Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Urology - Original Paper

Efficacy of a neoadjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate in high-risk prostate cancer: a single-center study

Authors: Kazuhisa Hagiwara, Takuya Koie, Chikara Ohyama, Hayato Yamamoto, Atsushi Imai, Shingo Hatakeyama, Takahiro Yoneyama, Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Yuki Tobisawa, Tohru Yoneyama

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The optimal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer (Pca) remains to be established. We previously reported favorable biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) for high-risk Pca patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy comprising a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist plus low-dose estramustine (LHRH + EMP) prior to radical prostatectomy (RP). In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy comprising a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate (GnRH + EMP) in patients with high-risk Pca.

Methods

Between September 2005 and March 2016, we identified 406 high-risk Pca patients of whom 136 received neoadjuvant GnRH + EMP (GnRH group) and 270 received LHRH + EMP (LHRH group) before RP. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and pathological covariates between the two groups. The endpoint was the rate of pathological T0 status.

Results

The rates of pathological T0 status were 11.0 and 8.9% in the GnRH group and LHRH group, respectively (P = 0.490). The 2-year BRFS rates were 97.8% in the GnRH group and 87.8% in the LHRH group (P = 0.027).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that neoadjuvant GnRH antagonist + EMP followed by RP may improve the pathological outcomes and reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk Pca. Further prospective studies to confirm these findings are warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:969–974CrossRefPubMed D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:969–974CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 65:124–137CrossRefPubMed Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 65:124–137CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich A et al (2014) The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 65:918–927CrossRefPubMed Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich A et al (2014) The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 65:918–927CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Loeb S, Schaeffer EM, Trock BJ et al (2010) What are the outcomes of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer? Urology 76:710–714CrossRefPubMed Loeb S, Schaeffer EM, Trock BJ et al (2010) What are the outcomes of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer? Urology 76:710–714CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Roach M III, Bae K, Speight J et al (2008) Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and external-beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term results of RTOG 8610. J Clin Oncol 26:585–591CrossRefPubMed Roach M III, Bae K, Speight J et al (2008) Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and external-beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term results of RTOG 8610. J Clin Oncol 26:585–591CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Koie T, Mitsuzuka K, Yoneyama T et al (2015) Neoadjuvant luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate improves prostate-specific antigen-free survival in high-risk prostate cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 20:1018–1025CrossRefPubMed Koie T, Mitsuzuka K, Yoneyama T et al (2015) Neoadjuvant luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate improves prostate-specific antigen-free survival in high-risk prostate cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 20:1018–1025CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference McLeod D, Zinner N, Tomera K et al (2001) A phase 3 multicenter, open-label randomized study of abarelix versus leuprolide acetate in men with prostate cancer. Urology 58:756–761CrossRefPubMed McLeod D, Zinner N, Tomera K et al (2001) A phase 3 multicenter, open-label randomized study of abarelix versus leuprolide acetate in men with prostate cancer. Urology 58:756–761CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ozono S, Ueda T, Hoshi S et al (2012) The efficacy and safety of degarelix, a GnRH antagonist: a 12-month, multicentre, randomized, maintenance dose-finding phase II study in Japanese patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 42:477–484 Ozono S, Ueda T, Hoshi S et al (2012) The efficacy and safety of degarelix, a GnRH antagonist: a 12-month, multicentre, randomized, maintenance dose-finding phase II study in Japanese patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 42:477–484
9.
go back to reference Crawford ED, Tombal B, Miller K et al (2011) A phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix: comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist effect on prostate cancer. J Urol 186:889–897CrossRefPubMed Crawford ED, Tombal B, Miller K et al (2011) A phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix: comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist effect on prostate cancer. J Urol 186:889–897CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Allsobrook WC Jr, Amin MB et al (2005) The 2005 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Allsobrook WC Jr, Amin MB et al (2005) The 2005 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sooriakumaran P, Nyberg T, Akre O et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in prostate cancer: observational study of mortality outcomes. BMJ 348:g1502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sooriakumaran P, Nyberg T, Akre O et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in prostate cancer: observational study of mortality outcomes. BMJ 348:g1502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Abdollah F, Sun M, Schmitges J et al (2012) Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer: estimations of the number needed to treat according to tumor and patient characteristics. J Urol 88:73–83CrossRef Abdollah F, Sun M, Schmitges J et al (2012) Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer: estimations of the number needed to treat according to tumor and patient characteristics. J Urol 88:73–83CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Klotz L, Boccon-Gibod L, Shore ND et al (2008) The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int 102:1531–1538CrossRefPubMed Klotz L, Boccon-Gibod L, Shore ND et al (2008) The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int 102:1531–1538CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Crawford ED, Tombal B, Miller K et al (2011) A phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix: comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist effect on prostate cancer. J Urol 186:889–897CrossRefPubMed Crawford ED, Tombal B, Miller K et al (2011) A phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix: comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist effect on prostate cancer. J Urol 186:889–897CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Crawford ED, Shore ND, Moul JW et al (2014) Long-term tolerability and efficacy of degarelix: 5-year results from a phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix. Urology 83:1122–1128CrossRefPubMed Crawford ED, Shore ND, Moul JW et al (2014) Long-term tolerability and efficacy of degarelix: 5-year results from a phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix. Urology 83:1122–1128CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Radu A, Pichon C, Camparo P et al (2010) Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in tumor blood vessels. N Engl J Med 363:1621–1630CrossRefPubMed Radu A, Pichon C, Camparo P et al (2010) Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in tumor blood vessels. N Engl J Med 363:1621–1630CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mariani S, Salvatori L, Basciani S et al (2006) Expression and cellular localization of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in normal human prostate, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. J Urol 175:2072–2077CrossRefPubMed Mariani S, Salvatori L, Basciani S et al (2006) Expression and cellular localization of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in normal human prostate, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. J Urol 175:2072–2077CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hoare D, Skinner TA, Black A et al (2015) Serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels predict time to development of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 9:122–127PubMedPubMedCentral Hoare D, Skinner TA, Black A et al (2015) Serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels predict time to development of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 9:122–127PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Tao X, Zhao N, Zhang Z et al (2013) Follicle-stimulating hormone enhances the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells by activating transient receptor potential channel C3. Endocr Relat Cancer 20:415–429CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tao X, Zhao N, Zhang Z et al (2013) Follicle-stimulating hormone enhances the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells by activating transient receptor potential channel C3. Endocr Relat Cancer 20:415–429CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Zhu Y, Lai Y et al (2013) Follicle-stimulating hormone inhibits apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells by regulating the OCT4 stem cell signaling pathway. Int J Oncol 43:1194–1204PubMedPubMedCentral Zhang Z, Zhu Y, Lai Y et al (2013) Follicle-stimulating hormone inhibits apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells by regulating the OCT4 stem cell signaling pathway. Int J Oncol 43:1194–1204PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Huang Y, Jin H, Liu Y et al (2010) FSH inhibits ovarian cancer cell apoptosis by up-regulating surviving and down-regulating PDCD6 and DR5. Endocr Relat Cancer 30:13–26CrossRef Huang Y, Jin H, Liu Y et al (2010) FSH inhibits ovarian cancer cell apoptosis by up-regulating surviving and down-regulating PDCD6 and DR5. Endocr Relat Cancer 30:13–26CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Speicher LA, Laing N, Barone LR et al (1994) Interaction of an estramustine photoaffinity analogue with cytoskeltal proteins in prostate carcinoma cells. Mol Pharmacol 46:866–872PubMed Speicher LA, Laing N, Barone LR et al (1994) Interaction of an estramustine photoaffinity analogue with cytoskeltal proteins in prostate carcinoma cells. Mol Pharmacol 46:866–872PubMed
23.
go back to reference Van Poppel H, Werbrouck PW, Baert L (1990) Effect of estramustine phosphate on free androgens: a comparative study of the effect on orchiectomy and estramustine phosphate on free androgens in patients with prostatic cancer. Acta Urol Belg 58:89–95PubMed Van Poppel H, Werbrouck PW, Baert L (1990) Effect of estramustine phosphate on free androgens: a comparative study of the effect on orchiectomy and estramustine phosphate on free androgens in patients with prostatic cancer. Acta Urol Belg 58:89–95PubMed
24.
go back to reference Lawrentschuk N, Fernandes K, Bell D et al (2011) Efficacy of a second line luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist after advanced prostate cancer biochemical recurrence. J Urol 185:848–854CrossRefPubMed Lawrentschuk N, Fernandes K, Bell D et al (2011) Efficacy of a second line luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist after advanced prostate cancer biochemical recurrence. J Urol 185:848–854CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hoshi S, Yamaguchi O, Fujioka T et al (2006) A randomized comparative study of endocrine monotherapy and a combination of estramustine phosphate with the endocrine therapy in patients with untreated stage D prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 11:303–308CrossRefPubMed Hoshi S, Yamaguchi O, Fujioka T et al (2006) A randomized comparative study of endocrine monotherapy and a combination of estramustine phosphate with the endocrine therapy in patients with untreated stage D prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 11:303–308CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of a neoadjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate in high-risk prostate cancer: a single-center study
Authors
Kazuhisa Hagiwara
Takuya Koie
Chikara Ohyama
Hayato Yamamoto
Atsushi Imai
Shingo Hatakeyama
Takahiro Yoneyama
Yasuhiro Hashimoto
Yuki Tobisawa
Tohru Yoneyama
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1546-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

International Urology and Nephrology 5/2017 Go to the issue