Top

Published in:

01-09-2019

Improved Expectations About Length of Sick Leave During Occupational Rehabilitation Is Associated with Increased Work Participation

Authors: Lene Aasdahl, Kristine Pape, Ottar Vasseljen, Roar Johnsen, Marius Steiro Fimland

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2019

Abstract

Objectives To assess changes in participants’ expectations about length of sick leave during Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-based occupational rehabilitation, and whether the change in expectations was associated with future work participation. Methods Cohort study with 9 months follow-up including sick listed workers who took part in one of two randomized controlled trials. The change in expectations about length of sick leave were assessed using a test of marginal homogeneity. Furthermore, linear and logistic regression evaluated associations between changes in expectations and sustainable return to work (RTW) and work participation days. Results During rehabilitation, there was a statistically significant improvement in participants’ (n = 168) expectations about length of sick leave. During 9 months follow-up, participants with consistently positive expectations had the highest probability of RTW (0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.95) and the most work participation days (159, 95% CI 139–180). Participants with improved expectations had higher probability of sustainable RTW (0.68, 95% CI 0.50–0.87) and more work participation days (133, 95% CI 110–156) compared to those with reduced (probability of RTW: 0.50, 95% CI 0.22–0.77; workdays: 116, 95% CI 85–148), or consistently negative expectations (probability of RTW: 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.31; workdays: 93, 95% CI 82–103). Conclusions During ACT-based occupational rehabilitation, 33% improved, 48% remained unaltered, and 19% of the participants reduced their expectations about RTW. Expectations about RTW can be useful to evaluate in the clinic, and as an intermediary outcome in clinical trials. The changes were associated with future work outcomes, suggesting that RTW expectations is a strong predictor for RTW.

OECD. Mental health and work. Paris: Mental Health and Work OECD Publishing; 2013.CrossRef

Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Vezina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, et al. Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2001;9(7):351–360.CrossRef

Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9071-6.CrossRefPubMed

Cornelius LR, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S. Prognostic factors of long term disability due to mental disorders: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):259–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9261-5.CrossRefPubMed

Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Zuberbier OA, et al. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain. 2004;107(1–2):77–85.CrossRef

Fleten N, Johnsen R, Forde OH. Length of sick leave—Why not ask the sick-listed? Sick-listed individuals predict their length of sick leave more accurately than professionals. BMC Public Health. 2004;4(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-4-46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Carriere JS, Thibault P, Sullivan MJ. The mediating role of recovery expectancies on the relation between depression and return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(2):348–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9543-4.CrossRefPubMed

Du Bois M, Donceel P. A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(3):380–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0567-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nielsen MB, Madsen IE, Bultmann U, Christensen U, Diderichsen F, Rugulies R. Predictors of return to work in employees sick-listed with mental health problems: findings from a longitudinal study. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21(6):806–811. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq171.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JH, de Boer AG, Blonk RW, van Dijk FJ. Predicting the duration of sickness absence for patients with common mental disorders in occupational health care. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(1):67–74.CrossRef

11.

Aasdahl L, Pape K, Jensen C, Vasseljen O, Braathen T, Johnsen R, et al. Associations between the readiness for return to work scale and return to work: a prospective study. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9705-2.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.CrossRef

13.

Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you’ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients’ recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ. 2001;165(2):174–179.PubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Laisne F, Lecomte C, Corbiere M. Biopsychosocial predictors of prognosis in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(5):355–382. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.591889.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Iles RA, Davidson M, Taylor NF, O’Halloran P. Systematic review of the ability of recovery expectations to predict outcomes in non-chronic non-specific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9161-0.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Costa-Black KM. Core components of return-to-work interventions. In: Loisel P, Anema J, editors. Handbook of work disability. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 427–440.CrossRef

17.

Heijbel B, Josephson M, Jensen I, Stark S, Vingard E. Return to work expectation predicts work in chronic musculoskeletal and behavioral health disorders: prospective study with clinical implications. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(2):173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9016-5.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Brouwers EPM, Terluin B, Tiemens BG, Verhaak PFM. Predicting return to work in employees sick-listed due to minor mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):323–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9198-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Aasdahl L, Pape K, Vasseljen O, Johnsen R, Gismervik S, Halsteinli V, et al. Effect of inpatient multicomponent occupational rehabilitation versus less comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation on sickness absence in persons with musculoskeletal- or mental health disorders: a randomized clinical trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):170–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9708-z.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Aasdahl L, Pape K, Vasseljen O, Johnsen R, Gismervik S, Jensen C, et al. Effects of inpatient multicomponent occupational rehabilitation versus less comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation on somatic and mental health: secondary outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):456–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9679-5.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Fimland MS, Vasseljen O, Gismervik S, Rise MB, Halsteinli V, Jacobsen HB, et al. Occupational rehabilitation programs for musculoskeletal pain and common mental health disorders: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):368. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-368.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Hayes SC, Strosahl K, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.

23.

Hayes SC, Villatte M, Levin M, Hildebrandt M. Open, aware, and active: contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:141–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104449.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Reme SE, Tangen T, Moe T, Eriksen HR. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in sick listed chronic low back pain patients. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(10):1075–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.04.012.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Von Korff M, Crane P, Lane M, Miglioretti DL, Simon G, Saunders K, et al. Chronic spinal pain and physical-mental comorbidity in the United States: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Pain. 2005;113(3):331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.11.010.CrossRef

26.

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370.CrossRef

27.

Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23(2):129–138.PubMed

28.

Stuart A. A test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions in a two-way classification. Biometrika. 1955;42(3/4):412–416.CrossRef

29.

Maxwell AE. Comparing the classification of subjects by two independent judges. Br J Psychiatry. 1970;116(535):651–655.CrossRef

30.

Skatteboe S, Roe C, Fagerland MW, Granan LP. Expectations of pain and functioning in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1386-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Mancuso CA, Graziano S, Briskie LM, Peterson MG, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, et al. Randomized trials to modify patients’ preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(2):424–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0052-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Reme SE, Hagen EM, Eriksen HR. Expectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:139. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Lovvik C, Shaw W, Overland S, Reme SE. Expectations and illness perceptions as predictors of benefit recipiency among workers with common mental disorders: secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2014;4(3):e004321. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004321.CrossRef

34.

Laisne F, Lecomte C, Corbiere M. Biopsychosocial determinants of work outcomes of workers with occupational injuries receiving compensation: a prospective study. Work. 2013;44(2):117–132. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1378.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Rise MB, Gismervik SO, Johnsen R, Fimland MS. Sick-listed persons’ experiences with taking part in an in-patient occupational rehabilitation program based on acceptance and commitment therapy: a qualitative focus group interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):526. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1190-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Improved Expectations About Length of Sick Leave During Occupational Rehabilitation Is Associated with Increased Work Participation
Authors: Lene Aasdahl
Kristine Pape
Ottar Vasseljen
Roar Johnsen
Marius Steiro Fimland
Publication date: 01-09-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9808-4

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Improved Expectations About Length of Sick Leave During Occupational Rehabilitation Is Associated with Increased Work Participation

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Adaptation of a Guide to Equip Employers to Manage the Gradual Return to Work of Individuals with a Musculoskeletal Disorder

The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review

Do Differences in Work Disability Duration Between Men and Women Vary by Province in Canada?

A Systematic Scoping Review of Work Interventions for Hospitalised Adults with an Acquired Neurological Impairment

Return-to-Work Coordinators’ Practices for Workers with Burnout

Trajectories of Physical Work Capacity in Early Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of Hip and Knee: Results from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) Study