Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 2/2020

Open Access 01-08-2020 | Anticoagulant

Inpatient and outpatient treatment patterns of cancer-associated thrombosis in the United States

Authors: J. D. Guo, P. Hlavacek, T. Poretta, G. Wygant, D. Lane, M. Gorritz, X. Wang, C. C. Chen, R. L. Wade, X. Pan, J. Rajpura, B. Stwalley, L. Rosenblatt

Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are among the recommended treatment options for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in the 2019 National Comprehensive Care Network guidelines. Little is known about the current utilization of DOACs in CAT patients, particularly on the inpatient to outpatient therapy transition. This study assessed real-world treatment patterns of CAT in hospital/ED in adult cancer patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with CAT during a hospital visit in IQVIA’s Hospital Charge Data Master database between July 1, 2015 and April 30, 2018, and followed their outpatient medical and pharmacy claims to evaluate the initial inpatient/ED and outpatient anticoagulants received within 3 months post-discharge. Results showed that LMWH and unfractionated heparin (UFH) were the most common initial inpatient/ED CAT treatments (35.2% and 27.4%, respectively), followed by DOACs (9.6%); 20.8% of patients received no anticoagulants. Most DOAC patients remained on DOACs from inpatient/ED to outpatient settings (71.4%), while 24.1%, 43.5%, and 0.1% of patients treated with LMWH, warfarin, or UFH respectively, remained on the same therapy after discharge. In addition, DOACs were the most common initial post-discharge outpatient therapy. Outpatient treatment persistence and adherence appeared higher in patients using DOACs or warfarin versus LMWH or UFH. This study shows that DOACs are used as an inpatient/ED treatment option for CAT, and are associated with less post-discharge treatment switching and higher persistence and adherence. Further research generating real-world evidence on the role of DOACs to help inform the complex CAT clinical treatment decisions is warranted.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kahale L, Hakoum M, Tsolakian I et al (2018) Anticoagulation for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism in people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD006650PubMed Kahale L, Hakoum M, Tsolakian I et al (2018) Anticoagulation for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism in people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD006650PubMed
2.
go back to reference Timp J, Braekkan S, Versteeg H, Cannegieter S (2013) Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis. Blood 122(10):1712–1723CrossRef Timp J, Braekkan S, Versteeg H, Cannegieter S (2013) Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis. Blood 122(10):1712–1723CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sheth R, Niekamp A, Quencer K et al (2017) Thrombosis in cancer patients: etiology, incidence, and management. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 7(Supple 3):S178–S185CrossRef Sheth R, Niekamp A, Quencer K et al (2017) Thrombosis in cancer patients: etiology, incidence, and management. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 7(Supple 3):S178–S185CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Berger J, Seheult R, Laliberte F et al (2018) Clinical outcomes of prolonged anticoagulation with rivaroxaban after unprovoked venous thromboembolism. Res Pract Thromb Haemast 2:58–68CrossRef Berger J, Seheult R, Laliberte F et al (2018) Clinical outcomes of prolonged anticoagulation with rivaroxaban after unprovoked venous thromboembolism. Res Pract Thromb Haemast 2:58–68CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kraaijpoel N, Carrier M (2019) How I treat cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Blood 133(4):291–298CrossRef Kraaijpoel N, Carrier M (2019) How I treat cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Blood 133(4):291–298CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cohen AT, Katholing A, Rietbrock S, Bamber L, Martinez C (2017) Epidemiology of first and recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer. A population-based cohort study. Thromb Haemost 117(1):57–65CrossRef Cohen AT, Katholing A, Rietbrock S, Bamber L, Martinez C (2017) Epidemiology of first and recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer. A population-based cohort study. Thromb Haemost 117(1):57–65CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Razak N, Jones G, Bhandari M, Berndt M, Metharom (2018) Cancer-associated thrombosis: an overview of mechanisms, risk factors and treatment. Cancers 10:1–21 Razak N, Jones G, Bhandari M, Berndt M, Metharom (2018) Cancer-associated thrombosis: an overview of mechanisms, risk factors and treatment. Cancers 10:1–21
9.
go back to reference Khorana AA et al (2008) Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood 111:4902–4907CrossRef Khorana AA et al (2008) Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood 111:4902–4907CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Piccioli A et al (2002) Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood 100(10):3484–3488CrossRef Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Piccioli A et al (2002) Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood 100(10):3484–3488CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McBane RD, Wysokinski WE, Le-Rademacher J et al (2018) Apixaban, dalteparin, in active cancer associated venous thromboembolism, the ADAM VTE trial. Blood 132:421CrossRef McBane RD, Wysokinski WE, Le-Rademacher J et al (2018) Apixaban, dalteparin, in active cancer associated venous thromboembolism, the ADAM VTE trial. Blood 132:421CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Young AM, Marchall A, Thirlwall J et al (2018) Comparison of an oral factor Xa inhibitor with low molecular weight heparin in patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism: results of a randomized trial (SELECT-D). J Clin Oncol 36(20):2017–2023CrossRef Young AM, Marchall A, Thirlwall J et al (2018) Comparison of an oral factor Xa inhibitor with low molecular weight heparin in patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism: results of a randomized trial (SELECT-D). J Clin Oncol 36(20):2017–2023CrossRef
13.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease. Version 1.2019. February 28, 2019 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease. Version 1.2019. February 28, 2019
14.
go back to reference Khorana A, McCrae K, Milentijevic D et al (2017) Current practice patterns and patient persistence with anticoagulant treatments for cancer-associated thrombosis. Res Pract Thromb Haemast 1:14–22CrossRef Khorana A, McCrae K, Milentijevic D et al (2017) Current practice patterns and patient persistence with anticoagulant treatments for cancer-associated thrombosis. Res Pract Thromb Haemast 1:14–22CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Xiang E, Ahuja T, Raco V et al (2018) Anticoagulation prescribing patterns in patients with cancer. J Thromb Thrombolysis 45(1):89–98CrossRef Xiang E, Ahuja T, Raco V et al (2018) Anticoagulation prescribing patterns in patients with cancer. J Thromb Thrombolysis 45(1):89–98CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Guo JD, Hlavacek P, Poretta T et al Treatment patterns in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the US: a real world retrospective database analysis. In: Proceedings of the American Associated for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 20–Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philedelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2267 Guo JD, Hlavacek P, Poretta T et al Treatment patterns in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the US: a real world retrospective database analysis. In: Proceedings of the American Associated for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 20–Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philedelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2267
17.
go back to reference White RH, Garcia M, Sadeghi B et al (2010) Evaluation of the predictive value of ICD-9-CM coded administrative data for venous thromboembolism in the United States. Thromb Res 126:61–67CrossRef White RH, Garcia M, Sadeghi B et al (2010) Evaluation of the predictive value of ICD-9-CM coded administrative data for venous thromboembolism in the United States. Thromb Res 126:61–67CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fang MC, Fan D, Sung SH et al (2017) Validity of using inpatient and outpatient administrative codes to identify acute venous thromboembolism: the CVRN VTE study. Med Care 55:e137–e143CrossRef Fang MC, Fan D, Sung SH et al (2017) Validity of using inpatient and outpatient administrative codes to identify acute venous thromboembolism: the CVRN VTE study. Med Care 55:e137–e143CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Masserie C, Kariburyo MF, Mardekian J et al (2015) Clinical outcomes and treatment patterns of venous thromboembolism among cancer patients in a large commercial database. Value Health 18:A1–A307 Masserie C, Kariburyo MF, Mardekian J et al (2015) Clinical outcomes and treatment patterns of venous thromboembolism among cancer patients in a large commercial database. Value Health 18:A1–A307
Metadata
Title
Inpatient and outpatient treatment patterns of cancer-associated thrombosis in the United States
Authors
J. D. Guo
P. Hlavacek
T. Poretta
G. Wygant
D. Lane
M. Gorritz
X. Wang
C. C. Chen
R. L. Wade
X. Pan
J. Rajpura
B. Stwalley
L. Rosenblatt
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0929-5305
Electronic ISSN: 1573-742X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-02032-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 2/2020 Go to the issue