.PubMedCrossRef Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Schwarz N, Smith D. Misimagining the unimaginable: the disability paradox and health care decision making. Health Psychol. 2005;24:S57–62.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Straton JB, Wang NY, Meoni LA, et al. Physical functioning, depression, and preferences for treatment at the end of life: the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:577–82.PubMedCrossRef Straton JB, Wang NY, Meoni LA, et al. Physical functioning, depression, and preferences for treatment at the end of life: the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:577–82.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fallowfield LJ, Jenkins VA, Beveridge HA. Truth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2002;16:297–303.PubMedCrossRef Fallowfield LJ, Jenkins VA, Beveridge HA. Truth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2002;16:297–303.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cosgriff JA, Pisani M, Bradley EH, O’Leary JR, Fried TR. The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end-of-life. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1566–71.PubMedCrossRef Cosgriff JA, Pisani M, Bradley EH, O’Leary JR, Fried TR. The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end-of-life. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1566–71.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pantilat SZ, Steimle AE. Palliative care for patients with heart failure. JAMA. 2004;291:2476–82.PubMedCrossRef Pantilat SZ, Steimle AE. Palliative care for patients with heart failure. JAMA. 2004;291:2476–82.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Phillips RS, et al. Factors associated with change in resuscitation preference of seriously ill patients. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1558–64.PubMedCrossRef Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Phillips RS, et al. Factors associated with change in resuscitation preference of seriously ill patients. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1558–64.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kutner JS, Steiner JF, Corbett KK, Jahnigen DW, Barton PL. Information needs in terminal illness. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1341–52.PubMedCrossRef Kutner JS, Steiner JF, Corbett KK, Jahnigen DW, Barton PL. Information needs in terminal illness. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1341–52.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary J. Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1398–403.PubMedCrossRef Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary J. Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1398–403.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cherlin E, Fried T, Prigerson HG, Schulman-Green D, Johnson-Hurzeler R, Bradley EH. Communication between physicians and family caregivers about care at the end of life: when do discussions occur and what is said? J Palliat Med. 2005;8:1176–85.PubMedCrossRef Cherlin E, Fried T, Prigerson HG, Schulman-Green D, Johnson-Hurzeler R, Bradley EH. Communication between physicians and family caregivers about care at the end of life: when do discussions occur and what is said? J Palliat Med. 2005;8:1176–85.PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
go back to reference Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary JR, Byers AL. Unmet desire for caregiver-patient communication and increased caregiver burden. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:59–65.PubMedCrossRef Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary JR, Byers AL. Unmet desire for caregiver-patient communication and increased caregiver burden. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:59–65.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hinton J. How reliable are relatives’ retrospective reports of terminal illness? Patients and relatives’ accounts compared. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:1229–36.PubMedCrossRef Hinton J. How reliable are relatives’ retrospective reports of terminal illness? Patients and relatives’ accounts compared. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:1229–36.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Addington-Hall J, McPherson C. After-death interviews with surrogates/bereaved family members: some issues of validity. J Pain Sympt Manage. 2001;22:784–90.CrossRef Addington-Hall J, McPherson C. After-death interviews with surrogates/bereaved family members: some issues of validity. J Pain Sympt Manage. 2001;22:784–90.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Using the Experiences of Bereaved Caregivers to Inform Patient- and Caregiver-centered Advance Care Planning
Authors
Terri R. Fried, MD
John R. O’Leary, MA
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0748-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2008 Go to the issue