Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2007

01-11-2007 | Original Article

The Association between Treatment Preferences and Trajectories of Care at the End-of-Life

Authors: JoAnne Alissi Cosgriff, MD, MPH, Margaret Pisani, MD, MPH, Elizabeth H. Bradley, PhD, John R. O’Leary, MA, Terri R. Fried, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Honoring patients’ treatment preferences is a key component of high-quality end-of-life care.

Objective

To determine the association of preferences with end-of-life care.

Design

Observational cohort study.

Participants

118 community-dwelling persons age ≥65 years with advanced disease who died in a study which prospectively assessed treatment preferences.

Measurements

End-of-life care was categorized according to four pathways: (1) relief of symptoms only, (2) limited attempt to reverse acute process with rapid change to symptomatic relief, (3) more intensive attempt to reverse acute process with eventual change to symptomatic relief, and (4) highly intensive attempt to reverse acute process with no change in goal.

Results

Adjusting for diagnosis, those with greater willingness to undergo intensive treatment (defined as a desire for invasive therapies despite ≥50% chance of death) were significantly more likely to receive care with an initial goal of life prolongation (pathways 2–4) [odds ratio 4.73 (95% confidence interval 1.39–16.08)] than those with lower willingness. Nonetheless, mismatches between preferences and pathways were frequent. Only 1 of 27 participants (4%) with lower willingness to undergo intensive treatment received highly intensive intervention (pathway 4); 53 of 91 participants (58%) with greater willingness to undergo intensive treatment received symptom control only (pathway 1).

Conclusions

The association between preferences and trajectories of end-of-life care suggests that preferences are used to guide treatment decision-making. In contrast to concerns that patients are receiving unwanted aggressive care, mismatches between preferences and trajectories were more frequently in the direction of patients receiving less aggressive care than they are willing to undergo.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Council on Scientific Affairs AMA. Good care of the dying patient. JAMA. 1996;275:474–8.CrossRef Council on Scientific Affairs AMA. Good care of the dying patient. JAMA. 1996;275:474–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lynn J. Measuring quality of care at the end of life: a statement of principles. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:526–7.PubMed Lynn J. Measuring quality of care at the end of life: a statement of principles. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:526–7.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sachs GA, Ahronheim JC, Rhymes JA, Volicer L, Lynn J. Good care of dying patients: the alternative to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:553–62.PubMed Sachs GA, Ahronheim JC, Rhymes JA, Volicer L, Lynn J. Good care of dying patients: the alternative to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:553–62.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Lynn J, Teno JM, Phillips RS, et al. Perceptions by family members of the dying experience of older and seriously ill patients. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:97–106.PubMed Lynn J, Teno JM, Phillips RS, et al. Perceptions by family members of the dying experience of older and seriously ill patients. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:97–106.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, et al. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004;291:88–93.PubMedCrossRef Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, et al. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004;291:88–93.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cohen LM, Germain MJ, Woods AL, Mirot A, Burleson JA. The family perspective of ESRD deaths. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45:154–61.PubMedCrossRef Cohen LM, Germain MJ, Woods AL, Mirot A, Burleson JA. The family perspective of ESRD deaths. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45:154–61.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Teno JM, Fisher ES, Hamel MB, Coppola K, Dawson NV. Medical care inconsistent with patients’ treatment goals: association with 1-year Medicare resource use and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:496–500.PubMedCrossRef Teno JM, Fisher ES, Hamel MB, Coppola K, Dawson NV. Medical care inconsistent with patients’ treatment goals: association with 1-year Medicare resource use and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:496–500.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:493–7.PubMedCrossRef Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:493–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Karlsen S, Addington-Hall J. How do cancer patients who die at home differ from those who die elsewhere? Palliat Med. 1998;12:279–86.PubMedCrossRef Karlsen S, Addington-Hall J. How do cancer patients who die at home differ from those who die elsewhere? Palliat Med. 1998;12:279–86.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gomes B, Higginson IJ. Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review. BMJ. 2006;332:515–21.PubMedCrossRef Gomes B, Higginson IJ. Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review. BMJ. 2006;332:515–21.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ratner E, Norlander L, McSteen K. Death at home following a targeted advance-care planning process at home: the kitchen table discussion. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:778–81.PubMedCrossRef Ratner E, Norlander L, McSteen K. Death at home following a targeted advance-care planning process at home: the kitchen table discussion. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:778–81.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lee MA, Brummel-Smith K, Meyer J, Drew N, London MR. Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST): outcomes in a PACE program. Program of all-inclusive care for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1219–25.PubMed Lee MA, Brummel-Smith K, Meyer J, Drew N, London MR. Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST): outcomes in a PACE program. Program of all-inclusive care for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1219–25.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hamel MB, Teno JM, Goldman L, et al. Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:116–25.PubMed Hamel MB, Teno JM, Goldman L, et al. Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:116–25.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Somogyi-Zalud E, Zhong Z, Hamel MB, Lynn J. The use of life-sustaining treatments in hospitalized persons aged 80 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:930–4.PubMedCrossRef Somogyi-Zalud E, Zhong Z, Hamel MB, Lynn J. The use of life-sustaining treatments in hospitalized persons aged 80 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:930–4.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rose JH, O’Toole EE, Dawson NV, et al. Perspectives, preferences, care practices, and outcomes among older and middle-aged patients with late-stage cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4907–17.PubMedCrossRef Rose JH, O’Toole EE, Dawson NV, et al. Perspectives, preferences, care practices, and outcomes among older and middle-aged patients with late-stage cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4907–17.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Danis M, Southerland LI, Garrett JM, et al. A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:882–8.PubMedCrossRef Danis M, Southerland LI, Garrett JM, et al. A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:882–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Danis M, Mutran E, Garrett JM, et al. A prospective study of the impact of patient preferences on life-sustaining treatment and hospital cost. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1811–7.PubMedCrossRef Danis M, Mutran E, Garrett JM, et al. A prospective study of the impact of patient preferences on life-sustaining treatment and hospital cost. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1811–7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Kagawa-Singer M. End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:620–5.PubMedCrossRef Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Kagawa-Singer M. End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:620–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fried TR, Bradley EH. What matters to older seriously ill persons making treatment decisions? A qualitative study. J Palliat Med. 2003;6:237–44.PubMedCrossRef Fried TR, Bradley EH. What matters to older seriously ill persons making treatment decisions? A qualitative study. J Palliat Med. 2003;6:237–44.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fried TR, Byers AL, Gallo WT, et al. Prospective study of health status preferences and changes in preferences over time in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:890–5.PubMedCrossRef Fried TR, Byers AL, Gallo WT, et al. Prospective study of health status preferences and changes in preferences over time in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:890–5.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference The Connecticut Hospice Inc. Summary guidelines for initiation of advanced care. Branford, CT: John Thompson Institute; 1996. The Connecticut Hospice Inc. Summary guidelines for initiation of advanced care. Branford, CT: John Thompson Institute; 1996.
23.
go back to reference Murphy DJ, Knaus WA, Lynn J. Study population in SUPPORT: patients (as defined by disease categories and mortality projections), surrogates, and physicians. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:11S–28S.PubMedCrossRef Murphy DJ, Knaus WA, Lynn J. Study population in SUPPORT: patients (as defined by disease categories and mortality projections), surrogates, and physicians. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:11S–28S.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86.PubMed Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–9.PubMed Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–9.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR. Assessment of patient preferences: Integrating treatments and outcomes. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57:S348–54.PubMed Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR. Assessment of patient preferences: Integrating treatments and outcomes. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57:S348–54.PubMed
27.
go back to reference The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274:1591–8.CrossRef The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274:1591–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Brody J. Facing up to the inevitable, in search of a good death. New York Times. 2003 Dec 30; Sect. F:F5–6. Brody J. Facing up to the inevitable, in search of a good death. New York Times. 2003 Dec 30; Sect. F:F5–6.
30.
go back to reference Lunney JR, Lynn J, Foley DJ, Lipson S, Guralnik JM. Patterns of functional decline at the end of life. JAMA. 2003;289:2387–92.PubMedCrossRef Lunney JR, Lynn J, Foley DJ, Lipson S, Guralnik JM. Patterns of functional decline at the end of life. JAMA. 2003;289:2387–92.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lynn J, Harrell F, Jr., Cohn F, Wagner D, Connors AF, Jr. Prognoses of seriously ill hospitalized patients on the days before death: implications for patient care and public policy. New Horiz. 1997;5:56–61.PubMed Lynn J, Harrell F, Jr., Cohn F, Wagner D, Connors AF, Jr. Prognoses of seriously ill hospitalized patients on the days before death: implications for patient care and public policy. New Horiz. 1997;5:56–61.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Hershberger RE, Nauman D, Walker TL, Dutton D, Burgess D. Care processes and clinical outcomes of continuous outpatient support with inotropes (COSI) in patients with refractory endstage heart failure. J Card Fail. 2003;9:180–7.PubMedCrossRef Hershberger RE, Nauman D, Walker TL, Dutton D, Burgess D. Care processes and clinical outcomes of continuous outpatient support with inotropes (COSI) in patients with refractory endstage heart failure. J Card Fail. 2003;9:180–7.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–82.PubMedCrossRef Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–82.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Singer PA, Martin DK, Kelner M. Quality end-of-life care: patients’ perspectives. JAMA. 1999;281:163–8.PubMedCrossRef Singer PA, Martin DK, Kelner M. Quality end-of-life care: patients’ perspectives. JAMA. 1999;281:163–8.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:S187–93.PubMed Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:S187–93.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, et al. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician–patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med. 1998;105:222–9.PubMedCrossRef Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, et al. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician–patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med. 1998;105:222–9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34:30–42.PubMedCrossRef Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34:30–42.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Pritchard RS, Fisher ES, Teno JM, et al. Influence of patient preferences and local health system characteristics on the place of death. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Risks and Outcomes of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:1242–50.PubMed Pritchard RS, Fisher ES, Teno JM, et al. Influence of patient preferences and local health system characteristics on the place of death. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Risks and Outcomes of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:1242–50.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The Association between Treatment Preferences and Trajectories of Care at the End-of-Life
Authors
JoAnne Alissi Cosgriff, MD, MPH
Margaret Pisani, MD, MPH
Elizabeth H. Bradley, PhD
John R. O’Leary, MA
Terri R. Fried, MD
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0362-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2007 Go to the issue