Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2008

01-10-2008 | Original Article

Patient Opinions Regarding ‘Pay for Performance for Patients’

Authors: Judith A. Long, MD, Marie Helweg-Larsen, PhD, Kevin G. Volpp, MD, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pay for performance (P4P) programs have shown only modest improvements in outcomes and do not target patient behaviors. Many large employers and payers are turning to pay for performance for patients (P4P4P) to reduce health costs and improve the health of their covered populations. How these programs may be perceived by patients is unknown.

Objective

To assess patients’ opinion of the acceptability of P4P4P.

Design

Cross-sectional self-administered survey.

Participants

Patients in waiting rooms in two university-based primary care clinics.

Measurements

Participants were asked their opinions about paying people to quit smoking, lose weight, control their blood pressure, or control their diabetes.

Results

Respondents were split on whether P4P4P is desirable. Thrity-six to 42% thought it was a good/excellent idea to pay smokers to quit smoking, obese people to lose weight, people with hypertension to control their blood pressure, or people with diabetes to control their blood sugar, while 41–44% of the sample thought it was a bad/very bad idea. Smokers and patients who were obese endorsed P4P4P more favorably as a means to achieving tobacco cessation and weight loss than their non-smoking and non-obese counterparts.

Conclusions

Acceptance of paying patients for performance by the general population is equivocal. Establishing the efficacy of paying patients for performance may help it gain wider acceptance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Galvin R. Evaluating the performance of pay for performance. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(1):126S–130S.PubMedCrossRef Galvin R. Evaluating the performance of pay for performance. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(1):126S–130S.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Epstein AM, Lee TH, Hammel MB. Paying physicians for high-quality care. New Engl J Med. 2004;350(4):406–410.PubMedCrossRef Epstein AM, Lee TH, Hammel MB. Paying physicians for high-quality care. New Engl J Med. 2004;350(4):406–410.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Epstein AM. Paying for performance in the United States and abroad. New Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):406–408.PubMedCrossRef Epstein AM. Paying for performance in the United States and abroad. New Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):406–408.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H, et al. Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. New Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):375–384.PubMedCrossRef Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H, et al. Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. New Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):375–384.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chassin MR. Does paying for performance improve the quality of health care? Med Care Res Rev. 2006;631(1):22S–125S.PubMedCrossRef Chassin MR. Does paying for performance improve the quality of health care? Med Care Res Rev. 2006;631(1):22S–125S.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Annals Int Med. 2006;145(4):265–272. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Annals Int Med. 2006;145(4):265–272.
7.
go back to reference Glickman SW, Ou FS, DeLong ER, et al. Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2007;297(21):2373–2380.PubMedCrossRef Glickman SW, Ou FS, DeLong ER, et al. Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2007;297(21):2373–2380.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, Rothberg MB, Benjamin EM, Ma A, Bratzler DW. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. New Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):486–496.PubMedCrossRef Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, Rothberg MB, Benjamin EM, Ma A, Bratzler DW. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. New Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):486–496.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li Z, Epstein AM. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA. 2005;294(14):1788–1793.PubMedCrossRef Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li Z, Epstein AM. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA. 2005;294(14):1788–1793.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schroeder SA. Shattuck Lecture. We can do better - improving the health of the American People. New Engl J Med. 2007;357(12):1221–1228.PubMedCrossRef Schroeder SA. Shattuck Lecture. We can do better - improving the health of the American People. New Engl J Med. 2007;357(12):1221–1228.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs- United States, 1995–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51(14):300–303. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs- United States, 1995–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51(14):300–303.
13.
go back to reference Yi D. For Many Employees, Fitness has its Prize. Los Angeles Times, March 12 2007. Yi D. For Many Employees, Fitness has its Prize. Los Angeles Times, March 12 2007.
14.
go back to reference Mcqueen MP. Wellness plans reach out to the healthy. Wall Street Journal Abstracts, 2007;March 28: D1. Mcqueen MP. Wellness plans reach out to the healthy. Wall Street Journal Abstracts, 2007;March 28: D1.
15.
go back to reference Jordan S. Financial carrot is a healthy incentive, more companies use enticing benefits to lure workers into wellness programs. Omaha World Herald, 2007;March 25:A1. Jordan S. Financial carrot is a healthy incentive, more companies use enticing benefits to lure workers into wellness programs. Omaha World Herald, 2007;March 25:A1.
16.
go back to reference Song KM. New health-benefits plan prompts county workers to diet and head for the gym. The Seattle Times, 2006;July 22:A1. Song KM. New health-benefits plan prompts county workers to diet and head for the gym. The Seattle Times, 2006;July 22:A1.
18.
20.
go back to reference Donatelle RJ, Hudson D, Dobie S, Goodall A, Hunsberger M, Oswald K. Incentives in smoking cessation: status of the field and implications for research and practice with pregnant smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2004;9(Supplement 2):S163–S179.CrossRef Donatelle RJ, Hudson D, Dobie S, Goodall A, Hunsberger M, Oswald K. Incentives in smoking cessation: status of the field and implications for research and practice with pregnant smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2004;9(Supplement 2):S163–S179.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Volpp KG, Gurmankin Levy A, Asch DA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(1):12–18, Jan.PubMedCrossRef Volpp KG, Gurmankin Levy A, Asch DA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(1):12–18, Jan.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction. 2005;101:102–203. Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction. 2005;101:102–203.
23.
go back to reference Higgins ST, Silverman K, eds. Motivating Behavior Change Among Illicit Drug Abusers: Research on Contingency Management Interventions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. Higgins ST, Silverman K, eds. Motivating Behavior Change Among Illicit Drug Abusers: Research on Contingency Management Interventions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999.
24.
go back to reference Marcus AC, Kaplan CP, Crane LA, et al. Reducing loss-to-follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears. Results from a randomized trial testing an intensive follow-up protocol and economic incentives. Med Care. 1998;36(3):397–410, Mar.PubMedCrossRef Marcus AC, Kaplan CP, Crane LA, et al. Reducing loss-to-follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears. Results from a randomized trial testing an intensive follow-up protocol and economic incentives. Med Care. 1998;36(3):397–410, Mar.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Stevens-Simon C, O’Connor P, Bassford K. Incentives enhance postpartum compliance among adolescent prenatal patients. J Adolesc Health. 1994;15(5):396–399, Jul.PubMedCrossRef Stevens-Simon C, O’Connor P, Bassford K. Incentives enhance postpartum compliance among adolescent prenatal patients. J Adolesc Health. 1994;15(5):396–399, Jul.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Malotte CK, Rhodes F, Mais KE. Tuberculosis screening and compliance with return for skin test reading among active drug users. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(5):792–796, May.PubMedCrossRef Malotte CK, Rhodes F, Mais KE. Tuberculosis screening and compliance with return for skin test reading among active drug users. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(5):792–796, May.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Seal KH, Kral AH, Lorvick J, McNees A, Gee L, Edlin BR. A randomized controlled trial of monetary incentives vs. outreach to enhance adherence to the hepatitis B vaccine series among injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;71(2):127–131, Aug 20.PubMedCrossRef Seal KH, Kral AH, Lorvick J, McNees A, Gee L, Edlin BR. A randomized controlled trial of monetary incentives vs. outreach to enhance adherence to the hepatitis B vaccine series among injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;71(2):127–131, Aug 20.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jeffery RW, Thompson PD, Wing RR. Effects on weight reduction of strong monetary contracts for calorie restriction or weight loss. Behav Res Ther. 1978;16(5):363–369.PubMedCrossRef Jeffery RW, Thompson PD, Wing RR. Effects on weight reduction of strong monetary contracts for calorie restriction or weight loss. Behav Res Ther. 1978;16(5):363–369.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Finkelstein EA, Linnan LA, Tate DF, Birken BE. A pilot study testing the effect of different levels of financial incentives on weight loss among overweight employees. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49(9):981–989, Sep.PubMedCrossRef Finkelstein EA, Linnan LA, Tate DF, Birken BE. A pilot study testing the effect of different levels of financial incentives on weight loss among overweight employees. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49(9):981–989, Sep.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Jeffery RW, Gerber WM, Rosenthal BS, Lindquist RA. Monetary contracts in weight control: effectiveness of group and individual contracts of varying size. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(2):242–248, Apr.PubMedCrossRef Jeffery RW, Gerber WM, Rosenthal BS, Lindquist RA. Monetary contracts in weight control: effectiveness of group and individual contracts of varying size. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(2):242–248, Apr.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sindelar J, Elbel B, Petry NM. What do we get for our money? Cost-effectiveness of adding contingency management. Addiction. 2007;102(2):309–316, Feb.PubMedCrossRef Sindelar J, Elbel B, Petry NM. What do we get for our money? Cost-effectiveness of adding contingency management. Addiction. 2007;102(2):309–316, Feb.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sindelar JL, Olmstead TA, Peirce JM. Cost-effectiveness of prize-based contingency management in methadone maintenance treatment programs. Addiction. 2007;102(9):1463–1471, Sep.PubMedCrossRef Sindelar JL, Olmstead TA, Peirce JM. Cost-effectiveness of prize-based contingency management in methadone maintenance treatment programs. Addiction. 2007;102(9):1463–1471, Sep.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Kane RL, Johnson PE, Town RJ, Butler M. A structured review of the effect of economic incentives on consumers’ preventive behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(4):327–352.PubMedCrossRef Kane RL, Johnson PE, Town RJ, Butler M. A structured review of the effect of economic incentives on consumers’ preventive behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(4):327–352.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453–458.PubMedCrossRef Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453–458.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient Opinions Regarding ‘Pay for Performance for Patients’
Authors
Judith A. Long, MD
Marie Helweg-Larsen, PhD
Kevin G. Volpp, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0739-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2008 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.